Influences on the nature and functioning of online groups

Psychological Aspects of Cyberspace: Theory, Research, Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 228-242

  McKenna, Katelyn Y A ^a  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923510975     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511813740.011     Document Type: Chapter

References (50)

1. Abreu, S. (2000). How to manage telecommuters. Retrieved April 27, 2006, from http:// cnnstudentnews.cnn.com/2000/TECH/computing/06/19/telecommuting.idg.
2. Atkinson, J. W., & Birch, D. (1970). The dynamics of action. New York: Wiley.
3. Barak, A., & Dolev-Cohen, M. (2006). Does activity level in online support groups for distressed adolescents determine emotional relief? Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 6, 186-190.
4. Bargh, J. A. (1989). Conditional automaticity:Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. In J. S.Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 3-51). New York: Guilford Press.
5. Barrera, M., Jr., Glasgow, R. E., McKay, H. G., Boles, S. M., & Feil, E. G. (2002). Do Internet-based support interventions change perceptions of social support?An experimental trial of approaches for supporting diabetes self-management. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 637-654.
6. Barreto, M.,&Ellemers, N. (2000).You can't always do what youwant: Social identity and self-presentational determinants of the choice to work for a low-status group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 891-906.
7. Blank, T. O., & Adams-Blodnieks, M. (2007). The who and the what of usage of two cancer online communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1249-1257.
8. Brandon, D. P., & Hollingshead, A. B. (2007). Categorizing on-line groups. In A. Joinson, K. Y. A. McKenna, U. Reips, & T. Postmes (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Internet psychology (pp. 105-120). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Brewer, M. B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In T. K. Srull & R. S. Wyer, Jr. (Eds.), A dual process model of impression formation. Advances in social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 1-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Cascio, W. E. (2000). Managing virtualworkplace. Academy ofManagement Executive 14(3), 81-90.
11. Cervin, V. (1956). Individual behavior in social situations: Its relation to anxiety, neuroticism, and group solidarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 161-168.
12. Cummings, J., Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (2002). Beyond hearing: Where real world and Online support meet. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 78-88.
13. Davison, K. P., Pennebaker, J. W., & Dickerson, S. S. (2000). Who talks? The social psychology of illness support groups. American Psychologist, 55, 205-217.
14. Deaux, K. (1996). Social identification. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 777-798). New York: Guilford Press.
15. Dennis, A. R. (1996). Information exchange and use in group decision making: You can lead a group to information but you can't make it think. MIS Quarterly, 20, 433-455.
16. Dennis, A. R., & Kinney, S. T. (1998). Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality. Information Systems Research, 9, 256-274.
17. Douglas, K. M.,&McGarty, C. (2001). Identifiability and self-presentation: Computermediated communication and intergroup interaction. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 399-416.
18. Frable, D. E. S. (1993). Being and feeling unique: statistical deviance and psychological marginality. Journal of Personality, 61, 85-110.
19. Galegher, J.,&Kraut, R. E. (1994). Computer-mediated communication for intellectual teamwork: An experiment in group writing. Information Systems Research, 5, 110-138.
20. Galegher, J., Sproull, L., & Kiesler, K. (1998). Legitimacy, authority, and community in electronic support groups. Written Communication, 15, 493-530.
21. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1986). Striving for specific identities: The social reality of selfsymbolizing. In R. Baumeister (Ed.), Public self and private self (pp. 143-159). New York: Springer.
22. Hogg, M. A. (1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness. London: Harvester, Wheatsheaf.
23. Hogg, M. A.,&Reid, R. A. (2001). Social identity, leadership, and power. InA.Y. Lee-Chai&J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The use and abuse of power: Multiple perspectives on the causes of corruption (pp. 159-180). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
24. Joinson, A. N., & Paine, C. B. (2007). Self-disclosure, privacy, and the Internet. In A. N. Joinson, K. Y. A. McKenna, U. Reips, & T. Postmes (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Internet psychology (pp. 237-252). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Jones, E. E., Farina, A., Hastorf, A. H., Markus, H., Miller, D. T.,&Scott, R. A. (1984). Social stigma: The psychology of marked relationships. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
26. Kogan, N., & Wallach, M. A. (1967). Group risk taking as a function of members' anxiety and defensiveness. Journal of Personality, 35, 50-63.
27. Lambert, A. J., Payne, B. K., Shaffer, L. M., Jacoby, L. L., Chasteen, A., & Khan, S. (2003). Stereotypes as dominant responses: On the "social facilitation" of prejudice in anticipated public contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 277-295.
28. Leary, M. R. (1983). Social anxiousness: The construct and its measurement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 47, 66-75.
29. Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. McClendon, M. J. (1974). Interracial contact and the reduction of prejudice. Sociological Focus, 7(4), 47-65.
31. McKenna, K. Y. A., & Bargh, J. A. (1998). Coming out in the age of the Internet: Identity demarginalization through virtual group participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 681-694.
32. McKenna, K. Y. A., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). Causes and consequences of social interaction on the Internet: A conceptual framework. Media Psychology, 1, 249-269.
33. McKenna, K. Y. A., & Bargh, J. A. (2000). Plan 9 from cyberspace: The implication of the Internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 57-75.
34. McKenna, K. Y. A., & Green, A. S. (2002). Virtual group dynamics. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 6, 116-127.
35. McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, A. S., & Gleason, M. E. J. (2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: What's the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58, 9-31.
36. McKenna, K. Y., Green, A. S., & Smith, P. K. (2001). Demarginalizing the sexual self. Journal of Sex Research, 38, 302-311.
37. McKenna, K. Y. A., & Seidman, G. (2005). You, me, and we: Interpersonal processes in online groups. In Y. A. Hamburger (Ed.), The social net: The social psychology of the Internet (pp. 191-217). New York: Oxford University Press.
38. McKenna, K. Y. A., Seidman, G., Buffardi, A. & Green, A. S. (2007). Ameliorating social anxiety through online interaction. Manuscript under review. Ben-Gurion University.
39. Pettigrew, T. F. (1971). Racially separate or together? New York: McGraw-Hill.
40. Postmes, T., Spears, R., Sakhel, K., & DeGroot, D. (2001). Social influence in computer-mediated communication: The effect of anonymity on group behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1243-1254.
41. Prentice, D. A., Miller, D. T., & Lightdale, J. R. (1994). Asymmetrics in attachments to groups and their members: Distinguishing between common-identity and common-bond groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 484-493.
42. Sassenberg, K. (2002). Common bond and common identity groups on the Internet: Attachment and normative behavior in on-topic and off-topic chats. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 27-37.
43. Sassenberg, K., Boos, M.,&Klapproth, F. (2001).Wissen und problemlösekompetenz: Der einfluss von expertise auf den informationsaustausch in computervermittelter kommunikation [Knowledge and problem solving competence: The influence of expertise on information exchange in computer-mediated communication]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 32, 45-56.
44. Spears, R., Lea, M., & Lee, S. (1990). De-individuation and group polarization in computer-mediated communication. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 121-134.
45. Spears, R., Postmes, T., Lea, M., & Wolbert, A. (2002). When are net effects gross products? The power of influence and the influence of power in computermediated communication. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 91-107.
46. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1985). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 11, 1492-1512.
47. Thompson, L., & Nadler, J. (2002). Negotiating via information technology: Theory and application. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 109-124.
48. Wright, K. (2000). Computer-mediated social support, older adults, and coping. Journal of Communication, 50, 100-18.
49. Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269-274.
50. Zander, A., &Wulf, D. (1966). Members' test anxiety and competence: Determinants of a group's aspirations. Journal of Personality, 34, 55-70.