메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 292-308

Outcomes in Cochrane systematic reviews related to wound care: An investigation into prespecification

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPUTATION; ARTICLE; BURN; CHRONIC WOUND; COCHRANE LIBRARY; DECUBITUS; FOOT ULCER; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; LEG ULCER; META ANALYSIS; MORTALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; SURGICAL INFECTION; SURGICAL WOUND; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; WOUND CARE; WOUND DEHISCENCE; WOUND DRAINAGE; WOUND HEALING; WOUND INFECTION; CONSENSUS; LITERATURE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SELECTION BIAS; STANDARDS;

EID: 85019253451     PISSN: 10671927     EISSN: 1524475X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12519     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (13)

References (126)
  • 2
    • 77950985892 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A post-hoc analysis of reduction in diabetic foot ulcer size at 4 weeks as a predictor of healing by 12 weeks
    • Snyder R, Cardinal M, Dauphinée D, Stavosky J. A post-hoc analysis of reduction in diabetic foot ulcer size at 4 weeks as a predictor of healing by 12 weeks. Ostomy Wound Manag 2010; 56: 44–50.
    • (2010) Ostomy Wound Manag , vol.56 , pp. 44-50
    • Snyder, R.1    Cardinal, M.2    Dauphinée, D.3    Stavosky, J.4
  • 3
    • 84903141537 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review
    • Gargon E, Gurung B, Medley N, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, et al. Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review. PLos One 2014; 9: e99111.
    • (2014) PLos One , vol.9
    • Gargon, E.1    Gurung, B.2    Medley, N.3    Altman, D.G.4    Blazeby, J.M.5    Clarke, M.6
  • 4
    • 84890736325 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Chapter 5: defining the review question and developing criteria for including studies [Internet]
    • In, Higgins JPT, Green S, editors., The Cochrane Collaboration
    • O'Connor D, Green S, Higgins JP. Chapter 5: defining the review question and developing criteria for including studies [Internet]. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated march 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available at www.cochrane-handbook.org.
    • (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated march 2011]
    • O'Connor, D.1    Green, S.2    Higgins, J.P.3
  • 5
    • 84915803004 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions
    • Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Kirkham J, Dwan K, Kramer S, Green S, et al. Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;10: MR000035.
    • (2014) Cochrane Database Syst Rev , vol.10 , pp. MR000035
    • Page, M.J.1    McKenzie, J.E.2    Kirkham, J.3    Dwan, K.4    Kramer, S.5    Green, S.6
  • 6
    • 84923609324 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Survey of new 2007 and 2011 Cochrane reviews found 37% of prespecified outcomes not reported
    • Smith V, Clarke M, Williamson P, Gargon E. Survey of new 2007 and 2011 Cochrane reviews found 37% of prespecified outcomes not reported. J Clin Epidemiol 2015; 68: 237–45.
    • (2015) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.68 , pp. 237-245
    • Smith, V.1    Clarke, M.2    Williamson, P.3    Gargon, E.4
  • 7
    • 2442692780 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles
    • Chan A-W, Hróbjartsson A, Haahr MT, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA 2004; 291: 2457–65.
    • (2004) JAMA , vol.291 , pp. 2457-2465
    • Chan, A.-W.1    Hróbjartsson, A.2    Haahr, M.T.3    Gøtzsche, P.C.4    Altman, D.G.5
  • 8
    • 84903272310 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Evidence for the selective reporting of analyses and discrepancies in clinical trials: a systematic review of cohort studies of clinical trials
    • Dwan K, Altman DG, Clarke M, Gamble C, Higgins JPT, Sterne JAC, et al. Evidence for the selective reporting of analyses and discrepancies in clinical trials: a systematic review of cohort studies of clinical trials. PLoS Med 2014; 11: e1001666.
    • (2014) PLoS Med , vol.11
    • Dwan, K.1    Altman, D.G.2    Clarke, M.3    Gamble, C.4    Higgins, J.P.T.5    Sterne, J.A.C.6
  • 9
    • 77952787734 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes
    • Boutron I, Dutton S, Ravaud P, Altman DG. Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes. JAMA 2010; 303: 2058–64.
    • (2010) JAMA , vol.303 , pp. 2058-2064
    • Boutron, I.1    Dutton, S.2    Ravaud, P.3    Altman, D.G.4
  • 10
    • 84892407699 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Funding source and the quality of reports of chronic wounds trials: 2004 to 2011
    • Hodgson R, Allen R, Broderick E, Bland JM, Dumville JC, Ashby R, et al. Funding source and the quality of reports of chronic wounds trials: 2004 to 2011. Trials 2014; 15: 19.
    • (2014) Trials , vol.15 , pp. 19
    • Hodgson, R.1    Allen, R.2    Broderick, E.3    Bland, J.M.4    Dumville, J.C.5    Ashby, R.6
  • 11
    • 84908032839 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Outcomes in Cochrane systematic reviews addressing four common eye conditions: an evaluation of completeness and comparability
    • Saldanha IJ, Dickersin K, Wang X, Li T. Outcomes in Cochrane systematic reviews addressing four common eye conditions: an evaluation of completeness and comparability. PLoS One 2014; 9.
    • (2014) PLoS One , vol.9
    • Saldanha, I.J.1    Dickersin, K.2    Wang, X.3    Li, T.4
  • 13
  • 14
    • 84902931975 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative: protocol for an international Delphi study to achieve consensus on how to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “core outcome set
    • Prinsen CAC, Vohra S, Rose MR, King-Jones S, Ishaque S, Bhaloo Z, et al. Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative: protocol for an international Delphi study to achieve consensus on how to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “core outcome set”. Trials 2014; 15: 247.
    • (2014) Trials , vol.15 , pp. 247
    • Prinsen, C.A.C.1    Vohra, S.2    Rose, M.R.3    King-Jones, S.4    Ishaque, S.5    Bhaloo, Z.6
  • 17
    • 85020663015 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • [Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, online]., (accessed on April 20
    • Dat AD, Poon F, Pham KB, Doust J. Aloe vera for treating acute and chronic wounds [Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, online]. Available at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD008762.pub2/abstract (accessed on April 20, 2015).
    • (2015) Aloe vera for treating acute and chronic wounds
    • Dat, A.D.1    Poon, F.2    Pham, K.B.3    Doust, J.4
  • 122
    • 77954905049 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Outcomes in controlled and comparative studies on non-healing wounds: recommendations to improve the quality of evidence in wound management
    • Gottrup F, Apelqvist J, Price P. Outcomes in controlled and comparative studies on non-healing wounds: recommendations to improve the quality of evidence in wound management. J Wound Care 2010; 19: 237–68.
    • (2010) J Wound Care , vol.19 , pp. 237-268
    • Gottrup, F.1    Apelqvist, J.2    Price, P.3
  • 124
    • 84872606337 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Wound infection, dressings and pain, is there a relationship in the chronic wound?
    • Cutting KF, White RJ, Mahoney P. Wound infection, dressings and pain, is there a relationship in the chronic wound? Int Wound J 2013; 10: 79–86.
    • (2013) Int Wound J , vol.10 , pp. 79-86
    • Cutting, K.F.1    White, R.J.2    Mahoney, P.3
  • 125
    • 85006292594 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • VenUS IV (Venous leg Ulcer Study IV)—compression hosiery compared with compression bandaging in the treatment of venous leg ulcers: a randomised controlled trial, mixed-treatment comparison and decision-analytic model
    • Ashby RL, Gabe R, Ali S, Saramago P, Chuang L-H, Adderley U, et al. VenUS IV (Venous leg Ulcer Study IV)—compression hosiery compared with compression bandaging in the treatment of venous leg ulcers: a randomised controlled trial, mixed-treatment comparison and decision-analytic model. NIHR J Library 2014; 18(57): 1–293.
    • (2014) NIHR J Library , vol.18 , Issue.57 , pp. 1-293
    • Ashby, R.L.1    Gabe, R.2    Ali, S.3    Saramago, P.4    Chuang, L.-H.5    Adderley, U.6
  • 126
    • 37749041179 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • OMERACT: an international initiative to improve outcome measurement in rheumatology
    • Tugwell P, Boers M, Brooks P, Simon L, Strand V, Idzerda L. OMERACT: an international initiative to improve outcome measurement in rheumatology. Trials 2007; 8: 38.
    • (2007) Trials , vol.8 , pp. 38
    • Tugwell, P.1    Boers, M.2    Brooks, P.3    Simon, L.4    Strand, V.5    Idzerda, L.6


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.