Strategic patenting in biotechnology

Technology Analysis and Strategic Management

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 529-538

  Thumm, Nikolaus ^a  

^a Swiss Fed Inst Intellectual Proper   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOTECHNOLOGY; INNOVATION; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

CENTRAL EUROPE; EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; EUROPE; SWITZERLAND; WORLD;

EID: 12144263285     PISSN: 09537325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0953732042000295829     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. S. Kortum & J. Lerner, What is behind the recent surge in patenting? Research Policy, 28, 1999, pp. 1-22.
2. Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property, Research and Patenting in Biotechnology; A Survey in Switzerland (Bern, 2003).
3. (http://www.swisslifesciences.ch/page/index.html).
4. E. Hettinger, Justifying intellectual property, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 18 (1), 1989, pp. 31-52,
5. P. Geroski, Markets for technology: knowledge, innovation and appropriability, in: P. Stoneman (Ed.) Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change (London, Blackwell, 1995) (cf. p. 91).
6. P. Drahos, A Philosophy of Intellectual Property (Aldershot, Brookfield, Singapore, Sydney, 1996), p. 136.
7. M. Schankerman, Enforcing patent rights and competition, Presentation at the OECD Conference on IPR, Innovation and Economic Performance, OECD, Paris, 28 August 2003.
8. R. Dunford, The suppression of technology as a strategy for controlling resource dependence, Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 1987, pp. 512-525.
9. N. Thumm, Intellectual Property Rights, National Systems and Harmonisation in Europe (Springer, Heidelberg, 2000), ch. 6.3.6.
10. W. Cohen, A. Goto, A. Nagata, R. Nelson & J. Walsh, R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States, Research Policy, 31, 2002, pp. 1349-1367.
11. I b i d.
12. I b i d.
13. European Commission, Technology policy in the telecommunication sector, market responses and economic impacts, EC, Enterprise Papers No. 8, 2002;
14. B. Hall & R. Ziedonis, The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry 1979 1995, RAND Journal of Economics, 32 (1), 2001, pp. 101-128.
15. E. von Hippel, The Sources of Innovation (Oxford, Oxford University Press 1988), p. 48.
16. Ernst A. & Young A., Endurance, The European Biotechnology Report 2003 (London, 2003), p. 12.
17. I b i d.