Innovation processes: Which process for which project?

Technovation

Volumn 35, Issue , 2015, Pages 59-70

  Salerno, Mario Sergio ^a   Gomes, Leonardo Augusto De Vasconcelos ^a   Da Silva, Débora Oliveira ^a   Bagno, Raoni Barros ^a   Freitas, Simone Lara Teixeira Uchôa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Contingency approach; Innovation management; Innovation organization; Innovation processes; New product development (NPD)

Indexed keywords

RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

CONTINGENCY APPROACHES; CONTINGENCY THEORY; INNOVATION MANAGEMENT; INNOVATION PROCESS; INNOVATION PROJECTS; LARGE-SCALE STUDIES; NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; TRADITIONAL MODELS;

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 85027958772     PISSN: 01664972     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2014.07.012     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. 3M, 2002. A Century of Innovation: the 3M History. 3M, Saint Paul. isbn:0-9722302-1-1. Available from: 〈http://solutions.3m.com/wps/portal/3M/en-WW/History/3M/Company/century-innovation〉.
2. Akgün, A.E., Keskin, H., Lynn, G., Dogan, D., 2012. Antecedents and consequences of team sensemaking capability in product development projects. R&D Manag. 42 (5), 473-493.
3. Andres, H.P., Zmud, R.W., 2001. A contingency approach to software project coordination. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 18 (3), 41-70.
4. Bessant, J., Lamming, R., Noke, H., Phillips, W., 2005. Managing innovation beyond the steady state. Technovation 25 (12), 1366-1376.
5. Brown, S.L., Eisenhardt, K.L., 1995. Product development: past research, present findings, and future directions. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20 (2), 343-378.
6. Cankurtaran, P., Langerak, F., Griffin, A., 2013. Consequences of new product development speed: a meta-analysis. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 30 (3), 465-486.
7. Clark, K.B., Fujimoto, T., 1991. Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organisation and Management in the World Auto Industry. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
8. Cooper, R.G., 1990. Stage-gate systems: a new tool for managing new products. Bus. Horiz., 44-54.
9. Cooper, R.G., 1993. Winning at New Products: Accelerating the Process from Idea to Launch. Addison-Wesley, New York.
10. Cooper, R.G., 1994. Perspective - third generation new product processes. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 11 (1), 3-14.
11. Cooper, R.G., 2008. Perspective: the stage-gate idea-to-launch process - update, what's new, and NexGen System. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 25 (3), 213-232.
12. Cooper, R.G., Edgett, S.J., Kleinschmidt, E.J., 1997. Portfolio management in new product development: lessons from the leaders - I. Res. Technol. Manag. 40 (5), 16-28.
13. Cooper, R.G., Edgett, S.J., Kleinschmidt, E.J., 2002. Optimizing the stage-gate process: what best practice companies do. Res. Technol. Manag. 45 (5), 21-27.
14. De Clercq, D., Thongpapanl, N., Dimov, D., 2013. Shedding new light on the relationship between contextual ambidexterity and firm performance: an investigation of internal contingencies. Technovation 33 (4-5), 119-132.
15. Eisenhardt, K., 1989. Building theory from case study research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 14 (4), 532-550.
16. Eisenhardt, K.M., Graebner, M.E., 2007. Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Acad. Manag. J. 50 (1), 25-32.
17. Edquist, C., Iturriagagoitia, J.M.Z., 2012. Public procurement for innovation as mission-oriented policy. Res. Policy 41 (10), 1757-1769.
18. Eling, K., Langerak, F., Griffin, A., 2013a. A stage-wise approach to exploring performance effects of cycle time reduction. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 30 (4), 626-641.
19. Eling, K., Griffin, A., Langera, F., 2013b. Using intuition in fuzzy front-end decision-making: a conceptual framework. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 31 (5), 1-17.
20. Fernández, P., Del Río, L.M., Varela, J., Bande, B., 2010. Relationships among functional units and new product performance: the moderating effect of technological turbulence. Technovation 30 (5-6), 310-321.
21. Gassmann, O., Widenmayer, B., Zeschky, M., 2012. Implementing radical innovation in the business: the role of transition modes in large firms. R&D Manag. 42 (2), 120-132.
22. Goffin, K., Mitchell, R., 2010. Innovation Management: Strategy and Implementation Using the Pentathlon Framework, second ed. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
23. Gomes, L.A.V., Salerno, M.S., 2010. Modelo que integra processo de desenvolvimento de produto e planejamento inicial de spin-offs acadêmicos. Gestão&Produc¸ão 17 (2), 245-255.
24. Hansen, M.T., Birkinshaw, J., 2007. The innovation value chain. Harv. Bus. Rev. 85 (6), 121-130.
25. Ignatius, J., Leen, J.Y.A., Ramayah, T., Hin, C.K., Jatan, M., 2012. The impact of technological learning on NPD outcomes: the moderating effect of project complexity. Technovation 32 (7-8), 452-463.
26. Kahn, K.B., Barczak, G., Nicholas, J., Ledwith, A., Perks, H., 2012. An examination of new product best practice. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 29 (2), 180-192.
27. Katz, G., 2011. Rethinking the product development funnel. Visions 35 (2), 24-31.
28. Khurana, A., Rosenthal, S.R., 1998. Towards holistic "front ends" in new product development. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 15 (1), 57-74.
29. Killen, C.P, Hunt, R.A, 2013. Robust project portfolio management: capability evolution and maturity. Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus. 6 (1), 131-151.
30. Killen, C.P, Kjaer, C., 2012. Understanding project interdependencies: the role of visual representation, culture and process. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 30 (5), 554-566.
31. Kim, J., Wilemon, D., 2003. Sources and assessment of complexity in NPD. R&D Manag. 33 (1), 15-30.
32. Knudsen, M.P., Mortensen, T.B., 2011. Some immediate - but negative - effects of openness on product development performance. Technovation 31 (1), 54-64.
33. Kok, R.A.W., Biemans, W.G., 2009. Creating a market-oriented product innovation process: a contingency approach. Technovation 29 (8), 517-526.
34. Krishnan, V., Ulrich, K.T., 2001. Product development decisions: a review of the literature. Manag. Sci. 47 (1), 1-21.
35. Kurkkio, M., Frishammar, J., Lichtenthaler, U., 2011. Where process development begins: a multiple case study of front end activities in process firms. Technovation 31 (9), 490-504.
36. Lawrence, P., Lorsch, J., 1967. Organization and Environment. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
37. Leon, H.C.M., Farris, J.A., Letens, G., 2013. Improving product development performance through iteration front-loading. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 60 (3), 552-565.
38. Lowman, M., Trott, P., Hoecht, A., Sellam, Z., 2012. Innovation risks of outsourcing in pharmaceutical new product development. Technovation 32 (2), 99-109.
39. Mendes, G.H.S., Toledo, J.C., 2012. Gestão do pré-desenvolvimento de produtos: estudos de caso na indústria de equipamentos médico-hospitalares. Produc¸ão 22 (3), 391-404.
40. O'Connor, G.C., Leifer, R., Paulson, A.S., Peters, L.S., 2008. Grabbing Lightning: Building a Capability for Breakthrough Innovation. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
41. O'Connor, G.C., Rice, M., 2013. A comprehensive model of uncertainty associated with radical innovation. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 30 (1), 2-18.
42. Pérez-Luño, A., Cambra, J., 2013. Listen to the market: do its complexity and signals make companies more innovative? Technovation 33 (6-7), 180-192.
43. Pich, M., Loch, C., Meyer, H.A., 2002. On uncertainty, ambiguity and complexity in project management. Manag. Sci. 48 (8), 1008-1023.
44. Rice, M.P., O'Connor, G.C., Pierantozzi, R., 2008. Implementing a learning plan to counter project uncertainty. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 49 (2), 54-62.
45. Rothwell, R., 1992. Successful industrial-innovation - critical factors for the 1990s. R&D Manag. 22 (3), 221-239.
46. Sarpong, D., Maclean, M., 2012. Mobilising differential visions for new product innovation. Technovation 32 (12), 694-702.
47. Sauser, B.J., Reilly, R.R., Shenhar, A.J., 2009. Why projects fail? How contingency theory can provide new insights: a comparative analysis of NASA's Mars Climate Orbiter Loss. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 27 (7), 665-679.
48. Shenhar, A.J., 2001. One size does not fit all projects: exploring classical contingency domains. Manag. Sci. 47 (3), 394-414.
49. Shenhar, A.J., Dvir, D., 2007. Reinventing Project Management: the Diamond Approach to Successful Growth and Innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
50. Sommer, S.C., Loch, C.H., 2009. Incentive contracts in projects with unforeseeable uncertainty. Prod. Oper. Manag. 18 (2), 185-196.
51. Thompson, J.D., 1967. Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York.
52. Utterback, J.M., 1971. The process of technological innovation within the firm. Acad. Manag. J. 14 (1), 75-88.
53. von Hippel, E., 1988. The Sources of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York.
54. Voss, C., Tsikriktsis, N., Frohlich, M., 2002. Case research in operations management. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 22 (2), 195-219.
55. Vohora, A., Wright, M., Lockett, A., 2004. Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies. Res. Policy 33 (1), 147-175.
56. Wang, Y., Li-Ying, J., 2014. When does inward technology licensing facilitate firms' NPD performance? A contingency perspective. Technovation 34 (1), 44-53.
57. Wheelwright, S.C., Clark, K.B., 1992. Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency and Quality. Free Press, New York.
58. Wild, R., 1977. Concepts for Operations Research. John Wiley, New York.
59. Woodward, J., 1965. Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
60. Yao, T., Jiang, B., Liu, H., 2013. Impact of economic and technical uncertainties on dynamic new product development. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 60 (1), 157-168.
61. Yin, R., 1994. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, second ed. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills.