Towards indicators outlining prospects to reduce car use with an application to European cities

Ecological Indicators

Volumn 84, Issue , 2018, Pages 172-182

  Bojković, Nataša ^a   Petrović, Marijana ^a   Parezanović, Tanja ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE   (Serbia)

Author keywords

Car use; European cities; Indicators; Sustainable urban mobility

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILES; INDICATORS (INSTRUMENTS);

CAR USE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS; EUROPEAN CITIES; GRAPHICAL TECHNIQUE; INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITIES; INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON; PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS; URBAN MOBILITY;

DATA VISUALIZATION;

AUTOMOBILE; CAR USE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DECISION MAKING; MOBILITY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SUSTAINABILITY; URBAN AREA; VISUALIZATION; WALKING;

EUROPE;

EID: 85028697117     PISSN: 1470160X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.08.061     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Adler, N., Raveh, A., Presenting DEA graphically. Omega 36:5 (2008), 715–729.
2. Agentschap, E.M., A Closer Look at Urban Transport: TERM 2013: Transport Indicators Tracking Progress Towards Environmental Targets in Europe. 2013, Publications Office of the European Union.
3. Albalate, D., Bel, G., Factors explaining urban transport systems in large European cities: a cross-sectional approach. IREA–Working Papers, 2009 IR09/005, 2009.
4. Alonso, A., Monzón, A., Cascajo, R., Comparative analysis of passenger transport sustainability in European cities. Ecol. Indic. 48 (2015), 578–592.
5. Arribas-Bel, D., Nijkamp, P., Scholten, H., Multidimensional urban sprawl in Europe: a self-organizing map approach Computers. Environ. Urban Syst. 35:4 (2011), 263–275, 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.10.002.
6. Atilgan, Y.K., Atilgan, E.L., RobCoP: a matlab package for robust CoPlot analysis. Open J. Stat., 7(01), 2017, 23.
7. Atilgan, Y.K., Robust coplot analysis. Commun. Stat.-Simul. Comput. 45:5 (2016), 1763–1775.
8. Berri, A., Lyk-Jensen, S.V., Mulalic, I., Zachariadis, T., Household transport consumption inequalities and redistributive effects of taxes: a repeated cross-sectional evaluation for France, Denmark and Cyprus. Transp. Policy 36 (2014), 206–216, 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.08.007.
9. Bravata, D.M., Shojania, K.G., Olkin, I., Raveh, A., CoPlot: a tool for visualizing multivariate data in medicine. Stat. Med. 27:12 (2008), 2234–2247.
10. Cangur, S., Yaman, C., Ercan, I., Yaman, M., Tok, S., The relationship of anthropometric measurements with psychological criteria in female athletes. Psychol. Health Med., 2016, 1–7.
11. Chataway, E.S., Kaplan, S., Nielsen, T.A.S., Prato, C.G., Safety perceptions and reported behavior related to cycling in mixed traffic: a comparison between Brisbane and Copenhagen. Transp. Res. Part F: Traff. Psychol. Behav. 23 (2014), 32–43, 10.1016/j.trf.2013.12.021.
12. Chee, W.L., Fernandez, J.L., Factors that influence the choice of mode of transport in Penang: a preliminary analysis. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 91 (2013), 120–127, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.409.
13. Cox, W., Utt, J., The costs of sprawl reconsidered: what the data really show. Backgrounder 1770 (2004), 1–18.
14. Cox, W., Urban travel and urban population density. Journeys, 2012, 19–28 Retrieved from http://www.lta.gov.sg/ltaacademy/doc/JOURNEYS_Nov%202012.pdf.
15. Danwen, B.A.O., Wei, D.E.N.G., Shihui, G.U., Impact of parking rates on resident travel behavior. J. Transp. Syst. Eng. Inf. Technol. 10:3 (2010), 80–85, 10.1016/s1570-6672(09)60049-0.
16. Dargay, J., Hanly, M., Volatility of car ownership, commuting mode and time in the UK. Transp. Rese. Part A: Policy Pract. 41:10 (2007), 934–948, 10.1016/j.tra.2007.05.003.
17. Deaton, A., Zaidi, S., Income versus consumption. Guidelines for Constructing Consumption Aggregates for Welfare Analysis, 2002, LSMS Working Paper Number 135. World Bank Publications, Washington, 11–13.
18. Debnath, A.K., Chin, H.C., Haque, M.M., Yuen, B., A methodological framework for benchmarking smart transport cities. Cities 37 (2014), 47–56.
19. Demirhan, H., Atilgan, Y.K., New horizontal global solar radiation estimation models for Turkey based on robust coplot supported genetic programming technique. Energy Convers. Manage. 106 (2015), 1013–1023.
20. Etminani-Ghasrodashti, R., Ardeshiri, M., Modeling travel behavior by the structural relationships between lifestyle, built environment and non-working trips. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 78 (2015), 506–518, 10.1016/j.tra.2015.06.016.
21. European Commission, European Commission Transport White Paper ? Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area –towards a Competitive and Resource Efficient Transport System. 2011, European Commission, Brussels, 2011 COM(2011)144.
22. European Commission, Commission Staff Working Document Accompanying the White Paper –Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area: Towards a Competitive and Resource Efficient Transport System. 2011, SEC(2011) 391 final.
23. European Commission, Urban Mobility Package: Together Towards Competitive and Resource Efficient Urban Mobility. 2013, European Commission, Brussels, 2013 COM(2013)913. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/transport/sites/transport/files/themes/urban/doc/ump/swd%282013%29524-communication.pdf.
24. Ewing, R.H., Hamidi, S., Measuring Sprawl 2014. Report Prepared for Smart Growth America., 2014 Retrieved from https://smartgrowthamerica.org/resources/measuring-sprawl-2014/.
25. Fina, S., Siedentop, S., Urban Sprawl in Europe?identifying the Challenge. 2008, REALCORP, Vienna Retrieved from http://programm.corp.at/cdrom2008/papers2008/CORP2008_34.pdf.
26. Firnkorn, M., Müller, M., Selling mobility instead of cars: new business strategies of automakers and the impact on private vehicle holding. Bus. Strat. Environ. 21:4 (2012), 264–280, 10.1002/bse.738.
27. Gillis, D., Semanjski, I., Lauwers, D., How to monitor sustainable mobility in cities? Literature review in the frame of creating a set of sustainable mobility indicators. Sustainability, 8(1), 2015, 29, 10.3390/su8010029.
28. Giuliano, G., Dargay, J., Car ownership, travel and land use: a comparison of the US and Great Britain. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 40:2 (2006), 106–124, 10.1016/j.tra.2005.03.002.
29. Gordon, P., Richardson, H.W., Are compact cities a desirable planning goal?. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 63:1 (1997), 95–106.
30. Haghshenas, H., Vaziri, M., Urban sustainable transportation indicators for global comparison. Ecol. Indic. 15:1 (2012), 115–121.
31. Hammer, A., Vieth, M., Maier, F., A Critical Analysis of the Co-plot Method (Working Paper No. 32). 2005, School of Business Administration, International University in Germany, Bruchsal.
32. Hawk, W., Consumer Expenditure Program. Expenditures of urban and rural households in 2011. Beyond Numbers: Ppending, 2(5), 2013 (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, February 2013). Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/opub/btn/volume-2/expenditures-of-urban-and-rural-households-in-2011.htm.
33. Hu, X., Wang, J., Wang, L., Understanding the travel behavior of elderly people in the developing country: a case study of Changchun, China. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 96 (2013), 873–880, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.099.
34. Joly, I., Masson, S., Petiot, R., The determinants of urban public transport: an international comparison and econometric analysis. AET. European Transport Conference 2004?ETC 2004, 4–6 October 2004, Strasbourg, AET, 2004 (pp. 25-p).
35. Kasanko, M., Barredo, J.I., Lavalle, C., McCormick, N., Demicheli, L., Sagris, V., Brezger, A., Are European cities becoming dispersed? A comparative analysis of 15 European urban areas. Landsc. Urban Plan. 77:1 (2006), 111–130, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.003.
36. Klinger, T., Kenworthy, J.R., Dimensions of urban mobility cultures-a comparison of German cities. J. Transp. Geogr. 31 (2013), 18–29, 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.05.002.
37. Li, M., Song, G., Cheng, Y., Yu, L., Identification of prior factors influencing the mode choice of short distance travel. Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc., 2015, 2015, 10.1155/2015/795176.
38. Lipshitz, G., Raveh, A., Application of the co-plot method in the study of socio-economic differences between cities: a basis for a differential development policy. Urban Stud. 31:1 (1994), 123–135, 10.1080/00420989420080071.
39. Little, A.D., Little, Arthur D., (eds.) Future of Urban Mobility 2.0: Imperatives to Shape Extended Mobility Ecosystems of Tomorrow, 2014, UITP Tech.Report Retrieved from http://www.adlittle.com/downloads/tx_adlreports/Arthur_D._Little___UITP_Future_of_Urban_Mobility_2_0. pdf.
40. Mar-Molinero, C., Mingers, J., An evaluation of the limitations of, and alternatives to, the Co-Plot methodology. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 58:7 (2007), 874–886.
41. McCloskey, D., Birrell, B., Yip, R., Making public transport work in Melbourne. People Place 17:3 (2009), 49–59.
42. Miettinen, K., Survey of methods to visualize alternatives in multiple criteria decision making problems. OR Spectrum 36:1 (2014), 3–37.
43. Mindali, O., Raveh, A., Salomon, I., Urban density and energy consumption: a new look at old statistics. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 38:2 (2004), 143–162, 10.1016/j.tra.2003.10.004.
44. Miranda, H.F., Rodrigues da Silva, A.N., Benchmarking sustainable urban mobility: the case of Curitiba, Brazil. Transp. Policy 21 (2012), 141–151, 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.03.009.
45. Moeinaddini, M., Asadi-Shekari, Z., Shah, M.Z., An urban mobility index for evaluating and reducing private motorized trips. Measurement 63 (2015), 30–40, 10.1016/j.measurement.2014.11.026.
46. Newbold, K.B., Scott, D.M., Spinney, J.E., Kanaroglou, P., Páez, A., Travel behavior within Canada's older population: a cohort analysis. J. Transp. Geogr. 13:4 (2005), 340–351, 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.07.007.
47. Nordfjærn, T., Şimşekoğlu, Ö., Lind, H.B., Jørgensen, S.H., Rundmo, T., Transport priorities, risk perception and worry associated with mode use and preferences among Norwegian commuters. Acc. Anal. Prevent. 72 (2014), 391–400, 10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.028.
48. Osório de Andrade Guerra, J.B.S., Ribeiro, J.M.P., Fernandez, F., Bailey, C., Barbosa, S.B., da Silva Neiva, S., The adoption of strategies for sustainable cities: a comparative study between Newcastle and Florianópolis focused on urban mobility. J. Clean. Prod. 113 (2016), 681–694, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.135.
49. Oueslati, W., Alvanides, S., Garrod, G., Determinants of urban sprawl in European cities. Urban Stud. 52:9 (2015), 1594–1614, 10.1177/0042098015577773.
50. Peiravian, F., Derrible, S., Ijaz, F., Development and application of the pedestrian environment index (PEI). J. Transp. Geogr. 39 (2014), 73–84, 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.06.020.
51. Pitombo, C.S., Salgueiro, A.R., da Costa, A.S.G., Isler, C.A., A two-step method for mode choice estimation with socioeconomic and spatial information. Spatial Stat. 11 (2015), 45–64, 10.1016/j.spasta.2014.12.002.
52. Pucher, J., Renne, J.L., Socioeconomics of urban travel: evidence from the 2001 NHTS. Transp. Q. 57:3 (2003), 49–77.
53. Rahman, M.M., Strawderman, L., Adams-Price, C., Turner, J.J., Transportation alternative preferences of the aging population. Travel Behav. Soc. 4 (2016), 22–28, 10.1016/j.tbs.2015.12.003.
54. Raveh, A., Co-plot: a graphic display method for geometrical representations of MCDM. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 125:3 (2000), 670–678, 10.1016/s0377-2217(99)00276-3.
55. Rodrigues da Silva, A.N., Costa, M.D.S., Ramos, R.A.R., Development and application of I_SUM- an index of sustainable urban mobility. Transportation Research Board 89th Annual Meeting (No. 10-0767), 2010.
56. Rodrigues da Silva, A.N., Nunes de Azevedo Filho, M.A., Macêdo, M.H., Sorratini, J.A., Ferreira da Silva, A., Lima, J.P., Pinheiro, A.M.G.S., A comparative evaluation of mobility conditions in selected cities of the five Brazilian regions. Transp. Policy 37 (2015), 147–156, 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.10.017.
57. Rogers, J.M., Gray, M.B., CE data: quintiles of income versus quintiles of outlays. Mon. Labor Rev. 117:12 (1994), 32–37.
58. Santos, G., Maoh, H., Potoglou, D., von Brunn, T., Factors influencing modal split of commuting journeys in medium-size European cities. J. Transp. Geogr. 30 (2013), 127–137, 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.04.005.
59. Schwanen, T., Urban form and commuting behaviour: a cross-European perspective. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 93:3 (2002), 336–343, 10.1111/1467-9663.00206.
60. Sharav, N., Shiftan, Y., Evaluation of past investment in urban public transportation. Theor. Econ. Lett. 7:03 (2017), 543–561, 10.4236/tel.2017.73040.
61. Shoval, N., Raveh, A., Categorization of tourist attractions and the modeling of tourist cities: based on the co-plot method of multivariate analysis. Tour. Manage. 25:6 (2004), 741–750, 10.1016/j.tourman.2003.09.005.
62. Slesnick, D.T., Consumption and Social Welfare: Living Standards and Their Distribution in the United States. 2001, Cambridge University Press.
63. Sonicki, Z., Cvitković, A., Edwards, K.L., Miletić-Medved, M., Čvorišćec, D., Babuš, V., Jelaković, B., Visual assessment of endemic nephropathy markers relationship. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 150 (2009), 836–840.
64. Stead, D., Relationships between land use, socioeconomic factors, and travel patterns in Britain. Environ. Plan. B: Plan. Des. 28:4 (2001), 499–528, 10.1068/b2677.
65. Szirmai, V., Urban sprawl in europe. Reg. Stat. 2 (2012), 129–148, 10.15196/RS02109.
66. Talby, D., Feitelson, D.G., Raveh, A., Comparing logs and models of parallel workloads using the Co-Plot method. Feitelson, D.G., Rudolph, L., (eds.) Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences 1659, 1999, 43–66 Heidelberg, Germany.
67. Talby, D., Feitelson, D.G., Raveh, A., A co-plot analysis of logs and models of parallel workloads. ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simul. (TOMACS) 17:3 (2007), 12–36, 10.1145/1243991.1243993.
68. Tovar, M.C., Kilbane-Dawe, I., Effects of 20mph Zones on Cycling and Walking Behaviours in London Stage 1-Literature Review. 2013, Par Hill Research Ltd, London.
69. Uhel, R., Urban Sprawl in Europe: The Ignored Challenge., 2006, EEA Report European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
70. Wegener, M., The future of mobility in cities: challenges for urban modelling. Transp. Policy 29 (2013), 275–282, 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.07.004.