An examination of new product development best practice

Journal of Product Innovation Management

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 180-192

  Kahn, Kenneth B ^a   Barczak, Gloria ^b   Nicholas, John ^c   Ledwith, Ann ^c   Perks, Helen ^d  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LIMERICK   (Ireland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; DELPHI METHODOLOGY; EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION; IRELAND; MATURITY LEVELS; NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT; UNITED KINGDOM;

INDUSTRY; MANAGEMENT; MANAGERS; RESEARCH;

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84857862431     PISSN: 07376782     EISSN: 15405885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00888.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Adams-Bigelow, M. E. 2004. First results from the 2003 comparative performance assessment study (CPAS). In The PDMA handbook of new product development (2nd ed.), ed. K. B. Kahn, 546-66. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
2. Argyris, C. 1985. Making knowledge more relevant to practice: Maps for action. In Doing research that is useful for theory and practice, ed. E. E. Lawler, A. M. Mohrman, T. G. Cummings, S. A. Mohrman, and G. E. Ledford, 79-106. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
3. Ausura, B., B. Gill, and S. Haines. 2004. Overview and context for life cycle management. In The PDMA handbook of new product development (2nd ed.), ed. K. B. Kahn, 497-512. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
4. Barczak, G., A. Griffin, and K. Kahn. 2009. Trends and drivers of success in NPD practices: Results of the 2003 PDMA best practices study. Journal of Product Innovation Management 26 (1): 3-23.
5. Brown, S., and K. Eisenhardt. 1995. Product development: Past research, present findings and future directions. Academy of Management Review 20 (2): 343-78.
6. Camp, R. 1989. Benchmarking: The search for industry best practices that lead to superior performance. Milwaukee, WI: ASQ Quality Press.
7. Chan, A. 2004. Using an effective metrics program to support business objectives. In The PDMA handbook of new product development (2nd ed.), ed. K. B. Kahn, 445-54. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
8. Clark, P. A. 1987. Anglo-American innovation. New York: De Gruyter.
9. Clark, P. 2003. Organizational innovations. London: Sage.
10. Cooper, R. G., S. J. Edgett, and E. J. Kleinschmidt. 2002. Improving new product development performance and practices. Consortium Learning Forum Best-Practice Report. Houston, TX: American Productivity and Quality Center.
11. Cooper, R. G., S. J. Edgett, and E. J. Kleinschmidt. 2004a. Benchmarking best NPD practices-I. Research-Technology Management 47 (1): 31-43.
12. Cooper, R. G., S. J. Edgett, and E. J. Kleinschmidt. 2004b. Benchmarking best NPD practices-II. Research-Technology Management 47 (3): 50-59.
13. Cooper, R. G., and E. J. Kleinschmidt. 1995. Benchmarking the firm's critical success factors in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management 12 (5): 374-91.
14. Cormican, K., and D. O'Sullivan. 2004. Auditing best practice for effective product innovation management. Technovation 24 (10): 819-29.
15. Davidson, J. M., A. Clamen, and R. A. Karol. 1999. Learning from the best new product developers. Research-Technology Management 42 (4): 12-18.
16. Dooley, K.,A. Subra, and J.Anderson. 2002. Adoption rates and patterns of best practices in new product development. International Journal of Innovation Management 6 (1): 85-103.
17. Garcia, R., and R. Calantone. 2002. A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: A literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management 19 (2): 110-32. (Pubitemid 34405927)
18. Godener, A., and K. E. Soderquist. 2004. Use and impact of performance measurement results in R&D and NPD: An exploratory study. R&D Management 34 (2): 191-219.
19. Goodman, P. S. 1985. Critical issues in doing research that contribute to theory and practice. In Doing research that is useful for theory and practice, ed. E. E. Lawler, A. M. Mohrman, T. G. Cummings, S. A. Mohrman, and G. E. Ledford, 324-42. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
20. Griffin, A. 1997a. Drivers of NPD success: The 1997 PDMA report. Chicago, IL: PDMA.
21. Griffin, A. 1997b. PDMA research on new product development practices: Updating trends and benchmarking best practices. Journal of Product Innovation Management 14 (6): 429-58. (Pubitemid 127396992)
22. Henard, D., and D. Szymanski. 2001. Why some new products are more successful than others. Journal of Marketing Research 38: 362-75.
23. Hult, G. T. M., D. J. Ketchen Jr., D. A. Griffith, C. A. Finnegan, T. Gonzalez-Padron, N. Harmancioglu, Y. Huang, M. B. Talay, and S. T. Cavusgil. 2008. Data equivalence in cross-cultural international business research: Assessment and guidelines. Journal of International Business Studies 39: 1027-44.
24. Kahn, K. B., G. Barczak, and R. Moss. 2006. Establishing a NPD best practices framework. Journal of Product Innovation Management 23 (2): 106-16.
25. Kleinschmidt, E. 2006. Rejoinders to establishing an NPD best practices framework. Journal of Product Innovation Management 23 (2): 117-27.
26. Loch, C. 2000. Tailoring product development to strategy: Case of European technology manufacturer. European Management Journal 18 (3): 246-58.
27. Mallon, M., J. Duberley, and L. Cohen. 2005. Careers in public sector science: Orientations and implications. R&D Management 35 (4): 395-407. (Pubitemid 41343853)
28. Murray, J. A., A. O'Driscoll, and A. Torres. 2002. Discovering diversity in marketing practice. European Journal of Marketing 36 (3): 373-90.
29. Owen-Smith, J. 2003. From separate systems to a hybrid order: Accumulative advantage across public and private science at research one universities. Research Policy 32: 1081-104.
30. Page, A. L. 1993. Assessing new product development practices and performance: Establishing crucial norms. Journal of Product Innovation Management 10 (4): 273-90.
31. Paulk, M. C., B. Curtis, M. B. Chrissis, and C. V. Weber. 1993. Capability maturity model for software, version 1.1. Software Engineering Institute, Technical Report No. CMU/SEI-93-TR-24.
32. Rossiter, J. R. 2002. The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing 19: 305-35.
33. Stokes, D. E. 1997. Pasteur's quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
34. Swan, J., A. Goussevskaia, S. Newell, M. Robertson, M. Bresnen, and A. Obembe. 2007. Modes of organizing biomedical innovation in the UK and US and the role of integrative and relational capabilities. Research Policy 36 (4): 529-47. (Pubitemid 46680562)
35. Taylor, F. 1967. The principles of scientific management. New York: W. W. Norton.
36. Torrington, D. 1994. International human resource management. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Prentice-Hall.
37. Urban, G. L., and J. R. Hauser. 1980. Design and marketing of new products. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
38. Wickelmaier, F. 2003. An introduction to MDS. Working Paper. Sound Quality Research Unit at Alaborg University, Aalboarg East, Denmark.