Using hyperLOPIT to perform high-resolution mapping of the spatial proteome

Nature Protocols

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 1110-1135

  Mulvey, Claire M ^a   Breckels, Lisa M ^a   Geladaki, Aikaterini ^a   Britovšek, Nina Koevar ^a   Nightingale, Daniel J H ^a   Christoforou, Andy ^b   Elzek, Mohamed ^a   Deery, Michael J ^a   Gatto, Laurent ^a   Lilley, Kathryn S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b Celgene Institute for Translational Research Europe CITRE   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CELL COMPONENT; CELL FRACTIONATION; CELL ORGANELLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENSITY GRADIENT CENTRIFUGATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HYPER LOCALIZATION OF ORGANELLE PROTEINS BY ISOTOPE TAGGING; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MACHINE LEARNING; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MOLECULAR IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; CHEMISTRY; EUKARYOTIC CELL; PROCEDURES; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

PROTEOME;

CELL FRACTIONATION; CENTRIFUGATION, DENSITY GRADIENT; EUKARYOTIC CELLS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 85019675158     PISSN: 17542189     EISSN: 17502799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2017.026     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Shin, S.J. et al. Unexpected gain of function for the scaffolding protein plectin due to mislocalization in pancreatic cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110, 19414-19419 (2013).
2. Cody, N.A.L., Iampietro, C. & Lécuyer, E. The many functions of mRNA localization during normal development and disease: from pillar to post. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Dev. Biol. 2, 781-796 (2013).
3. De Matteis, M.A. & Luini, A. Mendelian disorders of membrane trafficking. N. Engl. J. Med. 365, 927-938 (2011).
4. Olkkonen, V.M. & Ikonen, E. When intracellular logistics fails - genetic defects in membrane trafficking. J. Cell Sci. 119, 5031 (2006).
5. Sadowski, P.G. et al. Quantitative proteomic approach to study subcellular localization of membrane proteins. Nat. Protoc. 1, 1778-1789 (2006).
6. Ting, L., Rad, R., Gygi, S.G. & Haas, W. MS3 eliminates ratio distortion in isobaric labeling multiplexed quantitative proteomics. Nat. Methods 8, 937-940 (2011).
7. Christoforou, A. & Lilley, K.S. Taming the isobaric tagging elephant in the room in quantitative proteomics. Nat. Methods 8, 911-913 (2011).
8. Breckels, L.M., Mulvey, C.M., Lilley , K.S. & Gatto, L. A Bioconductor workflow for processing and analysing spatial proteomics data. F1000 Res. 5, 2926 (2016).
9. Breckels, L.M. et al. The effect of organelle discovery upon sub-cellular protein localisation. J. Proteomics 88, 129-140 (2013).
10. Breckels, L.M. et al. Learning from heterogeneous data sources: an application in spatial proteomics. PLoS Comput. Biol. 12, e1004920 (2016).
11. Gatto, L., Breckels, L.M., Wieczorek, S., Burger, T. & Lilley, K.S. Mass-spectrometry-based spatial proteomics data analysis using pRoloc and pRolocdata. Bioinformatics 30, 1322-1324 (2014).
12. Christoforou, A., Arias, A.M. & Lilley, K.S. in Methods in Molecular Biology (ed. Daniel Martins-de-Souza) 157-174 (Springer, 2014).
13. Gatto, L. et al. A foundation for reliable spatial proteomics data analysis. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 13, 1937-1952 (2014).
14. Christoforou, A. et al. A draft map of the mouse pluripotent stem cell spatial proteome. Nat. Commun. 7, 8992 (2016).
15. Breckels, L.M., Naake, T. & Gatto, L. pRolocGUI: interactive visualisation of spatial proteomics data. R Package Version 1.6.2. (2016).
16. Gentleman, R. et al. Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol. 5, R80 (2004).
17. Huber, W. et al. Orchestrating high-throughput genomic analysis with bioconductor. Nat. Methods 12, 115-121 (2015).
18. Gatto, L. & Lilley, K.S. MSnbase-an R/bioconductor package for isobaric tagged mass spectrometry data visualization, processing and quantitation. Bioinformatics 28, 288-289 (2012).
19. Magin, T.M., McWhir, J. & Melton, D.W. A new mouse embryonic stem cell line with good germ line contribution and gene targeting frequency. Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 3795-3796 (1992).
20. Dunkley, T.P.J. et al. Mapping the Arabidopsis organelle proteome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 6518-6523 (2006).
21. Groen, A.J. et al. Identification of trans-Golgi network proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana root tissue. J. Proteome Res. 13, 763-776 (2013).
22. Hall, S.L., Hester, S., Griffin, J.L., Lilley, K.S. & Jackson, A.P. The organelle proteome of the DT40 lymphocyte cell line. Mol. Cell Proteomics 8, 1295-1305 (2009).
23. Tan, D.J.L. et al. Mapping organelle proteins and protein complexes in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Proteome Res. 8, 2667-2678 (2009).
24. Itzhak, D.N., Tyanova, S., Cox, J. & Borner, G.H.H. Global, quantitative and dynamic mapping of protein subcellular localization. eLife 5, e16950 (2016).
25. Lund-Johansen, F. et al. MetaMass, a tool for meta-analysis of subcellular proteomics data. Nat. Methods 13, 837-840 (2016).
26. Islinger, M., Eckerskorn, C. & Völkl, A. Free-flow electrophoresis in the proteomic era: a technique in flux. Electrophoresis 31, 1754-1763 (2010).
27. Parsons, H.T. et al. Isolation and proteomic characterization of the Arabidopsis Golgi defines functional and novel components involved in plant cell wall biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 159, 12-26 (2012).
28. de Michele, R. et al. Free-flow electrophoresis of plasma membrane vesicles enriched by two-phase partitioning enhances the quality of the proteome from Arabidopsis seedlings. J. Proteome Res. 15, 900-913 (2016).
29. Loh, K.H. et al. Proteomic analysis of unbounded cellular compartments: synaptic clefts. Cell 166, 1295-1307.e21 (2016).
30. Hung, V. et al. Proteomic mapping of the human mitochondrial intermembrane space in live cells via ratiometric APEX tagging. Mol. Cell 55, 332-341 (2014).
31. Trost, M. et al. The phagosomal proteome in interferon-γ-activated macrophages. Immunity 30, 143-154 (2009).
32. Thimiri Govinda Raj, D.B. et al. A novel strategy for the comprehensive analysis of the biomolecular composition of isolated plasma membranes. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 541-541 (2011).
33. Heard, W., Sklenáč, J., Tomé, D.F.A., Robatzek, S. & Jones, A.M.E. Identification of regulatory and cargo proteins of endosomal and secretory pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana by proteomic dissection. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 14, 1796-1813 (2015).
34. Bausch-Fluck, D. et al. A mass spectrometric-derived cell surface protein atlas. PLoS One 10, e0121314 (2015).
35. Théry, C., Amigorena, S., Raposo, G. & Clayton, A. Isolation and characterization of exosomes from cell culture supernatants and biological fluids. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. Chap. 3: Unit 3.22 (2006).
36. Shah, A.D. et al. Integrative analysis of subcellular quantitative proteomics studies reveals functional cytoskeleton membrane-lipid raft interactions in cancer. J. Proteome Res. 15, 3451-3462 (2016).
37. Naba, A. et al. The extracellular matrix: tools and insights for the "omics" era. Matrix Biol. 49, 10-24 (2016).
38. Wysocka, J., Reilly, P.T. & Herr, W. Loss of HCF-1-chromatin association precedes temperature-induced growth arrest of tsBN67 cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 3820-3829 (2001).
39. Stadler, C. et al. Immunofluorescence and fluorescent-protein tagging show high correlation for protein localization in mammalian cells. Nat. Methods 10, 315-323 (2013).
40. Pagliarini, D.J. et al. A mitochondrial protein compendium elucidates complex I disease biology. Cell 134, 112-123 (2008).
41. Rhee, H.-W. et al. Proteomic mapping of mitochondria in living cells via spatially-restricted enzymatic tagging. Science 339, 1328-1331 (2013).
42. de Duve, C. Tissue fractionation. J. Cell Biol. 50, 20D-55D (1971).
43. Foster, L.J. et al. A mammalian organelle map by protein correlation profiling. Cell 125, 187-199 (2006).
44. Jadot, M. et al. Accounting for protein subcellular localization: a compartmental map of the rat liver proteome. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 16, 194-212 (2016).
45. Jean Beltran, P.M., Mathias, R.A. & Cristea, I.M. A portrait of the human organelle proteome in space and time during cytomegalovirus infection. Cell Syst. 3, 361-373.e366 (2016).
46. Jakobsen, L. et al. Novel asymmetrically localizing components of human centrosomes identified by complementary proteomics methods. EMBO J. 30, 1520-1535 (2011).
47. Rickwood, D.E. Iodinated Density Gradient Media - A Practical Approach (ed. Rickwood, D.) 147 (Oxford University Press, 1985).
48. Pertl-Obermeyer, H. et al. Identification of cargo for adaptor protein (AP) complexes 3 and 4 by sucrose gradient profiling. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 15, 2877-2889 (2016).
49. Graham, J. in Cell Biology Protocols 153-199 (Wiley, 2006).
50. Lazar, C., Gatto, L., Ferro, M., Bruley, C. & Burger, T. Accounting for the multiple natures of missing values in label-free quantitative proteomics data sets to compare imputation strategies. J. Proteome Res. 15, 1116-1125 (2016).
51. Webb-Robertson, B.J. et al. Review, evaluation, and discussion of the challenges of missing value imputation for mass spectrometry-based label-free global proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 14, 1993-2001 (2015).
52. Braun, C.R. et al. Generation of multiple reporter ions from a single isobaric reagent increases multiplexing capacity for quantitative proteomics. Anal. Chem. 87, 9855-9863 (2015).
53. Nikolovski, N., Shliaha, P.V., Gatto, L., Dupree, P. & Lilley, K.S. Label free protein quantification for plant Golgi protein localisation and abundance. Plant Physiol. 66, 1033-1043 (2014).
54. Parsons, H.T. & Heazlewood, J.L. Beyond the Western front: targeted proteomics and organelle abundance profiling. Front. Plant Sci. 6, 301 (2015).
55. Trotter, M.W.B., Sadowski, P.G., Dunkley, T.P.J., Groen, A.J. & Lilley, K.S. Improved sub-cellular resolution via simultaneous analysis of organelle proteomics data across varied experimental conditions. Proteomics 10, 4213-4219 (2010).
56. McAlister, G.C. et al. MultiNotch MS3 enables accurate, sensitive, and multiplexed detection of differential expression across cancer cell line proteomes. Anal. Chem. 86, 7150-7158 (2014).
57. Tyanova, S. et al. The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote)omics data. Nat. Methods 13, 731-740 (2016).
58. Tomizioli, M. et al. Deciphering thylakoid sub-compartments using a mass spectrometry-based approach. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 13, 2147-2167 (2014).
59. Kalmar, T. et al. Regulated fluctuations in Nanog expression mediate cell fate decisions in embryonic stem cells. PLoS Biol. 7, e1000149 (2009).
60. Wang, Y., Lilley, K.S. & Oliver, S.G. A protocol for the subcellular fractionation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae using nitrogen cavitation and density gradient centrifugation. Yeast 31, 127-135 (2014).
61. Baldwin, D.N. & Linial, M.L. Proteolytic activity, the carboxy terminus of Gag, and the primer binding site are not required for Pol incorporation into foamy virus particles. J. Virol. 73, 6387-6393 (1999).
62. The UniProt Consortium. UniProt: a hub for protein information. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D204-D212 (2015).
63. The Gene Ontology Consortium et al. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 25, 25-29 (2000).