Influence of clinically relevant factors on the immediate biomechanical surrounding for a series of dental implant designs

Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

Volumn 133, Issue 3, 2011, Pages

  Shunmugasamy, Vasanth Chakravarthy ^a   Gupta, Nikhil ^a   Pessoa, Roberto Sales ^b   Janal, Malvin N ^c   Coelho, Paulo G ^c  

^a POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF UBERLÂNDIA   (Brazil)

^c NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomechanical surrounding; Factorial analysis; Finite element method; Implant design

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; BONE; DESIGN; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; LOADING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STRAIN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE METHOD; BIOMECHANICAL SURROUNDING; BONE LOSS; BONE THICKNESS; BONE VOLUME; DENTAL IMPLANTS; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; IMPLANT DESIGN; LOADING CONDITION; STRAIN DISTRIBUTIONS; STRAIN LEVELS; TRABECULAR BONES; TWO-WAY INTERACTION;

DENTAL PROSTHESES;

TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMECHANICS; BONE REGENERATION; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL CARE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; IMPLANT; JAW; MANDIBLE; MASTICATION; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; OSTEOLYSIS; PHYSIOLOGY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; YOUNG MODULUS; CORTICAL BONE; THICKNESS; TRABECULAR BONE;

ALVEOLAR PROCESS; BIOMECHANICS; BITE FORCE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ELASTIC MODULUS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MANDIBLE; METHODS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PHYSIOLOGY; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TITANIUM;

EID: 79551642917     PISSN: 01480731     EISSN: 15288951     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1115/1.4003318     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Albrektsson T. Branemark P.I. Hansson H.A. Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated Titanium Implants: Requirements for Ensuring a Long-Lasting, Direct Bone-to-Implant Inchorage in Man. Acta Orthopaedica 1981, 52(2):155-170. 10.3109/17453678108991776.
2. Isidor F. Loss of Osseointegration Caused by Occlusal Load of Oral Implants. A Clinical and Radiographic Study in Monkeys. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 1996, 7(2):143-152. ZZZZZZ, 0905-7161, 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070208.x.
3. Isidor F. Histological Evaluation of Peri-Implant Bone at Implants Subjected to Occlusal Overload or Plaque Accumulation. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 1997, 8(1):1-9. ZZZZZZ, 0905-7161, 10.1111/j.1600-0501.1997.tb00001.x.
4. Hoshaw S.J. Brunski J.B. Cochran G.V. B. Mechanical Loading of Branemark Implants Affects Interfacial Bone Modeling and Remodeling. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994, 9(3):345-360. ZZZZZZ, 0882-2786.
5. Frost H.M. Bone Mass and the Mechanostat: A Proposal. Anat. Rec. 1987, 219(1):1-9. ANREAK, 0003-276X, 10.1002/ar.1092190104.
6. Duyck J. Naert I. Rønold H.J. Ellingsen J.E. Oosterwyck H.V. Sloten J.V. The Influence of Static and Dynamic Loading on Marginal Bone Reactions Around Osseointegrated Implants: An Animal Experimental Study. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2001, 12(3):207-218. ZZZZZZ, 0905-7161, 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012003207.x.
7. Koontz J.T. Charras G.T. Guldberg R.E. A Microstructural Finite Element Simulation of Mechanically Induced Bone Formation. ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 2001, 123(6):607-612. JBENDY, 0148-0731, 10.1115/1.1406951.
8. Fujisaki K. Tadano S. Strain Measurement of Pure Titanium Covered With Soft Tissue Using X-Ray Diffraction. ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 2010, 132(3):031004. JBENDY, 0148-0731, 10.1115/1.4000935.
9. Chou H.-Y. Muftu S. Bozkaya D. Biomechanical Evaluation of a Wide-Diameter Short Dental Implant for Use in Compromised Bone Quality Regions by Finite Element Method. Frontiers in Biomedical Devices 2006, 39-40. 10.1115/NANOBIO2006-18022, and , ASME, Irvine, CA.
10. Frost H.M. Wolff's Law and Bone's Structural Adaptations to Mechanical Usage: An Overview for Clinicians. Angle Orthod. 1994, 64(3):175-188. ZZZZZZ, 0003-3219.
11. Rekow E.D. Harsono M. Janal M. Thompson V.P. Zhang G. Factorial Analysis of Variables Influencing Stress in All-Ceramic Crowns. Dent. Mater. 2006, 22(2):125-132. DEMAEP, 0109-5641, 10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.010.
12. Rafferty B.T. Janal M.N. Zavanelli R.A. Silva N.R. F. A. Rekow E.D. Thompson V.P. Coelho P.G. Design Features of a Three-Dimensional Molar Crown and Related Maximum Principal Stress. A Finite Element Model Study. Dent. Mater. 2010, 26(2):156-163. DEMAEP, 0109-5641, 10.1016/j.dental.2009.09.009.
13. Albrektsson T. Zarb G. Worthington P. Eriksson A.R. The Long-Term Efficacy of Currently Used Dental Implants: A Review and Proposed Criteria of Success. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986, 1(1):11-25. ZZZZZZ, 0882-2786.
14. Van Oosterwyck H. Duyck J. Vander Sloten J. Van der Perre G. Naert I. Peri-Implant Bone Tissue Strains in Cases of Dehiscence: A Finite Element Study. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2002, 13(3):327-333. ZZZZZZ, 0905-7161, 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130314.x.
15. Pessoa R.S. Muraru L. Marcantonio-Júnior E. Vaz L.G. Sloten J.V. Duyck J. Jaecques S.V. N. Influence of Implant Connection Type on the Biomechanical Environment of Immediately Placed Implants-CT-Based Nonlinear, Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2010, 12(3):219-234. and pp.
16. Lin C.-L. Lin Y.-H. Chang S.-H. Multi-Factorial Analysis of Variables Influencing the Bone Loss of an Implant Placed in the Maxilla: Prediction Using FEA and SED Bone Remodeling Algorithm. J. Biomech. 2010, 43(4):644-651. JBMCB5, 0021-9290, 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.10.030.
17. Çehreli M. Sahin S. Akça K. Role of Mechanical Environment and Implant Design on Bone Tissue Differentiation: Current Knowledge and Future Contexts. J. Dent. 2004, 32(2):123-132. ZZZZZZ, 0300-5712, 10.1016/j.jdent.2003.09.003.
18. Şahin S. Çehreli M.C. Yalçin E. The Influence of Functional Forces on the Biomechanics of Implant-Supported Prostheses-A Review. J. Dent. 2002, 30(7-8):271-282. ZZZZZZ, 0300-5712, 10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00065-9.
19. Kozlovsky A. Tal H. Laufer B.-Z. Leshem R. Rohrer M.D. Weinreb M. Artzi Z. Impact of Implant Overloading on the Peri-Implant Bone in Inflamed and Non-Inflamed Peri-Implant Mucosa. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2007, 18(5):601-610. ZZZZZZ, 0905-7161, 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01374.x.
20. Sevimay M. Turhan F. Kiliçarslan M.A. Eskitascioglu G. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Effect of Different Bone Quality on Stress Distribution in an Implant-Supported Crown. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2005, 93(3):227-234. JPDEAT, 0022-3913, 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.12.019.
21. Teixeira E.R. Sato Y. Akagawa Y. Shindoi N. A Comparative Evaluation of Mandibular Finite Element Models With Different Lengths and Elements for Implant Biomechanics. J. Oral Rehabil. 1998, 25(4):299-303. ZZZZZZ, 0305-182X, 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1998.00244.x.
22. De Smet E. Jaecques S.V. N. Wevers M. Jansen J.A. Jacobs R. Sloten J.V. Naert I.E. Effect of Controlled Early Implant Loading on Bone Healing and Bone Mass in Guinea Pigs, as Assessed by Micro-CT and Histology. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2006, 114(3):232-242. ZZZZZZ, 0909-8836, 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00355.x.
23. Katleen V. Ignace N. Liesbet G. Jozef Vander S. Robert P. Joke D. Influence of Controlled Immediate Loading and Implant Design on Peri-Implant Bone Formation. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2007, 34(2):172-181. JCPEDZ, 0303-6979.
24. Frost H.M. Perspectives: Bone's Mechanical Usage Windows. Bone Miner. 1992, 19(3):257-271. BOMIET, 0169-6009, 10.1016/0169-6009(92)90875-E.
25. De Smet E. Jaecques S.V. N. Jansen J.J. Walboomers F. Sloten J.V. Naert I.E. Effect of Constant Strain Rate, Composed of Varying Amplitude and Frequency, of Early Loading on Peri-Implant Bone (Re)modelling. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2007, 34(7):618-624. JCPEDZ, 0303-6979, 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01082.x.
26. Bozkaya D. Muftu S. Muftu A. Evaluation of Load Transfer Characteristics of Five Different Implants in Compact Bone at Different Load Levels by Finite Elements Analysis. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2004, 92(6):523-530. JPDEAT, 0022-3913, 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.07.024.
27. Misch C.E. Suzuki J.B. Misch-Dietsh F.M. Bidez M.W. A Positive Correlation Between Occlusal Trauma and Peri-Implant Bone Loss: Literature Support. Implant Dent. 2005, 14(2):108-116. ZZZZZZ, 1056-6163, 10.1097/01.id.0000165033.34294.db.
28. Bozkaya D. Muftu S. Efficiency Considerations for the Purely Tapered Interference Fit (TIF) Abutments Used in Dental Implants. ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 2004, 126(4):393-401. JBENDY, 0148-0731, 10.1115/1.1784473.
29. Gentile M.A. Chuang S.K. Dodson T.B. Survival Estimates and Risk Factors for Failure With 6×5.7-mm Implants. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005, 20(6):930-937. ZZZZZZ, 0882-2786.
30. Chuang S.K. Cai T. Douglass C.W. Wei L.J. Dodson T.B. Frailty Approach for the Analysis of Clustered Failure Time Observations in Dental Research. J. Dent. Res. 2005, 84(1):54-58. JDREAF, 0022-0345, 10.1177/154405910508400109.
31. Chun-Li L. Jen-Chyan W. Wen-Jen C. Biomechanical Interactions in Tooth-Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Dentures With Variations in the Number of Splinted Teeth and Connector Type: A Finite Element Analysis. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2008, 19(1):107-117. ZZZZZZ, 0905-7161.
32. Cehreli M.C. Iplikcioglu H. Bilir O.G. The Influence of the Location of Load Transfer on Strains Around Implants Supporting Four Unit Cement-Retained Fixed Prostheses: In Vitro Evaluation of Axial Versus Off-Set Loading. J. Oral Rehabil. 2002, 29(4):394-400. ZZZZZZ, 0305-182X, 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00867.x.
33. Steigenga J.T. Al-Shammari K.F. Nociti F.H. Misch C.E. Wang H.-L. Dental Implant Design and Its Relationship to Long-Term Implant Success. Implant Dent. 2003, 12(4):306-317. ZZZZZZ, 1056-6163, 10.1097/01.ID.0000091140.76130.A1.
34. Tada S. Stegaroiu R. Kitamura E. Miyakawa O. Kusakari H. Influence of Implant Design and Bone Quality on Stress/Strain Distribution in Bone Around Implants: A 3-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003, 18(3):357-368. ZZZZZZ, 0901-5027.
35. van Steenberghe D. Lekhlom U. Bolender C. Folmer T. Henry P. Herrmann I. Higuchi K. Laney W. Linden U. Astrand P. Applicability of Osseointegrated Oral Implants in the Rehabilitation of Partial Edentulism: A Prospective Multicenter Study on 558 Fixtures. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990, 5(3):272-281. ZZZZZZ, 0882-2786.
36. Jaffin R.A. Berman C.L. The Excessive Loss of Branemark Fixtures in Type-IV Bone: A 5-Year Analysis. J. Periodontol. 1991, 62(1):2-4. ZZZZZZ, 0022-3492, 10.1902/jop.1991.62.1.2.
37. Hansson S. Implant-Abutment Interface: Biomechanical Study of Flat Top Versus Conical. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2000, 2(1):33-41. 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00104.x.