High school student engineering design thinking and performance

ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Becker, Kurt Henry ^a   Mentzer, Nathan ^b   Park, Kyungsuk ^c  

^a Utah State University   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Engineering design; Engineering education; High school; Technological literacy

Indexed keywords

CURRICULA; DESIGN; EDUCATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; STEM (SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING AND MATHEMATICS); STUDENTS; TEACHING;

ENGINEERING DESIGN; ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCESS; ENGINEERING THINKINGS; HIGH SCHOOL; LEARNING AND TEACHINGS; LEARNING EXPERIENCES; TECHNOLOGICAL LITERACY; VERBAL PROTOCOL ANALYSIS;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 85029073686     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21535965     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (45)

1. National Center for Technological Literacy. Our Nation's Challenge. 2010 [cited 2010 January 12]; Available from: http://www.mos.org/nctl/our-nations- challenge.php.
2. Katehi, L., G. Pearson, and M. Feder, eds. Engineering in K-12 Education. 2009, The National Academies Press: Washington, D.C.
3. Garmire, E. and G. Pearson, eds. Tech Tally: Approaches to Assessing Technological Literacy. 2006, National Academies Press: Washington, D.C.
4. Gorham, D., Engineering and Standards for Technological Literacy. The Technology Teacher, 2002. 61(7): p. 29-34.
5. International Technology Education Association, Technology for All Americans: A Rationale and Structure for the Study of Technology. 1996, Reston, VA: Author.
6. International Technology Education Association, Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology. 2000, Reston, VA: Author.
7. Pearson, G. and A.T. Young, eds. Technically Speaking: Why All Americans Need to Know More About Technology. 2002, National Academy of Engineering.
8. National Academy of Engineering, The Engineer of 2020. 2004, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
9. Atman, C., J.R. Chimka, K.M. Bursic, and H.L. Nachtmann, A Comparison of Freshman and Senior Engineering Design Processes. Design Studies, 1999. 20: p. 131-152.
10. Atman, C., D. Kilgore, and A. McKenna, Characterizing Design Learning: A Mixed-Methods Study of Engineering Designers' Use of Language. Journal of Engineering Education, 2008. 97(3).
11. Mosborg, S., R.S. Adams, R. Kim, C. Atman, J. Turns, and M. Cardella. Conceptions of the Engineering Design Process: An Expert Study of Advanced Practicing Professionals. In 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. 2005. Portland, Or.
12. Mosborg, S., M. Cardella, J. Saleem, C. Atman, R.S. Adams, and J. Turns, Engineering Design Expertise Study, CELT Technical Report CELT-06-01. 2006, University of Washington: Seattle.
13. Morozov, A., K. Yasuhara, D. Kilgore, and C. Atman, Developing as Designers: Gender and Institutional Analysis of Survey Responses to Most Important Design Activities and Playground Information Gather Questions, CAEE-TR-07-06. 2008, University of Washington: Seattle.
14. Vande Zande, R. (2007) Design education as community outreach and interdisciplinary study. Journal for Learning through the Arts, 3(1), 1-22.
15. Staw, B. (2006) Individualistic culture trumps teamwork. University of California at Berkeley (online). Retrieved from www.haas.berkeley.edu/news/ 20060717-staw.html
16. Goldman, S. (2002). "Instructional Design: Learning through Design." In J. Guthrie, (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Education. Second Edition. New York: Macmillan Reference USA. 1163-1169.
17. Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J. & Ryan, M. (2003) Promoting deep science learning through case-based reasoning: rituals and practices in learning by design classrooms, in N. M. Seel [Ed.] Instructional Design: International Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 89-114.
18. Carroll, M., Britos, L., Koh, J., Hornstein, M., Goldman, S., & Royalty, A. (2010, February 1). Destination, imagination and the fires within: Design thinking in a middle school classroom. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 29(1), 37-53.
19. Sheppard, S.D., K. Macatangay, A. Colby, and W.M. Sullivan, Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field. 2009, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20. King, P.M. and K.S. Kitchener, Developing Reflective Judgment. 1994, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
21. King, P.M., The Development of Reflective Judgment and Formal Operational Thinking in Adolescents and Young Adults. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1977. 38(7233A).
22. Kitchener, K.S. and P.M. King, Reflective Judgment: Concepts of Justification and Their Relationship to Age and Education. Journal of Applied Development Psychology, 1981. 2(2): p. 89-116.
23. Kitchener, K.S., Intellectual Development in Late Adolescents and Young Adults: Reflective Judgment and Verbal Reasoning. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1977-78. 39(956B).
24. Dally, J.W. and G.M. Zhang, A Freshman Engineering Design Course. Journal of Engineering Education, 1993. 82(2): p. 83-91.
25. Rubenzer, R., The role of right hemisphere in learning & creativity implications for enhancing problem solving ability. Gifted Child Quarterly, 1979. 23(March 1979): p. 78-100.
26. Polya, G., How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method. 1945, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
27. Hayes, J.R., The Complete Problem Solver. 2nd ed. 1989, Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Newell, A. and H. Simon, Human Problem Solving. 1972, Englewood Hills: Prentice-Hall.
29. Bucciarelli, L.L., An ethnographic perspective on engineering design. Design Studies, 1988. 9(3): p. 159-168.
30. National Academy of Engineering, Educating the Engineer of 2020:Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. 2005, Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
31. Mawson, B., Beyond 'The Design Process': An alternative pedagogy for technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2003. 13(2): p. 117-128.
32. McKeachie, W.J., McKeachie's Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers. 12th ed. 2006, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
33. Schulz, N.N. Methods to stimulate electrical engineering concepts to non-EE students. In IEEE Proceedings of Southeastcon 1991. 1991.
34. Yair, G., Reforming motivation: How the structure of instruction affects students' learning experiences. British Educational Research Journal, 2000. 26(2): p. 191-210.
35. Ericsson, K., & Simon, H. (1993). Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data (revised version). Cambridge: MIT Press.
36. Atman, C., R.S. Adams, M. Cardella, J. Turns, S. Mosborg, and J. Saleem, Engineering Design Processes: A comparison of Students and Expert Practitioners. Journal of Engineering Education, 2007. 96(4).
37. Creswell, J.W., Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. 1998, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
38. Prensky, M., H. Sapiens Digital: From Digital Immigrants and Digital Natives to Digital Wisdom. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 2009. 5(3).
39. Ennis, C.W. and S.W. Gyeszly, Protocol Analysis of the Engineering Systems Design Process. Research in Engineering Design, 1991. 3(1): p. 15-22.
40. Christiaans, H.H.C.M. and K.H. Dorst, Cognitive Models in Industrial Design Engineering: A Protocol Study. Design Theory and Methodology, 1992. 42: p. 131-140.
41. Christensen, B.T. and C. Schunn, The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and preinventive structure: the case of engineering design. Memory & Cognition, 2007. 35(1): p. 29-38.
42. Jain, V.K., and D.K. Sobek II. (2006). Linking Design Process to Customer Satisfaction Through Virtual Design of Experiments. Research in Engineering Design, 17(2), 59-71.
43. Kilgore, D., Atman, C. J., Yasuhara, K., Barker, T. J., & Morozov, A. (2007). Considering Context: A Study of First-Year Engineering Students. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), 321-334.
44. Christiaans, H., & Dorst, K. H. (1992). Cognitive Models in Industrial Design Engineering: A Protocol Study. Design Theory and Methodology, 42, 131-140.
45. Bogusch, L. L., Turns, J., & Atman, C. J. (2000). Engineering Design Factors: How Broadly Do Students Define Problems? Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education 2000 Conference, Kansas City.