Achieving twelve-months of intergroup bias reduction: The dual identity-electronic contact (DIEC) experiment

International Journal of Intercultural Relations

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 158-163

  White, Fiona A ^a   Abu Rayya, Hisham M ^b   Weitzel, Chela ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Electronic (E) contact; Intergroup bias reduction; Intergroup relations; Long term contact

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894906861     PISSN: 01471767     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Aboud F., Tredoux E., Tropp C.L., Spears Brown R., Niens C., Noor U.N.M. Interventions to reduce prejudice and enhance inclusion and respect for ethnic differences in early childhood: A systematic review. Developmental Review 2012, 32:307-336.
2. Abrams D., Vasiljevic M., Wardrop H.M. Prejudice reduction, collective action, and then what?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2012, 35:425-426.
3. Allport G.W. The nature of prejudice 1954, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.
4. Binder J., Zagefka H., Brown R., Funke F., Kessler T., Mummendey A., et al. Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three European countries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2009, 96:843-856.
5. Brown R.J., Condor S., Mathews A., Wade G., Williams J.A. Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology 1986, 59:273-286.
6. Brown R., Hewstone M. An integrative theory of intergroup contact. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 2005, 37:255-343.
7. Clement S., van Nieuwenhuizen A., Kassam A., Flach C., Lazarus A., de Castro M., et al. Filmed v. live social contact interventions to reduce stigma: Randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry 2012, 201:57-64.
8. Devine P.G., Forscher P.S., Austin A.J., Cox W.T.L. Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice habit-breaking intervention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2012, 48:1267-1278.
9. Dovidio J.F., Gaertner S.L., Niemann Y.F., Snider K. Racial, ethnic, and cultural differences in responding to distinctiveness and discrimination on campus: Stigma and common group identity. Journal of Social Issues 2001, 57:167-188.
10. Dovidio J.F., Gaertner S.L., Saguy T. Commonality and the complexity of "we": Social attitudes and social change. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2009, 13:3-20.
11. González R., Brown R. Dual identities in intergroup contact: Group status and size moderate the generalization of positive attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2006, 42:753-767.
12. Pettigrew T.F. Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology 1998, 49:65-85.
13. Pettigrew T.F., Tropp L.R. How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology 2008, 38(6):922-934.
14. Sobel M.E. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Social methodology 1982, 290-312. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. S. Leinhardt (Ed.).
15. Stephan W.G., Stephan C.W. Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues 1985, 41:157-175.
16. Turner R.N., Hewstone M., Voci A. Reducing explicit and implicit outgroup prejudice via direct and extended contact: The mediating role of self-disclosure and intergroup anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2007, 93:369-388.
17. White F.A., Abu-Rayya H. A dual identity-electronic contact (DIEC) experiment promoting short- and long-term intergroup harmony. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2012, 48:597-608.