Genome of the pitcher plant Cephalotus reveals genetic changes associated with carnivory

Nature Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2017, Pages

  Fukushima, Kenji ^a,b,c   Fang, Xiaodong ^d,e   Alvarez Ponce, David ^f   Cai, Huimin ^d,e   Carretero Paulet, Lorenzo ^g,h   Chen, Cui ^d   Chang, Tien Hao ^h   Farr, Kimberly M ^h   Fujita, Tomomichi ⁱ   Hiwatashi, Yuji ^j   Hoshi, Yoshikazu ^k   Imai, Takamasa ^l   Kasahara, Masahiro ^l   Librado, Pablo ^m,n   Mao, Likai ^d   Mori, Hitoshi ^o   Nishiyama, Tomoaki ^p   Nozawa, Masafumi ^a,q   Pálfalvi, Gergo ^a,b   Pollard, Stephen T ^c   Rozas, Julio ^m   Sánchez Gracia, Alejandro ^m   Sankoff, David ^r   Shibata, Tomoko F ^a,s   Shigenobu, Shuji ^a,b   Sumikawa, Naomi ^a   Uzawa, Taketoshi ^t   Xie, Meiying ^d   Zheng, Chunfang ^r   Pollock, David D ^c   Albert, Victor A ^h   Li, Shuaicheng ^d,e   Hasebe, Mitsuyasu ^a,b   more..

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR BASIC BIOLOGY   (Japan)

^b GRADUATE UNIVERSITY FOR ADVANCED STUDIES   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d BGI SHENZHEN   (China)

^e CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^f UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^g GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^h UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

ⁱ HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^j MIYAGI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^k TOKAI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^l UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^m UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^o NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^p KANAZAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^q TOKYO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^r UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^s TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^t OSAKA KYOIKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85022052445     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2397334X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41559-016-0059     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. Juniper, B. E., Robins, R. J. & Joel, D. M. The Carnivorous Plants (Academic, 1989).
2. Darwin, C. Insectivorous Plants (D. Appleton and Company, 1875).
3. Albert, V. A., Williams, S. E. & Chase, M. W. Carnivorous plants: phylogeny and structural evolution. Science 257, 1491-1495 (1992).
4. Denoeud, F. et al. The coffee genome provides insight into the convergent evolution of caffeine biosynthesis. Science 345, 1181-1184 (2014).
5. Jaillon, O. et al. The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla. Nature 449, 463-467 (2007).
6. Li, L., Stoeckert, C. J. & Roos, D. S. OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res. 13, 2178-2189 (2003).
7. Gallie, D. R. & Chang, S. C. Signal transduction in the carnivorous plant Sarracenia purpurea. Regulation of secretory hydrolase expression during development and in response to resources. Plant Physiol. 115, 1461-1471 (1997).
8. Okabe, T., Yoshimoto, I., Hitoshi, M., Ogawa, T. & Ohyama, T. An S-like ribonuclease gene is used to generate a trap-leaf enzyme in the carnivorous plant Drosera adelae. FEBS Lett. 579, 5729-5733 (2005).
9. Nishimura, E. et al. S-like ribonuclease gene expression in carnivorous plants. Planta 238, 955-967 (2013).
10. Ellison, A. M. Nutrient limitation and stoichiometry of carnivorous plants. Plant Biol. 8, 740-747 (2006).
11. Król, E. et al. Quite a few reasons for calling carnivores 'the most wonderful plants in the world'. Ann. Bot. 109, 47-64 (2012).
12. Adlassnig, W., Peroutka, M. & Lendl, T. Traps of carnivorous pitcher plants as a habitat: composition of the fluid, biodiversity and mutualistic activities. Ann. Bot. 107, 181-194 (2011).
13. Whitney, H. M. & Federle, W. Biomechanics of plant-insect interactions. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 16, 105-111 (2013).
14. Bak, S. et al. Cytochromes P450. Arab. B. 9, e0144 (2011).
15. Li, F. et al. Identification of the wax ester synthase/acyl-coenzyme A: diacylglycerol acyltransferase WSD1 required for stem wax ester biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 148, 97-107 (2008).
16. Buch, F. et al. Secreted pitfall-trap fluid of carnivorous Nepenthes plants is unsuitable for microbial growth. Ann. Bot. 111, 375-383 (2013).
17. Schulze, W. X. et al. The protein composition of the digestive fluid from the Venus flytrap sheds light on prey digestion mechanisms. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 11, 1306-1319 (2012).
18. Michalko, J. et al. Glucan-rich diet is digested and taken up by the carnivorous sundew (Drosera rotundifolia L.): implication for a novel role of plant β -1, 3-glucanases. Planta 238, 715-725 (2013).
19. Bemm, F. et al. Venus flytrap carnivorous lifestyle builds on herbivore defense strategies. Genome Res. 26, 1-14 (2016).
20. Heubl, G., Bringmann, G. & Meimberg, H. Molecular phylogeny and character evolution of carnivorous plant families in Caryophyllales - revisited. Plant Biol. 8, 821-830 (2006).
21. Castoe, T. A. et al. Evidence for an ancient adaptive episode of convergent molecular evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 8986-8991 (2009).
22. Michalak, P. Coexpression, coregulation, and cofunctionality of neighboring genes in eukaryotic genomes. Genomics 91, 243-248 (2008).
23. Stewart, C. B., Schilling, J. W. & Wilson, A. C. Adaptive evolution in the stomach lysozymes of foregut fermenters. Nature 330, 401-404 (1987).
24. Zhang, J. Parallel adaptive origins of digestive RNases in Asian and African leaf monkeys. Nat. Genet. 38, 819-823 (2006).
25. Choi, S. S., Vallender, E. J. & Lahn, B. T. Systematically assessing the influence of 3-dimensional structural context on the molecular evolution of mammalian proteomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23, 2131-2133 (2006).
26. Bustamante, C. D., Townsend, J. P. & Hartl, D. L. Solvent accessibility and purifying selection within proteins of Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 301-308 (2000).
27. Goldman, N., Thorne, J. L. & Jones, D. T. Assessing the impact of secondary structure and solvent accessibility on protein evolution. Genetics 149, 445-458 (1998).
28. Goldstein, R. A., Pollard, S. T., Shah, S. D. & Pollock, D. D. Nonadaptive amino acid convergence rates decrease over time. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 1373-1381 (2015).
29. Ellison, A. M. & Gotelli, N. J. Energetics and the evolution of carnivorous plants-Darwin's 'most wonderful plants in the world'. J. Exp. Bot. 60, 19-42 (2009).
30. Scherzer, S. et al. The Dionaea muscipula ammonium channel DmAMT1 provides NH4+ uptake associated with Venus flytrap's prey digestion. Curr. Biol. 23, 1649-1657 (2013).
31. Murashige, T. & Skoog, F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15, 473-497 (1962).
32. Marcais, G. & Kingsford, C. A fast, lock-free approach for efficient parallel counting of occurrences of k-mers. Bioinformatics 27, 764-770 (2011).
33. Gnerre, S. et al. High-quality draft assemblies of mammalian genomes from massively parallel sequence data. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 1513-1518 (2011).
34. Boetzer, M., Henkel, C. V, Jansen, H. J., Butler, D. & Pirovano, W. Scaffolding pre-assembled contigs using SSPACE. Bioinformatics 27, 578-579 (2011).
35. Luo, R. et al. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. GigaScience 1, 18 (2012).
36. English, A. C. et al. Mind the gap: upgrading genomes with Pacific Biosciences RS long-read sequencing technology. PLoS ONE 7, e47768 (2012).
37. Benson, G. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 573-580 (1999).
38. Levin, J. Z. et al. Comprehensive comparative analysis of strand-specific RNA sequencing methods. Nat. Methods 7, 709-715 (2010).
39. Birney, E. & Durbin, R. Using GeneWise in the Drosophila annotation experiment. Genome Res. 10, 547-548 (2000).
40. Trapnell, C. et al. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 511-515 (2010).
41. Mitchell, A. et al. The InterPro protein families database: the classification resource after 15 years. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D213-D221 (2014).
42. Quevillon, E. et al. InterProScan: protein domains identifier. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, W116-W120 (2005).
43. Parra, G., Bradnam, K. & Korf, I. CEGMA: a pipeline to accurately annotate core genes in eukaryotic genomes. Bioinformatics 23, 1061-1067 (2007).
44. Rice, P., Longden, I. & Bleasby, A. EMBOSS: the European molecular biology open software suite. Trends Genet. 16, 276-277 (2000).
45. Axtell, M. J. ShortStack: comprehensive annotation and quantification of small RNA genes. RNA 19, 740-751 (2013).
46. Kozomara, A. & Griffiths-Jones, S. miRBase: annotating high confidence microRNAs using deep sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D68-D73 (2014).
47. Dsouza, M., Larsen, N. & Overbeek, R. Searching for patterns in genomic data. Trends Genet. 13, 497-498 (1997).
48. Lorenz, R. et al. ViennaRNA package 2.0. Algorithms Mol. Biol. 6, 26 (2011).
49. Jones-Rhoades, M. W. & Bartel, D. P. Computational identification of plant microRNAs and their targets, including a stress-induced miRNA. Mol. Cell 14, 787-799 (2004).
50. Dai, X. & Zhao, P. X. psRNATarget: a plant small RNA target analysis server. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, W155-W159 (2011).
51. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312-1313 (2014).
52. Zeng, L. et al. Resolution of deep angiosperm phylogeny using conserved nuclear genes and estimates of early divergence times. Nat. Commun. 5, 4956 (2014).
53. Wickett, N. J. et al. Phylotranscriptomic analysis of the origin and early diversification of land plants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E4859-E4868 (2014).
54. Bell, C. D., Soltis, D. E. & Soltis, P. S. The age and diversification of the angiosperms re-revisited. Am. J. Bot. 97, 1296-1303 (2010).
55. Ouyang, S. & Buell, C. R. The TIGR Plant Repeat Databases: a collective resource for the identification of repetitive sequences in plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, D360-D363 (2004).
56. Wallace, I. M., O'Sullivan, O., Higgins, D. G. & Notredame, C. M-Coffee: combining multiple sequence alignment methods with T-Coffee. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, 1692-1699 (2006).
57. Capella-Gutierrez, S., Silla-Martinez, J. M. & Gabaldon, T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25, 1972-1973 (2009).
58. Darriba, D., Taboada, G. L., Doallo, R. & Posada, D. ProtTest 3: fast selection of best-fit models of protein evolution. Bioinformatics 27, 1164-1165 (2011).
59. Sanderson, M. J. r8s: inferring absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times in the absence of a molecular clock. Bioinformatics 19, 301-302 (2003).
60. Librado, P., Vieira, F. G. & Rozas, J. BadiRate: estimating family turnover rates by likelihood-based methods. Bioinformatics 28, 279-281 (2012).
61. Carretero-Paulet, L. et al. High gene family turnover rates and gene space adaptation in the compact genome of the carnivorous plant Utricularia gibba. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 1284-1295 (2015).
62. Jurka, J. et al. Repbase Update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 110, 462-467 (2005).
63. Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 57, 289-300 (1995).
64. Kim, D. et al. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 14, R36 (2013).
65. Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30, 923-930 (2014).
66. Sun, J., Nishiyama, T., Shimizu, K. & Kadota, K. TCC: an R package for comparing tag count data with robust normalization strategies. BMC Bioinformatics 14, 219 (2013).
67. Robinson, M. D. & Oshlack, A. A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. Genome Biol. 11, 2010-2011 (2010).
68. Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139-140 (2010).
69. Robinson, M. D. & Smyth, G. K. Small-sample estimation of negative binomial dispersion, with applications to SAGE data. Biostatistics 9, 321-332 (2008).
70. Grabherr, M. G. et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-seq data without a reference genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 644-652 (2011).
71. Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403-410 (1990).
72. Paszota, P. et al. Secreted major Venus flytrap chitinase enables digestion of Arthropod prey. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2, 374-383 (2014).
73. Takahashi, K. et al. A cysteine endopeptidase ('dionain') is involved in the digestive fluid of Dionaea muscipula (Venus's fly-trap). Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 75, 346-348 (2011).
74. Athauda, S. B. et al. Enzymic and structural characterization of nepenthesin, a unique member of a novel subfamily of aspartic proteinases. Biochem. J. 381, 295-306 (2004).
75. Buch, F., Pauchet, Y., Rott, M. & Mithofer, A. Characterization and heterologous expression of a PR-1 protein from traps of the carnivorous plant Nepenthes mirabilis. Phytochemistry 100, 43-50 (2014).
76. Rottloff, S. et al. Functional characterization of a class III acid endochitinase from the traps of the carnivorous pitcher plant genus, Nepenthes. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 4639-4647 (2011).
77. Hatano, N. & Hamada, T. Proteome analysis of pitcher fluid of the carnivorous plant Nepenthes alata. J. Proteome Res. 7, 809-816 (2008).
78. Hatano, N. & Hamada, T. Proteomic analysis of secreted protein induced by a component of prey in pitcher fluid of the carnivorous plant Nepenthes alata. J. Proteomics 75, 4844-4852 (2012).
79. Renner, T. & Specht, C. D. Molecular and functional evolution of class I chitinases for plant carnivory in the Caryophyllales. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 2971-2985 (2012).
80. Eilenberg, H., Pnini-Cohen, S., Schuster, S., Movtchan, A. & Zilberstein, A. Isolation and characterization of chitinase genes from pitchers of the carnivorous plant Nepenthes khasiana. J. Exp. Bot. 57, 2775-2784 (2006).
81. Matusíková, I. et al. Tentacles of in vitro-grown round-leaf sundew (Drosera rotundifolia L.) show induction of chitinase activity upon mimicking the presence of prey. Planta 222, 1020-1027 (2005).
82. An, C.-I., Fukusaki, E. & Kobayashi, A. Aspartic proteinases are expressed in pitchers of the carnivorous plant Nepenthes alata Blanco. Planta 214, 661-667 (2002).
83. Srivastava, A., Rogers, W. L., Breton, C. M., Cai, L. & Malmberg, R. L. Transcriptome analysis of Sarracenia, an insectivorous plant. DNA Res. 18, 253-261 (2011).
84. Jensen, M. K. et al. Transcriptome and genome size analysis of the Venus flytrap. PLoS ONE 10, e0123887 (2015).
85. Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772-780 (2013).
86. Gouveia-Oliveira, R., Sackett, P. W. & Pedersen, A. G. MaxAlign: maximizing usable data in an alignment. BMC Bioinformatics 8, 312 (2007).
87. Huerta-Cepas, J. et al. The human phylome. Genome Biol. 8, 934-941 (2007).
88. Huerta-Cepas, J., Serra, F. & Bork, P. ETE 3: reconstruction, analysis, and visualization of phylogenomic data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 1635-1638 (2016).
89. Letunic, I. & Bork, P. Interactive Tree Of Life v2: online annotation and display of phylogenetic trees made easy. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, W475-W478 (2011).
90. Kolesnikov, N. et al. ArrayExpress update-simplifying data submissions. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D1113-D1116 (2015).
91. Irizarry, R. A. et al. Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics 4, 249-264 (2003).
92. Sipos, B., Massingham, T., Jordan, G. E. & Goldman, N. PhyloSim - Monte Carlo simulation of sequence evolution in the R statistical computing environment. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 104 (2011).
93. Rasmussen, M. D. & Kellis, M. A Bayesian approach for fast and accurate gene tree reconstruction. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 273-290 (2011).
94. Wu, Y. C., Rasmussen, M. D., Bansal, M. S. & Kellis, M. TreeFix: statistically informed gene tree error correction using species trees. Syst. Biol. 62, 110-120 (2013).
95. Nakamura, Y., Gojobori, T. & Ikemura, T. Codon usage tabulated from international DNA sequence databases: status for the year 2000. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 292 (2000).
96. Shimodaira, H. & Hasegawa, M. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 1114-1116 (1999).
97. Lartillot, N., Lepage, T. & Blanquart, S. PhyloBayes 3: a Bayesian software package for phylogenetic reconstruction and molecular dating. Bioinformatics 25, 2286-2288 (2009).
98. Wilson, E. B. Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 22, 209-212 (1927).
99. Yates, F. Contingency tables involving small numbers and the χ 2 test. J. R. Stat. Soc. 1(suppl.) 217-235 (1934).
100. Neyman, J. & Pearson, E. S. On the use and interpretation of certain test criteria for purposes of statistical inference: part I. Biometrika 20A, 175-240 (1928).
101. Biasini, M. et al. SWISS-MODEL: modelling protein tertiary and quaternary structure using evolutionary information. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, W252-W258 (2014).
102. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera -a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605-1612 (2004).
103. Tien, M. Z., Meyer, A. G., Sydykova, D. K., Spielman, S. J. & Wilke, C. O. Maximum allowed solvent accessibilites of residues in proteins. PLoS ONE 8, e80635 (2013).