Msnbase-an R/Bioconductor package for isobaric tagged mass spectrometry data visualization, processing and quantitation

Bioinformatics

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 288-289

  Gatto, Laurent ^a   Lilley, Kathryn S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; MASS SPECTROMETRY; METHODOLOGY; PROTEOMICS;

MASS SPECTROMETRY; PROTEOMICS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84856104821     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr645     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Bolstad,B.M. et al. (2003) A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias. Bioinformatics, 19, 185-193.
2. Gentleman,R.C. et al. (2004) Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol., 5, R80.
3. Huber,W. et al. (2002) Variance stabilization applied to microarray data calibration and to the quantification of differential expression. Bioinformatics, 18 (Suppl. 1), S96-S104.
4. Karp,N.A. et al. (2010) Addressing accuracy and precision issues in itraq quantitation. Mol. Cell Proteomics, 9, 1885-1897.
5. Lilley,K.S. et al. (2011) Challenges for proteomics core facilities. Proteomics, 11, 1017-1025.
6. Nilsson,T. et al. (2010) Mass spectrometry in high-throughput proteomics: ready for the big time. Nat. Methods, 7, 681-685.
7. Ross,P.L. et al. (2004) Multiplexed protein quantitation in saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol. Cell Proteomics, 3, 1154-1169.
8. Taylor,C.F. et al. (2007) The minimum information about a proteomics experiment (MIAPE). Nat. Biotechnol., 25, 887-893.
9. Thompson,A. et al. (2003) Tandem mass tags: a novel quantification strategy for comparative analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS. Anal. Chem., 75, 1895-1904.