Patient and family member-led research in the intensive care unit: A novel approach to patient-centered research

PLoS ONE

Volumn 11, Issue 8, 2016, Pages

  Gill, Marlyn ^a   Bagshaw, Sean M ^b,c   McKenzie, Emily ^a   Oxland, Peter ^a,b   Oswell, Donna ^a   Boulton, Debbie ^a   Niven, Daniel J ^a,b   Potestio, Melissa L ^a,b   Shklarov, Svetlana ^a   Marlett, Nancy ^a   Stelfox, Henry T ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b ALBERTA HEALTH SERVICES   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALBERTA; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMMUNICATION SKILL; CRITICAL ILLNESS; FAMILY ATTITUDE; FAMILY COUNSELING; FAMILY DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT CARE; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; TELEPHONE INTERVIEW; TRANSITIONAL CARE; DECISION MAKING; FAMILY; HUMAN RELATION; INTENSIVE CARE; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

AGED; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CRITICAL CARE; CRITICAL ILLNESS; DECISION MAKING; FAMILY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PROFESSIONAL-FAMILY RELATIONS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

EID: 84983320420     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160947     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Swainston K, Summerbell C. The effectiveness of community engagement approaches and methods for health promotion interventions: Rapid Review Phase 3. University of Teesside: NICE National Collaborating Centre; 2007.
2. Gauvin FP. Patient and service user engagement: an environmental scan. Canadian Health Services Research Foundation; 2010.
3. Pearson M, Monks T, Gibson A, Allen M, Komashie A, Fordyce A, et al. Involving patients and the public in healthcare operational research-The challenges and opportunities. Oper Res Health Care. 2013; 2(4):86-89.
4. INVOLVE. 2015. Available: http://www.involve.nihr.ac.uk.
5. Chalmers I, Bracken MB, Djulbegovic B, Garattini S, Grant J, Gulmezoglu AM, et al. How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. Lancet. 2014; 383(9912):156-165. doi: 10. 1016/S0140-6736(13)62229-1 PMID: 24411644
6. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008; 337:a1655. doi: 10. 1136/bmj.a1655 PMID: 18824488
7. Glasgow RE, Lichtenstein E, Marcus AC. Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. Am J Public Health. 2003; 93 (8):1261-1267. PMID: 12893608
8. Domecq J, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, Wang Z, Nabhan M, Shippee N, et al. Patient engagement in research: A systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; 14(1):89.
9. Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, Herron-Marx S, Hughes J, Tysall C, et al. A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities. Patient. 2014; 7(4):387-395. doi: 10.1007/s40271-014-0065-0 PMID: 25034612
10. Nolen KB, Warren NA. Meeting the needs of family members of ICU patients. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2014; 37(4):393-406. doi: 10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000040 PMID: 25185767
11. Marlett N, Shklarov S, Marshall D, Santana MJ, Wasylak T. Building new roles and relationships in research: A model of patient engagement research. Qual Life Res. 2015; 24(5):1057-1067. doi: 10. 1007/s11136-014-0845-y PMID: 25377348
12. Burns KE, Duffett M, Kho ME, Meade MO, Adhikari NK, Sinuff T, et al. A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians. CMAJ. 2008; 179(3):245-252. doi: 10.1503/cmaj. 080372 PMID: 18663204
13. Marlett N, Emes C. Grey matters: A guide for collaborative research with seniors. Calgary, Alberta: University of Calgary Press; 2010: 344.
14. Antonovski A. Health, Stress and Coping. San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass; 1979.
15. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications; 1985.
16. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005; 15 (9):1277-1288. PMID: 16204405
17. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Atherton; 1967.
18. Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods, vol. 2. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1990.
19. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook, vol. 2. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994.
20. Shenton AK. Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Educ Inf. 2004; 22 (2):63-75.
21. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994.
22. Kirk J, Miller ML. Reliability and validity in qualitative research, vol. 1. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1986.
23. Laurance J, Henderson S, Howitt PJ, Matar M, Al Kuwari H, Edgman-Levitan S, et al. Patient engagement: Four case studies that highlight the potential for improved health outcomes and reduced costs. Health Affairs. 2014; 33(9):1627-1634. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0375 PMID: 25201668
24. Elliott D, Davidson JE, Harvey MA, Bemis-Dougherty A, Hopkins RO, Iwashyna TJ, et al. Exploring the scope of post-intensive care syndrome therapy and care: Engagement of non-critical care providers and survivors in a second stakeholders meeting. Crit Care Med. 2014; 42(12):2518-2526. doi: 10. 1097/CCM.0000000000000525 PMID: 25083984
25. Rozin P, Royzman EB. Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality & Social Psychology Review. 2001; 5(4):296-320.
26. Charland P, Stiphout M, Wallace N Patient and family experiences in Alberta's ICUs: Successes and challenges. Calgary, AB: Workforce Research and Evaluation, Alberta Health Services; 2015.
27. Wesson JS. Meeting the informational, psychosocial and emotional needs of each ICU patient and family. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 1997; 13(2):111-118. PMID: 9180500
28. Pronovost P, Berenholtz S, Dorman T, Lipsett PA, Simmonds T, Haraden C. Improving communication in the ICU using daily goals. J Crit Care. 2003; 18(2):71-75. PMID: 12800116
29. Fox MY. Improving communication with patients and families in the intensive care unit: palliative care strategies for the intensive care unit nurse. J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2014; 16(2):93-98.
30. Jacobowski NL, Girard TD, Mulder JA, Ely EW. Communication in critical care: Family rounds in the intensive care unit. Am J Crit Care. 2010; 19(5):421-430. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2010656 PMID: 20810417
31. Wilkinson P. A qualitative study to establish the self-perceived needs of family members of patients in a general intensive care unit. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 1995; 11(2):77-86. PMID: 7772959
32. Nelson JE, Puntillo KA, Pronovost PJ, Walker AS, McAdam JL, Ilaoa D, et al. In their own words: Patients and families define high-quality palliative care in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2010; 38(3):808-818. PMID: 20198726
33. Azoulay E, Pochard F, Chevret S, Lemaire F, Mokhtari M, Le Gall JR, et al. Meeting the needs of intensive care unit patient families: A multicenter study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001; 163(1):135-139. PMID: 11208638
34. James Lind Alliance. 2015. Available: http://www.jla.nihr.ac.uk.
35. Building a Patient-Centered Research Community. 2015. Available: http://www.pcori.org.
36. Berger R. Now I see it, now I don't: Researcher's position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qual Res. 2015; 15(2):219-234.
37. Macleod MR, Michie S, Roberts I, Dirnagl U, Chalmers I, Ioannidis JP, et al. Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste. Lancet. 2014; 383(9912):101-104. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13) 62329-6 PMID: 24411643