Tilted and short implants supporting fixed prosthesis in an atrophic maxilla: A 3D-FEA biomechanical evaluation

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 17, Issue S1, 2015, Pages e332-e342

  Almeida, Erika O ^a   Rocha, Eduardo P ^b   Júnior, Amilcar C Freitas ^c   Anchieta, Rodolfo B ^b,d   Poveda, Ronald ^e   Gupta, Nikhil ^e   Coelho, Paulo G ^d  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO NORTE   (Brazil)

^b SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^c POTIGUAR UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

^d NEW YORK UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^e POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Dental implants; Finite element analysis; Osseointegration

Indexed keywords

TOOTH IMPLANT;

ATROPHY; BIOMECHANICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMAN; MAXILLA; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PATHOLOGY; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SURGERY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG MODULUS;

ATROPHY; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ELASTIC MODULUS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAXILLA; TREATMENT OUTCOME; X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 85028264611     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: 17088208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cid.12129     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Capelli M, Zuffetti F, Del Fabbro M, Testori T. Immediate rehabilitation of the completely edentulous jaw with fixed prostheses supported by either upright or tilted implants: a multicenter clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22:639-644.
2. Testori T, Del Fabbro M, Capelli M, Zuffetti F, Francetti L, Weinstein RL. Immediate occlusal loading and tilted implants for the rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla: 1-year interim results of a multicenter prospective study. Clin Oral Imlants Res 2008; 19:227-232.
3. Turkyilmaz I, Patel NS, McGlumphy EA. Oral rehabilitation of a severely resorbed edentulous maxilla with screwed-retained hybrid denture using cresco system: a case report. Eur J Dent 2008; 2:220-223.
4. Sagat G, Yalcin S, Gultekin BA, Mijiritsky E. Influence of arch shape and implant position on stress distribution around implants supporting fixed full-arch prosthesis in edentulous maxilla. Implant Dent 2010; 19:498-508.
5. White SN, Caputo AA, Anderkvist T. Effect of cantilever length on stress transfer by implant-supported prostheses. J Prosthetic Dent 1994; 71:493-499.
6. Sertgoz A, Guvener S. Finite element analysis of the effect of cantilever and implant length on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis. J Prosthetic Dent 1996; 76:165-169.
7. Krekmanov L. Placement of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants in patients with severe bone deficiency: a clinical report of procedure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15:722-730.
8. Wallace SS, Froum SJ. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 2003; 8:328-343.
9. Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Francetti L, Weinstein R. Systematic review of survival rates for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004; 24:565-577.
10. Tuna T, Yorgidis M, Strub JR. Prognosis of implants and fixed restorations after lateral sinus elevation: a literature review. J Oral Rehabil 2012; 39:226-238.
11. Yerit KC, Posch M, Guserl U, etal. Rehabilitation of the severely atrophied maxilla by horseshoe Le Fort I osteotomy (HLFO). Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004; 97:683-692.
12. Dimitriou R, Mataliotakis GI, Angoules AG, Gianooudis PV. Complications following autologous bone graft harvesting from the iliac crest and using the RIA: a systematic review. Injuri 2011; 42:3-15.
13. Nystrom E, Ahlqvist J, Kahnberg KE, Rosenquist JB. Autogenous onlay bone grafts fixed with screw implants for the treatment of severely resorbed maxillae. Radiographic evaluation of preoperative bone dimensions, postoperative bone loss, and changes in soft-tissue profile. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996; 25:351-359.
14. Aparicio C, Perales P, Rangert B. Tilted implants as an alternative to maxillary sinus grafting: a clinical, radiologic, and periotest study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2001; 3:39-49.
15. Fortin Y, Sullivan RM, Rangert BR. The Marius implant bridge: surgical and prosthetic rehabilitation for the completely edentulous upper jaw with moderate to severe resorption: a 5-year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2002; 4:69-77.
16. Rossetti PH, Bonachela WC, Rossetti LM. Relevant anatomic and biomechanical studies for implant possibilities on the atrophic maxilla: critical appraisal and literature review. J Prosthodontists 2010; 19:449-457.
17. Sun HL, Huang C, Wu YR, Shi B. Failure rates of short (
18. Menchero-Cantalejo E, Barona-Dorado C, Cantero-Alvarez M, Fernandez-Caliz F, Martinez-Gonzalez JM. Meta-analysis on the survival of short implants. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2011; 16:546-551.
19. Anitua E, Orive G, Aguirre JJ, Andia I. Five-year clinical evaluation of short dental implants placed in posterior areas: a retrospective study. J Periodontol 2008; 79:42-48.
20. Degidi M, Piattelli A, Iezzi G, Carinci F. Immediately loaded short implants: analysis of a case series of 133 implants. Quintessence Int 2007; 38:193-201.
21. das Neves FD, Fones D, Bernardes SR, do Prado CJ, Neto AJ. Short implants - an analysis of longitudinal studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21:86-93.
22. Fugazzotto PA. Shorter implants in clinical practice: rationale and treatment results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23:487-496.
23. Misch CE, Steignga J, Barboza E, Misch-Dietsh F, Cianciola LJ, Kazor C. Short dental implants in posterior partial edentulism: a multicenter retrospective 6-year case series study. J Periodontol 2006; 77:1340-1347.
24. Malo P, Rangert B, Nobre M. All-on-4 immediate-function concept with Branemark System implants for completely edentulous maxillae: a 1-year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005; 7:S88-S94.
25. Cresp R, Vinci R, Cappare R. Ramanos GE, Gherlone E. A clinical study of edentulous patients rehabilitated according to the "all on four" immediate function protocol. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012; 27:428-434.
26. Pomares C. A retrospective study of edentulous patients rehabilitated according to the "all-on-four" or the "all-on-six" immediate function concept using flapless computer-guided implant surgery. Eur J Oral Implant 2010; 3:155-163.
27. Pomares C. A retrospective clinical study of edentulous patients rehabilitated according to the "all on four" or the "all on six" immediate function concept. Eur J Oral Implantol 2009; 2:55-60.
28. Watanabe F, Hata Y, Komatsu S, Ramos TC, Fukuda H. Finite element analysis of the influence of implant inclination, loading position, and load direction on stress distribution. Odontology 2003; 91:31-36.
29. Krekmanov L, Kahn M, Rangert B, Lindstrom H. Tilting of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants for improved prosthesis support. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15:405-414.
30. Caglar A, Aydin C, Ozen J, Yilmaz C, Korkmaz T. Effects of mesiodistal inclination of implants on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21:36-44.
31. Malo P, Nobre M, Lopes A. The use of computer-guided flapless implant surgery and four implants placed in immediate function to support a fixed denture: preliminary results after a mean follow-up period of thirteen months. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 97:S26-S34.
32. Tealdo T, Bevilacqua M, Pera F, etal. Immediate function with fixed implant-supported maxillary dentures: a 12-month pilot study. T J Prosthet Dent 2008; 99:351-360.
33. Jemt T. Fixed implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. A five-year follow-up report. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994; 5:142-147.
34. Misch CE. Maxillary partial and complete edentulous implant treatment plans: fixed and overdenture prostheses. In: Misch CE, ed. Dental implant prosthetics. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2004:281-308.
35. Rocci A, Martignoni M, Gottlow J. Immediate loading in the maxilla using flapless surgery, implants placed in predetermined positions, and prefabricated provisional restorations: a retrospective 3-year clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003; 5(Suppl 1):29-36.
36. Fischer K, Stenberg T. Early loading of ITI implants supporting a maxillary full-arch prosthesis: 1-year data of a prospective, randomized study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19:374-381.
37. Butz F, Ogawa T, Chang TL, Nishimura I. Three-dimensional bone-implant integration profiling using micro-computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21:687-695.
38. Magne P. Efficient 3D finite element analysis of dental restorative procedures using micro-CT data. Dental Mater 2007; 23:539-548.
39. de Almeida EO, Rocha EP, Freitas AC, Jr, Freitas MM, Jr. Finite element stress analysis of edentulous mandibles with different bone types supporting multiple-implant superstructures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25:1108-1114.
40. Huang HL, Hsu JT, Fuh LJ, Tu MG, Ko CC, Shen YW. Bone stress and interfacial sliding analysis of implant designs on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: a non-linear finite element study. J Dent 2008; 36:409-417.
41. Silva GC, Mendonca JA, Lopes LR, Landre J, Jr. Stress patterns on implants in prostheses supported by four or six implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25:239-246.
42. Bevilacqua M, Tealdo T, Menini M, etal. The influence of cantilever length and implant inclination on stress distribution in maxillary implant-supported fixed dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2011; 105:5-13.
43. Ciftci Y, Canay S. The effect of veneering materials on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prosthetic restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15:571-582.
44. Furmanski J, Anderson M, Bal S, etal. Clinical fracture of cross-linked UHMWPE acetabular liners. Biomaterials 2009; 30:5572-5582.
45. Pessoa RS, Muraru L, Junior EM, etal. Influence of implant connection type on the biomechanical environment of immediately placed implants - CT-based nonlinear, three-dimensional finite element analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010; 12:219-234.
46. Geng JP, Tan KB, Liu GR. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85:585-598.
47. Van Staden RC, Guan H, Loo YC. Application of the finite element method in dental implant research. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2006; 9:257-270.
48. Rubo JH, Capello Souza EA. Finite-element analysis of stress on dental implant prosthesis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010; 12:105-113.
49. De Smet E, Jaecques SV, Jansen JJ, Walboomers F, Vander Sloten J, Naert IE. Effect of constant strain rate, composed of varying amplitude and frequency, of early loading on peri-implant bone (re)modelling. J Clin Periodontol 2007; 34:618-624.
50. Bozkaya D, Muftu S, Muftu A. Evaluation of load transfer characteristics of five different implants in compact bone at different load levels by finite elements analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 92:523-530.
51. Misch CE, Suzuki JB, Misch-Dietsh FM, Bidez MW. A positive correlation between occlusal trauma and peri-implant bone loss: literature support. Implant Dent 2005; 14:108-116.
52. Bozkaya D, Muftu S. Efficiency considerations for the purely tapered interference fit (TIF) abutments used in dental implants. J Biomech Eng 2004; 126:393-401.
53. Shunmugasamy VC, Gupta N, Pessoa RS, Janal MN, Coelho PG. Influence of clinically relevant factors on the immediate biomechanical surrounding for a series of dental implant designs. J Biomech Eng 2011. DOI:10.1115/1.4003318
54. Kozlovsky A, Tal H, Laufer BZ, etal. Impact of implant overloading on the peri-implant bone in inflamed and non-inflamed peri-implant mucosa. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18:601-610.
55. Bellini CM, Romeo D, Galbusera F, etal. A finite element analysis of tilted versus nontilted implant configurations in the edentulous maxilla. Int J Prosthodont 2009; 22:155-157.
56. Zampelis A, Rangert B, Heijl L. Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: a two-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 97:S35-S43.