Task Effects on Eye Movements During Reading

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1561-1566

  Kaakinen, Johanna K ^a   Hyönä, Jukka ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Eye movements; Proofreading; Reading; Task effects

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COMPREHENSION; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS;

ADULT; ATTENTION; COMPREHENSION; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS; SET (PSYCHOLOGY); VOCABULARY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78249237549     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0020693     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Asano M., Yokosawa K. Proofreaders' characteristics of high-level vision. Japanese Journal of Psychonomic Science 2007, 26:29-37.
2. Bertram R., Hyönä J. The length of a complex word modifies the role of morphological structure: Evidence from eye movements when reading short and long Finnish compounds. Journal of Memory and Language 2003, 48:615-634. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00539-9.
3. Daneman M., Reingold E.M. What eye fixations tell us about phonological recoding during reading. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 1993, 47:153-178. doi: 10.1037/h0078818.
4. Daneman M., Reingold E.M., Davidson M. Time course of phonological activation during reading: Evidence from eye fixations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1995, 21:884-898. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.884.
5. Heller D. Eye movements in reading. Cognition and eye movements 1982, 139-154. North Holland, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. R. Groner, P. Fraisse (Eds.).
6. Hendriks A.W. Vergence of eye movements during fixations in reading. Acta Psychologica 1996, 92:131-151. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(95)00011-9.
7. Holbrook M.B. Effect of subjective interletter similarity, perceived word similarity, and contextual variables on the recognition of letter substitutions in a proofreading task. Perceptual & Motor Skills 1978, 47:251-258.
8. Hyönä J., Niemi P., Underwood G. Reading long words embedded in sentences: Informativeness of word halves affects eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1989, 15:142-152. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.15.1.142.
9. Kaakinen J.K., Hyönä J. Perspective effects on expository text comprehension: Evidence from think-aloud protocols, eyetracking and recall. Discourse Processes 2005, 40:239-257. doi: 10.1207/s15326950dp4003_4.
10. Kaakinen J.K., Hyönä J. Perspective effects in repeated reading: An eye movement study. Memory & Cognition 2007, 35:1323-1336.
11. Kaakinen J.K., Hyönä J. Perspective-driven text comprehension. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2008, 22:319-334. doi: 10.1002/acp.1412.
12. Kaakinen J.K., Hyönä J., Keenan J. Perspective effects on on-line text processing. Discourse Processes 2002, 33:159-173. doi: 10.1207/S15326950DP3302_03.
13. Kaakinen J.K., Hyönä J., Keenan J.M. How prior knowledge, working memory capacity, and relevance of information affect eye-fixations in expository text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2003, 29:447-457. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.3.447.
14. Laycock F. Significant characteristics of college students with varying flexibility in reading rate: I. Eye movements in reading prose. Journal of Experimental Education 1955, 23:311-319.
15. Levy B.A., Begin J. Proofreading familiar text: Allocating resources to perceptual and conceptual processes. Memory & Cognition 1984, 12:621-632.
16. Niemi P., Virjamo M. Proofreading: Visual, phonological, syntactic or all of these?. Journal of Research in Reading 1986, 9:31-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.1986.tb00109.x.
17. O'Connor R.E., Forster K.I. Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition. Memory & Cognition 1981, 9:78-92.
18. Osaka N., Oda K. Effective visual field size necessary for vertical reading during Japanese text processing. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1991, 29:345-347.
19. Osaka, N., Osaka, M., & Tsuji, H. (1995). Effective visual field size necessary for proofreading during Japanese text editing. In J. M. Findlay, R. Walker, & R. W. Kentridge (Eds.), Eye movement research: Mechanisms, processes and applications (pp. 453-463). doi: 10.1016/S0926-907X(05)80038-8.
20. Perea M., Rosa E., Gómez C. The frequency effect for pseudowords in the lexical decision task. Perception & Psychophysics 2005, 67:301-314.
21. Radach R., Huestegge L., Reilly R. The role of global top-down factors in local eye-movement control in reading. Psychological Research 2008, 72:675-688. doi: 10.1007/s00426-008-0173-3.
22. Radach R., Kennedy A. Theoretical perspectives on eye movements in reading: Past controversies, current deficits and an agenda for future research. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2004, 16:3-26. doi: 10.1080/09541440340000295.
23. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing. Psychological Bulletin 1978, 85:618-660. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.85.3.618.
24. Rayner K., Duffy S.A. Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition 1986, 14:191-201.
25. Rayner K., Raney G.E. Eye movement control in reading and visual search: Effects of word frequency. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1996, 3:245-248.
26. Reichle E.D., Warren T., McConnell K. Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher-level language processing on eye movements during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2009, 16:1-21. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.1.1.
27. Rothkopf E.Z., Billington M.J. Goal-guided learning from text: Inferring a descriptive processing model from inspection times and eye movements. Journal of Educational Psychology 1979, 71:310-327. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.71.3.310.
28. Shebilske W.L., Fisher D.F. Eye movements and context effects during reading of extended discourse. Eye movements in reading: Perceptual and language processes 1983, 157-179. Academic, New York, NY. K. Rayner (Ed.).
29. Singer M., Halldorson M. Constructing and validating motive bridging inferences. Cognitive Psychology 1996, 30:1-38. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1996.0001.
30. Stolz J.A., Besner D. On the myth of automatic semantic activation in reading. Current Directions in Psychological Science 1999, 8:61-65. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00015.
31. White S.J., Liversedge S.P. Orthographic familiarity influences initial eye fixation positions in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2004, 16:52-78. doi: 10.1080/09541440340000204.
32. Wotschack C. Eye movements in reading strategies: How reading strategies modulate effects of distributed processing and oculomotor control (Doctoral dissertation, Universität Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany) 2009, Retrieved from http://opus.kobv.de/ubp/volltexte/2009/3684/.