CRISPR/Cas9-induced Targeted Mutagenesis and Gene Replacement to Generate Long-shelf Life Tomato Lines

Scientific Reports

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Yu, Qing Hui ^a   Wang, Baike ^a   Li, Ning ^a   Tang, Yaping ^a   Yang, Shengbao ^a   Yang, Tao ^a   Xu, Juan ^a   Guo, Chunmiao ^a   Yan, Peng ^a   Wang, Qiang ^a   Asmutola, Patiguli ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF MICROBIOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGROBACTERIUM TUMEFACIENS; BREEDING; CRISPR-CAS9 SYSTEM; GENE INSERTION; GENOTYPE; HETEROZYGOSITY; HOMOZYGOSITY; MUTATION RATE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; SHELF LIFE; SITE DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS; TOMATO; TRANSGENIC PLANT; VELOCITY; CRISPR CAS SYSTEM; GENE EDITING; GENE TARGETING; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PLANT GENE;

AGROBACTERIUM TUMEFACIENS; CRISPR-CAS SYSTEMS; GENE EDITING; GENE TARGETING; GENES, PLANT; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; MUTAGENESIS, SITE-DIRECTED; PLANTS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED;

EID: 85029664199     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-12262-1     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Tester, M. & Langridge, P. Breeding Technologies to Increase Crop Production in a Changing World. Science (80-.) 327, 818-822 (2010).
2. Fauser, F., Schiml, S. & Puchta, H. Both CRISPR/Cas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genome engineering in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 79, 348-359 (2014).
3. Belhaj, K., Chaparro-Garcia, A., Kamoun, S., Patron, N. J. & Nekrasov, V. Editing plant genomes with CRISPR/Cas9. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 32, 76-84 (2015).
4. Puchta, H. & Fauser, F. Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants: Prospects for a bright future. Plant Journal 78, 727-741 (2014).
5. Rick, C. M. & Butler, L. Cytogenetics of the Tomato. Adv. Genet. 8, 267-382 (1956).
6. Garg, N., Cheema, D. S. & Dhatt, A. S. Genetics of yield, quality and shelf life characteristics in tomato under normal and late planting conditions. Euphytica 159, 275-288 (2008).
7. Saladié, M. et al. A reevaluation of the key factors that influence tomato fruit softening and integrity. Plant Physiol. 144, 1012-28 (2007).
8. Casals, J. et al. Genetic basis of long shelf life and variability into Penjar tomato. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 59, 219-229 (2012).
9. Bota, J. et al. Characterization of a landrace collection for Tomatiga de Ramellet (Solanum lycopersicum L.) from the Balearic Islands. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 61, 1131-1146 (2014).
10. Robinson RW, T. M. L. Ripening inhibitor: a gene with multiple effects on ripening. Tomato Genet Coop Rep 18, 36-37 (1968).
11. Tigchelaar, E. C. M., Tomes, M. L. & Kerr EA, B. R. J. A new fruit ripening mutant, non-ripening (nor). Tomato Genet Coop Rep 23, 33 (1973).
12. Thompson, A. J. et al. Molecular and genetic characterization of a novel pleiotropic tomato-ripening mutant. Plant Physiol 120, 383-389 (1999).
13. Paran, I. & Van Der Knaap, E. Genetic and molecular regulation of fruit and plant domestication traits in tomato and pepper. Journal of Experimental Botany 58, 3841-3852 (2007).
14. Garg, N. & Cheema, D. S. Genotype environment interactions for shelf life and yield attributes in tomato hybrids heterozygous at rin, nor, or alc loci. J. Crop Improv. 22, 17-30 (2008).
15. McGlasson, W. B., Last, J. H., Shaw, K. J. & Meldrum, S. K. Influence of the non-ripening mutants rin and nor on the aroma of tomato fruit. HortScience 22, 632-634 (1987).
16. Kopeliovitch, E., Mizrahi, Y., Rabinowitch, H. D. & Kedar, N. Effect of the fruit-ripening mutant genes rin and nor on the flavor of tomato fruit. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 107, 361-364 (1982).
17. Casals, J. et al. Long-term postharvest aroma evolution of tomatoes with the alcobaça (alc) mutation. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 233, 331-342 (2011).
18. Shan, Q. et al. Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 686-688 (2013).
19. Zhang, H. et al. The CRISPR/Cas9 system produces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation. Plant Biotechnol. J. 12, 797-807 (2014).
20. Sun, X. et al. Targeted mutagenesis in soybean using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Sci. Rep. 5, 10342 (2015).
21. Brooks, C., Nekrasov, V., Lippman, Z. B. & Van Eck, J. Efficient Gene Editing in Tomato in the First Generation Using the Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats/CRISPR-Associated9 System1. Plant Physiol 166, 1292-1297 (2014).
22. Pan, C. et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated efficient and heritable targeted mutagenesis in tomato plants in the first and later generations. Sci. Rep. 6, 24765 (2016).
23. Cermak, T. et al. A Multipurpose Toolkit to Enable Advanced Genome Engineering in Plants. Plant Cell 29, 1196-1217 (2017).
24. Li, J.-F. et al. Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 688-691 (2013).
25. Wang, Z.-P. et al. Egg cell-specific promoter-controlled CRISPR/Cas9 efficiently generates homozygous mutants for multiple target genes in Arabidopsis in a single generation. Genome Biol. 16, 144 (2015).
26. Mao, Y. et al. Development of germ-line-specific CRISPR-Cas9 systems to improve the production of heritable gene modifications in Arabidopsis. Plant Biotechnol. J. 14, 519-532 (2016).
27. Hyun, Y. et al. Site-directed mutagenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana using dividing tissue-targeted RGEN of the CRISPR/Cas system to generate heritable null alleles. Planta 241, 271-284 (2015).
28. Yan, L. et al. High-Efficiency Genome Editing in Arabidopsis Using YAO Promoter-Driven CRISPR/Cas9 System. Molecular Plant 8, 1820-1823 (2015).
29. Schwartz, C. M., Hussain, M. S., Blenner, M. & Wheeldon, I. Synthetic RNA polymerase III promoters facilitate high efficiency CRISPR-Cas9 mediated genome editing in Yarrowia lipolytica. ACS Synth. Biol. 5, 356-359 (2016).
30. Ma, X. et al. A Robust CRISPR/Cas9 System for Convenient, High-Efficiency Multiplex Genome Editing in Monocot and Dicot Plants. Mol. Plant 8, 1274-1284 (2015).
31. Hisano, Y. et al. Precise in-frame integration of exogenous DNA mediated by CRISPR/Cas9 system in zebrafish. Sci. Rep. 5, 8841 (2015).
32. Cermák, T., Baltes, N. J., Cegan, R., Zhang, Y. & Voytas, D. F. High-frequency, precise modification of the tomato genome. Genome Biol. 16, 232 (2015).
33. Zhang, D., Li, Z. & Li, J. F. Targeted Gene Manipulation in Plants Using the CRISPR/Cas Technology. Journal of Genetics and Genomics 43, 251-262 (2016).
34. Yu, C. et al. Small molecules enhance crispr genome editing in pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 16, 142-147 (2015).
35. Maruyama, T. et al. Increasing the efficiency of precise genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9 by inhibition of nonhomologous end joining. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 538-42 (2015).
36. Chen, F. et al. High-frequency genome editing using ssDNA oligonucleotides with zinc-finger nucleases. Nat. Methods 8, 753-5 (2011).
37. Zhao, P. et al. One-step homozygosity in precise gene editing by an improved CRISPR/Cas9 system. Cell Res. 26, 633-636 (2016).
38. Komor, A. C., Kim, Y. B., Packer, M. S., Zuris, J. A. & Liu, D. R. Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage. Nature 61, 5985-91 (2016).
39. Eid, A., Ali, Z. & Mahfouz, M. M. High efficiency of targeted mutagenesis in arabidopsis via meiotic promoter-driven expression of Cas9 endonuclease. Plant Cell Rep. 35, 1555-1558 (2016).
40. Xu, R.-F. et al. Generation of inheritable and 'transgene clean' targeted genome-modified rice in later generations using the CRISPR/ Cas9 system. Sci. Rep. 5, 11491 (2015).
41. Huang, S., Weigel, D., Beachy, R. N. & Li, J. A proposed regulatory framework for genome-edited crops. Nat. Genet. 48, 109-111 (2016).
42. Ishii, T. & Araki, M. Consumer acceptance of food crops developed by genome editing. Plant Cell Rep. 35, 1507-1518 (2016).
43. Jones, H. D. Future of breeding by genome editing is in the hands of regulators. GM Crops Food 6, 223-232 (2015).
44. Waltz, E. Gene-edited CRISPR mushroom escapes US regulation. Nature 532, 293 (2016).
45. Ron, M. et al. Hairy root transformation using Agrobacterium rhizogenes as a tool for exploring cell type-specific gene expression and function using tomato as a model. Plant Physiol. 166, 455-69 (2014).
46. Ito, Y., Nishizawa-Yokoi, A., Endo, M., Mikami, M. & Toki, S. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of the RIN locus that regulates tomato fruit ripening. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 467, 76-82 (2015).
47. Ali, Z. et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated viral interference in plants. Genome Biol. 16, 238 (2015).
48. Tian, J. Q. J. & Quan, J. Circular Polymerase Extension Cloning of Complex Gene Libraries and Pathways. PLoS One 4, e6441 (2009).
49. Sivankalyani, V., Takumi, S., Thangasamy, S., Ashakiran, K. & Girija, S. Punctured-hypocotyl method for high-efficient transformation and adventitious shoot regeneration of tomato. Sci. Hortic. (Amsterdam) 165, 357-364 (2014).