An integrated model for product development process and initial strategic planning of academic spin-offs;Modelo que integra processo de desenvolvimento de produto e planejamento inicial de spin-offs acadêmicos

Gestao e Producao

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 245-255

  De Vasconcelos Gomes, Leonardo Augusto ^a   Salerno, Mario Sergio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Academic spin offs; Initial planning; Product development process

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956990290     PISSN: 0104530X     EISSN: 18069649     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-530x2010000200003     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. CHENG, L. C. et al. Plano tecnológico: um processo auxiliar ao desenvolvimento de produtos de empresas de base tecnológica de origem acadêmica. Locus Científco, v. 1, p. 32-40, 2007.
2. CLARK, K. B.; WHEELWRIGHT, S. C. Managing new product and process development: text and cases. New York: The Free Press, 1993. 896 p.
3. COOPER, R. G. Winning at new products: accelerating the process from idea to launch. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing, 1993.
4. COOPER, R. G.; EDGETT, S. J.; KLEINSCHIMIDT, E. J. Optimizing the stage-gate process: what best practice companies are doing. Research-Technology Management, v. 45, n. 5, p. 21-27, 2002.
5. COURTNEY, H.; KIRKLAND, J.; VIGUERIE, P. Strategy under uncertain. Harvard Business Review, v. 75, n. 6, p. 66-79, 1997.
6. DAY, G. S.; SCHOEMAKER, P. J. H.; GUNTHER, R. E. (Eds). Wharton on managing emerging technologies. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2000.
7. EISENHARDT, K. M. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, v. 14, n. 4, p. 532-550, 1989.
8. HEIRMAN, A.; CLARYSSE, B. Which tangible and intangible assets matter for innovation speed in start-ups. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, v. 24, n. 4, p. 303-315, 2007.
9. LEE, S.; YOON, B.; LEE, C.; PARK, J. Business planning based on technological capabilities: patent analysis for technology-driven roadmapping. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 76, n. 6, p. 769-786, 2009.
10. MUSTAR, P. et al. Conceptualising the hererogeneity of research-based spin-offs: a mult-dimensional taxonomy. Research Policy, v. 35, n. 2, p. 289-308, 2006.
11. NDONZUAU, F. N.; PIRNAY, F.; SURLEMONT, B. A stage model of academic spin-off creation. Technovation, v. 22, n. 5; p. 281-289, 2002.
12. NELSON, R. R. Why do firms differ, and how does it matter? Strategic Management Journal, v. 12, p. 61-74, 1991.
13. PAVIA, T. M. The early stages of new product development in entrepreneurial high-tec firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, v. 8, p. 18-31, 1991.
14. PHAAL, R.; FARRUKH, C. J. P.; PROBERT, D. P. R. Technology roadmapping: planning framework for evolution and revolution. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, v. 71, n. 1-2, p. 5-26, 2004.
15. PHAAL; R.; MULLER, G. An architectural framework for roadmapping: towards visual strategy. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, v. 76, p. 39-49, 2009.
16. ROBERTS, E. B. Entrepreneurs in high technology: lessons from MIT and beyond. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.
17. ROZENFELD, H. et al. Gesta̧o de desenvolvimento de produtos: uma referência para a melhoria do processo. Sa̧o Paulo: Saraiva, 2006.
18. SHANE, S. Academic entrepreneurship: university spinoffs and wealth creation. New York: Aldershot Edward Elgar, 2004.
19. SOMMER, S. C.; LOCH, C. H. Selecionism and learning in projects with complexity and unforeseeable uncertainty. Management Science, v. 50, n. 10, p. 1334-1347, 2004.
20. VOHORA, A.; WRIGHT, M.; LOCKETT, A.. Critical junctures in the development of university high-tec spinout companies. Research Policy, v. 33, n. 1, p. 147-175, 2004.
21. VOJAK, B. A.; CHAMBER, F. A. Roadmapping disruptive technical threats and opportunities in complex, technology-based subsystems: the SAILS methodology. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, v. 71, p. 121-139, 2004.
22. VOSS, C.; TSIKRIKTSIS, T.; FROHLICH, M. Case research in operations management. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, v. 22, n. 2, p. 195-219, 2002.