Brutal pragmatism on food

BMJ (Online)

Volumn 346, Issue 7914, 2013, Pages

  Winkler, J T ^a  

^a LONDON METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIABETES MELLITUS; DIET; EPIDEMIC; FOOD INDUSTRY; FOOD PROCESSING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; NUTRITION; OBESITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; SHORT SURVEY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TAX;

DIABETES MELLITUS; DIET; FOOD; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; OBESITY;

EID: 84879732517     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17561833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f3728     Document Type: Short Survey

References (7)

1. Winkler J, White J. Sugar claims: straight & credible, slippery & cunning, action & information on sugars. London, 1997.
2. Mytton OT, Clarke D, Rayner M. Taxing unhealthy food and drinks to improve health. BMJ 2012;344:e2931.
3. Smed S, Robertson A. Are taxes on fatty foods having their desired effects on health? BMJ 2012;345:e6885.
4. Winkler J. Why soft drinks taxes will not work. Br J Nutr 2012;108:395-6.
5. Stafford N. Denmark cancels "fat tax" and shelves "sugar tax" because of threat of job losses. BMJ 2012;345:e7889.
6. Sadler K, Nicholson S, Steer T, Gill V, Bates B, Tipping S, et al. National diet and nutrition survey: assessment of dietary sodium in adults (aged 19 to 64 years) in England, 2011. Department of Health, 2012.
7. Brinsden HC, He FJ, Jenner KH, MacGregor JA. Surveys of the salt content in UK bread: progress made and further reductions possible. BMJ Open 2013;3:e002936.