The patent management trichotomy: patenting, publishing, and secrecy

Management Decision

Volumn 55, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 1087-1099

  Holgersson, Marcus ^a,b   Wallin, Martin W ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Defensive publishing; Innovation; Intellectual property management; Patenting; Strategic disclosure; Trade secret

Indexed keywords

EID: 85022320068     PISSN: 00251747     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/MD-03-2016-0172     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Agostini, L., Caviggioli, F., Filippini, R. and Nosella, A. (2015), “Does patenting influence SME sales performance? A quantity and quality analysis of patents in Northern Italy”, European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 238-257.
2. Alexy, O., Criscuolo, P. and Salter, A. (2009), “Does IP strategy have to cripple open innovation?”, MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 51 No. 1, pp. 71-77.
3. Anton, J.J. and Yao, D.A. (2004), “Little patents and big secrets: managing intellectual property”, The RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 35 No. 1, pp. 1-22.
4. Arora, A. (1997), “Patents, licensing, and market structure in the chemical industry”, Research Policy, Vol. 26 Nos 4-5, pp. 391-403.
5. Arrow, K.J. (1962), “Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention”, in National Bureau of Economic Research (Ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 609-625.
6. Arundel, A. (2001), “The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation”, Research Policy, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 611-624.
7. Arundel, A. and Kabla, I. (1998), “What percentage of innovations are patented? Empirical estimates for European firms”, Research Policy, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 127-141.
8. Arundel, A., Van De Paal, G. and Soete, L. (1995), Innovation Strategies of Europe’s Largest Industrial Firms: Results of the PACE Survey for Information Sources, Public Research, Protection of Innovations and Government Programmes, MERIT, Maastricht.
9. Baldwin, C.Y. and Von Hippel, E. (2011), “Modeling a paradigm shift: from producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation”, Organization Science, Vol. 22 No. 6, pp. 1399-1417.
10. Bar, T. (2006), “Defensive publications in an R&D race”, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 229-254.
11. Barrett, B. (2002), “Defensive use of publications in an intellectual property strategy”, Nature Biotechnology, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 191-193.
12. Bekkers, R., Duysters, G. and Verspagen, B. (2002), “Intellectual property rights, strategic technology agreements and market structure: the case of GSM”, Research Policy, Vol. 31 No. 7, pp. 1141-1161.
13. Bessen, J. (2004), “Holdup and licensing of cumulative innovations with private information”, Economics Letters, Vol. 82 No. 3, pp. 321-326.
14. Bessen, J. and Maskin, E. (2009), “Sequential innovation, patents, and imitation”, The RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 40 No. 4, pp. 611-635.
15. Blind, K. and Thumm, N. (2004), “Interrelation between patenting and standardisation strategies: empirical evidence and policy implications”, Research Policy, Vol. 33 No. 10, pp. 1583-1598.
16. Blind, K., Edler, J., Frietsch, R. and Schmoch, U. (2006), “Motives to patent: empirical evidence from Germany”, Research Policy, Vol. 35 No. 5, pp. 655-672.
17. Bloom, N. and Van Reenen, J. (2002), “Patents, real options and firm performance”, The Economic Journal, Vol. 112 No. 478, pp. C97-C116.
18. Bogers, M., Bekkers, R. and Granstrand, O. (2012), “Intellectual property and licensing strategies in open collaborative innovation”, in De Pablos Heredero, C. and López, D. (Eds), Open Innovation at Firms and Public Administrations: Technologies for Value Creation, IGI Global, Hershey, PA, pp. 37-58.
19. Bogers, M., Granstrand, O. and Holgersson, M. (2012), “The dynamics of multi-layered openness in innovation systems: the role of distributed knowledge and intellectual property”, R&D Management Conference, Grenoble, May 23-25.
20. Brouwer, E. and Kleinknecht, A. (1999), “Innovative output, and a firm’s propensity to patent: an exploration of CIS micro data”, Research Policy, Vol. 28 No. 6, pp. 615-624.
21. Candelin-Palmqvist, H., Sandberg, B. and Mylly, U.-M. (2012), “Intellectual property rights in innovation management research: a review”, Technovation, Vol. 32 Nos 9-10, pp. 502-512.
22. Chabchoub, N. and Niosi, J. (2005), “Explaining the propensity to patent computer software”, Technovation, Vol. 25 No. 9, pp. 971-978.
23. Chang, H.F. (1995), “Patent scope, antitrust policy, and cumulative innovation”, The RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 34-57.
24. Chesbrough, H.W. (2003), Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
25. Chesbrough, H.W. (2006), Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
26. Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R. and Walsh, J.P. (2000), “Protecting their intellectual assets: appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent (or not)”, Working Paper No. 7552, NBER.
27. Dahlander, L. and Wallin, M.W. (2006), “A man on the inside: unlocking communities as complementary assets”, Research Policy, Vol. 35 No. 8, pp. 1243-1259.
28. David, P.A. (1993), “Intellectual property institutions and the panda’s thumb: patents, copyrights, and trade secrets in economic theory and history”, in Wallerstein, M.B., Mogee, M.E. and Schoen, R.A. (Eds), Global Dimensions of Intellectual Property Rights in Science and Technology, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 19-61.
29. Davis, L.N. (2006), “Why do small high-tech firms take out patents, and why not?”, in Andersen, B. (Ed.), Intellectual Property Rights: Innovation, Governance and the Institutional Environment, Edward Elgar, London, pp. 148-176.
30. Duguet, E. and Kabla, I. (1998), “Appropriation strategy and the motivations to use the patent system: an econometric analysis at the firm level in French manufacturing”, Annals of Economics and Statistics/Annales d'Économie et de Statistique, Nos 49-50, pp. 289-327.
31. Ewing, T. (2012), “Facebook: a soldier of fortune? Tom Ewing investigates”, available at: http://anewdomain.net/2012/04/13/facebook-a-patent-privateer-or-a-soldier-of-fortune/ (accessed October 16, 2012).
32. Giuri, P., Mariani, M., Brusoni, S., Crespi, G., Francoz, D., Gambardella, A., Garcia-Fontes, W., Geuna, A., Gonzales, R., Harhoff, D., Hoisl, K., Le Bas, C., Luzzi, A., Magazzini, L., Nesta, L., Nomaler, Ö., Palomeras, N., Patel, P., Romanelli, M. and Verspagen, B. (2007), “Inventors and invention processes in Europe: results from the PatVal-EU survey”, Research Policy, Vol. 36 No. 8, pp. 1107-1127.
33. Granstrand, O. (1999), The Economics and Management of Intellectual Property: Towards Intellectual Capitalism, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.
34. Granstrand, O. (Ed.) (2003), Economics, Law and Intellectual Property, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
35. Granstrand, O. (2006), “Intellectual property rights for governance in and of innovation systems”, in Andersen, B. (Ed.), Intellectual Property Rights: Innovation, Governance and the Institutional Environment, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp. 311-343.
36. Granstrand, O. and Holgersson, M. (2013), “Managing the intellectual property disassembly problem”, California Management Review, Vol. 55 No. 4, pp. 184-210.
37. Granstrand, O. and Holgersson, M. (2014), “The challenge of closing open innovation: the intellectual property disassembly problem”, Research-Technology Management, Vol. 57 No. 5, pp. 19-25.
38. Granstrand, O., Patel, P. and Pavitt, K. (1997), “Multi-technology corporations: why they have ‘distributed’ rather than ‘distinctive core’ competences”, California Management Review, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 8-25.
39. Greenhalgh, C. and Rogers, M. (2010), Innovation, Intellectual Property, and Economic Growth, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
40. Hall, B.H. (2005), “Exploring the patent explosion”, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 30 Nos 1/2, pp. 35-48.
41. Hall, B.H. and Ziedonis, R.H. (2001), “The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the US semiconductor industry, 1979-1995”, The RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 101-128.
42. Hanel, P. (2006), “Intellectual property rights business management practices: a survey of the literature”, Technovation, Vol. 26 No. 8, pp. 895-931.
43. Hannah, D.R. (2005), “Should I keep a secret? The effects of trade secret protection procedures on employees’ obligations to protect trade secrets”, Organization Science, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 71-84.
44. Harabi, N. (1995), “Appropriability of technical innovations an empirical analysis”, Research Policy, Vol. 24 No. 6, pp. 981-992.
45. Hargadon, A. and Sutton, R.I. (1997), “Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 42 No. 4, pp. 716-749.
46. Harhoff, D., Henkel, J. and Von Hippel, E. (2003), “Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: how users benefit by freely revealing their innovations”, Research Policy, Vol. 32 No. 10, pp. 1753-1769.
47. Heller, M.A. (1998), “The tragedy of the anticommons: property in the transition from Marx to markets”, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 111 No. 3, pp. 621-688.
48. Heller, M.A. and Eisenberg, R.S. (1998), “Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research”, Science, Vol. 280 No. 5364, pp. 698-701.
49. Hemphill, T.A. (2014), “Patent assertion entities: do they impede innovation and technology commercialisation?”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol. 26 No. 7, pp. 717-731, doi: 10.1080/09537325.2013.850478.
50. Henkel, J., Baldwin, C.Y. and Shih, W. (2013), “IP modularity: profiting from innovation by aligning product architecture with intellectual property”, California Management Review, Vol. 55 No. 4, pp. 65-82.
51. Holgersson, M. (2012), “Innovation and intellectual property: strategic IP management and economics of technology”, PhD thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg.
52. Holgersson, M. (2013), “Patent management in entrepreneurial SMEs: a literature review and an empirical study of innovation appropriation, patent propensity, and motives”, R&D Management, Vol. 43 No. 1, pp. 21-36.
53. Holgersson, M. and Granstrand, O. (2017), “Patenting motives, technology strategies, and open innovation”, Management Decision, Vol. 55 No. 6.
54. Horstmann, I., Macdonald, G.M. and Slivinski, A. (1985), “Patents as information transfer mechanisms: to patent or (maybe) not to patent”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 93 No. 5, pp. 837-858.
55. Hu, A.G. and Jefferson, G.H. (2009), “A great wall of patents: what is behind China’s recent patent explosion?”, Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 90 No. 1, pp. 57-68.
56. Hussinger, K. (2006), “Is silence golden? Patents versus secrecy at the firm level”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 15 No. 8, pp. 735-752, doi: 10.1080/10438590500510467.
57. Itami, H. and Roehl, T.W. (1987), Mobilizing Invisible Assets, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
58. Jell, F., Henkel, J. and Wallin, M.W. (forthcoming), “Offensive patent portfolio races”, Long Range Planning.
59. Johnson, J.P. (2014), “Defensive publishing by a leading firm”, Information Economics and Policy, Vol. 28, September, pp. 15-27.
60. Katila, R. and Ahuja, G. (2002), “Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 45 No. 6, pp. 1183-1194.
61. Keupp, M.M., Beckenbauer, A. and Gassmann, O. (2010), “Enforcing intellectual property rights in weak appropriability regimes”, Management International Review, Vol. 50 No. 1, pp. 109-130.
62. Kitching, J. and Blackburn, R. (1998), “Intellectual property management in the small and medium enterprise (SME)”, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 327-335.
63. Lavie, D. (2006), “The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: an extension of the resource-based view”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 638-658.
64. Leiponen, A. and Byma, J. (2009), “If you cannot block, you better run: small firms, cooperative innovation, and appropriation strategies”, Research Policy, Vol. 38 No. 9, pp. 1478-1488.
65. Lemley, M.A. and Shapiro, C. (2007), “Patent holdup and royalty stacking”, Texas Law Review, Vol. 85, pp. 1991-2049.
66. Levin, R.C., Klevorick, A.K., Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G. (1987), “Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 783-831.
67. Liebeskind, J.P. (1996), “Knowledge, strategy, and the theory of the firm”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17 No. S2, pp. 93-107.
68. Mansfield, E. (1986), “Patents and innovation: an empirical study”, Management Science, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 173-181.
69. Merton, R.K. (1968), “The Matthew effect in science”, Science, Vol. 159 No. 3810, pp. 56-63.
70. Merton, R.K. (1973), The Sociology of Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
71. Murray, F. and O’Mahony, S. (2007), “Exploring the foundations of cumulative innovation: implications for organization science”, Organization Science, Vol. 18 No. 6, pp. 1006-1021.
72. Nerkar, A., Paruchuri, S. and Khaire, M. (2007), “Business method patents as real options: value and disclosure as drivers of litigation”, in Reuer, J.J. and Tong, T.W. (Eds), Real Options Theory (Advances in Strategic Management), Vol. 24, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 247-274, available at: www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/book/10.1016/s0742-3322%282007%2924
73. O’Mahony, S. (2003), “Guarding the commons: how community managed software projects protect their work”, Research Policy, Vol. 32 No. 7, pp. 1179-1198.
74. Parchomovsky, G. (2000), “Publish or Perish”, Michigan Law Review, Vol. 98 No. 4, pp. 926-952.
75. Peters, T., Thiel, J. and Tucci, C.L. (2013), “Protecting growth options in dynamic markets: the role of strategic disclosure in integrated intellectual property strategies”, California Management Review, Vol. 55 No. 4, pp. 121-142.
76. Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G.R. (1978), The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective, Harper & Row, New York, NY.
77. Phelps, M. and Kline, D. (2009), Burning the Ships: Transforming Your Company’s Culture through Intellectual Property Strategy, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
78. Pisano, G. (2006), “Profiting from innovation and the intellectual property revolution”, Research Policy, Vol. 35 No. 8, pp. 1122-1130.
79. Pisano, G.P. and Teece, D.J. (2007), “How to capture value from innovation: shaping intellectual property and industry architecture”, California Management Review, Vol. 50 No. 1, pp. 278-296.
80. Rai, A.K. (2001), “Fostering cumulative innovation in the biopharmaceutical industry: the role of patents and antitrust”, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 813-853.
81. Reitzig, M. (2007), “How executives can enhance IP strategy and performance”, MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 49 No. 1, pp. 37-43.
82. Scherer, F.M. (1983), “The propensity to patent”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 107-128.
83. Scotchmer, S. (2004), Innovation and Incentives, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
84. Shapiro, C. (2001), “Navigating the patent thicket: cross licenses, patent pools, and standard setting”, in Jaffe, A.B., Lerner, J. and Stern, S. (Eds), Innovation Policy and the Economy, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 119-150.
85. Somaya, D. (2012), “Patent strategy and management”, Journal of Management, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 1084-1114.
86. Somaya, D., Teece, D.J. and Wakeman, S. (2011), “Innovation in multi-invention contexts: mapping solutions to technological and intellectual property complexity”, California Management Review, Vol. 53 No. 4, pp. 47-79.
87. Teece, D.J. (1986), “Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy”, Research Policy, Vol. 15 No. 6, pp. 285-305.
88. Teece, D.J. (1998), “Capturing value from knowledge assets: the new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets”, California Management Review, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 55-79.
89. Teece, D.J. (2006), “Reflections on ‘profiting from innovation’”, Research Policy, Vol. 35 No. 8, pp. 1131-1146.
90. Teece, D.J. (2009), Dynamic Capabilities & Strategic Management: Organizing for Innovation and Growth, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
91. Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997), “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18 No. 7, pp. 509-533.
92. Thomä, J. and Bizer, K. (2013), “To protect or not to protect? Modes of appropriability in the small enterprise sector”, Research Policy, Vol. 42 No. 1, pp. 35-49.
93. Thumm, N. (2004a), “Motives for patenting biotechnological inventions: an empirical investigation in Switzerland”, International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 275-285.
94. Thumm, N. (2004b), “Strategic patenting in biotechnology”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 529-538.
95. Tietze, F. (2012), Technology Market Transactions, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.
96. Veer, T. and Jell, F. (2012), “Contributing to markets for technology? A comparison of patent filing motives of individual inventors, small companies and universities”, Technovation, Vol. 32 Nos 9-10, pp. 513-522.
97. Von Hippel, E. (2005), Democratizing Innovation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
98. Wright, B.D. (1983), “The economics of invention incentives: patents, prizes, and research contracts”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 73 No. 4, pp. 691-707.
99. Ziegler, N., Gassmann, O. and Friesike, S. (2014), “Why do firms give away their patents for free?”, World Patent Information, Vol. 37, pp. 19-25.