메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

A SHARED study-the benefits and costs of setting up a health research study involving lay co-researchers and how we overcame the challenges

Author keywords

Dementia; Health research; Lay co researchers; Memory loss; NHS Trust approval; Payment setting; Service users

Indexed keywords


EID: 85032271039     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20567529     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s40900-016-0021-3     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (32)

References (15)
  • 1
    • 85067237641 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Department of Health. Best Research for Best Health. London:Department of Health; 2006.
    • (2006)
  • 2
    • 77951652460 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • “It all depends”: Conceptualizing public involvement in the context of health technology assessment agencies
    • Gauvin F-P et al. “It all depends”: Conceptualizing public involvement in the context of health technology assessment agencies. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70:1518–26.
    • (2010) Soc Sci Med , vol.70 , pp. 1518-1526
    • Gauvin, F.-P.1
  • 3
    • 78249261803 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Patient and public involvement in clinical guidelines: International experiences and future perspectives
    • Boivin ACK, Fervers B, Gracia J, James M, Marshall C, Sakala C, et al. Patient and public involvement in clinical guidelines: international experiences and future perspectives. Qual Safety Health Care. 2010;19(5):e22. doi:10.1136/qshc.2009.034835.
    • (2010) Qual Safety Health Care , vol.19 , Issue.5 , pp. e22
    • Boivin, A.C.K.1    Fervers, B.2    Gracia, J.3    James, M.4    Marshall, C.5    Sakala, C.6
  • 4
    • 85067260700 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • INVOLVE
    • INVOLVE, http://www.invo.org.uk/. accessed 28/01/16
  • 6
    • 84906970210 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities
    • Brett J et al. A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities. Patient-Patient Centred Outcomes Res. 2014;7(4):387–95.
    • (2014) Patient-Patient Centred Outcomes Res , vol.7 , Issue.4 , pp. 387-395
    • Brett, J.1
  • 8
    • 84951919341 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The contemporary state of service-user-led research
    • Rose D. The contemporary state of service-user-led research. Lancet Psychiatry. 2015;2(11):959–60.
    • (2015) Lancet Psychiatry , vol.2 , Issue.11 , pp. 959-960
    • Rose, D.1
  • 9
    • 85067235614 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Alzheimer's Society Research Network
    • Alzheimer's Society Research Network www.alzheimers.org.uk/researchnetwork
  • 10
    • 78751607227 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Finding a way to pay in the UK: Methods and mechanisms for paying service users involved in research
    • Rickard W, Purtell R. Finding a way to pay in the UK: methods and mechanisms for paying service users involved in research. Disability Soc. 2011;26(1):33–48.
    • (2011) Disability Soc , vol.26 , Issue.1 , pp. 33-48
    • Rickard, W.1    Purtell, R.2
  • 11
    • 84874363519 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Paradoxes and Plato: Who’s sailing the ship?
    • Ives J, Damery S, Redwod S. PPI, paradoxes and Plato: Who’s sailing the ship? J Med Ethics. 2013;39(3):181–5.
    • (2013) J Med Ethics , vol.39 , Issue.3 , pp. 181-185
    • Ives, J.1    Damery, S.2    Redwod, S.P.P.I.3
  • 12
    • 84928311857 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A little more conversation please? Qualitative study of researchers’ and patients’ interview accounts of training for patient and public involvement in clinical trials
    • Dudley L et al. A little more conversation please? Qualitative study of researchers’ and patients’ interview accounts of training for patient and public involvement in clinical trials. Trials. 2015;16:190. doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0667-4.
    • (2015) Trials , vol.16
    • Dudley, L.1
  • 14
    • 85067236138 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • UK Research Integrity Office. Code of Practice for Research-Promoting good practice and preventing misconduct
    • UK Research Integrity Office. Code of Practice for Research-Promoting good practice and preventing misconduct. 2009. http://ukrio.org/publications/code-of-practice-for-research/. Last accessed 16/12/15
    • (2009)


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.