Effects of mesiodistal inclination of implants on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prostheses

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 36-44

  Çaǧlar, Alper ^a   Aydin, Cemal ^a   Özen, Jülide ^b   Yilmaz, Caner ^a   Korkmaz, Turan ^a  

^a GAZI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b GULHANE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Finite element analysis; Fixed partial dentures; Implant inclination; Implant supported prostheses; Stress distribution

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CADAVER; DENTAL CARE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; WEIGHT BEARING;

CADAVER; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MAXILLA; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 33644797066     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Gunne J, Jemt T, Linden B. Implant treatment in partially edentulous patients. A report on prostheses after 3 years. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:143-148.
2. Lekholm U, van Steenberghe D, Herrmann I, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous jaws. A prospective 5-year multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:627.
3. Palacci P. Optimal Implant Positioning and Soft Tissue Management for the Branemark System. Chicago: Quintessence, 1995.
4. Rangert B, Jemt T, Jörneus L. Forces and moments on Brånemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:241-247.
5. Geng JP, Tan KBC, Liu G.R. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: A review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:585-598.
6. Iplikçioǧlu H, Akça K, Çehreli MC. The use of computerized tomography for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry. J Oral Implantol 2002;28:29-36.
7. Krekmanov L, Kahn M, Rangert B, Lindstrom H. Tilting of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants for improved prosthesis support. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:405-414.
8. Barbier L, Vander Sloten J, Krzesinski G, Schepers E, Van Der Perre G. Finite element analysis of non-axial versus axial loading of oral implants in the mandible of the dog. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:847-858.
9. Teixeira ER, Sato Y, Akagawa Y, Shindoi N. A Comparative evaluation of mandibular finite element models with different lengths and elements for implant biomechanics. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:299-303.
10. Gross MD, Arbel G, Hershkovitz I. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the facial skeleton on simulated occlusal loading. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:684-694.
11. Koolstra JH, van Eijden TMGJ, Weijs WA, Naeije M. A three-dimensional mathematical model of the human masticatory system predicting maximum possible bite forces. J Biomech 1988;21:563-576.
12. Meijer HJA, Starmans FJM, Steen WHA, Bosman F. Location of implants in the interforaminal region of the mandible and the consequences for the design of the superstructure. J Oral Rehabil 1994;21:47-56.
13. Iplikçioǧlu H, Akça K. Comparative evaluation of the effect of diameter, length and number of implants supporting three-unit fixed partial prostheses on stress distribution in the bone. J Dent 2002;30:41-46.
14. Meijer HJA, Starmans FJM, Steen WHA, Bosman F. A three-dimensional finite element analysis of bone around dental implants in an edentulous human mandible. Arch Oral Biol 1993;38:491-496.
15. Sato Y, Teixeira ER, Tsuga K, Shindoi N. The effectiveness of a new algorithm on a three-dimensional finite element model construction of bone trabeculae in implant biomechanics. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:640-643.
16. Sato Y, Wadamoto M, Tsuga K, Teixeira ER. The effectiveness of element downsizing on a three-dimensional finite element model of bone trabeculae in implant biomechanics. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:640-643.
17. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In: Branemark P-I, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T (eds). Tissue-Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence, 1985:199-209.
18. Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: A 5-year analysis. J Periodontol 1991;62:2-4.
19. Holmes DC, Loftus JT. Influence of bone quality on stress dis-tribution for endosseous implants. J Oral Implantol 1997;23:104-111.
20. Truhlar RS, Orenstein IH, Morris HF, Ochi S. Distribution of bone quality in patients receiving endosseous dental implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;55:38-45.
21. Ulm C, Kneissel M, Schedle A, Solar P, Matejka M, Schneider B. Characteristic features of trabecular bone in edentulous maxillae. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:459-467.
22. Smith DE, Zarb GA. Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;62:567-572.
23. Misch CE. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. St Louis: Mosby, 1999.
24. Weinberg LA. Therapeutic biomechanics concepts and clinical procedures to reduce implant loading. Part I.J Oral Implantol 2001;27:293-301.
25. Weinberg LA. Therapeutic biomechanics concepts and clinical procedures to reduce implant loading. Part II: Therapeutic differential loading. J Oral Implantol 2001;27:302-310.
26. Lewinstein I, Banks-Sills L, Eliasi R. Finite element analysis of a new system (IL) for supporting an implant-retained cantilever prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:355-366.
27. Clelland NL, Ismail YH, Zaki HS, Pipko D. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis in and around the Screw-Vent implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:391-398.
28. White SN, Caputo AA, Anderkvist T. Effect of cantilever length on stress transfer by implant-supported prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:493-499.
29. Parel SM. Prosthesis design and treatment planning for the partially edentulous implant patient. J Oral Implantol 1996;22:31-33.
30. Renouard F. Risk Factors in Implant Dentistry: Simplified Clinical Analysis for Predictable Treatment. Chicago: Quintessence, 1999.
31. van Zyl PP, Grundling NL, Jooste CH, Terblanche E. Three-dimensional finite element model of a human mandible incorporating six osseointegrated implants for stress analysis of mandibular cantilever prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:51-55.