Is decoupling GDP growth from environmental impact possible?

PLoS ONE

Volumn 11, Issue 10, 2016, Pages

  Ward, James D ^a   Sutton, Paul C ^b   Werner, Adrian D ^c   Costanza, Robert ^d   Mohr, Steve H ^e   Simmons, Craig T ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DENVER   (United States)

^c FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CIVILIZATION; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT; GROWTH RATE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; WELLBEING; ENVIRONMENT; HUMAN; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ENVIRONMENT; GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL;

EID: 84992389887     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164733     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Beckerman W. In Defence of Economic Growth. London: Jonathan Cape; 1974.
2. Drews S, van den Bergh JCJM. Public views on economic growth, the environment and prosperity: Results of a questionnaire survey. Glob Environ Change. 2016; 39:1-14.
3. Simon J. The Ultimate Resource. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1981.
4. Toman MA, Pezzey J, Krautkraemer J. Neoclassical economic growth theory and 'sustainability'. In: Bromley D, editor. Handbook of Environmental Economics. Oxford: Blackwell; 1995; pp. 139-165.
5. Fischer-Kowalski M, Swilling M, Weizsacker EU, Ren Y, Moriguchi Y, Crane W, et al. Decoupling: natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. United Nations Environment Programme; 2011.
6. Giljum S, Hak T, Hinterberger F, Kovanda J. Environmental governance in the European Union: strategies and instruments for absolute decoupling. Int J Sust Dev. 2005; 8(1-2): 31-46.
7. OECD. Towards Green Growth. Paris, France: OECD; 2011.
8. Smulders S, Toman M, Withagen C. Growth theory and 'green growth', Oxford Rev Econ Pol. 2014; 30(3): 423-446.
9. World Bank Inclusive Green Growth-The Pathway to Sustainable Development. The World Bank. Washington DC; 2012.
10. Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens WW. The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books; 1972.
11. Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J. Beyond the Limits: Confronting Global Collapse, Envisioning a Sustainable Future. Post Mills, VT: Chelsea Green; 1992.
12. Meadows DH, Randers J, Meadows DL. Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update. Post Mills, VT: Chelsea Green; 2004.
13. Turner GM. A comparison of The Limits to Growth with thirty years of reality. Glob Environ Chang. 2008; 18: 397-411.
14. Anderson K. Duality in climate science. Nat Geosci. 2015; 8: 898-900.
15. Antal M, van den Bergh JCJM Macroeconomics, financial crisis and the environment: Strategies for a sustainability transition. Environ Innov Soc Transit. 2013; 6: 47-66.
16. Eastin J, Grundmann R, Prakash A. The two limits debates: "Limits to Growth" and climate change, Futures. 2011; 43: 16-26.
17. Klein N. This Changes Everything: Capitalism versus the Climate. London: Penguin Books; 2014.
18. Tol RSJ. The economic effects of climate change. J Econ Perspect. 2009; 23(2): 29-51.
19. Rockstrom J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson A, Chapin FS, Lambin EF, et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature. 2009; 461 (7263): 472-475. doi: 10.1038/461472a PMID: 19779433
20. Ockwell DG. Energy and economic growth: Grounding our understanding in physical reality. Energ Policy. 2008; 36(12): 4600-4604.
21. Meyer R. Not Doomed Yet: The Biggest Political-Economy News This Millenium. The Atlantic. April 12, 2016. Available: http://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/04/flat-emissions-economy-growth/ 477873/.
22. Davenport C. Can Economies Rise as Emission Fall? The Evidence Says Yes. New York Times. April 5, 2016. Available: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/06/upshot/promising-signs-that-economies-canrise-as-carbon-emissions-decline.html.
23. OECD Secretariat. Indicators to measure decoupling of environmental pressure from economic growth. Sustainable development SG/SD (2002), 1; 2002.
24. UN General Assembly. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations Resolution A/RES/70/1. New York; 2015.
25. World Bank. World Bank Open Data. 2016; accessed online May 2016. Available: http://data. worldbank.org/.
26. Lutter S, Lieber M, Giljum S. Global Material Flow database: Material extraction data. 2016; accessed online May 2016. Available: http://www.materialflows.net.
27. BP. BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2015. 2015; accessed online May 2016. Available: http:// www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html.
28. Gupta S. Decoupling: a step toward sustainable development with reference to OECD countries. Int J Sust Dev World. 2015; 22(6): 510-519.
29. Stern DI. The role of energy in economic growth, Ann NY Acad Sci. 2011; 1219: 6-51.
30. Baker D. Behind the Gap Between Productivity and Wage Growth. Centre for Economic Policy and Research. Issue Brief February 2007.
31. Pessoa JP, Van Reenen J. Wage growth and productivity growth: the myth and reality of 'decoupling'. Centre for Economic Performance. LSE, Dec 2013.
32. Bringezu S, Schutz H, Steger S, Baudisch J. International comparison of resource use and its relation to economic growth: The development of total material requirement, direct material inputs and hidden flows and the structure of TMR, Ecol Econ. 2004; 51(1): 97-124.
33. Behrens A, Giljum S, Kovanda J, Niza S. The material basis of the global economy. Ecol Econ. 2007; 64(2): 444-453.
34. Csereklyei Z, Stern DI. Global energy use: Decoupling or convergence? Energ Econ. 2015; 51: 633-641.
35. Pulselli FM, Coscieme L, Neri L, Regoli A, Sutton PC, Lemmi A, et al. The world economy in a cube: A more rational structural representation of sustainability. Glob Environ Chang. 2015; 35: 41-51.
36. O'Rourke D, Lollo N. Transforming Consumption: From Decoupling, to Behavior Change, to System Changes for Sustainable Consumption. Annu Rev Env Resour. 2015; 40: 233-259.
37. Meadowcroft J. Reaching the limits? Developed country engagement with sustainable development in a challenging conjuncture. Environ Plann C. 2013; 31(6): 988-1002.
38. Ehrlich P, Holdren J. Impact of population growth. Science. 1971; 171: 1212-1217. PMID: 5545198
39. Commoner B. The environmental cost of economic growth. In: Ridker RG, editor, Population, Resources and the Environment. Washington DC: Government Printing Office; 1972; pp. 339-363.
40. Chertow MR. The IPAT Equation and Its Variants: Changing Views of Technology and Environmental Impact. J Ind Ecol. 2014; 4(3): 13-29.
41. Hatfield-Dodds S, Schandl H, Adams PD, Baynes TM, Brinsmead TS, Bryan BA, et al. Australia is 'free to choose'economic growth and falling environmental pressures. Nature. 2015; 527(7576): 49-53. doi: 10.1038/nature16065 PMID: 26536956
42. Hatfield-Dodds S, Adams PD, Brinsmead TS, Bryan BA, Chiew FHS, Finnigan JJ, et al. Australian National Outlook 2015: Economic activity, resource use, environmental performance and living standards, 1970-2050. Canberra, Australia: CSIRO; 2015.
43. Kubiszewski I, Costanza R, Franco C, Lawn P, Talberth J, Jackson T, et al. Beyond GDP: Measuring and Achieving Global Genuine Progress. Ecol Econ. 2013; 93: 57-68.
44. Costanza R, Kubiszewski I, Giovannini E, Lovins H, McGlade J, Pickett KE, et al. Time to leave GDP behind. Nature. 2014; 505: 283-285. PMID: 24436983
45. Costanza R, Daly L, Fioramonti L, Giovannini E, Kubiszewski I, Mortensen LF, et al. The UN Sustainable Development Goals and the Dynamics of Well-being. Solutions. 2016; 7: 20-22.