When is computer-mediated intergroup contact most promising? Examining the effect of out-group members' anonymity on prejudice

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 77, Issue , 2017, Pages 198-210

  Schumann, Sandy ^a,b   Klein, Olivier ^a   Douglas, Karen ^c   Hewstone, Miles ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anonymity; Computer mediated communication; Intergroup contact; Prejudice; Social presence

Indexed keywords

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

ANONYMITY; COMPUTER MEDIATED COMMUNICATION; INTERGROUP CONTACTS; PREJUDICE; SOCIAL PRESENCE;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

ADULT; CONFLICT; CONVERSATION; FACTORIAL DESIGN; HUMAN; PREJUDICE;

EID: 85028744719     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.006     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. Abbott, L., Austin, R., Mulkeen, A., Metcalfe, N., The global classroom: Advancing cultural awareness in special schools through collaborative work using ICT. European Journal of Special Needs Education 19:2 (2004), 225–240, 10.1080/08856250410001678504.
2. Allport, G.W., The nature of prejudice. 1954, Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, MA.
3. Alvídrez, S., Piñeiro-Naval, V., Marcos-Ramos, M., Rojas-Solís, J.L., Intergroup contact in computer-mediated communication: The interplay of a stereotype-disconfirming behavior and a lasting group identity on reducing prejudiced perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior 52 (2015), 533–540, 10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.006.
4. Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Net intergroup contact. Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on intercultural collaboration, 2010, ACM, 223–226.
5. Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Furnham, A., The positive net. Computers in Human Behavior 23:2 (2007), 1033–1045, 10.1016/j.chb.2005.08.008.
6. Amichai-Hamburger, Y., McKenna, K.Y., The contact hypothesis reconsidered: Interacting via the Internet. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11:3 (2006), 825–843, 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00037.x.
7. Aragon, S.R., Creating social presence in online environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education 2003:100 (2003), 57–68, 10.1002/ace.119.
8. Bente, G., Rüggenberg, S., Krämer, N.C., Eschenburg, F., Avatar-mediated Networking: Increasing social presence and interpersonal trust in net-based collaborations. Human Communication Research 34:2 (2008), 287–318, 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00322.x.
9. Biocca, F., The Cyborg's Dilemma: Progressive embodiment in virtual environments. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2), 1997, 10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00070.x.
10. Biocca, F., Nowak, K., Plugging your body into the telecommunication system: Mediated embodiment, media interfaces, and social virtual environments. Communication Technology and Society, 2001, 407–447.
11. Blau, I., Barak, A., How do personality, synchronous media, and discussion topic affect participation?. Educational Technology & Society 15:2 (2012), 12–24.
12. Borelli, J.L., Sbarra, D.A., Mehl, M., David, D.H., Experiential connectedness in children's attachment interviews: An examination of natural word use. Personal Relationships 18:3 (2011), 341–351, 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01294.x.
13. Brown, R., Hewstone, M., An integrative theory of intergroup contact. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 37 (2005), 255–343, 10.1016/S0065-2601(05)37005-5.
14. Cameron, L., Rutland, A., Brown, R., Promoting children's positive intergroup attitudes towards stigmatized groups: Extended contact and multiple classification skills training. International Journal of Behavioral Development 31:5 (2007), 454–466, 10.1177/0165025407081474.
15. Cameron, L., Rutland, A., Brown, R., Douch, R., Changing children's intergroup attitudes toward refugees: Testing different models of extended contact. Child Development 77:5 (2006), 1208–1219, 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00929.x.
16. Christopherson, K.M., The positive and negative implications of anonymity in Internet social interactions:“On the Internet, Nobody Knows You're a Dog”. Computers in Human Behavior 23:6 (2007), 3038–3056, 10.1016/j.chb.2006.09.001.
17. Collins, M., The ideology of anonymity and pseudonymity. 2013 The Huffington Post. Accessible at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/malcolm-collins/online-anonymity_b_3695851.html.
18. Crisp, R.J., Husnu, S., Attributional processes underlying imagined contact effects. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 14:2 (2011), 275–287, 10.1177/1368430210390721.
19. Crisp, R.J., Turner, R.N., Can imagined interactions produce positive perceptions?: Reducing prejudice through simulated social contact. American Psychologist 64:4 (2009), 231–240, 10.1037/a0014718.
20. Cuhadar, E., Kampf, R., Learning about conflict and negotiations through computer simulations: The case of PeaceMaker. International Studies Perspectives 15:4 (2014), 509–524, 10.1111/insp.12076.
21. Döhring, N., Sozialpsychologie des Internets (Social Psychology of the Internet). 2003, Hogrefe Verlag, Göttingen, Germany.
22. Douglas, K.M., McGarty, C., Identifiability and self-presentation: Computer-mediated communication and intergroup interaction. British Journal of Social Psychology 40:3 (2001), 399–416, 10.1348/014466601164894.
23. Dovidio, J.F., Gaertner, S.L., Kawakami, K., Intergroup contact: The past, present, and the future. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 6:1 (2003), 5–21, 10.1177/1368430203006001009.
24. Dubrovsky, V.J., Kiesler, S., Sethna, B.N., The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups. Human-Computer Interaction 6:2 (1991), 119–146.
25. Ensari, N., Miller, N., The out-group must not be so bad after all: The effects of disclosure, typicality, and salience on intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83:2 (2002), 313–329, 10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.313.
26. ∗ power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods 39:2 (2007), 175–191, 10.3758/BF03193146.
27. Field, A., Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. 2013, Sage Publications Inc, London, UK.
28. Gunawardena, C.N., Zittle, F.J., Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education 11:3 (1997), 8–26, 10.1080/08923649709526970.
29. Hamberger, J., Hewstone, M., Inter-ethnic contact as a predictor of blatant and subtle prejudice: Tests of a model in four West European nations1. British Journal of Social Psychology 36:2 (1997), 173–190, 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1997.tb01126.x.
30. Harwood, J., The contact space: A novel framework for intergroup contact research. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 29:2 (2010), 147–177, 10.1177/0261927X09359520.
31. Harwood, J., Hewstone, M., Paolini, S., Voci, A., Grandparent-grandchild contact and attitudes toward older adults: Moderator and mediator effects. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31:3 (2005), 393–406, 10.1177/0146167204271577.
32. Hayes, A.F., Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs 76:4 (2009), 408–420, 10.1080/03637750903310360.
33. Hayes, A.F., PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. [White paper]. Accessible at:, 2012 http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.
34. Herring, S., Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(4), 1999, 10.1111/j.1083-6101.1999.tb00106.x.
35. Hewstone, M., Brown, R., (eds.) Social Psychology and Society. Contact and Conflict in Intergroup Encounters, 1986, Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, MA.
36. Hewstone, M., Judd, C.M., Sharp, M., Do observer ratings validate self-reports of intergroup contact?: A round-robin analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47:3 (2011), 599–609, 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.014.
37. Hostetter, C., Busch, M., Measuring up online: The relationship between social presence and student learning satisfaction. Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 6:2 (2006), 1–12.
38. Hoter, E., Shonfeld, M., Ganayim, A., Information and communication technology (ICT) in the service of multiculturalism. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(2), 2009 Accessible at: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/601/1207.
39. Houlette, M.A., Gaertner, S.L., Johnson, K.M., Banker, B.S., Riek, B.M., Dovidio, J.F., Developing a more inclusive social identity: An elementary school intervention. Journal of Social Issues 60:1 (2004), 35–55, 10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00098.x.
40. Husnu, S., Crisp, R.J., Elaboration enhances the imagined contact effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46:6 (2010), 943–950, 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.014.
41. Internetlivestats, Internet live statistics. Accessible at. 2017 http://www.internetlivestats.com.
42. Judd, C.M., Park, B., Out-group homogeneity: Judgments of variability at the individual and group levels. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54:5 (1988), 778–788, 10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.778.
43. Kampf, R., Cuhadar, E., Do computer games enhance learning about conflicts? A cross-national inquiry into proximate and distant scenarios in Global Conflicts. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014 (in press).
44. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P.A., Jochems, W., Van Buuren, H., Determining sociability, social space, and social presence in (a) synchronous collaborative groups. CyberPsychology & Behavior 7:2 (2004), 155–172, 10.1089/109493104323024429.
45. Krizan, Z., Baron, R.S., Group polarization and choice-dilemmas: How important is self-categorization?. European Journal of Social Psychology 37:1 (2007), 191–201, 10.1002/ejsp.345.
46. La Libre, Le baptême étudiant passe devant la justice (Trans.) The baptism is brought before court, 2013 Accessible at: http://www.lalibre.be/actu/belgique/le-bapteme-etudiant-passe-devant-la-justice-53d7270935702004f7d9d80b.
47. Lakens, D., Equivalence tests: A practical primer for t-tests, correlations, and meta-analyses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2017, 10.1177/1948550617697177.
48. Lemmer, G., Wagner, U., Can we really reduce ethnic prejudice outside the lab? A meta-analysis of direct and indirect contact interventions. European Journal of Social Psychology 45:2 (2015), 152–168, 10.1002/ejsp.2079.
49. Lowry, P.B., Romano, N.C., Jenkins, J.L., Guthrie, R.W., The CMC interactivity model: How interactivity enhances communication quality and process satisfaction in lean-media groups. Journal of Management Information Systems 26:1 (2009), 155–196.
50. McFarland, S., Authoritarianism, social dominance, and other roots of generalized prejudice. Political Psychology 31:3 (2010), 453–477, 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00765.x.
51. McKenna, K.Y.A., Influences on the nature and functioning of online groups. Barak, A., (eds.) Psychological aspects of cyberspace: Theory, research, applications, 2008, Cambridge University Press, New York, USA, 228–242.
52. McKenna, K.Y.A., Samuel-Azran, T., Sutton-Balaban, N., Virtual meetings in the Middle East: Implementing the contact hypothesis on the Internet. Israel Journal of Conflict Resolution 1:1 (2009), 63–87.
53. Miller, N., Personalization and the promise of contact theory. Journal of Social Issues 58:2 (2002), 387–410, 10.1111/1540-4560.00267.
54. Miller, N., Brewer, M.B., Edwards, K., Cooperative interaction in desegregated settings: A laboratory analogue. Journal of Social Issues 41:3 (1985), 63–79, 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1985.tb01129.x.
55. Newberry, B., Media richness, social presence and technology supported communication activities in education. 2001 Available at: http://learngen.org/Resources/lgend101_norm1/200/210/211_3.html.
56. Paolini, S., Hewstone, M., Cairns, E., Voci, A., Effects of direct and indirect cross-group friendships on judgments of Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland: The mediating role of an anxiety-reduction mechanism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30:6 (2004), 770–786, 10.1177/0146167203262848.
57. Park, E.K., Sundar, S.S., Can synchronicity and visual modality enhance social presence in mobile messaging?. Computers in Human Behavior 45 (2015), 121–128, 10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.001.
58. Pennebaker, J.W., King, L.A., Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77:6 (1999), 1296–1312, 10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1296.
59. Pennebaker, J.W., Mehl, M.R., Niederhoffer, K.G., Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology 54:1 (2003), 547–577, 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041.
60. Pettigrew, T.F., Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology 49:1 (1998), 65–85, 10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65.
61. Pettigrew, T.F., Tropp, L.R., A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90:5 (2006), 751–783, 10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751.
62. Pettigrew, T.F., Tropp, L.R., How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 38:6 (2008), 922–934, 10.1002/ejsp.504.
63. Postmes, T., The psychological dimensions of collective action, online. Joinson, A., McKenna, K., Postmes, T., Reips, U.-D., (eds.) Oxford handbook of internet psychology, 2007, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 165–186.
64. Postmes, T., Baym, N., Intergroup dimensions of the internet. Intergroup Communication: Multiple Perspectives 2 (2005), 213–240.
65. Postmes, T., Spears, R., Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 123:3 (1998), 238–259, 10.1037/0033-2909.123.3.238.
66. Postmes, T., Spears, R., Behavior online: Does anonymous computer communication reduce gender inequality?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28:8 (2002), 1073–1083, 10.1177/01461672022811006.
67. Postmes, T., Spears, R., Lea, M., Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE-effects of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research 25:6 (1998), 689–715, 10.1177/009365098025006006.
68. Postmes, T., Spears, R., Lea, M., Intergroup differentiation in computer-mediated communication: Effects of depersonalization. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 6:1 (2002), 3–16, 10.1037/1089-2699.6.1.3.
69. Reicher, S.D., Spears, R., Postmes, T., A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European Review of Social Psychology 6:1 (1995), 161–198, 10.1080/14792779443000049.
70. Richardson, J., Swan, K., Examing social presence in online courses in relation to students' perceived learning and satisfaction. 2003 Available at: https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/18713.
71. Roberts, T.L., Lowry, P.B., Sweeney, P.D., An evaluation of the impact of social presence through group size and the use of collaborative software on group member “voice” in face-to-face and computer-mediated task groups. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 49:1 (2006), 28–43.
72. Rubin, M., Hewstone, M., Voci, A., Stretching the boundaries: Strategic perceptions of intragroup variability. European Journal of Social Psychology 31:4 (2001), 413–429, 10.1002/ejsp.51.
73. Rucker, D.D., Preacher, K.J., Tormala, Z.L., Petty, R.E., Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 5:6 (2011), 359–371, 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00355.x.
74. Rüggenberg, S., So nah und doch so fern. Soziale Präsenz und Vertrauen in der computervermittelten Kommunikation (So close and yet so far away: Social presences and trust in computer-mediated communication)., 2007 Doctoral dissertation).
75. Sassenberg, K., Postmes, T., Cognitive and strategic processes in small groups: effects of anonymity of the self and anonymity of the group on social influence. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 41:3 (2002), 463–480, 10.1348/014466602760344313.
76. Schwab, A.K., Greitemeyer, T., The world's biggest salad bowl: Facebook connecting cultures. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 45:4 (2015), 243–252, 10.1111/jasp.12291.
77. Spears, R., Postmes, T., Group identity, social influence and collective action online: Extensions and applications of the SIDE model. Sundar, S.S., (eds.) The handbook of psychology of communication technology, 2015, Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
78. Spears, R., Postmes, T., Lea, M., Wolbert, A., When are net effects gross products? Communication. Journal of Social Issues 58:1 (2002), 91–107, 10.1111/1540-4560.00250.
79. Stephan, W.G., Stephan, C.W., Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues 41:3 (1985), 157–175, 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1985.tb01134.x.
80. Stock, O., Zancanaro, M., Rocchi, C., Tomasini, D., Koren, C., Eisikovits, Z., et al. The design of a collaborative interface for narration to support reconciliation in a conflict. AI & Society 24 (2009), 51–59.
81. Tam, T., Hewstone, M., Harwood, J., Voci, A., Kenworthy, J., Intergroup contact and grandparent–grandchild communication: The effects of self-disclosure on implicit and explicit biases against older people. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 9:3 (2006), 413–429, 10.1177/1368430206064642.
82. Tanis, M., Postmes, T., Two faces of anonymity: Paradoxical effects of cues to identity in CMC. Computers in Human Behavior 23:2 (2007), 955–970, 10.1016/j.chb.2005.08.004.
83. Tropp, L.R., Pettigrew, T.F., Relationships between intergroup contact and prejudice among minority and majority status groups. Psychological Science 16:12 (2005), 951–957, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01643.x.
84. Tu, C.H., McIsaac, M., The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. The American Journal of Distance Education 16:3 (2002), 131–150, 10.1207/S15389286AJDE1603_2.
85. Turner, R.N., Crisp, R.J., Imagining intergroup contact reduces implicit prejudice. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 49:1 (2010), 129–142, 10.1348/014466609X419901.
86. Turner, R.N., Crisp, R.J., Lambert, E., Imagining intergroup contact can improve intergroup attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 10:4 (2007), 427–441, 10.1177/1368430207081533.
87. Turner, R.N., Hewstone, M., Voci, A., Reducing explicit and implicit outgroup prejudice via direct and extended contact: The mediating role of self-disclosure and intergroup anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93:3 (2007), 369–388, 10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.369.
88. Tynes, B.M., Giang, M.T., Thompson, G.N., Ethnic identity, intergroup contact, and outgroup orientation among diverse groups of adolescents on the Internet. CyberPsychology & Behavior 11:4 (2008), 459–465, 10.1089/cpb.2007.0085.
89. Vezzali, L., Capozza, D., Stathi, S., Giovannini, D., Increasing outgroup trust, reducing infrahumanization, and enhancing future contact intentions via imagined intergroup contact. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48:1 (2012), 437–440, 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.09.008.
90. Voci, A., Hewstone, M., Intergroup contact and prejudice toward immigrants in Italy: The mediational role of anxiety and the moderational role of group salience. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 6:1 (2003), 37–54, 10.1177/1368430203006001011.
91. Vonofakou, C., Hewstone, M., Voci, A., Contact with out-group friends as a predictor of meta-attitudinal strength and accessibility of attitudes toward gay men. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92:5 (2007), 804–820, 10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.804.
92. Walther, J.B., Anderson, J.F., Park, D.W., Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction a meta-analysis of social and antisocial communication. Communication Research 21:4 (1994), 460–487, 10.1177/009365094021004002.
93. Walther, J.B., Hoter, E., Ganayem, A., Shonfeld, M., Computer-mediated communication and the reduction of prejudice: A controlled longitudinal field experiment among Jews and Arabs in Israel. Computers in Human Behavior 52 (2015), 550–558, 10.1016/j.chb.2014.08.004.
94. White, F.A., Abu-Rayya, H.M., A dual identity-electronic contact (DIEC) experiment promoting short-and long-term intergroup harmony. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48:3 (2012), 597–608, 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.01.007.
95. White, F.A., Abu-Rayya, H.M., Bliuc, A.M., Faulkner, N., Emotion expression and intergroup bias reduction between Muslims and Christians: Long-term Internet contact. Computers in Human Behavior 53 (2015), 435–442, 10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.074.
96. White, F.A., Abu-Rayya, H.M., Weitzel, C., Achieving twelve-months of intergroup bias reduction: The dual identity-electronic contact (DIEC) experiment. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 38 (2014), 158–163, 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.08.002.
97. White, F.A., Harvey, L.J., Abu-Rayya, H.M., Improving intergroup relations in the internet age: A critical review. Review of General Psychology 19:2 (2015), 129–139, 10.1037/gpr0000036.
98. Wright, S.C., Aron, A., McLaughlin-Volpe, T., Ropp, S.A., The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73:1 (1997), 73–90, 10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.73.
99. Wright, S.C., Aron, A., Tropp, L.R., Including others (and groups) in the self. Forgers, J.P., Wiliams, K.D., (eds.) The social self: Cognitive, interpersonal, and intergroup perspectives, 2002, Psychology Press, New York, USA, 343–364.
100. Wright, S.C., Van Der Zande, C.C., Bicultural friends: When cross-group friendships cause improved intergroup attitudes. Annual meeting of the society for experimental social psychology, St. Louis, MO, 1999, October.
101. Yablon, Y., Feeling close from a distance: Peace encounters via Internet technology. New Directions for Youth Development 116 (2007), 99–107.
102. Yablon, Y.B., Katz, Y.J., Internet-based group relations: A high school peace education project in Israel. Educational Media International 38 (2001), 175–182.
103. Zimbardo, P.G., The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1969, University of Nebraska Press.