How to monitor sustainable mobility in cities? Literature review in the frame of creating a set of sustainable mobility indicators

Sustainability (Switzerland)

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Gillis, Dominique ^a   Semanjski, Ivana ^a   Lauwers, Dirk ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Indicators; Sustainable and resilient urban environment; Sustainable mobility; Transportation

Indexed keywords

DEMOGRAPHIC SURVEY; LITERATURE REVIEW; MOBILITY; MONITORING; SOCIOECONOMIC INDICATOR; SUSTAINABILITY; TRANSPORTATION MODE; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM; URBAN AREA; VALUATION;

EID: 84956701148     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20711050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su8010029     Document Type: Review

References (149)

1. Lélé, S.M. Sustainable development: A critical review. World Dev. 1991, 19, 607-621.
2. Waas, T.; Verbruggen, A.; Wright, T. University research for sustainable development: Definition and characteristics explored. J. Clean. Prod. 2010, 18, 629-636.
3. Robert, K.W.; Parris, T.M.; Lei, A.A. What is Sustainable Development? Goals, Indicators, Values, and Practice. Environ. Sci. Policy Sustain. Dev. 2005, 47, 8-21.
4. Hopwood, B.; Mellor, M.; O'Brie, G. Sustainable development: Mapping different approaches. Sustain. Dev. 2005, 13, 38-52.
5. Kuik, O.J.; Verbruggen, H. Search of Indicators of Sustainable Development; Springer Science & Business Media: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012.
6. Parris, T.M.; Kates, R.W. Characterizing and measuring sustainable development. Ann. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2003, 28, 559-586.
7. De Sherbinin, A.; Bittar, H.G. The Role of Sustainability Indicators as a Tool for Assessing Territorial Environmental Competitiveness; International Forum for Rural Development: London, UK, 2003.
8. Joint UNECE/Eurostat/OECD Task Force on Measuring Sustainable Development. Framework and Suggested Indicators to Measure Sustainable Development; United Nations Economic Commission for Europe: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013.
9. Gallup Organisation. Perception Survey on Quality of Life in European Cities; European Commission: Berlin, Germany, 2009.
10. Rodrigues da Silva, A.N.; Azevedo Filho, M.A.N.; Macêdo, M.H.; Sorratini, J.A.; Silva, A.F.; Lima, J.P.; Serafico Pinheiro, A.M.G. A comparative evaluation of mobility conditions in selected cities of the five Brazilian regions. Transp. Policy 2015, 2015, 147-156.
11. Eurostat. Sustainable Development in the European Union; European Commission: Luxembourg, 2013.
12. WBCSD. Sustainable Mobility Project; World Business Council for Sustainable Development: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013; Available online: http://www.wbcsd.org/work-program/sector-projects/mobility/overview.aspx (accessed on 1 December 2015).
13. Banister, D. The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transp. Policy 2008, 15, 73-80.
14. Bertolini, L. Sustainable urban mobility, an evolutionary approach. Eur. Spat. Res. Policy 2005, 15, 109-125.
15. Elkington, J. Towards the sustainable Corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. Calif. Manag. Rev. 1994, 36, 90-100.
16. United Nations. Report of the World Summit for Sustainable Development; United Nations Press: Johannesburg, South Africa, 2002.
17. Egeter, B.; van de Riet, O. Systeemdiagram voor het beleidsveld vervoer en verkeer. In System Diagram for the Policy Area Transport and Traffic; TNO Inro: Delft, The Netherlands, 1998.
18. Lauwers, D.; Allaert, G. Sustainable Mobility Project 2.0, Methodology and Indicator Calculation Method for Sustainable Urban Mobility; World Business Council for Sustainable Development: Ghent, Belgium, 2015.
19. WorldBank, Indicators. 2013. Available online: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.CO2.TRAN.MT (accessed on 20 May 2015).
20. OECD. Reducing Transport Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Trends & Data; Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development: Paris, France, 2010.
21. EPA. Guide to Sustainability Transportation Performance Measures; United States Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, WA, USA, 2011.
22. UNESA. Indicators of Sustainable Development: Guidelines and Methodologies, 3rd ed.; United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs: New York, NY, USA, 2007.
23. VMM. Achtergrond Rapport Transport (Environmental Report Flanders-Background Report on Transport); Milieurapport Vlaanderen MIRA: Mechelen, Belgium, 2010.
24. OECD. Carbon Dioxide Emissions Embodied in International Trade; Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development: Paris, France, 2015.
25. European Commission & AmbientItalia. European Common Indicators; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2003.
26. WorldBank. Global City Indicators. 2013. Available online: http://www.cityindicators.org/Default.aspx (accessed on 15 April 2015).
27. The Centre for Sustainable Transportation. Sustainable Transportation Performance Indicators; The Centre for Sustainable Transportation: Davis, CA, USA, 2003.
28. Built Environment and Geosciences. Refinement and Test of Sustainability and Tools with Regard to European Transport Policies, 1.2; Business Unit of TNO Built Environment and Geosciences: Delft, The Netherlands, 2006.
29. REFIT. Transport Sustainability Indicators: Existing Sustainability Indicators, Knowledge Gaps and Roadmap towards Better Indicators and Tools; European Commission's Regulatory Fitness and Performance Programme: Brussel, Belgium, 2007.
30. Transport & Mobility Leuven. Sustainable Mobility, Policy Measures and Assessment; Transport & Mobility Leuven: Leuven, Belgium, 2004; Available online: http://www.tmleuven.be/project/summa/summa-d3.pdf (accessed on 3 June 2015).
31. United Nations. Transport Investing in Energy and Resource Efficiency; United Nations Environment Programme: New York, NY, USA, 2011.
32. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment. Land-Use/Transport Interaction Models as Tools for Sustainability Impact Assessment of Transport Investments: Review and Research Perspectives; The Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency: Hague, The Netherlands, 2004.
33. Eads, G.C. Transport and Sustainability. 2009. Available online: https://bitre.gov.au/events/2005/files/2005_seminar_series_Transport_and_Sustainability.ppt (accessed on 22 November 2015).
34. WBCSD. Mobility 2030: Meeting the Challenges to Sustainability; World Business Council for Sustainable Development: Hertfordshire, UK, 2004.
35. Zegras, P.C. Sustainable Urban Mobility: Exploring the role of Built Environment; Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2005.
36. Banister, D., Ed.; European Transport Policy and Sustainable Mobility; Taylor & Francis: London, UK, 2000.
37. WorldBank. Cairo Traffic Congestion Study Phase 1. 2010. Available online: http://www-wds.worldbank. org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2012/08/14/000112742_20120814112100/Rendered/PDF/718450ESW0Whit0ing0Annexes00PUBLIC0.pdf (accessed on 21 April 2015).
38. Texas, A & M Transportation Institute. National Congestion Tables. 2011. Available online: http://mobility.tamu.edu/ums/national-congestion-tables/(accessed on 14 May 2015).
39. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Transportation Cost and Benefit Analysis-Congestion Costs; Victoria Transport Policy Institute: Victoria, BC, Canada, 2013; Available online: http://vtpi.org/tca/(accessed on 18 January 2015).
40. Ronghui, L.; Sinha, S. Modelling Urban Bus Service and Passenger Reliability; Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds: Leeds, UK. Available online: http://www.its.leeds.ac.uk/software/dracula/downloads/Paper2-INSTR2007-Microsimulation-Bus-Reliability-Liu.pdf (accessed on 19 October 2015).
41. INRIX. INRIX Traffic Scorecard. 2013. Available online: http://scorecard.inrix.com/scorecard/(accessed on 19 December 2015).
42. TomTom. TomTom Congestion Index. 2013. Available online: http://www.tomtom.com/nl_be/congestionindex/(accessed on 10 August 2015).
43. IBM. IBM Global Commuter Pain Survey. 2011. Available online: http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/presskit/35314.wss (accessed on 10 September 2015).
44. Eboli, L.; Mazzulla, G. Performance indicators for an objective measure of public transport service quality. Avalable online: http://www.openstarts.uni.20Eboli%20e%20Mazzulla.pdf (accessed on 19 December 2015).
45. FHWA. Economic Returns from Transportation Investment; Federal Highway Administration: Washington, DC, USA, 2015. Available online: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/otps/060320a/forum.htm (accessed on 10 May 2015).
46. TNO Business Unit Mobility and Logistics. Refinement and Test of Sustainability and Tools with Regard to European Transport Policies; TNO Business Unit Mobility and Logistics: Hague, The Netherlands, 2007.
47. Transport & Mobility Leuven. Transport Sustainability Indicators: Existing Sustainability Indicators, Knowledge Gaps and Roadmap towards Better Indicators; Transport & Mobility Leuven: Leuven, Belgium, 2006.
48. UNDESA. Shanghai Manual: A Guide for Sustainable Urban Development in the 21st Century; United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs: New York, NY, USA, 2012.
49. Anoyrkati, E. Optimism Report Summary; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium; Luxembourg; Available online: http://cordis.europa.eu/result/rcn/55988_en.html (accessed on 1 December 2015).
50. Rye, T. An indicator Set for Measuring Cities Urban Mobility Performance; Civitas, 2015; Available online: www.civitas.eu/./rye_session_8_civ_forum_2015_capital_ag5_v3.pdf (accessed on 20 November 2015).
51. Klaus, R., Hohmeyer, O., Ottinger, R., Eds.; Social Costs and Sustainable Mobility; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2010.
52. Directorate General for Internal Policies. Economic Aspects of Sustainable Mobility; European Parlament: Brussels, Belgium, 2011.
53. Peralta-Quirós, T. Mobility for All: Getting the Right Urban Indicator. Available online: http://www. worldbank.org/en/topic/transport/brief/connections-note-25 (accessed on 19 December 2015).
54. Cianfano, M.; Gentile, G.; Nussio, F.; Tuffanelli, G.; Rossi, P.; Vergini, R.; Terenzi, G. Transport and Mobility Indicators Based on Traffic Measures Good Practices Guidebook; Citeair: Rome, Italy, 2011.
55. Transportation Research Board. Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2nd ed.; Transportation Research Board: Washington, DC, USA, 2014.
56. Garau, C.; Masala, F.; Pinna, F. Benchmarking Smart Urban Mobility: A Study on Italian Cities. In Computational Science and Its Applications; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2015; pp. 612-623.
57. Austroads. Traveller Efficiency; Austroads: Sydney, Australia, 2009; Available online: http://algin.net/austroads/site/Index.asp?id=202 (accessed on 14 July 2015).
58. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Transportation Cost and Benefit Analysis II-Travel Time Costs; Victoria Transport Policy Institute: Victoria, BC, Canada, 2013; Available online: www.vtpi.org/tca/tca0502.pdf (accessed on 18 September 2015).
59. Rockefeller Foundation. Measuring Urban Transportation Performance; Rockefeller Foundation: New York, NY, USA, 2010.
60. Van der Mede, P.; Palm, H.; Flikkema, H. Travel time variability as a new quality indicator, Transportation Planning Methods. In Proceedings of Seminar E Held At The PTRC European Transport Forum, England, UK, 2-6 September 1996.
61. The Ministry of Transport, New Zeland. Network reliability: Speed and Variance of Travel Time. 2015. Available online: http://www.transport.govt.nz/ourwork/tmif/networkreliability/nr003 (accessed on 19 October 2015).
62. Sustainable Measures. Land Use Indicators. Available online: http://sustainablemeasures.com (accessed on Accessed 10 October 2015).
63. OECD. Land Take (CSI 014/LSI 001)-Assessment; Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development: Paris, France, 2013.
64. MIRA. Achtergronddocument 2010 Transport; MIRA: Mechelen, Belgium, 2010.
65. Wuppertal Institute for Climate and Energy. Land Use and Urban Transport; Wuppertal Institute for Climate an Energy: Wuppertal, Germany, 2004.
66. OECD. Indicators for the Integration of Environmental Concerns into Transport Policies; Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development: Paris, France, 1999.
67. Newman, P.; Kenworthy, J. Urban Design to Reduce Automobile Dependence. Opolis Int. J. Suburb. Metrop. Stud. 2006, 2, 35-52.
68. Nicolas, J.P.; Pochet, P.; Poimboeuf, H. Towards sustainable mobility indicators: application to the Lyons conurbation. Transp. Policy 2003, 10, 197-208.
69. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Evaluating Transportation Land Use Impacts; Victoria Transport Policy Institute: Victoria, BC, Canada, 2012.
70. Sustainable Cities International. Indicators for Sustainability; Canadian International Development Agency: Vancouver, Canada, 2012.
71. Mega, V.; Pedersen, J. Urban Sustainability Indicators; European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions: Luxembourg, 1998.
72. Verron, H.; Malow, M.; Klippel, P. Quality Targets and Indicators for Sustainable Mobility; Umweltbundesamt Dessau: Dessau, Germany, 2005.
73. Anne, M.; Newman, P. Jan Gehl and new visions for walkable Australian cities. World Transp. Policy Pract. 2012, 17, 30-41.
74. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Evaluating Accessibility for Transportation Planning; Victoria Transport Policy Institute: Victoria, BC, Canada, 2012; Available online: http://www.vtpi.org/access.pdf (accessed on 9 October 2015).
75. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Guide to Sustainability Transportation Performance Measures; EPA:Washington, DC, USA, 2011.
76. OECD. Accessibility to Public Transport: The OECD Approach; OECD: Paris, France, 2013. Available online: http://www.oecd.org/gov/regional-policy/PPT-Transport.pdf (accessed on 2 October 2015).
77. Bhat, C.R.; Guo, J.Y.; Sen, S.; Weston, L. Measuring Access to Public Transportation Services: Review of Customer-Oriented Transit Performance Measures and Methods of Transit Submarket Identification; Centre for Transportation Research, University of Texas: Austin, TX, USA, 2005; Available online: https://www.utexas.edu/research/ctr/pdf_reports/0_5178_1.pdf (accessed on 20 October 2015).
78. Transport for London. Measuring Public Transport Accessibility Levels; Transport for London: London, UK, 2009 Available online: data.london.gov.uk/dataset/public-transport-accessibility-levels (accessed on 1 June 2015).
79. Victoria Transport Institute. Well Measured Developing Indicators for Sustainable and Livable Transport Planning; Victoria Transport Institute: Victoria, BC, Canada, 2013.
80. Haase, G.; Haase, T. Towards the Development of a Transport Accessibility Index; Pobal: Dublin, Ireland, 2008.
81. Rendall, S.; Page, S.; Reitsma, F.; van Houten, E.; Krumdieck, S. Quantifying Transport Energy Resilience: Active Mode Accessibility. Transp. Res. Rec. 2011, 2242, 72-80.
82. Global City Indicators. Profile Indicators. 2013. Available online: http://www.cityindicators.org/Default.aspx (accessed on 21 January 2015).
83. World Health Organisation. Global Status Report on Road Safety; World Health Organisation: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013.
84. European Commission. Eurostat. 2013. Available online: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/transport/data/main_tables (accessed on 17 November 2014).
85. OECD. Health Data Definitions, Sources and Methods Injuries in Road Traffic Accidents; Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development: Paris, France, 2013.
86. European Environment Agency. Noise Term; European Environment Agency: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2001; Available online: http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/traffic-noise-exposure-andannoyance (accessed on 10 April 2015).
87. Borst, H.C.; Miedema, H.M.E. Comparison of noise quality indicators. In Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 29 June-3 July 2003.
88. Jakovljevic, B.; Paunovic, K.; Belojevic, G. Road-traffic noise and factors influencing noise annoyance in an urban population. Environ. Int. 2008, 35, 552-556.
89. CEDR. Noise management and abatement. In Proceedings of the Conference of European Directors of Roads, Paris, France, April, 2010.
90. OECD. Guidelines for Community Noise; Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development: Paris, France, 2000.
91. Ising, H.; Babisch, W. Exposure and effect indicators of Environmental Noise. 2004. Available online: http://www.euro.who.int/document/NOH/isingpaper.pdf (accessed on 10 December 2014).
92. Clean Air Asia. Accessing Asia: Air Pollution and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Indicators for Road Transport and Electricity; Clean Air Asia: Pasig City, Philippines, 2012.
93. Gwilliam, K.; Kojima, M.; Johnson, T. Reducing Air Pollution from Urban Transport; WorldBank: Washington, WA, USA, 2004.
94. Cefic; ECTA. Guidelines for Measuring and Managing CO2 Emission from Freight Transport Operations; Cefic and ECTA: Brussels, Belgium, 2011.
95. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Transportation cost and benefit analysis II-Air Pollution Costs; Victoria Transport Policy Institute: Victoria, BC, Canada, 2013.
96. WorldBank. Indicators. 2013. Available online: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.PM10.MC.M3 (accessed on 27 January 2015).
97. World Health Organisation. Air Quality Guidelines; World Health Organisation: Geneva, Switzerland, 2005.
98. European Commission. Environment. 2013. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/air/quality/standards.htm (accessed on 14 January 2015).
99. European Environment Agency. 2013. Available online: http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-andmaps/indicators/exceedance-of-air-quality-limit-1/exceedance-ofair-quality-limit-4 (accessed on 10 December 2014).
100. Steg, L. Can public transport compete with the private car? IATSS Res. 2003, 27, 27-35.
101. Suminski, R.R.; Carlos Poston, W.S.; Petosa, R.L.; Stevens, E.; Katzenmoyer, L.M. Features of the Neighborhood Environment andWalking by U.S. Adults. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2005, 28, 149-155.
102. Humpel, N.; Owen, N.; Iverson, D.; Leslie, E. Perceived Environment Attributes, Residential Location, and Walking for Particular Purposes. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2004, 26, 119-125.
103. Owen, N.; Humpel, N.; Leslie, E.; Bauman, A.; Sallis, J.F. Understanding Environmental Influences on Walking-Review and Research Agenda. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2004, 27, 67-76.
104. Giles-Corti, B.; Broomhall, M.H.; Knuiman, M.; Collins, C.; Douglas, K.; Ng, K.; Lange, A.; Donovan, R.J. Increasing walking. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2005, 28, 169-176.
105. Gatersleben, B.; Uzzell, D. Affective Appraisals of the Daily Commute: Comparing Perceptions of Drivers, Cyclists, Walkers, and Users of Public Transport. Environ. Behav. 2007, 39, 416-431.
106. Bromley, R.D.F.; Matthews, D.L.; Thomas, C.J. City centre accessibility for wheelchair users: The consumer perspective and the planning implications. Cities 2007, 24, 229-241.
107. Wennberg, H.; Hydén, C.; Ståhl, A. Barrier-free outdoor environments: Older peoples' perceptions before and after implementation of legislative directives. Transp. Policy 2010, 17, 464-474.
108. Schmöcker, J.; Quddus, M.A.; Noland, R.B.; Bell, M.G.H. Mode choice of older and disabled people: A case study of shopping trips in London. J. Transp. Geogr. 2008, 16, 257-267.
109. Suen, L.; Mitchell, C. Accessible Transportation and Mobility; Committee on Accessible Transportation and Mobility: Washington, DC, USA, 2000.
110. Madhusudan, G.C. Disaster resilience of transportation infrastructure and ports-An overview. Int. J. Geomat. Geosci. 2011, 2, 443-455.
111. WorldBank. Affordability of Public Transport in Developing Countries; WorldBank: Washington, WA, USA, 2005.
112. Transport & Mobility Leuven. Refinement and Test of Sustainability and Tools with Regard to European Transport Policies; Transport & Mobility Leuven: Leuven, Belgium, 2006.
113. SUMMA. Sustainable Mobility, Policy Measures and Assessment; Transport & Mobility Leuven: Leuven, Belgium, 2004.
114. Van Nes, A.; Berghauser Pont, M.; Mashhoodi, B. Combination of Space syntax with space matrix and the mixed use index: The Rotterdam South test case. In Proceedings of the 8th International Space Syntax Symposium, Santiago de Chile, Chile, 3-6 January 2012.
115. OECD. Urban Accessibility: Perception, Measurement and Equitable Provision; Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development: Paris, France, 2013.
116. Batty, M. Cost, Accessibility, and Weighted Entropy. Geogr. Anal. 1983, 15, 256-267.
117. Boussauw, K. Aspects of Spatial Proximity and Sustainable Travel Behaviour in Flanders: A Quantitative Approach; Ghent University: Ghent, Belgium, 2011.
118. California Department of Transportation. Thinking Outside the Bus: Understanding User Perceptions of Waiting and Transferring in Order to Increase Transit Use; California Department of Transportation: Sacramento, CA, USA, 2007.
119. Welch, T.F.; Mishra, S.; Jha, M.K. Transit service indicators for alternative route structure analysis. In Applied Mathematics in Electrical and Computer Engineering; WSEAS Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2012.
120. Tapiador, F.J.; Burckhart, K.; Martí-Henneberg, J. Characterizing European High-Speed Train Stations Using Intermodal Time and Entropy Metrics. Transp. Res. A 2009, 43, 197-208.
121. De Stasio, C.; Fiorello, D.; Maffii, S. Public transport accessibility through co-modality: Are interconnectivity indicators good enough? Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2011, 2, 48-56.
122. Isek, H.; Ringler, A.; Taylor, B.D.; Miller, M.; Smart, M. Evaluating Transit Stops and Stations from the Perspective of Transit Users; California Department of Transportation: Sacramento, CA, USA, 2007.
123. Florida Department of Transportation Transit Office. Guidelines for Enhancing Intermodal Connections at Florida Transit Stations; Florida Department of Transportation Transit Office: Tallahassee, FL, USA, 2010.
124. Institut für Landes-und Stadtentwicklungsforschun. The LINK Forum on Intermodal Passenger Travel, Intermodal Passenger Transport in Europe. Available online: http://www.fgm.at/linkforum/index.phtml?ID1=984 (accessed on 14 March 2015).
125. Loukaitou-Sideris, A.; Peters, D.; Wei, W. Promoting Intermodal Connectivity at California's High-Speed Rail Stations; Mineta Transportation Institute: San José, CA, USA, 2015.
126. Hernandez, S.; Monzon, A. Key factors for defining an efficient urban transport interchange: Users' perceptions. Cities 2016, 158-167.
127. Snelder, M. Designing Robust Road Networks: A General Method Applied to The Netherlands; Delft University of Technology: Delft, The Netherlands, 2010.
128. Transportation & Logistics. Transportation & Logistics 2030, Volume 2: Transport Infrastructure-Engine or Hand Brake for Global Supply Chains?; PricewaterhouseCoopers: Ghent, Belgium, 2010.
129. United Nations Environment Programme. MCA4climate: A Practical Framework for Planning Pro-Development Climate Policies-Adaptation Theme Report: Increasing Infrastructure Resilience; UNEP: Paris, France, 2011.
130. WorldBank. Public Transport Capacity Analysis Procedures for Developing Cities; WorldBank: Washington, WA, USA, 2011.
131. City of Melbourne. Charting Transport: Looking at Transport through Graphs and Maps; City of Melbourne: Melbourne, Australia, 2011.
132. Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility. Urban Bus Toolkit. 2006. Available online: http://www. ppiaf.org/sites/ppiaf.org/files/documents/toolkits/UrbanBusToolkit/assets/1/1c/1c12.html (accessed on 10 October 2015).
133. European Environment Agency. Load Factors for Freight Transport; EEA: Brussel, Belgium, 2010.
134. U.S. Department of Transportation. Research and Innovative Technology Administration. 2013. Available online: http://www.transtats.bts.gov/Data_Elements.aspx?Data=5 (accessed on 15 February 2015).
135. European Environment Agency. Occupancy Rates of Passenger Vehicles. 2013. Available online: http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/occupancy-rates-of-passenger-vehicles/(accessed on 7 October 2015).
136. International Transport Forum. Moving Freight with Better Trucks; International Transport Forum: Paris, France, 2010.
137. World Health Organization. Measuring the Impacts of Transport Systems on Health; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2011.
138. The Federal Environment Agency. Quality Targets and Indicators for Sustainable Mobility; The Federal Environment Agency: Dessau-Roßlau, Germany, 2005.
139. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Well Measured, Developing Indicators for Sustainable and Livable Transport Planning; Victoria Transport Policy Institute: Victoria, BC, Canada, 2013; Available online: http://www.vtpi.org/tdm/tdm63.htm (accessed on 25 September 2015).
140. Burbidge, S.; Goulias, K. Active travel behavior. Transp. Lett. 2009, 1, 147-167.
141. SUMMA. SUstainable Mobility, Policy Measures and Assessment-Final Report; RAND Europe: Cambridge, UK, 2005.
142. Asian Development Bank. Walkability and Pedestrian Facilities in Asian Cities; Asian Development Bank: Mandaluyong, Philippines, 2011.
143. WorldBank. Road Sector Energy Consumption. 2013. Available online: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IS.ROD.ENGY.ZS (accessed on 13 May 2014).
144. United Nations. Indicators of Sustainable Development: Guidelines and Methodologies. Available online: http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/natlinfo/indicators/guidelines.pdf (accessed on 13 June 2015).
145. The WorldBank and Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board. Thailand: Making Transport More Energy Efficient. Available online: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/THAILANDEXTN/Resources/333295-1253072771677/TH_MakingTransportMoreEnergyEfficient_EnOverview.pdf (accessed on 21 October 2015).
146. UNESA. Indicators for Monitoring the Millennium Development Goals; United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs: New York, NY, USA, 2003.
147. WorldBank. Road Sector Gasoline Fuel Consumption Per Capita. 2013. Available online: http://data. worldbank.org/indicator/IS.ROD.SGAS.PC/countries (accessed on October 21 2015).
148. Joint Research Center. JRC Scientific and Policy Reports-Sustainability Assessment of Road Transport Technologies; JRC-IET: Brussel, Belgium, 2012.
149. Center for Sustainable Cities. Cities Safer by Design; World Resources Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2015.