Tech tally: Approaches to assessing technological literacy

Tech Tally: Approaches to Assessing Technological Literacy

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1-358

  Garmire, Elsa ^a   Pearson, Greg ^b  

^a DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

^b NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84988008275     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.17226/11691     Document Type: Book

References (308)

1. AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science). 1990. Science for All Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Bloch, E. 1986. Scientific and technological literacy: the need and the challenge. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 138-145.
3. DOEd (U.S. Department of Education). 2005. New No Child Left Behind Flexibility: Highly Qualified Teachers-Fact Sheet. Available online at: http:// www.ed.gov/nclb/methods/teachers/hqtflexibility.html (August 16, 2005).
4. ITEA (International Technology Education Association). 1996. Technology for All Americans: A Rationale and Structure for the Study of Technology. Reston, Va.: ITEA.
5. ITEA. 2000. Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology. Reston, Va.: ITEA.
6. NAE (National Academy of Engineering). 2002. Raising Public Awareness of Engineering. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
7. NAE and NRC (National Research Council). 2002. Technically Speaking: Why All Americans Need to Know More About Technology. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
8. NRC (National Research Council). 1999. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Edited by J.D. Bransford, A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
9. NRC. 2001. Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
10. NRC. 2005. Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
11. NSB (National Science Board). 2004. Science and Technology: Public Attitudes and Understanding. Science and Engineering Indicators, 2004. Available online at: http://nsf.gov/statistics/seind04/ (August 16, 2005).
12. AAAS. 1993. Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Dewey, J. 1910. How We Think. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath.
14. Dewey, J. 1916. Essays in Experimental Logic. Chicago: University of Chicago.
15. ITEA. 2004. The Second Installment of the ITEA/Gallup Poll and What It Reveals as to How Americans Think About Technology. A report of the second survey conducted by the Gallup Organization for the International Technology Education Association. Available online at: http://www.iteaconnect.org/TAA/PDFs/ GallupPoll2004.pdf (October 5, 2005).
16. NAE and NRC (National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council). 2002. Technically Speaking: Why All Americans Need to Know More About Technology. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
17. NRC (National Research Council). 1996. National Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
18. NRC. 1999. Being Fluent with Information Technology. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
19. AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science). 1993. Benchmarks for Science Literacy. Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Cross, N.G. 2000. Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
21. CSAP (Colorado State Assessment Program). 2004. Fact Sheet for Reading. Available online at: http://www.cde.state.co.us/cdeassess/csap/2004/Rdg_Fact_Sheet.pdf (March 28, 2005).
22. de Vries, M.J. 2005. Teaching About Technology: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Technology for Non-Philosophers. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Verlag.
23. ISBE (Illinois State Board of Education). 2005. Illinois Science Assessment Framework. Grades 4 and 7. State Assessments Beginning Spring 2006. Available online at: http://www.isbe.state.il.us/assessment/IAFScience.rtf (March 28, 2005).
24. ITEA (International Technology Education Association). 2002. Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology. Reston, Va.: ITEA.
25. ITEA. 2003. Advancing Excellence in Technological Literacy: Student Assessment, Professional Development, and Program Standards. Reston, Va.: ITEA.
26. Mitcham, C. 1994. Thinking Through Technology: The Path Between Engineering and Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. NAE (National Academy of Engineering) and NRC (National Research Council). 2002. Technically Speaking: Why All Americans Need to Know More About Technology. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
28. NAGB (National Assessment Governing Board). 2002. Mathematics Framework for the 2003 National Assessment of Educational Progress. Available online at: http: //www.nagb.org/pubs/math_framework/toc.html (December 9, 2004).
29. NAGB. 2004a. Science Framework for the 2005 National Assessment of Educational Progress. Available online at: http://www.nagb.org/pubs/s_framework_05/toc.html (October 21, 2005).
30. NAGB. 2004b. Mathematics Framework for the 2005 National Assessment of Educational Progress. Available online at: http://www.nagb.org/pubs/m_framework_05/ toc.html (October 21, 2005).
31. NAGB. 2005. Science NAEP 2009: Science Framework for the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress-Prepublication Edition. Developed by WestEd and the Council of Chief State School Officers under contract to the National Assessment Governing Board (contract # ED04CO0148). Available online at: http://www.nagb.org/pubs/naep_fw_pre_pub_edition_for_web.doc (February 15, 2006).
32. NRC (National Research Council). 1996. National Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
33. NRC. 1999. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Edited by J.D. Bransford, A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
34. Resnick, L. 1987. Education and Learning to Think. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
35. Wilson, M.R., and M.W. Bertenthal, eds. 2005. Systems for State Science Assessment. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
36. Adams, R.S., J. Turns, and C.J. Atman. 2003. Educating effective engineering designers: the role of reflective practice. Design Studies 24(2003): 275-294.
37. AERA (American Educational Research Association), APA (American Psychological Association), and NCME (National Council on Measurement in Education). 1999. Fairness in Testing and Test Use: Standards 7.3 and 7.4. Pp. 79-82 in Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, D.C.: AERA.
38. Ahmed, S., K.M. Wallace, and L.T.M. Blessing. 2003. Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks. Research in Engineering Design 14(2003): 1-11.
39. Anderson, J.R. 1990. Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications. San Francisco: Freeman.
40. Atman, C.J., J.R. Chimka, K.M. Bursic, and H. Nachtmann. 1999. A comparison of freshman and senior engineering design processes. Design Studies 20(2): 131-152.
41. Barnett, S.M., and S.J. Ceci. 2002. When and where do we apply what we learn?: a taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin 128(4): 612-637.
42. Bassok, M., and K.J. Holyoak. 1989. Interdomain transfer between isomorphic topics in algebra and physics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15(1): 153-166.
43. Bers, M.U. 2001. Identity construction environments: developing personal and moral values through design of a virtual city. Journal of the Learning Sciences 10(4): 365-415.
44. Bjork, R.A., and A. Richardson-Klavhen. 1989. On the Puzzling Relationship Between Environment Context and Human Memory. Pp. 313-344 in Current Issues in Cognitive Processes: The Tulane Flowerree Symposium on Cognition, edited by C. Izawa. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
45. Blanchette, I., and K. Dunbar. 2002. Representational change and analogy: how analogical inferences alter target representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 28(4): 672-685.
46. Borges, A.T., and J.K. Gilbert. 1999. Mental models of electricity. International Journal of Science Education 21(1): 95-117.
47. Brandt, R. 1998. Assessing Student Learning: New Rules, New Realities. Washington, D.C.: Educational Research Services.
48. Bransford, J.D., B.S. Stein, N.J. Vye, J.J. Franks, P.M. Auble, K.J. Mezynski, and G.A. Perfetto. 1983. Differences in approaches to learning: an overview. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 3: 390-398.
49. Bransford, J.D., A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking. 1999. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
50. Brown, A.L. 1990. Domain-specific principles affect learning and transfer in children. Cognitive Science 14(1): 107-133.
51. Brown, A.L., J.D. Bransford, R.A. Ferrara, and J. Campione. 1983. Learning, Remembering, and Understanding. Pp. 78-166 in Cognitive Development, vol. 3, edited by J. Flavell and E.M. Markman. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
52. Carey, S. 1999. Sources of Conceptual Change. Pp. 293-326 in Conceptual Development: Piaget's Legacy, edited by E.K. Scholnick, K. Nelson, S. Gelman, and P. Miller. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
53. Carey, S., and C. Smith. 1993. On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge. Educational Psychologist 28(3): 235-251.
54. Carraher, T.N. 1986. From drawings to buildings: mathematical scales at work. International Journal of Behavioral Development 9(4): 527-544.
55. Chi, M.T.H. 2000. Self-explaining: The Dual Processes of Generating Inference and Repairing Mental Models. Pp. 161-238 in Advances in Instructional Psychology: Educational Design and Cognitive Science, vol. 5, edited by R. Glaser. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
56. Chi, M.T.H, and R. Glaser. 1981. The Measurement of Expertise: Analysis of the Development of Knowledge and Skills as a Basis for Assessing Achievement. Pp. 37-47 in Design, Analysis and Policy in Testing, edited by E.L. Baker and E.S. Quellmalz. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.
57. Chi, M.T.H., P.J. Feltovich, and R. Glaser. 1981. Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science 5(2): 121-152.
58. Chi, M.T.H., J.D. Slotta, and N. De Leeuw. 1994. From things to processes: a theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction 4(1): 27-43.
59. Crismond, D. 2001. Learning and using science ideas when doing investigate-andredesign tasks: a study of naïve, novice, and expert designers doing constrained and scaffolded design work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38(7): 791-820.
60. Custer, R.L., M. Hoepfl, B. McAlister, J. Schell, and J. Scott. 2000. Using Alternative Assessment in Vocational Education. Information Series No. 381. ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education.
61. Davis, R.S., I.S. Ginns, and C.J. McRobbie. 2002. Elementary school students' understandings of technology concepts. Journal of Technology Education 14(1): 35-50.
62. diSessa, A.A. 1988. Knowledge in Pieces. Pp. 49-70 in Constructivism in the Computer Age, edited by G. Forman and P. Pufall. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
63. diSessa, A.A. 1993. Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction 10(2-3): 105-225.
64. diSessa, A.A. 2002. Why "conceptual ecology" is a good idea. Pp. 29-60 in Reconsidering Conceptual Change: Issues in Theory and Practice, edited by M. Limón and L. Mason. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Pulishers.
65. diSessa, A.A., and B.L. Sherin. 1998. What changes in conceptual change? International Journal of Science Education 20(10): 1155-1191.
66. diSessa, A.A., and J.F. Wagner. 2005. What Coordination Has to Say About Transfer. Pp. 121-154 in Transfer of Learning from a Modern Multidisciplinary Perspective, edited by J.P. Mestre. Greenwich, Conn.: Information Age Publishing.
67. diSessa, A A., N. Gillespie, and J. Esterly. In press. Coherence vs. fragmentation in the development of the concept of force. Cognitive Science.
68. Druin, A., ed. 1999. The Design of Children's Technology. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman.
69. Druin, A. 2002. The role of children in the design of new technology. Behaviour and Information Technology 21(1): 1-25.
70. Druin, A., and C. Fast. 2002. The child as learner, critic, inventor, and technology design partner: an analysis of three years of Swedish student journals. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 12(3): 189-213.
71. Druin, A., and J. Hendler, eds. 2001. Robots for Kids: Exploring New Technologies for Learning Experiences. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman.
72. Egan, D.E., and B.J. Schwartz. 1979. Chunking in recall of symbolic drawings. Memory and Cognition 7: 149-158.
73. Eich, E. 1985. Context, memory, and integrated item/context imagery. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 11(4): 764-770.
74. Ericsson, K.A., and W. Kintsch. 1995. Long-term working memory. Psychological Review 102(2): 211-245.
75. Etkina, E., J. Mestre, and A. O'Donnell. 2005. The Impact of the Cognitive Revolution on Science Learning and Teaching. Pp. 119-164 in The Cognitive Revolution in Educational Psychology, edited by J.M. Royer. Greenwich, Conn.: Information Age Publishing.
76. Foster, P., and M. Wright. 2001. How children think and feel about design and technology: two case studies. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education 38(2): 40-64.
77. Gick, M.L., and K.J. Holyoak. 1980. Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology 12(3): 306-355.
78. Hambleton, R., and J. Rogers. 1995. Item bias review. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 4(6). Available online at: http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=4&n=6.
79. Hammer, D., and A. Elby. 2003. Tapping epistemological resources for learning physics. Journal of the Learning Sciences 12(1): 53-91.
80. Hammer, D., A. Elby, R. Scherr, and E. Redish. 2005. Resources, Framing, and Transfer. Pp. 89-119 in Transfer of Learning from a Modern Multidisciplinary Perspective, edited by J.P. Mestre. Greenwich, Conn.: Information Age Publishing.
81. Hardiman, P.T., R. Dufresne, and J.P. Mestre. 1989. The relation between problem categorization and problem solving among experts and novices. Memory and Cognition 17(5): 627-638.
82. Hatano, G., and K. Inagaki. 1996. Cognitive and Cultural Factors in the Acquisition of Intuitive Biology. Pp. 683-708 in Handbook of Education and Human Development: New Models of Learning, Teaching and Schooling, edited by D.R. Olson and N. Torrance. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers Inc.
83. Hayes, J.R., and H.A. Simon. 1977. Psychological Differences Among Problem Isomorphs. Pp. 21-41 in Cognitive Theory, vol. 2, edited by N.J. Castellan Jr., D.B. Pisoni, and G.R. Potts. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
84. Herbeaux, J.-L., and R. Bannerot. 2003. Cultural Influences in Design. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, June 22-25, 2003, Nashville, Tenn. Available online at: http:// asee.org/acPapers/2003-549_Final.pdf (April 5, 2006).
85. Hestenes, D., M. Wells, and G. Swackhammer. 1992. Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher 30(3): 141-158.
86. Hill, A.M., and A. Anning. 2001a. Comparisons and contrasts between elementary/ primary "school situated design" and "workplace design" in Canada and England. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 11(2): 111-136.
87. Hill, A.M., and A. Anning. 2001b. Primary teachers' and students' understanding of school situated design in Canada and England. Research in Science Education 31(1): 117-135.
88. Hinduja, S. 2003. Trends and patterns among online software pirates. Ethics and Information Technology 5(1): 49-61.
89. Hmelo, C., D. Holton, and J. Kolodner. 2000. Designing to learn about complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences 9(3): 247-298.
90. Ioannides, C., and S. Vosniadou. 2002. The changing meanings of force. Cognitive Science Quarterly 2(1): 5-62.
91. ITEA (International Technology Education Association). 2000. Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology. Reston, Va.: ITEA.
92. Jarvis, T., and L. Rennie. 1996. Understanding technology: the development of a concept. International Journal of Science Education 18(8): 979-992.
93. Jarvis, T., and L. Rennie. 1998. Factors that influence children's developing perceptions of technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 8(3): 261-279.
94. Jenson, J., S. de Castell, and M. Bryson. 2003. "Girl talk": gender equity and identity discourses in a school-based computer culture. Women's Studies International Forum 26(6): 561-573.
95. Kafai, Y., C.C. Ching, and S. Marshall. 1997. Children as designers of educational multimedia software. Computers in Education 29(2-3): 117-126.
96. Kavakli, M., and J. Gero. 2002. The structure of concurrent actions: a case study on novice and expert designers. Design Studies 23(1): 25-40.
97. Kiplinger, V.L. 1997. Standard-setting procedures for the specification of performance levels on a standards-based assessment. Available online at: http:// www.cde.state.co.us/cdeassess/csap/asperf.htm (October 14, 2005).
98. Klahr, D., and S.M. Carver. 1988. Cognitive objectives in a LOGO debugging curriculum: instruction, learning, and transfer. Cognitive Psychology 20: 362- 404.
99. Larkin, J.H. 1981. Enriching Formal Knowledge: A Model for Learning to Solve Problems in Physics. Pp. 311-334 in Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition, edited by J.R. Anderson. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
100. Larkin, J.H. 1983. The Role of Problem Representation in Physics. Pp. 75-98 in Mental Models, edited by D. Gentner and A.L. Stevens. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
101. Lave, J. 1988. Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
102. Linn, R.L., and N.E. Gronlund. 2000. Measurement and Assessment in Teaching, 8th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
103. Littlefield, J., V. Delclos, S. Lever, K. Clayton, J. Bransford, and J. Franks. 1988. Learning LOGO: Method of Teaching, Transfer of General Skills, and Attitudes Toward School and Computers. Pp. 111-136 in Teaching and Learning
104. Luckhel, R., D. Thissen, and H. Wainer. 1994. On the relative value of multiplechoice, constructed-response, and examinee-selected items on two achievement tests. Journal of Educational Measurement 31(3): 234-250.
105. Mandler, J.M., and F. Orlich. 1993. Analogical transfer: the roles of schema abstraction and awareness. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 31(5): 485-487.
106. McCloskey, M. 1983a. Intuitive physics. Scientific American 248(4): 122-130.
107. McCloskey, M. 1983b. Naive Theories of Motion. Pp. 299-313 in Mental Models, edited by D. Gentner and A. Stevens. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
108. McDermott, L.C. 1984. Research on conceptual understanding in mechanics. Physics Today 37(7): 24-32.
109. McTighe, J., and S. Ferrara. 1996. Assessing Learning in the Classroom. Washington, D.C.: National Education Association.
110. Messick, S. 1989. Validity. Pp. 13-103 in Educational Measurement, 3rd ed., edited by R.L. Linn. New York: Macmillan.
111. Mestre, J.P. 1991. Learning and instruction in pre-college physical science. Physics Today 44(9): 56-62.
112. Mestre, J.P., ed. 2005. Transfer of Learning from a Modern Multidisciplinary Perspective. Greenwich, Conn.: Information Age Publishing.
113. Mestre, J., T. Thaden-Koch, R. Dufresne, and W. Gerace. 2004. The Dependence of Knowledge Deployment on Context among Physics Novices. Pp. 367-408 in Proceedings of the International School of Physics, "Enrico Fermi" Course CLVI, edited by E.F. Redish and M. Vicentini. Amsterdam: ISO Press.
114. Moskal, B.M., and J.A. Leydens. 2000. Scoring rubric development: validity and reliability. Available online at: http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=10 (January 26, 2006).
115. Mullins, C.A., C.J. Atman, and L.J. Shuman. 1999. Freshman engineers' performance when solving design problems. IEEE Transactions on Education 42(4): 281-287.
116. Nitko, A. J. 1996. Bias in Educational Assessment. Pp. 91-93 in Educational Assessment of Students, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Merrill.
117. NRC (National Research Council). 1996. National Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
118. NRC. 2001a. The Science and Design of Educational Assessment. Pp. 44-51 in Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment.. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
119. NRC. 2001b. Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
120. OERL (Online Evaluation Resource Library). 2006, Alignment Table for Instrument Characteristics-Technical Quality. Available online at: http://oerl.sri.com/instruments/ alignment/instralign_tq.html (January 26, 2006).
121. Orr, J.E. 1996. Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. Ithaca, N.Y.: ILR Press.
122. Petrina, S. 2003. "Two cultures" of technical courses and discourses: the case of computer-aided design. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 13(1): 47-73.
123. Petrina, S., F. Feng, and J. Kim. 2004. How We Learn (About, Through, and for Technology): A Review Of Research. Paper commissioned by the Committee on Assessing Technological Literacy. Unpublished.
124. Pomares-Brandt, P. 2003. Les nouvelles technologies de l'information et de la communication dans les enseignements technologiques. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Université de Provence, Aix-Marseille.
125. Reed, S.K., G.W. Ernst, and R. Banerji. 1974. The role of analogy in transfer between similar problem states. Cognitive Psychology 6(3): 436-450.
126. Reed, S.K., A. Dempster, and M. Ettinger. 1985. Usefulness of analogous solutions for solving algebra word problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 11(1): 106-125.
127. Rennie, L., and T. Jarvis. 1995. Three approaches to measuring children's perceptions about technology. International Journal of Science Education 17(6): 755-774.
128. Roth, W.-M. 1998. Designing Communities. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
129. Saxe, G. B. 1989. Transfer of learning across cultural practices. Cognition and Instruction 6(4): 325-330.
130. Schallies, M., A. Wellensiek, and A. Lembens. 2002. The development of mature capabilities for understanding and valuing in technology through school project work: individual and structural preconditions. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 12(1): 41-58.
131. Schoenfeld, A.H. 1985. Mathematical Problem Solving. New York: Academic Press.
132. Schoenfeld, A.H., and D.J. Herrmann. 1982. Problem perception and knowledge structure in expert and novice mathematical problem solvers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 8(4): 484-494.
133. Schwartz, W. 1995. Opportunity to Learn Standards: Their Impact on Urban Students. ERIC/CUE Digest no. 110. Available online at: http://www.eric.ed.gov/ ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2/content_storage_01/0000000b/80/2a/24/a0.pdf (January 26, 2006).
134. Selwyn, N. 2001. Turned on/switched off: exploring children's engagement with computers in primary school. Journal of Educational Computing Research 25(3): 245-266.
135. Selwyn, N. 2003. Doing IT for the kids: re-examining children, computers and the "information society." Media, Culture and Society 25(4): 351-378.
136. Sireci, S.G. 2005. The Most Frequently Unasked Questions About Testing. Pp. 111- 121 in Defending Standardized Testing, edited by R.P. Phelp. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
137. Smith, C., D. Maclin, L. Grosslight, and H. Davis. 1997. Teaching for understanding: a study of students' preinstruction theories of matter and a comparison of the effectiveness of two approaches to teaching about matter and density. Cognition and Instruction 15(3): 317-393.
138. Smith, J.P., A.A. diSessa, and J. Roschelle. 1994. Misconceptions reconceived: a constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. Journal of the Learning Sciences 3(2): 115-163.
139. Stiggins, R. 1995. Assessment literacy for the 21st century. Phi Delta Kappan 77(3): 238-245.
140. Strike, K.A., and G.J. Posner. 1985. A Conceptual Change View of Learning and Understanding. Pp. 211-231 in Cognitive Structure and Conceptual Change, edited by L.H.T. West and A.L. Pines. New York: Academic Press.
141. Taxen, G., A. Druin, C. Fast, and M. Kjellin. 2001. KidStory: a technology design partnership with children. Behaviour and Information Technology 20(2): 119-125.
142. Thomson, C. 1997. Concept Mapping as an Aid to Learning and Teaching. Pp. 97-110 in Shaping Concepts of Technology: from Philosophical Perspectives to Mental Images, edited by M.J. de Vries and A. Tamir. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Reprinted from International Journal of Technology and Design Education 7(1-2).
143. Tytler, R. 2000. A comparison of year 1 and year 6 students' conceptions of evaporation and condensation: dimensions of conceptual progression. International Journal of Science Education 22(5): 447-467.
144. Upitis, R. 1998. From hackers to Luddites, game players to game creators: profiles of adolescent students using technology. Journal of Curriculum Studies 30(3): 293-318.
145. Vosniadou, S., and W.F. Brewer. 1992. Mental models of the Earth: a study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology 24(4): 535-585.
146. Vosniadou, S., and C. Ioannides. 1998. From conceptual development to science education: a psychological point of view. International Journal of Science Education 20(10): 1213-1230.
147. Waller, A. 2004. Final Report on a Literature Review of Research on How People Learn Engineering Concepts and Processes. Paper commissionied by the Committee on Assessing Technological Literacy. Unpublished.
148. Watson, J.R., T. Prieto, and J.S. Dillon. 1997. Consistency of students' explanations about combustion. Science Education 81(4): 425-443.
149. Wegerif, R. 2004. The role of educational software as a support for teaching and learning conversations. Computers and Education 43: 179-191.
150. Welch, M., D. Barlex, and H.S. Lim. 2000. The strategic thinking of novice designers: discontinuity between theory and practice. Journal of Technology Studies 25(2): 34-44.
151. White, B.Y., and J.R. Frederiksen. 1998. Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction 16(1): 3-118.
152. Wineburg, S. 1998. Reading Abraham Lincoln: an expert/expert study in historical cognition. Cognitive Science 22(3): 319-346.
153. Zeidler, D., ed. 2003. The Role of Moral Reasoning on Socioscientific Issues and Discourse in Science Education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
154. Aikenhead, G.S., and A.G. Ryan. 1992. The Development of a New Instrument: Monitoring Views on Science-Technology-Society (VOSTS). Available online at: http://www.usask.ca/education/people/aikenhead/vosts_2.pdf (May 20, 2005). ASEE (American Society for Engineering Education). 2005. Teachers' Survey Results.
155. ASEE Engineering K-12 Center. Available online at: http://www. engineeringk12.org/educators/taking_a_closer_look/survey_results.htm (October 5, 2005).
156. Bame, E.A., M.J. de Vries, and W.E. Dugger, Jr. 1993. Pupils' attitudes towards technology: PATT-USA. Journal of Technology Studies 19(1): 40-48.
157. Bloom, B.S., B.B. Mesia, and D.R. Krathwohl. 1964. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: David McKay.
158. Cobb, M.D., and J. Macoubrie. 2004. Public perceptions about nanotechnology: risks, benefits and trust. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 6(4): 395-405.
159. Custer, R.L., G. Valesey, and B.N. Burke. 2001. An assessment model for a design approach to technological problem solving. Journal of Technology Education 12(2): 5-20.
160. ETS (Educational Testing Service). 2005. Sample Test Questions. The Praxis Series, Specialty Area Tests, Technology Education (0050). Available online at: http:// ftp.ets.org/pub/tandl/0050.pdf (May 27, 2005).
161. Finson, K.D. 2002. Drawing a scientist: what do we know and not know after 50 years of drawing. School Science and Mathematics 102(7): 335-345.
162. Hatch, L.O. 1985. Technological Literacy: A Secondary Analysis of the NAEP Science Data. Unpublished dissertation, University of Maryland.
163. Hatch, L.O. 2004. Technological Literacy: Trends in Academic Progress-A Secondary Analysis of the NAEP Long-term Science Data. Draft 6/16/04. Paper commissioned by the National Research Council Committee on Assessing Technological Literacy. Unpublished.
164. Hayden, M.A. 1989. The Development and Validation of a Test of Industrial Technological Literacy. Unpublished dissertation, Iowa State University.
165. Hill, R.B. 1997. The design of an instrument to assess problem solving activities in technology education. Journal of Technology Education 9(1): 31-46.
166. IBO (International Baccalaureate Organization). 2001. Design Technology. February 2001. Geneva, Switzerland: IBO.
167. ISBE (Illinois State Board of Education). 2001a. Science Performance Descriptors- Grades 1-5. Available online at: http://www.isbe.net/ils/science/word/descriptor_1- 5.rtf (April 11, 2005).
168. ISBE. 2001b. Science Performance Descriptors-Grades 6-12. Available online at: http://www.isbe.net/ils/science/word/descriptor_6-12.rtf (April 11, 2005).
169. ISBE. 2003. Illinois Standards Achievement Test-Sample Test Items: Illinois Learning Standards for Science. Available online at: http://www.isbe.net/assessment/ PDF/2003ScienceSample.pdf (August 31, 2005).
170. ITEA (International Technology Education Association). 2001. ITEA/Gallup Poll Reveals What Americans Think About Technology. A Report of the Survey Conducted by the Gallup Organization for the International Technology Education Association. Available online at: http://www.iteaconnect.org/TAA/PDFs/ Gallupreport.pdf (October 5, 2005).
171. ITEA. 2004. The Second Installment of the ITEA/Gallup Poll and What It Reveals as to How Americans Think about Technology. A Report of the Second Survey Conducted by the Gallup Organization for the International Technology Education Association. Available online at: http://www.iteaconnect.org/TAA/PDFs/ GallupPoll2004.pdf (October 5, 2005).
172. Kaplan. 2003. ASVAB-The Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery. 2004 Edition. New York: Simon and Schuster.
173. Kimbell, R., K. Stables, T. Wheeler, A. Wosniak, and V. Kelly. 1991. The Assessment of Performance in Design and Technology. The Final Report of the APU Design and Technology Project 1985-1991. London: School Examinations and Assessment Council.
174. MDE (Massachusetts Department of Education). 2001. Science and Technology/ Engineering Curriculum Framework. Available online at: http://www. doe.mass.edu/frameworks/scitech/2001/0501.doc (April 11, 2005).
175. MDE. 2005a. Science and Technology/Engineering, Grade 5. Released test items. Available online at: http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/2005/release/g5sci.pdf (August 31, 2005).
176. MDE. 2005b. Science and Technology/Engineering, Grade 8. Released test items. Available online at: http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/2005/release/g8sci.pdf (August 31, 2005).
177. Miller, J.D. 1983a. The American People and Science Policy: The Role of Public Attitudes in the Policy Process. New York: Pergamon Press.
178. Miller, J.D. 1983b. Scientific literacy: a conceptual and empirical review. Daedalus 112(2): 29-48.
179. Miller, J.D. 1986. Reaching the Attentive and Interested Publics for Science. Pp. 55- 69 in Scientists and Journalists: Reporting Science as News, edited by S. Friedman, S. Dunwoody, and C. Rogers. New York: Free Press.
180. Miller, J.D. 1987. Scientific Literacy in the United States. Pp. 19-40 in Communicating Science to the Public, edited by D. Evered and M. O'Connor. London: John Wiley and Sons.
181. Miller, J.D. 1992. From Town Meeting to Nuclear Power: The Changing Nature of Citizenship and Democracy in the United States. Pp. 327-328 in The United States Constitution: Roots, Rights, and Responsibilities, edited by A.E.D. Howard. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.
182. Miller, J.D. 1995. Scientific Literacy for Effective Citizenship. Pp. 185-204 in Science/ Technology/Society as Reform in Science Education, edited by R.E. Yager. New York: State University of New York Press.
183. Miller, J.D. 1998. The measurement of civic scientific literacy. Public Understanding of Science 7: 1-21.
184. Miller, J.D. 2000. The Development of Civic Scientific Literacy in the United States. Pp. 21-47 in Science, Technology, and Society: A Sourcebook on Research and Practice, edited by D.D. Kumar and D. Chubin. New York: Plenum Press.
185. Miller, J.D. 2001. The Acquisition and Retention of Scientific Information by American Adults. Pp. 93-114 in Free-Choice Science Education, edited by J.H. Falk. New York: Teachers College Press.
186. Miller, J.D. 2004. Public understanding of, and attitudes toward scientific research: what we know and what we need to know. Public Understanding of Science 13: 273-294.
187. Miller, J.D., and L. Kimmel. 2001. Biomedical Communications: Purposes, Audiences, and Strategies. New York: Academic Press.
188. Miller, J.D., and R. Pardo. 2000. Civic Scientific Literacy and Attitude to Science and Technology: A Comparative Analysis of the European Union, the United States, Japan, and Canada. Pp. 81-129 in Between Understanding and Trust: The Public, Science, and Technology, edited by M. Dierkes and C. von Grote. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
189. Miller, J.D., R. Pardo, and F. Niwa. 1997. Public Perceptions of Science and Technology: A Comparative Study of the European Union, the United States, Japan, and Canada. Madrid: BBV Foundation.
190. Morgan, G., B. Fischhoff, A. Bostrom, and C.J. Atman. 2002. Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
191. NSB (National Science Board). 1981. Science Indicators, 1980. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
192. NSB. 1983. Science Indicators, 1982. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
193. NSB. 1986. Science Indicators, 1985. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
194. NSB. 1988. Science and Engineering Indicators, 1987. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
195. NSB. 1990. Science and Engineering Indicators, 1989. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
196. NSB. 1992. Science and Engineering Indicators, 1991. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
197. NSB. 1994. Science and Engineering Indicators, 1993. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
198. NSB. 1996. Science and Engineering Indicators, 1996. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
199. NSB. 1998. Science and Engineering Indicators, 1998. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
200. NSB. 2000. Science and Engineering Indicators, 2000. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
201. NSB. 2004. Science and Engineering Indicators, 2004. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
202. Paul, R., and G.M. Nosich. 2004. A Model for the National Assessment of Higher- Order Thinking. Available online at: http://www.criticalthinking.org/resources/ articles/a-model-nal-assessment-hot.shtml (January 19, 2006).
203. Saskatchewan Education. 2001. 1999 Provincial Learning Assessment in Technological Literacy. May 2001. Available online at: http://www.learning.gov.sk.ca/branches/ cap_building_acct/afl/docs/plap/techlit/1999techlit.pdf.
204. TIDEE (Transferable Integrated Design Engineering Education). 2002. Assessments. Available online at: http://www.tidee.cea.wsu.edu/resources/assessments.html (August 31, 2005).
205. AAAS. 1998. Blueprints for Reform: Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education. New York: Oxford University Press.
206. ASTC (Association of Science-Technology Centers). 2004. ASTC Sourcebook of Science Center Statistics 2004. Washington, D.C.: ASTC.
207. Broughman, S.P., and K.W. Pugh. 2004. Characteristics of Private Schools in the United States: Results from the 2001-2002 Private School Universe Study, Table 1. Available online at: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2005/2005305.pdf (April 11, 2006).
208. Bybee, R.W. 1997. Achieving Scientific Literacy: From Purposes to Practices. Portsmouth, N.H.: Heinemann.
209. Custer, R.L., G. Valesey, and B.N. Burke. 2001. An assessment model for a design approach to technological problem solving. Journal of Technology Education 12(2): 5-20.
210. DoEd (U.S. Department of Education). 2003. The Nation's Report Card: Science 2000. NCES 2003-453. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, D.C.: DoEd.
211. Friedman, S., S. Dunwoody, and C. Rogers, eds. 1986. Scientists and Journalists: Reporting Science as News. New York: Free Press.
212. Friedman, S., S. Dunwoody, and C. Rogers. 1999. Communicating Uncertainty. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
213. ITEA (International Technology Education Association). 2000. Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology. Reston, Va.: ITEA.
214. ITEA. 2004a. Measuring Progress: A Guide to Assessing Students for Technological Literacy. Reston, Va.: ITEA.
215. ITEA. 2004b. The Second Installment of the ITEA/Gallup Poll and What It Reveals as to How Americans Think About Technology. A Report of the Second survey Conducted by the Gallup Organization for the International Technology Education Association. Available online at: http://www.iteaconnect.org/TAA/PDFs/ GallupPoll2004.pdf (October 5, 2005).
216. Lehr, C., and M. Thurlow. 2003. Putting It All Together: Including Students with Disabilities in Assessment and Accountability Systems. NCEO Policy Directions, Number 16/October 2003. Available online at: http://education.umn.edu/ nceo/OnlinePubs/Policy16.htm (February 23, 2006).
217. MCREL (Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning). 2004. Content Knowledge, 4th ed. Available online at: http://mcrel.org/standards-benchmarks/ (January 13, 2006).
218. Miller, J.D. 1983a. The American People and Science Policy: The Role of Public Attitudes in the Policy Process. New York: Pergamon Press.
219. Miller, J.D. 1983b. Scientific literacy: a conceptual and empirical review. Daedalus 112(2): 29-48.
220. Miller, J.D. 1986. Reaching the Attentive and Interested Publics for Science. Pp. 55- 69 in Scientists and Journalists: Reporting Science as News, edited by S. Friedman, S. Dunwoody, and C. Rogers. New York: Free Press.
221. Miller, J.D. 1987. Scientific Literacy in the United States. Pp. 19-40 in Communicating Science to the Public, edited by D. Evered and M. O'Connor. London: John Wiley and Sons.
222. Miller, J.D. 1992. From Town Meeting to Nuclear Power: The Changing Nature of Citizenship and Democracy in the United States. Pp. 327-328 in The United States Constitution: Roots, Rights, and Responsibilities, edited by A.E.D. Howard. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.
223. Miller, J.D. 1995. Scientific Literacy for Effective Citizenship. Pp. 185-204 in Science/ Technology/Society as Reform in Science Education, edited by R.E. Yager. New York: State University of New York Press.
224. Miller, J.D. 1998. The measurement of civic scientific literacy. Public Understanding of Science 7: 1-21.
225. Miller, J.D. 2000. The Development of Civic Scientific Literacy in the United States. Pp. 21-47 in Science, Technology, and Society: A Sourcebook on Research and Practice, edited by D.D. Kumar, and D. Chubin. New York: Plenum Press.
226. Miller, J.D. 2004a. Public understanding of and attitudes toward scientific research: what we know and what we need to know. Public Understanding of Science 13: 273-294.
227. Miller, J.D. 2004b. The Evaluation of Adult Science Learning. ASP Conference Series, vol. 319. Washington, D.C.: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
228. Miller, J.D., and L. Kimmel. 2001. Biomedical Communications: Purposes, Audiences, and Strategies. New York: Academic Press.
229. Miller, J.D., and R. Pardo. 2000. Civic Scientific Literacy and Attitude to Science and Technology: A Comparative Analysis of the European Union, the United States, Japan, and Canada. Pp. 81-129 in Between Understanding and Trust: The Public, Science, and Technology, edited by M. Dierkes and C. von Grote. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
230. Miller, J.D., R. Pardo, and F. Niwa. 1997. Public Perceptions of Science and Technology: A Comparative Study of the European Union, the United States, Japan, and Canada. Madrid: BBV Foundation.
231. Morley and Associates. Unpublished. Unpublished visitor survey for the New York Hall of Science, 2005.
232. NAE (National Academy of Engineering) and NRC (National Research Council). 2002. Technically Speaking: Why All Americans Need to Know More About Technology. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
233. NRC (National Research Council). 1996. National Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
234. NRC. 1997. Educating One and All: Students with Disabilities and Standards-Based Reform, edited by L.M. McDonnell, M.J. McLaughlin, and P. Morison. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
235. NRC. 1999a. Recommendations from High Stakes Testing for Tracking, Promotion, and Graduation, edited by J.P. Heubert and R.M. Hauser. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
236. NRC. 1999b. Being Fluent with Information Technology. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
237. NSB (National Science Board). 2000. Science and Engineering Indicators 2000, vol. 2. Arlington, Va.: NSB.
238. Pardo, R., and J.D. Miller. 2003. U.S. Environmental and Biotechnology Study, 2003. Unpublished questionnaire.
239. Shen, B.S.P. 1975. Science Literacy and the Public Understanding of Science. Pp. 44- 52 in Communication of Scientific Information, edited by S.B. Day. New York: Karger.
240. Taylor, S., and B. Serrell. 1991. Try It!: Improving Exhibits Through Formative Evaluation. Washington, D.C.: Association of Science Technology Centers and New York: New York Hall of Science.
241. U.S. Census Bureau. 2005. Annual Estimates of the Population for the United States and States, and for Puerto Rico: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2005 (NST-EST2005- 01): Table 1. Available online at: http://www.census.gov/popest/states/tables/NSTEST2005- 01.xls (April 11, 2006).
242. Young, B.A. 2003a. Public school student, staff, and graduate counts by state: School year 2001-02. Education Statistics Quarterly 5 (1): Table 2. Available online at: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/quarterly/vol_5/5_2/q3_4_t1.asp#Table-2 (April 11, 2006).
243. Young, B.A. 2003b. Public school student, staff, and graduate counts by state: School year 2001-02. Education Statistics Quarterly 5 (1): Table 1. Available online at: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/quarterly/vol_5/5_2/q3_4_t1.asp#Table-1 (April 11, 2006).
244. AERA (American Educational Research Association), APA (American Psychological Association), and NCME (National Council on Measurement in Education). 1999. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, D.C.: AERA.
245. Aldrich, C. 2004. Simulations and the Future of Learning. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
246. Alluisi, E.A. 1991. The development of technology for collective training: SIMNET, a case history. Human Factors 33(3): 343-362.
247. Andrews, D.H., and H.H. Bell. 2000. Simulation-Based Training. Pp. 357-384 in Training and Retraining: A Handbook for Business, Industry, Government, and the Military, edited by S. Tobias and J.D. Fletcher. New York: Macmillan Reference USA.
248. Bahr, M.W, and C.M. Bahr. 1997. Education assessment in the next millennium: contributions of technology. Preventing School Failure 4(Winter): 90-94.
249. Baker, F.B. 1989. Computer technology in test construction and processing. Pp. 409- 428 in Educational Measurement, 3rd ed., edited by R.L. Linn. New York: Macmillan.
250. Barrett, H., and J. Carney. 2005. Conflicting paradigms and competing purposes in electronic portfolio development. Educational Assessment. Submitted for publication.
251. Bennett, R.E., F. Jenkins, H. Persky, and A. Weiss. 2003. Assessing complex problem- solving performances. Assessment in Education 10(3): 347-359.
252. Bunderson, C.V., D.K. Inouye, and J.B. Olson. 1989. The four generations of computerized educational measurement. Pp. 367-408 in Educational Measurement, 3rd ed., edited by R.L. Linn. New York: Macmillan.
253. Carroll, J., D. Potthoff, and T. Huber. 1996. Learning from three years of portfolio use in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education 47(4): 253-262.
254. Concord Consortium. 2005. Molecular Logic Project. Available online at: http:// molo.concord.org/ (October 19, 2005).
255. Crusoe, D. 2005. A discussion of gender diversity in computer-based assessment. Available online at: http://www.bitculture.org/storage/DHC_Gender_Div_ EdDRvw0705.pdf (December 23, 2005).
256. Duffy, T.M., and J.R. Kirkley. 2004. Learning Theory and Pedagogy Applied in Distanced Learning: The Case of Cardean University. Pp. 107-141 in Learner Centered Theory and Practice in Distance Education: Cases from Higher Education, edited by T.M. Duffy and J.R. Kirkley. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
257. Fair Test Examiner. 1997. ETS and test cheating. Available online at: http:// www.fairtest.org/examarts/winter97/etscheat.htm (January 4, 2006).
258. Fletcher, J.D. 1999. Using networked simulation to assess problem solving by tactical teams. Computers in Human Behavior 15(May/July): 375-402.
259. Fletcher, J.D., and P.R. Chatelier. 2000. Military Training. Pp. 267-288 in Training and Retraining: A Handbook for Business, Industry, Government, and the Military, edited by S. Tobias and J.D. Fletcher. New York: Macmillan.
260. Georgi, D., and J. Crowe. 1998. Digital portfolios: a confluence of portfolio assessment and technology. Teacher Education Quarterly 25(1): 73-84.
261. Haertel, E., and D. Wiley. 2003. Comparability issues when scores are produced under varying test conditions. Paper presented at the Validity and Accommodations: Psychometric and Policy Perspectives Conference, August 4-5, College Park, Maryland.
262. Lord, F.M. 1971a. Robbins-Monro procedures for tailored testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement 31: 3-31.
263. Lord, F.M. 1971b. A theoretical study of the measurement effectiveness of flexilevel tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement 31: 805-813.
264. Lord, F.M. 1971c. The self-scoring flexilevel test. Educational and Psychological Measurement 31: 147-151.
265. Miller, J. 2004. The Evaluation of Adult Science Learning. Pp. 26-34 in Proceedings of NASA Office of Space Science Education and Public Outreach Conference 2002. ASP Conference Series 319. Washington, D.C.: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
266. Mislevy, R.J., R.G. Almond, and J.F. Lukas. 2003 A Brief Introduction to Evidence- Centered Design. RR-03-16. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service.
267. Munro, A., and Q.A. Pizzini. 1996. RIDES Reference Manual. Los Angeles, Calif.: Behavioral Technology Laboratories, University of Southern California.
268. Naglieri, J.A., F. Drascow, M. Schmidt, L. Handler, A. Prifitera, A. Margolis, and R. Velasquez. 2004. Psychological testing on the Internet: new problems, old issues. American Psychologist 59(3): 150-162.
269. O'Neil, H.F., K. Allred, and R.A. Dennis. 1997a. Validation of a Computer Simulation for Assessment of Interpersonal Skill. Pp. 229-254 in Workplace Readiness: Competencies and Assessment, edited by H.F. O'Neil. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
270. O'Neil, H.F., G.K.W.K. Chung, and R.S. Brown. 1997b. Use of Networked Simulations as a Context to Measure Team Competencies. Pp. 411-452 in Workplace Readiness: Competencies and Assessment, edited by H.F. O'Neil. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
271. Pizzini, Q.A., and A. Munro. 1998. VIVIDS Authoring for Virtual Environments. Los Angeles, Calif.: Behavioral Technology Laboratories, University of Southern California.
272. Pohlman, D.L., and J.D. Fletcher. 1999. Aviation Personnel Selection and Training. Pp. 277-308 in Handbook of Aviation Human Factors, edited by D.J. Garland, J.A. Wise, and V.D. Hopkin. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
273. Prensky, M. 2001. Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon 9(5). Available online at: http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital %20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf (January 4, 2006).
274. Robar, J., and A. Steele. 2004. Females and Games. Computer and Video Game Industry Research Study. March 2004. Issaquah, Washington: AisA Group.
275. Russell, M. 1999. Testing on Computers: A Follow-up Study Comparing Performance on Computer and on Paper. Available online at: http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/ v7n20/ (January 4, 2006).
276. Segall, D.O. 2001. ASVAB Testing via the Internet. Unpublished paper.
277. Shermis, M.D., P.M. Stemmer, and P.M. Webb. 1996. Computerized adaptive skill assessment in a statewide testing program. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 29(1): 49-67.
278. Smith, R.D. 2000. Simulation. Pp. 1578-1587 in Encyclopedia of Computer Science, 4th ed., edited by A. Ralston, E.D. Reilley, and D. Hemmendinger. New York: Grove's Dictionaries.
279. TELS (Technology Enhanced Learning in Science). 2005. Web-based inquiry science environment. Available online at: http://wise.berkeley.edu/ (October 19, 2005). soe.berkeley.edu/Pages/force.html (October 19, 2005).
280. Thinkertools. 2005. Force and motion. Available online at: http://thinkertools. soe.berkeley.edu/Pages/force.html (October 19, 2005)
281. Towne, D.M. 1997. An Intelligent Tutor for Diagnosing Faults in an Aircraft Power Distribution System. Technical Report 118. Los Angeles, Calif.: Behavioral Technology Laboratories, University of Southern California.
282. van der Linden, W.J. 1995. Advances in Computer Applications. Pp. 105-123 in International Perspectives on Academic Assessment, edited by T. Oakland and R.K. Hambleton. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
283. Weiss, D.J. 1983. Computer-Based Measurement of Intellectual Capabilities: Final Report. Minneapolis, Minn.: Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory, University of Minnesota.
284. Weiss, D.J. 2004. Computerized adaptive testing for effective and efficient measurement in counseling and education. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development 37(2): 70-84.
285. Woodcock, B.S. 2005. Total MMOG Active Subscriptions (Excluding Lineage, Lineage II, and Ragnorak Online). Available online at: http://mmogchart.com/ (August 22, 2005).
286. Zogby International. 2004. Young Mobile Voters Pick Kerry over Bush 55% to 40%, Rock the Vote/Zogby Poll Reveals: National Text-Message Poll Breaks New Ground. Press release dated October 31, 2004. Available online at: http:// www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=919 (August 22, 2005).
287. AAAS. 1993. Benchmarks for Science Literacy. Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
288. DOEd (U.S. Department of Education). 2005. Fact Sheet: New No Child Left Behind Flexibility: Highly Qualified Teachers. Available online at: http:// www.ed.gov/nclb/methods/teachers/hqtflexibility.pdf (January 22, 2005).
289. ETS (Educational Testing Service). 2005. ICT Literacy Assessment. Available online at: http://www.ets.org/ictliteracy/ (September 9, 2005).
290. Gee, J.P. 2003. What Video Games Have to Teach Us About Learning and Literacy. New York: Palgrave.
291. ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education). 1998. National Education Technology Standards for Students. Eugene, Ore.: ISTE.
292. ITEA (International Technology Education Association). 2000. Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology. Reston, Va.: ITEA.
293. ITEA. 2001. ITEA/Gallup Poll Reveals What Americans Think About Technology. A Report of the Survey Conducted by the Gallup Organization for the International Technology Education Association. Available online at: http:// www.iteaconnect.org/TAA/PDFs/Gallupreport.pdf (October 5, 2005).
294. ITEA. 2004. The Second Installment of the ITEA/Gallup Poll and What It Reveals as to How Americans Think About Technology. A Report of the Second Survey Conducted by the Gallup Organization for the International Technology Education Association. Available online at: http://www.iteaconnect.org/TAA/PDFs/ GallupPoll2004.pdf (October 5, 2005).
295. Kasesniemi, E., and P. Rautiainen. 2002. Mobile Culture of Children and Teenagers in Finland. Pp. 170-192 in Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance, edited by J.E. Katz and M. Aakhus. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
296. Lemke, M. 2004. Statement for the Assessing Technological Literacy Workshop, September 29, 2004. The National Academies, Washington, D.C. Unpublished.
297. Meade, S.D., and W.E. Dugger, Jr. 2004. Reporting on the status of technology education in the United States. Technology Teacher 63(October): 29-35.
298. NAE (National Academy of Engineering) and NRC (National Research Council). 2002. Technically Speaking: Why All Americans Need to Know More About Technology. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
299. NAGB (National Assessment Governing Board). 2005. Science Framework for the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress. Draft, September 30, 2005. Available online at: http://www.nagb.org/pubs/2005science:framework_dr.doc (October 19, 2005).
300. NCES (National Center for Education Statistics). 2005. National Household Education Surveys Program. Survey Topics/Population. Available online at: http:// nces.ed.gov/nhes/surveytopics_special.asp (January 24, 2005).
301. NORC (National Opinion Research Center). 2005. General Social Survey. Available online at: http://www.norc.uchicago.edu/projects/gensoc.asp (January 24, 2005).
302. NRC (National Research Council). 1996. National Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
303. NSB (National Science Board). 2004. Science and Technology: Public Attitudes and Understanding in Science and Engineering Indicators, 2004. Available online at: http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/seind04/c7/c7h.htm (May 25, 2005).
304. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development). 2004. Problem Solving for Tomorrow's World: First Measures of Cross-Curricular Competencies from PISA 2003. Programme for International Student Assessment. Available online at: http://www.pisa.oecd.org/dataoecd/25/12/34009000.pdf (January 21, 2005).
305. OECD and Statistics Canada. 2005. Learning a Living: First Results of the Adult Literacy and Lifeskills Survey. Available online at: http://www.statcan.ca/english/ freepub/89-603-XIE/2005001/pdf.htm (October 19, 2005).
306. Petrina, S., F. Feng, and J. Kim. 2004. How We Learn (About, Through, and for Technology): A Review of Research. Paper commissioned by the National Research Council Committee on Assessing Technological Literacy. Unpublished.
307. Valentine, G., S.L. Holloway, and N. Bingham. 2000. Transforming Cyberspace: Children's Interventions in the New Public Sphere. Pp. 156-173 in Children's Geographies: Playing, Living, Learning, edited by L. Holloway and G. Valentine. London and New York: Routledge.
308. Waller, A. 2004. Final Report on a Literature Review of Research on How People Learn Engineering Concepts and Processes. Paper commissioned by the Committee on Assessing Technological Literacy. Unpublished.