Patient engagement in research with older adults with cancer

Journal of Geriatric Oncology

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 391-396

  Puts, Martine T E ^a   Sattar, Schroder ^a   Ghodraty Jabloo, Vida ^a   Hsu, Tina ^b   Fitch, Marg ^a   Szumacher, Ewa ^c   Ayala, Ana Patricia ^a   Alibhai, Shabbir M H ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b OTTAWA REGIONAL CANCER CENTRE   (Canada)

^c DEPARTMENT OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cancer; Frail elderly; Patient and family engagement; Patient and public involvement; Patient partnership

Indexed keywords

AGING; ARTICLE; CANCER CONTROL; CANCER RESEARCH; CAREGIVER; CLINICAL RESEARCH; EMOTION; GERIATRICS; HUMAN; MALIGNANT NEOPLASM; ONCOLOGY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT ENGAGEMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STUDY DESIGN; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; AGED; METHODOLOGY; NEOPLASM; PATIENT SELECTION; STANDARDS;

AGED; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SELECTION; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 85020183217     PISSN: 18794068     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2017.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Scher, K.S., Hurria, A., Under-representation of older adults in cancer registration trials: known problem, little progress. J Clin Oncol 30:17 (Jun 10 2012), 2036–2038.
2. Domecq, J.P., Prutsky, G., Elraiyah, T., Wang, Z., Nabhan, M., Shippee, N., et al. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res, 14, 2014, 89.
3. Woolf, S.H., Zimmerman, E., Haley, A., Krist, A.H., Authentic engagement of patients and communities can transform research, practice, and policy. Health Aff (Millwood) 35:4 (Apr 2016), 590–594.
4. Dudley, L., Gamble, C., Preston, J., Buck, D., Hanley, B., Williamson, P., et al. What difference does patient and public involvement make and what are its pathways to impact? Qualitative study of patients and researchers from a cohort of randomised clinical trials. PLoS One, 10(6), 2015, e0128817.
5. Carman, K.L., Workman, T.A., Engaging patients and consumers in research evidence: applying the conceptual model of patient and family engagement. Patient Educ Couns 100:1 (2017 Jan), 25–29.
6. Duffett, L., Patient engagement: what partnering with patient in research is all about. Thromb Res, 28, 2016 Oct [Epub ahead of print].
7. Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Canada's strategy for patient-oriented research. Improving health outcomes through evidence-informed care. http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/44000.html, 2011.
8. Strategy for patient oriented research-SPOR-putting patients first. Patient engagement framework. 2014, Canadian Institutes of Health Research [ http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/48413.html].
9. Shippee, N.D., Domecq Garces, J.P., Prutsky Lopez, G.J., Wang, Z., Elraiyah, T.A., Nabhan, M., et al. Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework. Health Expect 18:5 (Oct 2015), 1151–1166.
10. Brett, J., Staniszewska, S., Mockford, C., Herron-Marx, S., Hughes, J., Tysall, C., et al. A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities. Patient 7:4 (2014), 387–395.
11. Welcome to INVOLVE, INVOLVE. http://www.invo.org.uk, 2015.
12. The National Health and Medical Research Council in collaboration with the Consumers Health Forum of Australia. Summary statement on consumer and community participation in health and medical research. https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/r22.pdf, 2002.
13. Scottish Government, Scotland's national dementia strategy. http://www.gov.scot/Resource/Doc/324377/0104420.pdf, 2010.
14. Darling, E., Parra, M.A., Involving patients and the public in research. Nurse Res 20:6 (Jul 2013), 21–25.
15. Frank, L., Forsythe, L., Ellis, L., Schrandt, S., Sheridan, S., Gerson, J., et al. Conceptual and practical foundations of patient engagement in research at the patient-centered outcomes research institute. Qual Life Res 24:5 (May 2015), 1033–1041.
16. Smith, S.K., Selig, W., Harker, M., Roberts, J.N., Hesterlee, S., Leventhal, D., et al. Patient engagement practices in clinical research among patient groups, industry, and academia in the United States: a survey. PLoS One, 10(10), 2015, e0140232.
17. Forsythe, L.P., Ellis, L.E., Edmundson, L., Sabharwal, R., Rein, A., Konopka, K., et al. Patient and stakeholder engagement in the PCORI pilot projects: description and lessons learned. J Gen Intern Med 31:1 (Jan 2016), 13–21.
18. Concannon, T.W., Fuster, M., Saunders, T., Patel, K., Wong, J.B., Leslie, L.K., et al. A systematic review of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research. J Gen Intern Med 29:12 (Dec 2014), 1692–1701.
19. Gamble, C., Dudley, L., Allam, A., Bell, P., Buck, D., Goodare, H., et al. An evidence base to optimise methods for involving patient and public contributors in clinical trials: a mixed-methods study. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK316049/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK316049.pdf, Sep. 2015.
20. Buck, D., Gamble, C., Dudley, L., Preston, J., Hanley, B., Williamson, P.R., et al. From plans to actions in patient and public involvement: qualitative study of documented plans and the accounts of researchers and patients sampled from a cohort of clinical trials. BMJ Open, 4(12), Dec 4 2014, e006400.
21. Boote, J., Baird, W., Beecroft, C., Public involvement at the design stage of primary health research: a narrative review of case examples. Health Policy 95:1 (Apr 2010), 10–23.
22. South, A., Hanley, B., Gafos, M., Cromarty, B., Stephens, R., Sturgeon, K., et al. Models and impact of patient and public involvement in studies carried out by the Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London: findings from ten case studies. Trials, 17, Jul 29 2016, 376.
23. PCORI (Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute), PCORI engagement rubric for applications. http://www.pcori.org/sites/default/files/Engagement-Rubric.pdf, 2015.
24. PCORI (Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute), PCORI funded projects: sample engagement plans. http://www.pcori.org/sites/default/files/PCORI-Sample-Engagement-Plans.pdf, 2015.
25. Carman, K.L., Dardess, P., Maurer, M.E., Workman, T.A., Ganachari, D., Pathak-Sen, E., A roadmap for patient and family engagement in healthcare practice and research. 2014, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Palo Alto California [ http://patientfamilyengagement.org/].
26. Marlett, N., Emes, C., Grey matters: A guide to collaborative research with seniors. First edition, 2010, University of Calgary press, Calgary.
27. Marlett, N., Shklarov, S., Marshall, D., Santana, M.J., Wasylak, T., Building new roles and relationships in research: a model of patient engagement research. Qual Life Res 24:5 (May 2015), 1057–1067.
28. Gill, M., Bagshaw, S.M., McKenzie, E., Oxland, P., Oswell, D., Boulton, D., et al. Patient and family member-led research in the intensive care Unit: a novel approach to patient-centered research. PLoS One, 11(8), 2016, e0160947.
29. Miller, J.L., Teare, S.R., Marlett, N., Shklarov, S., Marshall, D.A., Support for living a meaningful life with osteoarthritis: a patient-to-patient research study. Patient 9:5 (Oct 2016), 457–464.
30. Backhouse, T., Kenkmann, A., Lane, K., Penhale, B., Poland, F., Killett, A., Older care-home residents as collaborators or advisors in research: a systematic review. Age Ageing 45:3 (May 2016), 337–345.
31. Heaven, A., Brown, L., Foster, M., Clegg, A., Keeping it credible in cohort multiple randomised controlled trials: the community ageing research 75 + (CARE 75 +) study model of patient and public involvement and engagement. Res Involvement Engagement, 2, 2016, 30.
32. Mockford, C., Murray, M., Seers, K., Oyebode, J.R., Grant, R., Boex, S., et al. A SHARED study-the benefits and costs of setting up a health research study involving lay co-researchers and how we overcame the challenges. Res Involvement and Engagement, 2, 2016, 8.
33. Kelly, S., Lafortune, L., Hart, N., Cowan, K., Fenton, M., Brayne, C., Dementia priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance: using patient and public involvement and the evidence base to inform the research agenda. Age Ageing 44:6 (Nov 2015), 985–993.
34. Martin, S., Fleming, J., Cullum, S., Dening, T., Rait, G., Fox, C., et al. Exploring attitudes and preferences for dementia screening in Britain: contributions from carers and the general public. BMC Geriatr, 15, Sep 9 2015, 110.
35. The James Lind Alliance, About the James Lind alliance. Priority setting partnerships. http://www.jla.nihr.ac.uk/about-the-james-lind-alliance/, 2016.
36. Saunders, C., Crossing, S., Towards meeting the research needs of Australian cancer consumers. BMC Res Notes, 5, Dec 3 2012, 667.
37. Islam, K.M., Opoku, S.T., Apenteng, B.A., Fetrick, A., Ryan, J., Copur, M., et al. Engaging patients and caregivers in patient-centered outcomes research on advanced stage lung cancer: insights from patients, caregivers, and providers. J Cancer Educ 29:4 (Dec 2014), 796–801.
38. Saunders, C., Girgis, A., Butow, P., Crossing, S., Penman, A., From inclusion to independence – training consumers to review research. Health Res Policy Syst, 6, Mar 9 2008, 3.
39. Marsden, J., Bradburn, J., Patient and clinician collaboration in the design of a national randomized breast cancer trial. Health Expect 7:1 (Mar 2004), 6–17.
40. Chiu, C.G., Mitchell, T.L., Fitch, M.I., From patient to participant: enhancing the validity and ethics of cancer research through participatory research. J Cancer Educ 28:2 (Jun 2013), 237–246.
41. Miller, J., Knott, V.E., Wilson, C., Roder, D., A review of community engagement in cancer control studies among indigenous people of Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the USA. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 21:3 (May 2012), 283–295.
42. Puts, M., Sattar, S., Fossat, T., Fitch, M., Hsu, T., Szumacher, E., et al. The senior Toronto oncology panel-research participation by older adults with cancer and their family members/caregivers. J Geriatr Oncol, 7/6(Supplement 1), 2016, S104.
43. AgeUK, Engaging with older people evidence review. http://www.ageuk.org.uk/Documents/EN-GB/For-professionals/Research/Evidence_Review_Engagement_with_Older_People.pdf?dtrk=true, 2010.
44. Kauffman, K.S., Dosreis, S., Ross, M., Barnet, B., Onukwugha, E., Mullins, C.D., Engaging hard-to-reach patients in patient-centered outcomes research. J Comp Eff Res 2:3 (May 2013), 313–324.
45. McElfish, P.A., Goulden, P.A., Bursac, Z., Hudson, J., Purvis, R.S., Kim Yeary, K.H., et al. Engagement practices that join scientific methods with community wisdom: designing a patient-centered, randomized control trial with a Pacific Islander community. Nurs Inq, 20, Jun 2016 [Epub ahead of print].
46. Jardins, T.D., Drone, S.A., Hashisaka, S., Hazzard, J., Hunt, S.B., Massey, K., et al. Patient engagement and activation in three underserved beacon communities. J Health Care Poor Underserved 26:3 (Aug 2015), 777–783.
47. Dugas, M., Trottier, M.E., Chipenda, D.S., Vaisson, G., Provencher, T., Colquhoun, H., et al. Involving members of vulnerable populations in the development of patient decision aids: a mixed methods sequential explanatory study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 17(1), Jan 19 2017, 12.
48. Valerio, M.A., Rodriguez, N., Winkler, P., Lopez, J., Dennison, M., Liang, Y., et al. Comparing two sampling methods to engage hard-to-reach communities in research priority setting. BMC Med Res Methodol, 16(1), Oct 28 2016, 146.
49. Guise, J.M., O'Haire, C., McPheeters, M., Most, C., LaBrant, L., Lee, K., et al. A practice-based tool for engaging stakeholders in future research: a synthesis of current practices. J Clin Epidemiol 66:6 (Jun 2013), 666–674.
50. Bagley, H.J., Short, H., Harman, N.L., Hickey, H.R., Gamble, C., Woolfall, K., et al. A patient and public involvement (PPI) toolkit for meaningful and flexible involvement in clinical trials - a work in progress. Res Involvement and Engagement, 2, 2016, 15.
51. Staniszewska, S., Brett, J., Mockford, C., Barber, R., The GRIPP checklist: strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 27:4 (Oct 2011), 391–399.
52. Staniszewska, S., Developing consensus on guidance for reporting patient and public involvement (GRIPP 2). 2015, Warwick Royal College of Nursing Research Institute [ http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/med/research/hscience/rcn/research/themea/?newsItem=094d434550ebf4e90150f19dbdc0036b].
53. PiiAF, The public involvement impact assessment framework guidance. 2014, Universities of Lancaster, Liverpool and Exeter [ http://piiaf.org.uk/documents/piiaf-guidance-jan14.pdf].