From plans to actions in patient and public involvement: Qualitative study of documented plans and the accounts of researchers and patients sampled from a cohort of clinical trials

BMJ Open

Volumn 4, Issue 12, 2014, Pages

  Buck, Deborah ^a   Gamble, Carrol ^a   Dudley, Louise ^a   Preston, Jennifer ^a   Hanley, Bec ^b   Williamson, Paula R ^a   Young, Bridget ^a   Allam, Alison ^c   Bell, Philip ^c   Formstone, Neil ^c   Goodare, Heather ^c   Walker, Alison ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b TwoCan Associates   (United Kingdom)

^c TwoCan Associates ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; COHORT ANALYSIS; FUNDING; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); COMPARATIVE STUDY; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PERSONNEL; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS; UNITED KINGDOM;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; RESEARCH SUPPORT AS TOPIC;

EID: 84920518117     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006400     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Gradinger F, Britten N, Wyatt K, et al. Values associated with public involvement in health and social care research: a narrative review. Health Expect 2013. doi:10.1111/hex.12158
2. Stewart R, Liabo K. Involvement in research without compromising research quality. J Health Serv Res Policy 2012;17:248-51.
3. Barber R, Beresford P, Boote J, et al. Evaluating the impact of service user involvement on research: a prospective case study. Int J Consum Stud 2011;35:609-15.
4. Staley K. Exploring impact: public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. 2009. http://www.invo.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Involve-Exploring-Impactfinal28.10.09.pdf (accessed 31 Mar 2014).
5. Goodare H, Smith R. The rights of patients in research. BMJ 1995;310:1277-8.
6. Selby JV, Lipstein SH. PCORI at 3 years - progress, lessons, and plans. N Engl J Med 2014;370:592-5.
7. Snape D, Kirkham J, Preston J, et al. Exploring areas of consensus and conflict around values underpinning public involvement in health and social care research: a modified Delphi study. BMJ Open 2014;4:e004217.
8. Saunders C, Girgis A. Status, challenges and facilitators of consumer involvement in Australian health and medical research. Health Res Policy Syst 2010;8:34.
9. Hull D, Barton D, Guo K, et al. Patient and public involvement to support liver disease research. Br J Nurs 2012;21:972-6.
10. Robinson L, Newton J, Dawson P. Professionals and the public: power or partnership in health research? J Eval Clin Pract 2012;18:276-82.
11. Department of Health. Best Research for Best Health: a new national health research strategy. London: Department of Health, 2006.
12. National Institute of Health Research. Patient and public involvement. http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/ppi (accessed 5 Dec 2013).
13. Godlee F. Towards the patient revolution. BMJ 2014;348:g1209.
14. Simpson A, Jones J, Barlow S, et al. Adding SUGAR: service user and carer collaboration in mental health nursing research. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv 2014;52:22-30.
15. Mockford C, Staniszewska S, Griffiths F, et al. The impact of patient and public involvement on UK NHS health care: a systematic review. Int J Qual Health Care 2012;24:28-38.
16. Khwaja AI. Is increasing community participation always a good thing? J Eur Econ Assoc 2004;2:10.
17. INVOLVE. Public involvement in clinical trials: supplement to the briefing notes for researchers. Eastleigh: INVOLVE, 2012.
18. Vale CL, Thompson LC, Murphy C, et al. Involvement of consumers in studies run by the Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit: results of a survey. Trials 2012;13:9.
19. Boote J, Baird W, Beecroft C. Public involvement at the design stage of primary health research: a narrative review of case examples. Health Policy 2010;95:10-23.
20. Evans BA, Bedson E, Bell P, et al. Involving service users in trials: developing a standard operating procedure. Trials 2013;14:219.
21. Boote J, Baird W, Sutton A. Public involvement in the design and conduct of clinical trials: a review. Int J Interdiscip Soc Sci 2011;5:91-111.
22. Gamble C, Dudley L, Allam A, et al. Patient and public involvement in the early stages of clinical trial development: a systematic cohort investigation. BMJ Open 2014;4:e005234.
23. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:83.
24. Salmon P, Peters S, Rogers A, et al. Peering through the barriers in GPs' explanations for declining to participate in research: the role of professional autonomy and the economy of time. Fam Pract 2007;24:269-75.
25. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Burgess RG, Bryman A, eds. Analyzing qualitative data. London: Routledge, 1994:173-94.
26. Shenton AK. Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Educ Info 2004;22:63-75.
27. Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ 2000;320:50-2.
28. Snape D, Kirkham J, Britten N, et al. Exploring perceived barriers, drivers, impacts and the need for evaluation of public involvement in health and social care research: a modified Delphi study. BMJ Open 2014;4:e004943.
29. Ward PR, Thompson J, Barber R, et al. Critical perspectives on 'consumer involvement' in health research: epistemological dissonance and the know-do gap. J Sociol 2010;46:63-82.
30. Mathie E, Wilson P, Poland F, et al. Consumer involvement in health research: a UK scoping and survey. Int J Consum Stud 2014;38:35-44.
31. Thompson J, Barber R, Ward PR, et al. Health researchers' attitudes towards public involvement in health research. Health Expect 2009;12:209-20.
32. Staniszewska S, Jones N, Newburn M, et al. User involvement in the development of a research bid: barriers, enablers and impacts. Health Expect 2007;10:173-83.
33. Hewlett S, Wit M, Richards P, et al. Patients and professionals as research partners: challenges, practicalities, and benefits. Arthritis Rheum 2006;55:676-80.
34. Boote J, Barber R, Cooper C. Principles and indicators of successful consumer involvement in NHS research: results of a Delphi study and subgroup analysis. Health Policy 2006;75:280-97.
35. Telford R, Boote JD, Cooper CL. What does it mean to involve consumers successfully in NHS research? A consensus study. Health Expect 2004;7:209-20.
36. PiiAF Study Group. The Public Involvement Impact Assessment Framework: executive summary. http://piiaf.org.uk/documents/exec-summary-0114.pdf (accessed 5 Mar 2014).
37. Boote JD, Twiddy M, Baird W, et al. Supporting public involvement in research design and grant development: a case study of a public involvement award scheme managed by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Research Design Service (RDS). Health Expect 2013. doi:10.1111/hex.12130
38. Walker DM, Pandya-Wood R. Can research development bursaries for patient and public involvement have a positive impact on grant applications? A UK-based, small-scale service evaluation. Health Expect 2013. doi:10.1111/hex.12127
39. Williamson P, Clarke M. The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative: its role in improving cochrane reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;5:Ed000041.
40. Williamson PR, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, et al. Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider. Trials 2012;13:132.
41. Staniszewska S, Brett J, Mockford C, et al. The GRIPP checklist: strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2011;27:391-9.