Fractionation of rapeseed meal by milling, sieving and air classification—Effect on crude protein, amino acids and fiber content and digestibility

Animal Feed Science and Technology

Volumn 230, Issue , 2017, Pages 143-153

  Hansen, Jon Øvrum ^a   Skrede, Anders ^a   Mydland, Liv Torunn ^a   Øverland, Margareth ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

Author keywords

Air classification; Amino acids; Fractionation; Mink; Nutrient digestibility; Rapeseed meal

Indexed keywords

EID: 85021077711     PISSN: 03778401     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.05.007     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. AOAC International, Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 17th edition, 2000, Association of Analytical Communities, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
2. Bell, J.M., Shires, A., Composition and digestibility by pigs of hull fractions from rapeseed cultivars with yellow or brown seed coats. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 62 (1982), 557–565.
3. Buckton, G., Characterisation of small changes in the physical properties of powders of significance for dry powder inhaler formulations. Adv. Drug Del. Rev. 26 (1997), 17–27.
4. Challa, R., Srinivasan, R., To, F., Fractionation of soybean meal, cottonseed meal and wheat middlings using combination of sieving and air classification. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 159 (2010), 72–78.
5. Chwalibog, A., Glem-Hansen, N., Henckel, S., Thorbek, G., Energy metabolism in adult mink in relation to protein-energy levels and environmental temperature. Proc. 8th Symp. on Energy Metabolism, 1980, 283–286 EAAP Publ. No. 26.
6. Dijkink, B.H., Speranza, L., Paltsidis, D., Vereijken, J.M., Air dispersion of starch-protein mixtures: a predictive tool for air classification performance. Powder Technol. 172 (2007), 113–119.
7. Diosady, L.L., Rubin, L.J., Tar, C.G., Etkin, B., Air classification of rapeseed meal using the tervel separator. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 64 (1986), 768–774.
8. dos Santos, R.R., Muruci, L.N.M., Santos, L.O., Antoniassi, R., Silva, M.C.T., Damaso, J.P.L.d., Characterization of different oil soapstocks and their application in the lipase production by Aspergillus niger under solid state fermentation. J. Food Nutr. Res. 2 (2014), 561–566.
9. Dumont, M.-J., Narine, S.S., Soapstock and deodorizer distillates from North American vegetable oils Review on their characterization, extraction and utilization. Food Res. Int. 40 (2007), 957–974.
10. Grala, W., Verstegen, M.W., Jansman, A.J., Huisman, J., van Leeusen, P., Ileal apparent protein and amino acid digestibilities and endogenous nitrogen losses in pigs fed soybean and rapeseed products. J. Anim. Sci. 76 (1998), 557–568.
11. Khajali, F., Slominski, B.A., Factors that affect the nutritive value of canola meal for poultry. Poult. Sci. 91 (2012), 2564–2575.
12. King, R.D., Dietz, H.M., Air classification of rapeseed meal. Cereal Chem. 64 (1987), 411–413.
13. Knudsen, K.E.B., Fiber and nonstarch polysaccharide content and variation in common crops used in broiler diets. Poult. Sci. 93 (2014), 1–14.
14. Kracht, W., Dänicke, S., Kluge, H., Keller, K., Matzke, W., Hennig, U., Schumann, W., Effect of dehulling of rapeseed on feed value and nutrient digestibility of rape products in pigs. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 58 (2004), 389–404.
15. Mejicanos, G., Sanjayan, N., Kim, I.H., Nyachoti, C.M., Recent advances in canola meal utilization in swine nutrition. J. Anim. Sci. Technol., 58, 2016, 7.
16. Mejicanos, G.A., Tail-end Dehulling of Canola Meal: Chemical Composition and Nutritive Value of Dehulled Meal for Broiler Chickens and Weaned Pigs Master Thesis. 2015, University of Manitoba, USA.
17. Mertens, D.R., Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: collaborative study. J. AOAC Int. 85 (2002), 1217–1240.
18. Mitaru, B.N., Blair, R., Reichert, R.D., Roe, W.E., Dark and yellow rapeseed hulls, soybean hulls and a purified fiber source: their effects on dry matter, energy, protein and amino acid digestibilities in cannulated pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 59 (1984), 1510–1518.
19. Mustafa, A.F., Christensen, D.A., McKinnon, J.J., Chemical characterization and nutrient availability of high and low fiber canola meal. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 76 (1996), 579–586.
20. Newkirk, R.W., Classen, H.L., Scott, T.A., Edney, M.J., The digestibility and content of amino acids in toasted and non-toasted canola meals. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 83 (2003), 131–139.
21. O'Brien, R.D., Fats and Oils: Formulating and Processing for Applications. 3rd ed., 2008, CRC Press, Boca Raton, New York.
22. Reddy, N.R., Pierson, M.D., Sathe, S.K., Salunkhe, D.K., Dry bean tannins: a review of nutritional implications. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 62 (1985), 541–549.
23. S.A.S, Statistical Analysis System, User‘s Guide. Version 6. 4th ed., 1990, SAS institute, Cary, NC, USA.
24. Schutyser, M.A.I., van der Goot, A.J., The potential of dry fractionation processes for sustainable plant protein production. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 22 (2011), 154–164.
25. Seth, P.C.C., Clandinin, D.R., Metabolisable energy value and composition of rapeseed meal and of fractions derived therefrom by air-classification. Br. Poult. Sci. 14 (1973), 499–505.
26. Skrede, A., Berge, G., Storebakken, T., Herstad, O., Aarstad, K., Sundstøl, F., Digestibility of bacterial protein grown on natural gas in mink, pigs, chicken and Atlantic salmon. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 76 (1998), 103–116.
27. Skrede, A., Mydland, L., Ahlstrøm, Ø., Reitan, K., Gislerød, H., Øverland, M., Evaluation of microalgae as sources of digestible nutrients for monogastric animals. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 20 (2011), 131–142.
28. Smith, D.M., Maskara, A., Preparation of well dispersed systems: the role of oxide bridging in agglomerate formation. Int. Fine Part. Res. Inst. 1 (1993), 251–268.
29. Srinivasan, R., Yadav, M.P., Belyea, R.L., Rausch, K.D., Pruiett, L.E., Johnston, D.B., Tumbleson, M.E., Singh, V., Fiber separation from distillers dried grains with solubles using a larger elutriation apparatus and use of fiber as a feedstock for corn fiber gum production. Biol. Eng. 1 (2008), 39–49.
30. Takacs, L., Self-sustaining reactions induced by ball milling. Prog. Mater. Sci. 47 (2002), 355–414.
31. Tyler, R.T., Panchuk, B.D., Effect of seed moisture content on the air classification of field peas and faba beans. Cereal Chem. 59 (1982), 31–33.
32. Vhile, S.G., Skrede, A., Ahlstrøm, Ø., Hove, K., Comparative apparent total tract digestibility of major nutrients and amino acids in dogs (Canis familiaris), blue foxes (Alopex lagopus) and mink (Mustela vison). Anim. Sci. 81 (2005), 141–148.
33. Vose, J.R., Basterrechea, M.J., Gorin, P.A.J., Finlayson, A.J., Youngs, C.G., Air classification of field peas and horsebean flours: chemical studies of starch and protein fractions. Cereal Chem. 53 (1976), 928–936.
34. Vose, J.R., Separating grain components by air classification. Sep. Purif. Rev. 7 (1978), 1–29.
35. Wu, Y.V., Nichols, N.N., Fine grinding and air classification of field pea. Cereal Chem. 82 (2005), 341–344.
36. Zhou, X., Oryschak, M.A., Zijlstra, R.T., Beltranena, E., Effects of feeding high- and low-fibre fractions of air-classified: solvent-extracted canola meal on diet nutrient digestibility and growth performance of weaned pigs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 179 (2013), 112–120.
37. Zhou, X., Zijlstra, R.T., Beltranena, E., Nutrient digestibility of solvent-extracted Brassica napus and Brassica juncea canola meals and their air-classified fractions fed to ileal-cannulated grower pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 93 (2015), 217–228.