Finite-element analysis of stress on dental implant prosthesis

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 105-113

  Rubo, José Henrique ^a   Capello Souza, Edson Antonio ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Finite element analysis; Implant prosthesis; Stress distribution

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; TOOTH IMPLANT;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BONE DENSITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; JAW; MASTICATION; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; YOUNG MODULUS; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; DENTAL ABUTMENT; DENTAL PROCEDURE; PROCEDURES; TOOTH IMPLANT;

BITE FORCE; BONE DENSITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ELASTIC MODULUS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; JAW; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 77953793328     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: 17088208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00142.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Albrektsson T, Zarb GA. Current interpretations of the osseointegrated response: clinical significance. Int J Prosthodont 1993, 6:95-105.
2. Meijer HJA, Starmans FJM, Bosman F, Steen WHA. A comparison of finite element models of an edentulous mandible provided with implants. J Oral Rehabil 1993, 20:147-157.
3. Duncan RL, Turner CH. Mechanotransduction and the functional response of bone to mechanical strain. Calcif Tissue Int 1995, 57:344-358.
4. Skalak R. Aspects of biomechanical considerations. Tissue-integrated prostheses - Osseointegration in clinical dentistry 1985, 117-128. Branemark P-IZarb GAAlbreksson T. eds., Chicago, IL, Quintessence
5. Murphy WM, Williams KR, Gregory MC. Stress in bone adjacent to dental implants. J Oral Rehabil 1995, 22:897-903.
6. Sertgöz A, Güvener S. Finite element analysis of the effect of cantilever and implant length on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 1996, 76:165-169.
7. Weinberg LA, Kruger B. A comparison of implant/prosthesis loading with four clinical variables. Int J Prosthodont 1995, 8:421-433.
8. Rubo JH, Souza EAC. Finite element analysis of stress in bone around dental implants. J Oral Implantol 2008, 9:407-418.
9. Sahin S, Çehreli MC, Yalçin E. The influence of functional forces on the biomechanics of implant-supported prostheses - a review. J Dent 2002, 30:271-282.
10. Frost HM. Wolff's Law and bone's structural adaptation to mechanical use: an overview for clinicians. Angle Orthod 1994, 64:175-188.
11. Wiskott HWA, Belser UC. Lack of integration of smooth titanium surfaces: a working hypothesis based on strains generated in the surrounding bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999, 10:429-444.
12. Lewinstein I, Banks-Sills L, Eliasi R. Finite element analysis of a new system (IL) for supporting an implant-retained cantilever prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995, 10:355-366.
13. Powers JM, Sakaguchi RL. Craig's restorative dental materials 2006, 12th, ed., St. Louis, MO, Mosby
14. Cook SD, Klawitter JJ, Weinstein AM. The influence of implant geometry on the stress distribution around dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res A 1982, 16:369-379.
15. Brunski JB. Biomaterial and biomechanics in dental implant design. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988, 3:85-97.
16. Brunski JB. Influence of biomechanical factors at the bone-biomaterial interface. The bone-biomaterial interface 1991, 391-404. Davies JE. ed., Toronto, ON, University of Toronto Press
17. Rangert B, Eng M, Jemt T, Jorneus L. Forces and moments on Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989, 4:241-247.
18. Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1983, 49:843-848.
19. Taylor TD. Fixed implant rehabilitation for the edentulous maxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991, 6:329-337.
20. vanZyl Grundling N, Jooste CH, Terblanche E. Three-dimensional finite element model of a human mandible incorporating six osseointegrated implants for stress analysis of mandibular cantilever prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995, 10:51-57.
21. Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants. The Toronto study. Part II: the prosthetic results. J Prosthet Dent 1989, 64:53-61.
22. Kunavisarut C, Lang LA, Stoner BR, Felton DA. Finite element analysis on dental implant-supported prostheses without passive fit. J Prosthodont 2002, 11:30-40.
23. Suedam V, Souza EAC, Moura MS, Jacques LB, Rubo JH. Effect of abutment's height and framework alloy on the load distribution of mandibular cantilevered implant supported prosthesis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009, 20:196-200.
24. Benzing UR, Gall H, Weber H. Biomechanical aspects of two different implant-prosthetic concepts for edentulous maxillae. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995, 10:188-198.
25. Friberg B, Jemt T, Lekholm U. Early failures in 4641 consecutively placed Branemark dental implants: a study from stage I surgery to the connection of complete prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991, 6:142-146.
26. Jemt T, Lekhlom U. Implant treatment in edentulous maxillae: a 5-year follow-up report on patients with different degrees of jaw resorption. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995, 10:303-311.
27. van Steenberghe D, Lekholm U, Bolender C. Applicability of osseointegrated oral implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism: a prospective multicenter study on 558 fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990, 5:272-281.
28. Jemt T. Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prosthesis supported by Branemark implants in edentulous jaws: a study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual check-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991, 6:270-276.
29. Meijer HJA, Kuiper JH, Starmans FJM, Bosman F. Stress distribution around dental implants: influence of superstructure, length of implants, and height of mandible. J Prosthet Dent 1992, 68:96-102.
30. Tada S, Stegariou R, Kitamura E, Miyakawa O, Kusakari H. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003, 18:357-368.
31. Kitamura E, Stegariou R, Nomura S, Miyakawa O. Biomechanical aspects of marginal bone resorption around osseointegrated implants: considerations based on a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004, 15:401-412.
32. Siegele D, Soltez U. Numerical investigations of the influence of implant shape on stress distribution in the jaw bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989, 4:333-340.
33. Clelland NL, Lee JK, Bimbenet OC, Gilat A. Use of an axisymmetric finite element method to compare maxillary bone variables for a loaded implant. J Prosthod 1993, 2:183-189.
34. Brunski JB. Biomechanical factors affecting the bone-dental implant interface. Clin Mater 1992, 10:153-201.
35. Brunski JB. Biomechanics of dental implants. Endosseous implants for maxillofacial reconstruction 1995, 22-39. Bolck MSKent JN. eds., Philadelphia, PA, Saunders
36. Korioth TWP, Johannn AR. Influence of mandibular superstructure shape on implant stresses during simulated posterior biting. J Prosthet Dent 1999, 82:67-72.
37. Sertgöz A. Finite element analysis study of the effect of superstructure material on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis. Int J Prosthodont 1997, 10:19-27.
38. Hulterström M, Nilsson U. Cobalt-chromium as a framework material in implant-supported fixed prostheses: a 3-year follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994, 9:449-454.
39. Young FA, Williams KR, Draughn R, Strohaver R. Design of prosthetic cantilever bridgework supported by oseointegrated implants using the finite element method. Dent Mater 1998, 14:37-43.