Presenting DEA graphically

Omega

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 715-729

  Adler, Nicole ^a   Raveh, Adi ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

Co Plot; Data envelopment analysis; Efficiency; Multi dimensional scaling

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING;

CHINESE CITIES; CO-PLOT; DECISION MAKING UNIT; EXPLORATORY DATA ANALYSIS; INNER RINGS; MULTI-DIMENSIONAL SCALING; SIMULATION STUDIES; TWO DIMENSIONAL SPACES; VARIABLE RATIO;

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 38649083187     PISSN: 03050483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2006.02.006     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. A. Raveh., The Greek banking system: reanalysis of performance, European Journal of Operational Research 2000a;120: 525-34.
2. A. Raveh., Co-Plot: a graphic display method for geometrical representations of MCDM, European Journal of Operational Research 2000b;125: 670-8.
3. Lipshitz G., and Raveh A. Applications of the Co-Plot method in the study of socioeconomic differences among cities: a basis for a differential development policy. Urban Studies 31 (1994) 123-135
4. Weber Y., Shenkar O., and Raveh A. National versus corporate cultural fit in mergers and acquisitions: an exploratory study. Management Science 42 (1996) 1215-1227
5. Gilady R., Spector Y., and Raveh A. Multidimensional scaling: an analysis of computers 1980-2990. European Journal of Operational Research 95 (1996) 439-450
6. Adler N., Friedman L., and Sinuany-Stern Z. Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context. European Journal of Operational Research 140 (2002) 249-265
7. Desai A., and Walters L.C. Graphical presentations of data envelopment analysis: management implications from parallel axes representations. Decision Sciences 22 (1991) 335-353
8. Weber C.A., and Desai A. Determination of paths to vendor market efficiency using parallel coordinates representation: a negotiation tool for buyers. European Journal of Operational Research 90 (1996) 142-155
9. Belton V., and Vickers S.P. Demystifying DEA-A virtual interactive approach based on multiple criteria analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society 44 (1993) 883-896
10. Hackman S.T., Passy U., and Platzman L.K. Explicit representation of the two-dimensional section of a production possibility set. The Journal of Productivity Analysis 5 (1994) 161-170
11. Maital S., and Vaninsky A. Data envelopment analysis with a single DMU: a graphic projected-gradient approach. European Journal of Operational Research 115 (1999) 518-528
12. Albriktsen R., and Forsund F. A productive study of the Norwegian building industry. Journal of Productivity Analysis 2 (1990) 53-66
13. El-Mahgary S., and Lahdelma R. Data envelopment analysis: visualizing the results. European Journal of Operational Research 85 (1995) 700-710
14. Golany B., and Storbeck J.E. A data envelopment analysis of the operational efficiency of bank branches. Interfaces 29 (1999) 14-26
15. Talluri S., Whiteside M.M., and Seipel S.J. A nonparametric stochastic procedure for FMS evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research 124 (2000) 529-538
16. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., and Li S. Using data envelopment analysis to evaluate efficiency in the economic performance of Chinese cities. Socio-Economics and Planning Science 23 (1989) 325-344
17. Sueyoshi T. Measuring the industrial performance of Chinese cities by data envelopment analysis. Socio-Economics and Planning Science 26 (1992) 75-88
18. Ali A.I., and Seiford L.M. Computational accuracy and infinitesimals in data envelopment analysis. INFOR 31 (1993) 290-297
19. Zhu J. Data envelopment analysis versus principal component analysis: an illustrative study of economic performance of Chinese cities. European Journal of Operational Research 111 (1998) 50-61
20. Dyson R.G., Allen R., Camanho A.S., Podinovski V.V., Sarrico C.S., and Shale E.A. Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research 132 (2001) 245-259
21. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., and Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2 (1978) 429-444
22. Banker R.D., Charnes A., and Cooper W.W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 30 (1984) 1078-1092
23. Scheel H. Efficiency measurement system, 〈http://www.wiso.uni-dortmund.de/lsfg/or/scheel/ems〉, 2001.
24. Andersen P., and Petersen N.C. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 39 (1993) 1261-1294
25. Sinuany-Stern Z., and Friedman L. DEA and the discriminant analysis of ratios for ranking units. European Journal of Operational Research 111 (1998) 470-478
26. Wilson P.W. Detecting influential observations in data envelopment analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis 4 (1995) 27-45
27. Adler N., and Golany B. Evaluation of deregulated airline networks using data envelopment analysis combined with principal component analysis with an application to Western Europe. European Journal of Operations Research 132 (2001) 18-31
28. Adler N., and Golany B. Including principal component weights to improve discrimination in data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society 53 (2002) 985-991
29. Banker R.D., Gadh V.M., and Gorr W.L. A Monte Carlo comparison of two production frontier estimation methods: corrected ordinary least squares and data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 67 (1993) 332-343
30. Bardhan I.R., Cooper W.W., and Kumbhakar S.C. A simulation study of joint uses of data envelopment analysis and statistical regressions for production function estimation and efficiency evaluation. Journal of Productivity Analysis 9 (1998) 249-278
31. Smith P. Model misspecification in data envelopment analysis. Annals of Operational Research 73 (1997) 233-252
32. Guttman L. A general non-metric technique for finding the smallest space for a configuration of points. Psychometrica 33 (1968) 469-506
33. Raveh A. On measures of monotone association. The American Statistician 40 (1986) 117-123