Gauze and tape and transparent polyurethane dressings for central venous catheters

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn 2016, Issue 5, 2016, Pages

  Webster, Joan ^a,b,c   Gillies, Donna ^d   O'Riordan, Elizabeth ^e   Sherriff, Karen L ^b   Rickard, Claire M ^a,b  

^a ROYAL BRISBANE AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^d CUMBERLAND HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^e CHILDREN S HOSPITAL AT WESTMEAD   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYURETHAN; OPSITE;

CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER; GAUZE DRESSING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SURGICAL TAPE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TRANSPARENT DRESSING; ADULT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; BACTEREMIA; BACTERIAL INFECTIONS; CATHETER-RELATED INFECTIONS; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERIZATION; CHILD; HUMAN; INDWELLING CATHETER; META ANALYSIS; OCCLUSIVE DRESSING; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC);

ADULT; BACTEREMIA; BACTERIAL INFECTIONS; CATHETER-RELATED INFECTIONS; CATHETERIZATION, CENTRAL VENOUS; CATHETERS, INDWELLING; CHILD; HUMANS; OCCLUSIVE DRESSINGS; POLYURETHANES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84965071471     PISSN: 14651858     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003827.pub3     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Brandt B, DePalma J, Irwin M, Shogan J, Lucke JF. Comparison of central venous catheter dressings in bone marrow transplant recipients. Oncology Nursing Forum 1996;23(5):829-36.
2. Barros LFNM, Bettencourt ARC, Diccini S, Fram DS, Belasco AGS, Barbosa DA. Evaluation of two types of dressings used on central venous catheters for hemodialysis. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem 2009;22:481-6.
3. Giles Y, Aksoy M, Tezelman S. What really affects the incidence of central venous catheter-related infections for short-term catheterization. Acta Chirurgica Belgica 2002;102:256-8.
4. Neufeld M. A randomized control trial of the effectiveness of Opsite Wound versus IV3000 in maintaining an occlusive central line dressing. Master's Thesis, The School of Graduate Studies, McMaster University 1991.
5. Shivnan JC, McGuire D, Freedman S, Sharkazy E, Bosserman G, Larson E, et al. A comparison of transparent adherent and dry sterile gauze dressings for long-term central catheters in patients undergoing bone marrow transplant. Oncology Nursing Forum 1991;18(8):1349-56.
6. Wille JC, Blusse van Oud Albas A, Thewessen EA. A comparison of two transparent film-type dressings in central venous therapy. Journal of Hospital Infection 1993;23(2):113-21.
7. Andersen PT, Herlevsen P, Schaumburg H. A comparative study of 'Op-site' and 'Nobecutan gauze' dressings for central venous line care. Journal of Hospital Infection 1986;7(2):161-8.
8. Berggren E, Bernell L, Gustafsson L, Stenke L, Hast R. The evaluation of Opsite IV3000 versus tape and gauze dressings in the management of central venous catheters in oncology patients. Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Advances in Wound Management. 1995:Abstract 291.
9. Chico-Padrón RM, Carrión-García L, Delle-Vedove-Rosales L, González-Vargas CS, Marrero-Perera M, Medina-Chico S, et al. Comparative safety and costs of transparent versus gauze wound dressings in intravenous catheterization. Journal of Nursing Quality Care 2011;Mar 14:[Epub ahead of print].
10. Conly JM, Grieves K, Peters B. A prospective, randomized study comparing transparent and dry gauze dressings for central venous catheters. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1989;159(2):310-9.
11. Dickerson N, Horton P, Smith S, Rose RC. Clinically significant central venous catheter infections in a community hospital: association with type of dressing. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1989;160(4):720-2.
12. Freiberger D, Bryant J, Marino B. The effects of different central venous line dressing changes on bacterial growth in a pediatric oncology population. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing 1992;9(1):3-7.
13. Hägerström M, Matthiesen K, Thuessen C. An improved dressing method for haemodialysis patients with permanent central venous catheters. Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Advances in Wound Management. 1994:Abstract 197.
14. Keenlyside D. Central venous catheters - a randomized comparative study of OpSite IV3000 and Tegaderm. Royal Society of Medicine Services International Congress and Symposium Series Number 1992;179:47-51.
15. Keenlyside D. Avoiding an unnecessary outcome. A comparative trial between IV3000 and a conventional film dressing to assess rates of catheter-related sepsis. Professional Nurse 1993;8(5):288-91.
16. Lawson M, Kavanagh T, McCredie K, Marts K, Barbour N, Chandler W. Comparison of transparent dressing to paper tape dressing over central venous catheter sites. NITA 1986;9(1):40-3.
17. Le Corre I, Delorme M, Cournoyer S. A prospective, randomized trial comparing a transparent dressing and a dry gauze on the exit site of long term central venous catheters of hemodialysis patients. Journal of Vascular Access 2003;4(2):56-61.
18. Little K, Palmer D. Central line exit sites: which dressing?. Nursing Standard 1998;12(48):42-4.
19. Maki D, Will L. Colonization and infection associated with transparent dressings for central venous catheters - a comparative trial. Surgical Infection Society and Association for Practitioners in Infection Control. 1984.
20. Maki DG. Infections due to infusion therapy. In: Bennett JV, Brachman PS editor(s). Hospital Infections. Third Edition. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1992:849-91.
21. McCredie KB, Lawson M, Marts K, Stern RN. A comparative evaluation of transparent dressings and gauze dressings for central venous catheters. Journal of Parenteral & Enteral Nutrition 1984;8(1):96.
22. Nehme AE, Trigger JA. Catheter dressings in central parenteral nutrition: A prospective randomized comparative study. Nutritional Support Services 1984;49:42-50.
23. Olson C, Heilman BS. Clinical performance of a new transparent chlorhexidine gluconate central venous catheter dressing. Journal of the Association of Vascular Access. 2008;13:13-9.
24. Petrosino B, Becker H, Christian B. Infection rates in central venous catheter dressings. Oncology Nursing Forum 1988;15(6):709-17.
25. Powell C, Regan C, Fabri PJ, Ruberg RL. Evaluation of Opsite catheter dressings for parenteral nutrition: a prospective, randomized study. JPEN. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 1982;6(1):43-6.
26. Powell C, Fabri PJ, Traetow MJ, Ruberg RL. TPN catheter sepsis - Effect of Opsite. JPEN. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 1984;8(1):Abstract 75.
27. Powell CR, Traetow MJ, Fabri PJ, Kudsk KA, Ruberg RL. Op-Site dressing study: a prospective randomized study evaluating povidone iodine ointment and extension set changes with 7-day Op-Site dressings applied to total parenteral nutrition subclavian sites. JPEN. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 1985;9(4):443-6.
28. Reynolds MG, Tebbs SE, Elliott TS. Do dressings with increased permeability reduce the incidence of central venous catheter related sepsis?. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing 1987;13(1):26-9.
29. Ricard P, Martin R, Marcoux JA. Protection of indwelling vascular catheters:incidence of bacterial contamination and catheter-related sepsis. Critical Care Medicine. 1985;13(7):541-3.
30. Thomas M. Op-site wound dressing for subclavian line care. JPEN. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 1977;1:abstract 41.
31. Wheeler WE, Messner R, Stephens N. A comparison of transparent dressings and gauze dressings for single-lumen, nontunneled central parenteral nutritional catheters. Nutritional Support Services 1988;8(9):27-8.
32. Young GP, Alexeyeff M, Russell DM, Thomas RJ. Catheter sepsis during parenteral nutrition: The safety of long-term OpSite dressings. JPEN. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 1988;12(4):365-70.
33. Altman DG, Bland JM. Detecting skewness from summary information. BMJ 1996;313(7066):1200.
34. Callahan JL, Wesorick B. Bacterial growth under a transparent dressing. American Journal of Infection Control 1987;15(6):231-7.
35. Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG, on behalf of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group and the Cochrane Bias Methods Group (Editors). Chapter 9: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
36. Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315(7109):629-34.
37. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, on behalf of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group and the Cochrane Bias Methods Group (Editors). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org. Wiley-Blackwell, 2008.
38. Hoffmann KK, Weber DJ, Samsa GP, Rutala WA. Transparent polyurethane film as an intravenous catheter dressing: A meta-analysis of the infection risks. JAMA 1992;267(15):2072-6.
39. Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J, on behalf of the Cochrane Information Retrieval Methods Group. Chapter 6: Searching for studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
40. Maki DG, Kluger DM, Crnich CJ. The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: A systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2006;81:1159-71.
41. McCann M, Moore ZE. Interventions for preventing infectious complications in haemodialysis patients with central venous catheters. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006894.pub2]
42. Mermal LA. What is the predominant source of intracascular catheter infections?. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2011;52:211-2.
43. O'Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, Dellinger EP, Garland J, Heard SO, et al. Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. American Journal of Infection Control 2011;239(4 Suppl 1):S1-34.
44. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Annals of Internal Medicine 2010;152:726-32.
45. Schwartz-Fulton J, Colley R, Valanis B, Fischer JE. Hyperalimentation dressings and skin flora. NITA 1981;4:354-7.
46. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Search filters. http://www.sign.ac.uk/methodology/filters.html#random (accessed 8 September 2010).
47. Thomas S. Comparative review of the properties of six semipermeable film dressings. Pharmaceutical Journal 1988;240(6487):785-9.
48. Treston-Aurand J, Olmsted RN, Allen-Bridson K, Craig CP. Impact of dressing materials on central venous catheter infection rates. Journal of Intravenous Nursing 1997;20(4):201-6.