Continuous versus interrupted skin sutures for non-obstetric surgery

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn 2014, Issue 2, 2014, Pages

  Gurusamy, Kurinchi Selvan ^a   Toon, Clare D ^b   Allen, Victoria B ^c   Davidson, Brian R ^a  

^a ROYAL FREE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b WEST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL   (United Kingdom)

^c JOHN RADCLIFFE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPENDECTOMY; CONTINUOUS SKIN SUTURE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERRUPTED SKIN SUTURE; LENGTH OF STAY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SKIN SURGERY; SURGICAL INFECTION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SUTURE REMOVAL; SUTURE TECHNIQUE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WOUND CLOSURE; WOUND DEHISCENCE; WOUND INFECTION; ABDOMINAL WALL; INGUINAL REGION; META ANALYSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SUTURING METHOD;

ABDOMINAL WALL; ABDOMINAL WOUND CLOSURE TECHNIQUES; GROIN; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; SURGICAL WOUND DEHISCENCE; SURGICAL WOUND INFECTION; SUTURE TECHNIQUES;

EID: 84906683044     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1469493X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010365.pub2     Document Type: Review

References (118)

1. Anatol TI, Roopchand R, Holder Y, Shing Hon G. A comparison of the use of plain catgut, skin tapes and polyglactin sutures for skin closure: a prospective clinical trial. Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh 1997;42(2):124-7.
2. Hopkinson GB, Bullen BR. Removable subcuticular skin suture in acute appendicitis: a prospective comparative clinical trial. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition) 1982;284(6319):869.
3. Kotaluoto S, Pauniaho SL, Helminen M, Kuokkanen H, Rantanen T. Wound healing after open appendectomies in adult patients: a prospective, randomised trial comparing two methods of wound closure. World Journal of Surgery 2012;36(10):2305-10.
4. McLean NR, Fyfe AH, Flint EF, Irvine BH, Calvert MH. Comparison of skin closure using continuous and interrupted nylon sutures. British Journal of Surgery 1980;67(9):633-5.
5. Pauniaho SL, Lahdes-Vasama T, Helminen MT, Iber T, Makela E, Pajulo O. Non-absorbable interrupted versus absorbable continuous skin closure in pediatric appendectomies. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery 2010;99(3):142-6.
6. Adams IW, Bell MS, Driver RM, Fry WG. A comparative trial of polyglycolic acid and silk as suture materials for accidental wounds. Lancet 1977;310(8050):1216-7.
7. Agrawal V, Sharma N, Joshi MK, Minocha VR. Role of suture material and technique of closure in wound outcome following laparotomy for peritonitis. Tropical Gastroenterology 2009;30(4):237-40.
8. Anate M. Skin closure of laparotomy wounds: absorbable subcuticular sutures vs. non-absorbable interrupted sutures. West African Journal of Medicine 1991;10(2):150-7.
9. Andersen JR, Burcharth F, Larsen HW, Røder O, Andersen B. Polyglycolic acid, silk, and topical ampicillin. Their use in hernia repair and cholecystectomy. Archives of Surgery 1980;115(3):293-5.
10. Anonymous. Removable subcuticular skin suture in acute appendicitis: a prospective comparable clinical trial. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition) 1982;284(6323):1195.
11. Bang RL, Mustafa MD. Comparative study of skin wound closure with polybutester (Novafil) and polypropylene. Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh 1989;34(4):205-7.
12. Barker P. Breast biopsy: long term follow up of three methods of skin closure. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 1984;66(5):367-8.
13. Bohanes T, Neoral C, Klein J, Havlik R, Aujesky R, Kral V. [Role of modern absorbable suture materials in decreasing the occurrence of early complications after laparotomy]. Rozhledy v Chirurgii 2002;81(Supplement 1):S24-6.
14. Boutros S, Weinfeld AB, Friedman JD. Continuous versus interrupted suturing of traumatic lacerations: a time, cost, and complication rate comparison. Journal of Trauma 2000;48(3):495-7.
15. Chen K, Klapper AS, Voige H, Del Priore G. A randomized, controlled study comparing two standardized closure methods of laparoscopic port sites. JSLS: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2010;14(3):391-4.
16. Chen SY, Chen TM, Dai NT, Fu JP, Chang SC, Deng SC, et al. Do antibacterial-coated sutures reduce wound infection in head and neck cancer reconstruction?. European Journal of Surgical Oncology 2011;37(4):300-4.
17. Clough JV, Alexander-Williams J. Surgical and economic advantages of polyglycolic-acid suture material in skin closure. Lancet 1975;305(7900):194-5.
18. Corder AP, Schache DJ, Farquharson SM, Tristram S. Wound infection following high saphenous ligation. A trial comparing two skin closure techniques: subcuticular polyglycolic acid and interrupted monofilament nylon mattress sutures. Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh 1991;36(2):100-2.
19. de Waard J, Trimbos B, Peters L. Cosmetic results of lower midline abdominal incision: Donati stitches versus a continuous intracutaneous suture in a randomized clinical trial. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2006;85(8):955-9.
20. Elashry OM, Nakada SY, Wolf JS Jr, Sherburne Figenshau R, McDougall EM, Dayman RV. Comparative clinical study of port-closure techniques following laparoscopic surgery. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 1996;183(4):335-44.
21. Emi Y, Maehara Y. Multicenter randomized controlled trial in use of the synthetic absorbable surgical suture material for digestive system surgical procedures to prevent surgical wound infections. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 2012;113(Suppl 3):45-6.
22. Erel E, Pleasance PI, Ahmed O, Hart NB. Absorbable versus non-absorbable suture in carpal tunnel decompression. Journal of Hand Surgery (Edinburgh, Scotland) 2001;26(2):157-8.
23. Fagniez PL, Hay JM, Lacaine F, Thomsen C. Abdominal midline incision closure. A multicentric randomized prospective trial of 3, 135 patients, comparing continuous vs interrupted polyglycolic acid sutures. Archives of Surgery 1985;120(12):1351-3.
24. Ford HR, Jones P, Gaines B, Reblock K, Simpkins DL. Intraoperative handling and wound healing: controlled clinical trial comparing coated VICRYL plus antibacterial suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture with triclosan) with coated VICRYL suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture). Surgical Infections 2005;6(3):313-21.
25. Foster GE, Hardy EG, Hardcastle JD. Subcuticular suturing after appendicectomy. Lancet 1977;1(8022):1128-9.
26. Galal I, El-Hindawy K. Impact of using triclosan-antibacterial sutures on incidence of surgical site infection. American Journal of Surgery 2011;202(2):133-8.
27. Gandham SG, Meron D. Prospective randomised trial comparing traditional suture technique with the dynamic sliding loop suture technique in the closure of skin lacerations. Emergency Medicine Journal 2003;20(1):33-6.
28. Ghaderi H, Shamimi K, Moazzami F, Razavi SHE, Aminian A, Jalali SM, et al. A new look at an old dogma: wound complications in two methods of skin closure in uncomplicated appendicitis. Tehran University Medical Journal 2010;68(1):54-8.
29. Gislason H, Soreide O, Viste A. Wound complications after major gastrointestinal operations. The surgeon as a risk factor. Digestive Surgery 1999;16(6):512-4.
30. Hansen TB, Kirkeby L, Fisker H, Larsen K. Randomised controlled study of two different techniques of skin suture in endoscopic release of carpal tunnel. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery 2009;43(6):335-8.
31. Harimoto N, Shirabe K, Abe T, Yukaya T, Tsujita E, Gion T, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial investigating the type of sutures used during hepatectomy. World Journal of Gastroenterology 2011;17(18):2338-42.
32. Howard K, Simison AJM, Morris A, Bhalaik V. A prospective randomised trial of absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for wound closure after fasciectomy for Dupuytren's contracture. Journal of Hand Surgery, European Volume 2009;34(5):618-20.
33. Huszar O, Baracs J, Toth M, Damjanovich L, Kotan R, Lazar G, et al. Comparison of wound infection rates after colon and rectal surgeries using triclosan-coated or bare sutures -- a multi-center, randomized clinical study. Magyar Sebeszet 2012;65(3):83-91.
34. Irvin TT, Koffman CG, Duthie HL. Layer closure of laparotomy wounds with absorbable and non-absorbable suture materials. British Journal of Surgery 1976;63(10):793-6.
35. Irvin TI. Closure of the abdominal wound. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 1978;60(3):224-6.
36. Isik I, Selimen D, Senay S, Alhan C. Efficiency of antibacterial suture material in cardiac surgery: A double-blind randomized prospective study. Heart Surgery Forum 2012;15(1):E40-5.
37. Israelsson LA, Jonsson T. Closure of midline laparotomy incisions with polydioxanone and nylon: the importance of suture technique. British Journal of Surgery 1994;81(11):1606-8.
38. Jones I. Cosmetic results of lower midline abdominal incision: Donati stitches versus a continuous intracutaneous suture in a randomized clinical trial - Commentary. Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey 2006;61(12):776-7.
39. Kakeji Y, Emi Y, Maehara Y. Phase II multi-center randomized clinical trial on the use of synthetic absorbable sutures to prevent wound infection in surgery. Nihon Geka Gakkai zasshi 2009;110(Supplement 3):41-2.
40. Karabay O, Fermanci E, Silistreli E, Aykut K, Yurekli I, Catalyurek H, et al. Intracutaneous versus transcutaneous suture techniques: comparison of sternal wound infection rates in open-heart surgery patients. Texas Heart Institute Journal 2005;32(3):277-82.
41. Karounis H, Gouin S, Eisman H, Chalut D, Pelletier H, Williams B. A randomized, controlled trial comparing long-term cosmetic outcomes of traumatic pediatric lacerations repaired with absorbable plain gut versus nonabsorbable nylon sutures. Academic Emergency Medicine 2004;11(7):730-5.
42. Khachatryan N, Dibirov M, Omelyanovsky V, Chupalov M, Gasanova G. Prevention of postoperative infections in abdominal surgery using reabsorbable suture with antibacterial activity (vicryl plus) versus reabsorbable standard sutures. Surgical infections 2011;12(2):A13-4.
43. Knaebel HP, Koch M, Sauerland S, Diener MK, Buchler MW, Seiler CM. Interrupted or continuous slowly absorbable sutures - design of a multi-centre randomised trial to evaluate abdominal closure techniques INSECT-Trial [ISRCTN24023541]. BMC Surgery 2005;5:3.
44. Knaebel HP, Kirschner MH, Reidel MA, Buchler MW, Seiler CM. Operative standardization in randomized controlled surgical trials. Meeting of the INSECT trial. Der Chirurg 2006;77(3):267-72.
45. Leaper DJ, Benson CE. Subcuticular skin closure after inguinal surgery. A controlled trial of polypropylene or polydioxanone. Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh 1985;30(4):234-6.
46. Lu LK, Ko JM, Lee J, Krum DM, Lyn Price L, Finn D, et al. A randomized, prospective trial evaluating surgeon preference in selection of absorbable suture material. Journal of Drugs in Dermatology 2012;11(2):196-201.
47. Luck RP, Flood R, Eyal D, Saludades J, Hayes C, Gaughan J. Cosmetic outcomes of absorbable versus nonabsorbable sutures in pediatric facial lacerations. Pediatric Emergency Care 2008;24(3):137-42.
48. Luck R, Tredway T, Gerard J, Eyal D, Krug L, Flood R. Comparison of cosmetic outcomes of absorbable versus nonabsorbable sutures in pediatric facial lacerations. Pediatric Emergency Care 2013;29(6):691-5.
49. Lundblad R, Simensen HV, Wiig JN, Niels Gruner OP. Skin closure. A prospective randomized study. Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening 1989;109(12):1307-9.
50. Mattavelli I, Nespoli L, Alfieri S, Cantore F, Cobianchi L, Luperto M, et al. Effect of triclosan-coated suture on surgical site infection after colorectal surgery: Final results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. Surgical Infections 2013;14(2):A9.
51. Mendoza CB, Watne AL, Grace JE, Moore GE. Wire versus silk: choice of surgical wound closure in patients with cancer. American Journal of Surgery 1966;112(6):839-45.
52. Menovsky T, Bartels RH, van Lindert EL, Grotenhuis JA. Skin closure in carpal tunnel surgery: a prospective comparative study between nylon, polyglactin 910 and stainless steel sutures. Hand Surgery 2004;9(1):35-8.
53. Mouzas GL, Yeadon A. Does the choice of suture material affect the incidence of wound infection? A comparison of dexon (polyglycolic acid) sutures with other commonly used sutures in an accident and emergency department. British Journal of Surgery 1975;62(12):952-5.
54. Murphy PG, Tadros E, Cross S, Hehir D, Burke PE, Kent P, et al. Skin closure and the incidence of groin wound infection: a prospective study. Annals of Vascular Surgery 1995;9(5):480-2.
55. Mylonas C, Brocklehurst G. A prospective randomized comparison of continuous Polydioxanone and interrupted Neurilion for neurosurgical wound closure. British Journal of Neurosurgery 1991;5(4):357-60.
56. Nakamura T, Kashimura N, Noji T, Suzuki O, Ambo Y, Nakamura F, et al. Triclosan-coated sutures reduce the incidence of wound infections and the costs after colorectal surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Surgery 2013;153(4):576-83.
57. Niggebrugge AHP, Trimbos JB, Hermans J, Steup WH, Van De Velde CJH. Influence of abdominal-wound closure technique on complications after surgery: a randomised study. Lancet 1999;353(9164):1563-7.
58. Onwuanyi ON, Evbuomwan I. Skin closure during appendicectomy: a controlled clinical trial of subcuticular and interrupted transdermal suture techniques. Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh 1990;35(6):353-5.
59. Pease R. The incidence of hypertrophic scar formation in wounds closed with subcuticular nylon or polyglycolic acid (Dexon). British Journal of Plastic Surgery 1976;29(4):284-5.
60. Rasic Z, Schwarz D, Adam VN, Sever M, Lojo N, Rasic D, et al. Efficacy of antimicrobial triclosan-coated polyglactin 910 (Vicryl* Plus) suture for closure of the abdominal wall after colorectal surgery. Collegium Antropologicum 2011;35(2):439-43.
61. Richards PC, Balch CM, Aldrete JS. Abdominal wound closure. A randomized prospective study of 571 patients comparing continuous vs. interrupted suture techniques. Annals of Surgery 1983;197(2):238-43.
62. Risnes I, Abdelnoor M, Tore Baksaas S, Lundblad R, Svennevig JL. Sternal wound infections in patients undergoing open heart surgery: randomized study comparing intracutaneous and transcutaneous suture techniques. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2001;72(5):1587-91.
63. Risnes I, Abdelnoor M, Lundblad R, Baksaas ST, Svennevig JL. Leg wound closure after saphenous vein harvesting in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective randomized study comparing intracutaneous, transcutaneous and zipper techniques. Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal 2002;36(6):378-82.
64. Rogers P. Effect of triclosan-coated sutures on incidence of surgical wound infection after lower limb revascularization surgery: a randomized controlled trial. By Turtiainen et al. DOI:10.1007/s00268-012-1655-4. World Journal of Surgery 2012;36(10):2535-6.
65. Rosen DM, Carlton MA. Skin closure at laparoscopy. Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists 1997;4(3):347-51.
66. Sahlin S, Ahlberg J, Granstrom L, Ljungstrom KG. Monofilament versus multifilament absorbable sutures for abdominal closure. British Journal of Surgery 1993;80(3):322-4.
67. Sakka S, Graham K, Abdula A. Wound closure in hip surgery. Comparative study of subcuticular vs interrupted suture. A randomised prospective study [abstract]. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume 1995;77-B(Supplement II):232.
68. Sakka SA, Graham K, Abdulah A. Skin closure in hip surgery: subcuticular versus transdermal. A prospective randomized study. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica 1995;61(4):331-6.
69. Seiler CM, Bruckner T, Diener MK, Papyan A, Golcher H, Seidlmayer C, et al. Interrupted or continuous slowly absorbable sutures for closure of primary elective midline abdominal incisions: a multicenter randomized trial (INSECT: ISRCTN24023541). Annals of Surgery 2009;249(4):576-82.
70. Turner FW, Griswold WA, Janzen HW, Milner JF, Rivers LF. Clinical trial of a new absorbable synthetic suture material: polyglycolic acid. Canadian Journal of Surgery 1972;15(6):389-93.
71. Turtiainen J, Saimanen EI, Makinen KT, Nykanen AI, Venermo MA, Uurto IT, et al. Effect of triclosan-coated sutures on the incidence of surgical wound infection after lower limb revascularization surgery: a randomized controlled trial. World Journal of Surgery 2012;36(10):2528-34.
72. Vipond MN, Higgins AF. Subcuticular Prolene or PDS for skin closure?. Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh 1991;36(2):97-102.
73. Watson GM, Anders CJ, Glover JR. Op-Site skin closure: a comparison with subcuticular and interrupted sutures. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 1983;65(2):83-4.
74. Zhang ZT, Zhang HW, Fang XD, Wang LM, Li XX, Li YF, et al. Cosmetic outcome and surgical site infection rates of antibacterial absorbable (Polyglactin 910) suture compared to Chinese silk suture in breast cancer surgery: A randomized pilot research. Chinese Medical Journal 2011;124(5):719-24.
75. Farris RS, Hays LV. Controlled trial of the effectiveness of randomized wound closures. Missouri Medicine 1981;78(1):17-20.
76. Hamelmann WH, Timmermann W, Thiede A. Cost-benefit ratio of various skin closure methods. Chirurgische Praxis 2001;58(3):423-30.
77. Melo RM, Gazel ASC, Cozadi AO. Evaluation of the closure time and dehiscence between two methods of abdominal wall closure. Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes 1989;16(6):256-8.
78. Soottiporn C, Bidhya C, Paisarn V, Kamolnate T. Primary subcuticular appendectomy wound closure in children: results of a prospective clinical trial. Thai Journal of Surgery 1998;19(2):76-7.
79. Biancari F, Tiozzo V. Staples versus sutures for closing leg wounds after vein graft harvesting for coronary artery bypass surgery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 5. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008057]
80. Coulthard P, Esposito M, Worthington HV, van der Elst M, van Waes OJ, Darcey J. Tissue adhesives for closure of surgical incisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 5. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004287]
81. Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG (editors), on behalf of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group and the Cochrane Bias Methods Group. Chapter 9: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
82. DeMets DL. Methods for combining randomized clinical trials: strengths and limitations. Statistics in Medicine 1987;6(3):341-50.
83. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 1986;7(3):177-88.
84. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315(7109):629-34.
85. Ethicon. Monocryl. (Poliglecaprone 25) Monofilament Suture. http://www.ethiconproducts.co.uk/sites/default/files/pdf/ETHICON-MONOCRYL-Monofilament-Suture.pdf accessed on 27 February 2013.
86. Ethicon. Coated VICRYL. (Polyglactin 910) Suture. http://www.ethiconproducts.co.uk/sites/default/files/pdf/ETHICON-Coated-VICRYL-Suture.pdf accessed on 27 February 2013.
87. Garner JS. CDC guideline for prevention of surgical wound infections, 1985. Infection Control 1986;7(3):193-200.
88. Guo S, Dipietro LA. Factors affecting wound healing. Journal of Dental Research 2010;89(3):219-29.
89. Gurusamy KS, Gluud C, Nikolova D, Davidson BR. Assessment of risk of bias in randomized clinical trials in surgery. British Journal of Surgery 2009;96(4):342-9.
90. Herwaldt LA, Cullen JJ, Scholz D, French P, Zimmerman MB, Pfaller MA, et al. A prospective study of outcomes, healthcare resource utilization, and costs associated with postoperative nosocomial infections. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 2006;27(12):1291-8.
91. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine 2002;21(11):1539-58.
92. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
93. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC (editors) on behalf of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group and the Cochrane Bias Methods Group. Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
94. Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ (editors). Chapter 7: Selecting studies and collecting data. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
95. Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (editors) on behalf of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group and the Cochrane Bias Methods Group. Chapter 16: Special topics in statistics. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
96. Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 1992;13(10):606-8.
97. Keill RH, Keitzer WF, Nichols WK, Henzel J, DeWeese MS. Abdominal wound dehiscence. Archives of Surgery 1973;106(4):573-7.
98. Kettle C, Hills RK, Ismail KM. Continuous and interrupted suturing techniques for repair of episiotomy or second-degree tears. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 11. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000947.pub3]
99. Kjaergard LL, Villumsen J, Gluud C. Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses. Annals of Internal Medicine 2001;135(11):982-9.
100. Le TA, Dibley MJ, Vo VN, Archibald L, Jarvis WR, Sohn AH. Reduction in surgical site infections in neurosurgical patients associated with a bedside hand hygiene program in Vietnam. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 2007;28(5):583-8.
101. Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J (editors) on behalf of the Cochrane Information Retrieval Methods Group. Chapter 6: Searching for studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
102. Macaskill P, Walter SD, Irwig L. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine 2001;20(4):641-54.
103. Mackeen AD, Berghella V, Larsen ML. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 11. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003577.pub3]
104. Mannien J, Wille JC, Kloek JJ, van Benthem BH. Surveillance and epidemiology of surgical site infections after cardiothoracic surgery in The Netherlands, 2002-2007. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2011;141(4):899-904.
105. Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, Cook DJ, Jadad AR, Moher M, et al. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?. Lancet 1998;352(9128):609-13.
106. NCBI-MeSH. Cicatrix, Hypertrophic. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/68017439 1993 (accessed on 24th June 2013).
107. NCBI-MeSH. Keloid. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/68007627 2012 (accessed on 24th June 2013).
108. Newell DJ. Intention-to-treat analysis: implications for quantitative and qualitative research. International Journal of Epidemiology 1992;21(5):837-41.
109. Parell GJ, Becker GD. Comparison of absorbable with nonabsorbable sutures in closure of facial skin wounds. Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery 2003;5(6):488-90.
110. Reilly J, Allardice G, Bruce J, Hill R, McCoubrey J. Procedure-specific surgical site infection rates and postdischarge surveillance in Scotland. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 2006;27(12):1318-23.
111. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). 5.1. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.
112. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995;273(5):408-12.
113. Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Higgins JPT, Vist GE, Glasziou P, Guyatt GH (editors) on behalf of the Cochrane Applicability and Recommendations Methods Group and the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group. Chapter 11: Presenting results and 'Summary of findings' tables. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
114. Selvadurai D, Wildin C, Treharne G, Choksy SA, Heywood MM, Nicholson ML. Randomised trial of subcuticular suture versus metal clips for wound closure after thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 1997;79(4):303-6.
115. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Search filters. http://www.sign.ac.uk/methodology/filters.html (Accesseed 20 December, 2012).
116. Weiser TG, Regenbogen SE, Thompson KD, Haynes AB, Lipsitz SR, Berry WR, et al. An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data. Lancet 2008;372(9633):139-44.
117. Wood L, Egger M, Gluud LL, Schulz KF, Jüni P, Altman GD, et al. Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ 2008;336(7644):601-5.
118. Woodfield JC, Beshay N, van Rij AM. A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials assessing the prophylactic use of ceftriaxone. A study of wound, chest, and urinary infections. World Journal of Surgery 2009;33(12):2538-50.