Reduced mutation rate and increased transformability of transposon-free Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1-ISx

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 83, Issue 17, 2017, Pages

  Suárez, Gabriel A ^a   Renda, Brian A ^a,b   Dasgupta, Aurko ^a,c   Barrick, Jeffrey E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b The Innovation and Design Building   (United States)

^c WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Clean genome; Genome engineering; Insertion sequence; Mutation accumulation; Synthetic biology

Indexed keywords

ANTIGEN-ANTIBODY REACTIONS; BACTERIA; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; STRAIN RATE;

BACTERIAL STRAINS; DNA DAMAGE RESPONSE; GENETIC INSTABILITY; GENOME ENGINEERING; INSERTION SEQUENCES; MUTATION ACCUMULATIONS; STRAIN CONSTRUCTIONS; SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY;

GENES;

BACTERIUM; BIOLOGY; CELLS AND CELL COMPONENTS; DNA; GENE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOME; METABOLISM; MUTATION; PROTEIN;

ACINETOBACTER BAYLYI; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

BACTERIAL PROTEIN;

ACINETOBACTER; BACTERIAL GENOME; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MUTATION RATE; POINT MUTATION; TRANSPOSON;

ACINETOBACTER; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; DNA TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTS; GENOME, BACTERIAL; MUTATION RATE; POINT MUTATION;

EID: 85027436368     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01025-17     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Metzgar D, Bacher JM, Pezo V, Reader J, Döring V, Schimmel P, Marlière P, de Crécy-Lagard V. 2004. Acinetobacter sp. ADP1: an ideal model organism for genetic analysis and genome engineering. Nucleic Acids Res 32:5780-5790.
2. Vaneechoutte M, Young DM, Ornston LN, De Baere T, Nemec A, Van Der Reijden T, Carr E, Tjernberg I, Dijkshoorn L. 2006. Naturally transformable Acinetobacter sp. strain ADP1 belongs to the newly described species Acinetobacter baylyi. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:932-936. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.72.1.932-936.2006.
3. Elliott KT, Neidle EL. 2011. Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1: transforming the choice of model organism. IUBMB Life 63:1075-1080. https://doi.org/10.1002/iub.530.
4. de Berardinis V, Durot M, Weissenbach J, Salanoubat M. 2009. Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1 as a model for metabolic system biology. Curr Opin Microbiol 12:568-576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2009.07.005.
5. Young DM, Parke D, Ornston LN. 2005. Opportunities for genetic investigation afforded by Acinetobacter baylyi, a nutritionally versatile bacterial species that is highly competent for natural transformation. Annu Rev Microbiol 59:519-551. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.59.051905.105823.
6. Kannisto MS, Mangayil RK, Shrivastava-Bhattacharya A, Pletschke BI, Karp MT, Santala VP. 2015. Metabolic engineering of Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1 for removal of Clostridium butyricum growth inhibitors produced from lignocellulosic hydrolysates. Biotechnol Biofuels 8:198. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-015-0389-6.
7. Santala S, Efimova E, Kivinen V, Larjo A, Aho T, Karp M, Santala V. 2011. Improved triacylglycerol production in Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1 by metabolic engineering. Microb Cell Fact 10:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-10-36.
8. Santala S, Efimova E, Koskinen P, Karp MT, Santala V. 2014. Rewiring the wax ester production pathway of Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1. ACS Synth Biol 3:145-151. https://doi.org/10.1021/sb4000788.
9. Huang WE, Wang H, Zheng H, Huang L, Singer AC, Thompson I, Whiteley AS. 2005. Chromosomally located gene fusions constructed in Acinetobacter sp. ADP1 for the detection of salicylate. Environ Microbiol 7:1339-1348.
10. Zhang D, He Y, Wang Y, Wang H, Wu L, Aries E, Huang WE. 2012. Whole-cell bacterial bioreporter for actively searching and sensing of alkanes and oil spills. Microb Biotechnol 5:87-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-7915.2011.00301.x.
11. Averhoff B, Graf I. 2008. The natural transformation system of Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1: a unique DNA transport machinery, p 119-139. In Gerischer U (ed), Acinetobacter: molecular biology. Caister AP, Norfolk, United Kingdom.
12. Overballe-Petersen S, Harms K, Orlando LAA, Mayar JVM, Rasmussen S, Dahl TW, Rosing MT, Poole AM, Sicheritz-Ponten T, Brunak S, Inselmann S, de Vries J, Wackernagel W, Pybus OG, Nielsen R, Johnsen PJ, Nielsen KM, Willerslev E. 2013. Bacterial natural transformation by highly fragmented and damaged DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:19860-19865. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1315278110.
13. Buchan A, Ornston LN. 2005. When coupled to natural transformation in Acinetobacter sp. strain ADP1, PCR mutagenesis is made less random by mismatch repair. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:7610-7612. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.11.7610-7612.2005.
14. Vandecraen J, Chandler M, Aertsen A, Van Houdt R. 13 April 2017. The impact of insertion sequences on bacterial genome plasticity and adaptability. Crit Rev Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1080/1040841X.2017.1303661.
15. Raeside C, Gaffé J, Deatherage DE, Tenaillon O, Briska AM, Ptashkin RN, Cruveiller S, Médigue C, Lenski RE, Barrick JE, Schneider D. 2014. Large chromosomal rearrangements during a long-term evolution experiment with Escherichia coli. mBio 5:e01377-14. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01377-14.
16. Lee H, Doak TG, Popodi E, Foster PL, Tang H. 2016. Insertion sequencecaused large-scale rearrangements in the genome of Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res 44:7109-7119. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw647.
17. Umenhoffer K, Fehér T, Balikó G, Ayaydin F, Pósfai J, Blattner FR, Pósfai G. 2010. Reduced evolvability of Escherichia coli MDS42, an IS-less cellular chassis for molecular and synthetic biology applications. Microb Cell Fact 9:38. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-9-38.
18. Sleight SC, Bartley BA, Lieviant JA, Sauro HM. 2010. Designing and engineering evolutionary robust genetic circuits. J Biol Eng 4:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-1611-4-12.
19. Barbe V, Vallenet D, Fonknechten N, Kreimeyer A, Oztas S, Labarre L, Cruveiller S, Robert C, Duprat S, Wincker P, Ornston LN, Weissenbach J, Marlière P, Cohen GN, Médigue C. 2004. Unique features revealed by the genome sequence of Acinetobacter sp. ADP1, a versatile and naturally transformation competent bacterium. Nucleic Acids Res 32:5766-5779.
20. Gerischer U, D'Argenio DA, Ornston LN. 1996. IS1236, a newly discovered member of the IS3 family, exhibits varied patterns of insertion into the Acinetobacter calcoaceticus chromosome. Microbiology 142:1825-1831. https://doi.org/10.1099/13500872-142-7-1825.
21. Mahillon J, Chandler M. 1998. Insertion sequences. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62:725-774.
22. Segura A, Bünz PV, D'Argenio DA, Ornston LN. 1999. Genetic analysis of a chromosomal region containing vanA and vanB, genes required for conversion of either ferulate or vanillate to protocatechuate in Acinetobacter. J Bacteriol 181:3494-3504.
23. Cuff LE, Elliott KT, Seaton SC, Ishaq MK, Laniohan NS, Karls AC, Neidle EL. 2012 Analysis of IS1236-mediated gene amplification events in Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1. J Bacteriol 194:4395-4405. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00783-12.
24. Jezequel N, Lagomarsino MC, Heslot F, Thomen P. 2013. Long-term diversity and genome adaptation of Acinetobacter baylyi in a minimalmedium chemostat. Genome Biol Evol 5:87-97. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evs120.
25. Renda BA, Dasgupta A, Leon D, Barrick JE. 2015. Genome instability mediates the loss of key traits by Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1 during laboratory evolution. J Bacteriol 197:872-881. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.02263-14.
26. Bacher JM, Metzgar D, de Crécy-Lagard V. 2006. Rapid evolution of diminished transformability in Acinetobacter baylyi. J Bacteriol 188: 8534-8542. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00846-06.
27. Seaton SC, Elliott KT, Cuff LE, Laniohan NS, Patel PR, Neidle EL. 2012. Genome-wide selection for increased copy number in Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1: locus and context-dependent variation in gene amplification. Mol Microbiol 83:520-535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07945.x.
28. Barrick JE, Lenski RE. 2013. Genome dynamics during experimental evolution. Nat Rev Genet 14:827-839. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3564.
29. Lee H, Popodi E, Tang H, Foster PL. 2012. Rate and molecular spectrum of spontaneous mutations in the bacterium Escherichia coli as determined by whole-genome sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: E2774-E2783. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1210309109.
30. Dillon MM, Sung W, Lynch M, Cooper VS. 2017. Genome-wide biases in the rate and molecular spectrum of spontaneous mutations in Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio fischeri. Mol Biol Evol 34:93-109. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw224.
31. Dettman JR, Sztepanacz JL, Kassen R. 2016. The properties of spontaneous mutations in the opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa. BMC Genomics 17:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-2244-3.
32. Wösten MMSM. 1998. Eubacterial sigma-factors. FEMS Microbiol Rev 22:127-150.
33. Bekker M, De Vries S, Ter Beek A, Hellingwerf KJ, Teixeira De Mattos MJ. 2009 Respiration of Escherichia coli can be fully uncoupled via the nonelectrogenic terminal cytochrome bd-II oxidase. J Bacteriol 191: 5510-5517. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00562-09.
34. Lázár V, Pal Singh G, Spohn R, Nagy I, Horváth B, Hrtyan M, Busa-Fekete R, Bogos B, Méhi O, Csörgo B, Pósfai G, Fekete G, Szappanos B, Kégl B, Papp B, Pál C. 2013. Bacterial evolution of antibiotic hypersensitivity. Mol Syst Biol 9:700. https://doi.org/10.1038/msb.2013.57.
35. Zheng Q. 2016. Comparing mutation rates under the Luria-Delbrück protocol. Genetica 144:351-359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-016-9904-3.
36. Jack BR, Leonard SP, Mishler DM, Renda BA, Leon D, Suárez GA, Barrick JE. 2015. Predicting the genetic stability of engineered DNA sequences with the EFM Calculator. ACS Synth Biol 4:939-943. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.5b00068.
37. Kickstein E, Harms K, Wackernagel W. 2007. Deletions of recBCD or recD influence genetic transformation differently and are lethal together with a recJ deletion in Acinetobacter baylyi. Microbiology 153:2259-2270. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.2007/005256-0.
38. Csörgo B, Fehér T, Tímár E, Blattner FR, Pósfai G. 2012. Low-mutationrate, reduced-genome Escherichia coli: an improved host for faithful maintenance of engineered genetic constructs. Microb Cell Fact 11:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-11-11.
39. Hare JM, Perkins SN, Gregg-Jolly LA. 2006. A constitutively expressed, truncated umuDC operon regulates the recA-dependent DNA damage induction of a gene in Acinetobacter baylyi strain ADP1. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:4036-4043. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02774-05.
40. Hare JM, Adhikari S, Lambert KV, Hare AE, Grice AN. 2012. The Acinetobacter regulatory UmuDAb protein cleaves in response to DNA damage with chimeric LexA/UmuD characteristics. FEMS Microbiol Lett 334: 57-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2012.02618.x.
41. Hare JM, Ferrell JC, Witkowski TA, Grice AN. 2014. Prophage induction and differential RecA and UmuDAb transcriptome regulation in the DNA damage responses of Acinetobacter baumannii and Acinetobacter baylyi. PLoS One 9:e93861. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093861.
42. Newmark KG, O'Reilly EK, Pohlhaus JR, Kreuzer KN. 2005. Genetic analysis of the requirements for SOS induction by nalidixic acid in Escherichia coli. Gene 356:69-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2005.04.029.
43. Pósfai G, Plunkett G, Fehér T, Frisch D, Keil GM, Umenhoffer K, Kolisnychenko V, Stahl B, Sharma SS, de Arruda M, Burland V, Harcum SW, Blattner FR. 2006. Emergent properties of reduced-genome Escherichia coli. Science 312:1044-1046. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1126439.
44. Choi JW, Yim SS, Kim MJ, Jeong KJ. 2015. Enhanced production of recombinant proteins with Corynebacterium glutamicum by deletion of insertion sequences (IS elements). Microb Cell Fact 14:207. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-015-0401-7.
45. Li Y, Zhu X, Zhang X, Fu J, Wang Z, Chen T, Zhao X. 2016. Characterization of genome-reduced Bacillus subtilis strains and their application for the production of guanosine and thymidine. Microb Cell Fact 15:94. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-016-0494-7.
46. Hirokawa Y, Kawano H, Tanaka-Masuda K, Nakamura N, Nakagawa A, Ito M, Mori H, Oshima T, Ogasawara N. 2013. Genetic manipulations restored the growth fitness of reduced-genome Escherichia coli. J Biosci Bioeng 116:52-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2013.01.010.
47. Martínez-García E, Nikel PI, Aparicio T, de Lorenzo V. 2014. Pseudomonas 2.0: genetic upgrading of P. putida KT2440 as an enhanced host for heterologous gene expression. Microb Cell Fact 13:159. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-014-0159-3.
48. Unthan S, Baumgart M, Radek A, Herbst M, Siebert D, Brühl N, Bartsch A, Bott M, Wiechert W, Marin K, Hans S, Krümer R, Seibold G, Frunzke J, Kalinowski J, Rückert C, Wendisch VF, Noack S. 2015. Chassis organism from Corynebacterium glutamicum; a top-down approach to identify and delete irrelevant gene clusters. Biotechnol J 10:290-301. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201400041.
49. Morimoto T, Kadoya R, Endo K, Tohata M, Sawada K, Liu S, Ozawa T, Kodama T, Kakeshita H, Kageyama Y, Manabe K, Kanaya S, Ara K, Ozaki K, Ogasawara N. 2008. Enhanced recombinant protein productivity by genome reduction in Bacillus subtilis. DNA Res 15:73-81. https://doi.org/10.1093/dnares/dsn002.
50. Zhu D, Fu Y, Liu F, Xu H, Saris PEJ, Qiao M. 2017. Enhanced heterologous protein productivity by genome reduction in Lactococcus lactis NZ9000. Microb Cell Fact 16:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-016-0616-2.
51. Komatsu M, Uchiyama T, Omura S, Cane DE, Ikeda H. 2010. Genomeminimized Streptomyces host for the heterologous expression of secondary metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:2646-2651. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0914833107.
52. Lieder S, Nikel PI, de Lorenzo V, Takors R. 2015. Genome reduction boosts heterologous gene expression in Pseudomonas putida. Microb Cell Fact 14:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-015-0207-7.
53. Reuß DR, Altenbuchner J, Mäder U, Rath H, Ischebeck T, Sappa PK, Thürmer A, Guérin C, Nicolas P, Steil L, Zhu B, Feussner I, Klumpp S, Daniel R, Commichau FM, Völker U, Stülke J. 2017. Large-scale reduction of the Bacillus subtilis genome: consequences for the transcriptional network, resource allocation, and metabolism. Genome Res 27:289-299. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.215293.116.
54. Rahmer R, Heravi KM, Altenbuchner J. 2015. Construction of a supercompetent Bacillus subtilis 168 using the PmtlA-comKS inducible cassette. Front Microbiol 6:1431. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01431.
55. Deatherage DE, Barrick JE. 2014. Identification of mutations in laboratory-evolved microbes from next-generation sequencing data using breseq. Methods Mol Biol 1151:165-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0554-6_12.
56. Barrick JE, Colburn G, Deatherage DE, Traverse CC, Strand MD, Borges JJ, Knoester DB, Reba A, Meyer AG. 2014. Identifying structural variation in haploid microbial genomes from short-read resequencing data using breseq. BMC Genomics 15:1039. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-1039.
57. R Core Team. 2016. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
58. de Berardinis V, Vallenet D, Castelli V, Besnard M, Pinet A, Cruaud C, Samair S, Lechaplais C, Gyapay G, Richez C, Durot M, Kreimeyer A, Le Fèvre F, Schächter V, Pezo V, Döring V, Scarpelli C, Médigue C, Cohen GN, Marlière P, Salanoubat M, Weissenbach J. 2008. A complete collection of single-gene deletion mutants of Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1. Mol Syst Biol 4:174. https://doi.org/10.1038/msb.2008.10.
59. Hall BM, Ma C-X, Liang P, Singh KK. 2009. Fluctuation analysis CalculatOR: a web tool for the determination of mutation rate using Luria-Delbrück fluctuation analysis. Bioinformatics 25:1564-1565. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp253.
60. Murin CD, Segal K, Bryksin A, Matsumura I. 2012. Expression vectors for Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:280-283. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.05597-11.
61. Zheng Q. 2017. rSalvador 1.7: an R tool for the Luria-Delbrück fluctuation assay. http://eeeeeric.com/rSalvador/.