Comparison of student perceptions of virtual and physical laboratories

ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Koretsky, Milo ^a   Kelly, Christine ^a   Harding, Philip ^a   Gummer, Edith ^b  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Classroom Focused Research and Evaluation Program

Author keywords

Experimental design; Metacognition; Virtual laboratory

Indexed keywords

DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; STATISTICS; STUDENTS;

INTER-RATER RELIABILITIES; LABORATORY EXPERIENCES; METACOGNITION; PHYSICAL LABORATORY; STUDENT PERCEPTIONS; STUDENT PERFORMANCE; THINK-ALOUD PROTOCOL; VIRTUAL LABORATORIES;

LABORATORIES;

EID: 85029069764     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21535965     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Wankat, P.C. and F.S. Oreovicz, Teaching Engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1993.
2. Koretsky, M.D., D. Amatore, C. Barnes, and S. Kimura (2008). Enhancement of Student Learning in Experimental Design using a Virtual Laboratory. IEEE Trans. Ed., 51, 76.
3. Mosterman, P.J., M.A.M. Dorlandt, J.O. Campbell, C. Burow, R. Bouw, A.J. Brodersen, and J. Bourne (1994). Virtual Engineering Laboratories: Design and Experiments. Journal of Engineering Education, 83, 279.
4. Kemeny, J. and B. Zeitler (2001). An online geomechanics course with a virtual rock lab based on streaming audio and vector graphics. Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.
5. Hodge, H., H.S. Hinton, and M. Lightner (2001). Virtual Circuit Laboratory. Journal of Engineering Education, 90, 507.
6. Nippert, C.R. (2001). Using Web based Supplemental Instruction for Chemical Engineering Laboratories. Proceedings of the 2001 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition.
7. Harmon, T.C., G.A. Burks, J J. Giron, W. Wong, G.K.W.K. Chung, and E. Baker (2002). An Interactive Database Supporting Virtual Fieldwork in an Environmental Engineering Design Project. Journal of Engineering Education, 91, 167.
8. Bhargava, P., C. Cunningham, M. Tolomeo, A. Zehnder (2003). Virtual Labs, Real Data for Statics and Mechanics of Materials. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.
9. Richardson, J., N. Adamo-Villani, E. Carpenter, and G. Moore (2006). Designing and Implementing a Virtual 3D Microcontroller Laboratory Environment. 36th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings.
10. Jayakumar, S., R.G. Squires, G.V. Reklaitis, P.K. Andersen and B.K. Dietrich (1995). The Purdue-Dow Styrene Butadiene Polymerization Simulation. J Journal of Engineering Education, 84, 271.
11. Kuriyan, K., W. Muench, and G.V. Reklaitis (2001). Air Products Hydrogen Liquifaction Project: Building a Web-Based Simulation of an Industrial Process. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 9, 180.
12. Cameron, Ian, Caroline Crosthwaite, Christine Norton, Nicoleta Balliu, Moses Tadé, Andrew Hoadley, David Shallcross and Geoff Barton (2008). Development and Deployment of a Library of Industrially Focused Advanced Immersive VR Learning Environments. Advances in Engineering Education, Summer 2008.
13. G.K.W.K. Chung, T.C. Harmon, and E. Baker (2001). The Impact of a Simulation-Based Learning Design Project on Student Learning. IEEE Trans. Educ., 44, 390.
14. J. Campbell, J. Bourne, P. Mosterman, and A. Brodersen (2002). The Effectiveness of Learning Simulations for Electronic Laboratories," J. Eng. Edu., 91, 81.
15. Barr, R., M. Pandy, A. Petrosino, and V. Svihla (2005). Challenge-based instruction: The VaNTH Biomechanics learning modules. 35th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education.
16. Lindsay, E.D. and M.C. Good (2005). "Effects of Laboratory Access Modes upon Learning Outcomes," IEEE Trans. Ed., 48, 619.
17. Hall, R. Philpot, T, Oglesby, D. Flori, R., Hubing, N. Watkins, S. & Yellamraju, V. (2002). A model for the evaluation of innovative engineering courseware: Engineering an assessment program. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference.
18. Vos, H. & de Graff, E., (2004). Developing metacognition: a basis for active learning. European Journal of Engineering Education. 29, 543.
19. Wiliam, D. (2007). Keeping learning on track. In Lester, F. (ed.) Second Handbook of Mathematics Teaching and Learning.
20. Wankat, Phillip C. (2002). Improving engineering and technology education by applying what is known about how people learn. Journal of SMET Education: Innovations and Research. 3, 3.
21. Case, J., Gunstene, R., Lewis, A. (2001). Students' metacognitive development in an innovative second year chemical engineering course. Research in Science Education. 31, 313.
22. Silverman, D. (2000). Analyzing talk and text. Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd edition, N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (Editors), Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA.
23. Amatore, Danielle, Edith Gummer, and Milo D. Koretsky (2007). Instructional Design and Evaluation of a Virtual Laboratory in Nanoelectronics Processing. Proceedings of the 2007American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.