Framing the alcohol policy debate: industry actors and the regulation of the UK beverage alcohol market

Critical Policy Studies

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 53-71

  Hawkins, Benjamin ^a   Holden, Chris ^b  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

alcohol industry; alcohol policy; framing; minimum pricing; UK

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876955106     PISSN: 19460171     EISSN: 1946018X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19460171.2013.766023     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Anderson, P. 2007. " A safe, sensible and social AHRSE: New Labour and alcohol policy ". In Addiction Vol. 102, 1515-1521.
2. Baggott, R. 2010. A modern approach to an old problem? Alcohol policy and New Labour. Policy & politics, 38 (1): 135-152.
3. Béland, D. 2009. Ideas, institutions and policy change. Journal of European public policy, 16 (5): 701-718.
4. Benford, R. and Snow, D. 2000. Processes and social movements: an overview and assessment. Annual review of sociology, 26: 611-639.
5. Bero, L. 2003. Implications of the tobacco industry documents for public health and policy. Annual review of public health, 24: 267-288.
6. Bond, L., Daube, M. and Chikritzhs, T. 2010. Selling addictions: similarities in approaches between big tobacco and big booze. Australasian medical journal, 3 (6): 325-332.
7. Booth, A. 2008. The independent review of the effects of alcohol pricing and promotion, Sheffield: University of Sheffield.
8. Office, Cabinet. 2004. Alcohol harm reduction strategy for England, London: HMSO.
9. Chong, D. and Druckman, J. 2007. Framing theory. Annual review of political science, 10: 103-126.
10. Daviter, F. 2007. Policy framing in the European Union. Journal of European public policy, 14 (4): 654-666.
11. Department of Health (DoH). 2007. Safe sensible social: the next steps in the government's alcohol strategy, London: HMSO.
12. Department of Health (DoH). 2011. The public health responsibility deal, London: HMSO.
13. Desrosiers, M.E. 2012. Reframing frame analysis: key contributions to conflict studies. Ethnopolitics, 11 (1): 1-23.
14. Diageo. 3 September 2008. Changing Scotland's relationship with alcohol: response by Diageo to the Scottish Government's discussion paper. 3 September,
15. Druckman, J. 2001. Evaluating framing effects. Journal of economic psychology, 22: 96-101.
16. Edelman, M. 1977. Political language: words that succeed and policies that fail, New York: Academic Press.
17. Edelman, M. 1988. Political language: constructing the politics spectacle, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
18. Fairclough, N. 1992. Discourse and social change, Cambridge: Polity Press.
19. Farnsworth, K. 2004. Corporate power and social policy in a global economy: British welfare under the influence, Bristol: The Policy Press.
20. Farnsworth, K. and Holden, C. 2006. The business-social policy nexus: corporate power and corporate inputs into social policy. Journal of social policy, 35 (3): 473-494.
21. Fischer, F. 2003. Reframing public policy: discursive politics and deliberative practices, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Fischlein, M. 2010. Policy stakeholders and deployment of wind power in the sub-national context: a comparison of four U.S. states. Energy policy, 38: 4429-4439.
23. Glynos, J. and Howarth, D. 2007. Logics of critical explanation in social and political theory, Abingdon: Routledge.
24. Gusfield, J. 1981. The culture of public problems: drinking, driving and the symbolic order, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
25. Hajer, M. and Laws, D. 2006. " Ordering through discourse ". In Oxford handbook of public policy, Edited by: Moran, M., Rein, M. and Goodin, R. 251-268. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Hawkins, B. and Holden, C., 2013. 'Water dripping on stone'?: Industry lobbying and UK alcohol policy. Policy and politics http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/030557312X655468 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/030557312X655468)
27. Hawkins, B., Holden, C. and McCambridge, J. 2012. Alcohol industry influence on U.K. alcohol policy: a new research agenda for public health. Critical public health, 12 (3): 297-305.
28. Hillman, A.J. and Hitt, M.A. 1999. Corporate political strategy formulation: a model of approach, participation and strategy decision. Academy of management review, 24 (4): 825-842.
29. Government, HM. 2010. The coalition: our programme for government, London: HMSO.
30. Government, HM. 2012. The government's alcohol strategy, London: HMSO.
31. Holden, C. and Hawkins, B. 2012. Whisky gloss': the alcohol industry, devolution and policy communities in Scotland, Public policy and administration. doi: 10.1177/0952076712452290
32. Holden, C. and Lee, K. 2009. Corporate power and social policy: the political economy of the transnational tobacco companies. Global social policy, 9 (3): 328-354.
33. Holden, C., Hawkins, B. and McCambridge, J. 2012. Cleavages and co-operation in the UK alcohol industry: a qualitative study, Vol. 12, 483 BMC public health.
34. Howarth, D. 2000. Discourse, Buckingham: Open University Press.
35. Hurt, R.D. 2009. Open doorway to truth: legacy of the Minnesota tobacco trial. Mayo clinic proceedings, 84 (5): 446-456.
36. Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. 1985. Hegemony and socialist strategy, London: Verso.
37. Lakoff, G. 2004. Don't think of an elephant: know your values and frame the debate, White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing.
38. Loizides, N.G. 2009. Elite framing in conflict transformation in Turkey. Parliamentary affairs, 62 (2): 278-297.
39. Miller, D. and Harkins, C. 2010. Corporate strategy, corporate capture: food and alcohol industry lobbying and public health. Critical social policy, 30 (4): 564-589.
40. Northern Ireland Assembly. 2010. Minimum alcohol pricing, Belfast: Research and Library Service.
41. Ricard, Pernod. 9 September 2008. Changing Scotland's relationship with alcohol: a joint submission from Chivas Brothers Limited and Pernod Ricard UK commenting on the consultation document from the Scottish Government 9 September,
42. Rein, M. and Schön, D. 1994. Frame reflection, New York: Basic Books.
43. Room, R. 2004. Disabling the public interest: alcohol strategies and policies for England. Addiction, 99: 1083-1089.
44. Miller, SAB. 2008. Changing Scotland's relationship with alcohol: a discussion paper on our strategic approach: a response by SAB Miller
45. Schattschneider, E.E. 1960. The semisovereign people: a realist's view of democracy in America, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
46. Scheufele, D.A. and Tewksbury, D. 2007. Framing, agenda setting, and priming: the evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communications, 57: 9-20.
47. Schön, D. and Rein, M. 1996. Frame-critical policy analysis and frame-reflective policy practice. Knowledge and policy, 9 (1): 85-103.
48. Scotch Whisky Association (SWA). 2008. " The Scottish Whisky Association response to the Scottish Government's consultation paper ". In changing Scotland's relationship with alcohol.
49. Executive, Scottish. 2002. Plan for action on alcohol problems, Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
50. Government, Scottish. 2008. Changing Scotland's relationship with alcohol: a discussion paper on our strategic approach, Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
51. Government, Scottish. 2009. Changing Scotland's relationship with alcohol: a framework for action, Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
52. Semetko, H.A. and Valkenburg, P.M. 2000. Framing European politics: a content analysis of press and television news. Journal of communication, 50 (2): 93-109.
53. Sniderman, P.M. and Theriault, S.M. 2004. " The structure of political argument and the logic of issue framing ". In Studies in public opinion, Edited by: Saris, W.E. and Sniderman, P.M. 133-165. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
54. Snow, D. and Benford, R. 1988. Ideology frame resonance and participant mobilization. International social movements research, 1: 197-217.
55. Snow, D. and Benford, R. 1992. " Master frames and cycles of protest ". In Frontiers in social movement theory, Edited by: Morris, A. and Mueller, C. 197-217. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
56. Steinberg, M. 1998. Tilting the frame: considerations on collective action framing from a discursive turn. Theory and society, 27 (6): 845-872.
57. Stone, D. 1989. Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas. Political science quarterly, 104 (2): 281-300.
58. Taylor, C. 1971. Interpretation and the sciences of man. Review of metaphysics, 25 (1): 3-51.
59. Tesco. 2008. Tesco Plc submission to the Scottish Government consultation 'changing Scotland's relationship with alcohol.'
60. The Portman Group. September 2008. Changing Scotland's relationship with alcohol': a response from The Portman Group September.
61. Triandafyllidou, A. and Fotiou, A. 1998. Sustainability and modernity in the European Union. Sociological research online, 3 (1)
62. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. 1987. " Rational choice and the framing of decisions ". In Rational choice: the contrast between economics and psychology, Edited by: Hogarth, R.M. and Reder, M.W. 67-94. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
63. Weiss, J.A. 1989. The powers of problem definition: the case of government paper-work. Policy sciences, 22: 97-121.
64. Morrison Supermarkets Plc, W.M. 2008. Changing Scotland's relationship with alcohol: a response to discussion paper
65. WSTA. 4 September 2008. The Wine & Spirit Trade Association submission to the Scottish Government consultation changing Scotland's relationship with alcohol: a discussion paper on our strategic approach 4 September,