Assessment as a context for student engagement

Handbook of Research on Student Engagement

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 457-477

  Nichols, Sharon L ^a   Dawson, Heather S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85018452709     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_22     Document Type: Chapter

References (155)

1. Abrams, L., Pedulla, J. J., & Madaus, G. (2003). Views from the classroom: Teachers' opinions of statewide testing programs. Theory into Practice, 42(1), 18-28.
2. Allington, R., & McGill-Franzen, A. (1992). Unintended effects of educational reform in New York. Educational Policy, 6(4), 397-414.
3. Ames, C. (1984). Competitive, cooperative, and individualistic goal structures: A cognitive-motivational analysis. In R. E. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Vol. I. Student motivation. New York: Academic.
4. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271.
5. Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students' learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260-267.
6. Amrein, A., & Berliner, D. (2002). High-stakes testing, uncertainty, and student learning. Educational Policy and Analysis Archives, 10(8). Retrieved from http://www. epaa. asu. edu/epaa/v10n18
7. Anderman, E. M., & Maehr, M. L. (1994). Motivation and schooling in the middle grades. Review of Educational Research, 64(2), 287-309.
8. Anderman, E. (2007). The effects of personal, classroom, and school goal structures on academic cheating (pp. 87-106). In E. M. Anderman & T. B. Murdock (Eds.), Psychology of academic cheating. NY: Elsevier.
9. Atkinson, J. W. (1974). Motivational determinants of intellective performance and cumulative achievement. In J. W. Atkinson & J. O. Raynor (Eds.), Motivation and achievement. Washington, DC: V. H. Winston.
10. Atkinson, J. W. (1981a). Studying personality in the context of an advanced motivational psychology. American Psychologist, 36(2), 117-128.
11. Atkinson, J. W. (1981b). Thematic apperceptive measurement of motivation in 1950 and 1980. In G. D'Ydewalle & W. Lens (Eds.), Cognition in human motivation and learning (pp. 159-198). Hillsdale, NH: Erlbaum.
12. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. T. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61 213-238.
13. Berliner, D. C. (1979). Tempus educare. In P. L. Peterson & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Research on teaching: Concepts, findings, and implications (pp. 120-135). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing.
14. Berliner, D. C., & Biddle, B. J. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on America's public schools. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
15. Black, R, & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7-74.
16. Black, R, & Wiliam, D. (2006). Developing a theory of formative assessment. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 81-100). London: Sage.
17. Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). A taxonomy ofeducational objectives: Handbook I, the cognitive domain. New York: Longman.
18. Blumenfeld, P. C. (1992). Classroom learning and motivation: Clarifying and expanding goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 272-281.
19. Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(2), 199-231.
20. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R., & Zeidner, M. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic.
21. Boohrer-Jennings, J. (2005). Below the bubble: 'Educational triage' and the Texas accountability system. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 231-268.
22. Brookhart, S. M. (1997). A theoretical framework for the role of classroom assessment in motivating student effort and achievement. Applied Measurement in Education, 10 161-180.
23. Brookhart, S. M. (2004). Classroom assessment: Tensions and intersections in theory and practice. Teachers College Record, 106 (3), 429-458.
24. Brophy, J. (Ed.). (1998). Advances in research on teaching. Expectations in the classroom (Vol. 7, pp. 273308). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
25. Butler, R. (1988). Enhancing and undermining intrinsic motivation: The effects of task-involving and ego-involving evaluation on interest and performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58 1-14.
26. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2005). Engagement, disengagement, coping, and catastrophe. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 527-547). New York: Guilford Press.
27. Center on Education Policy. (2006). From the capital to the classroom: Year four of the No Child Left Behind Act. Washington DC: Author. http://www. cep-dc. org/nclb/Year4/CEP-NCLB-Report-4. pdf
28. Corno, L. (2001). Volitional aspects of self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 191-226). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Corno, L., & Mandinach, E. B. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18(2), 88-108.
30. Corno, L., & Mandinach, E. B. (2004). What we have learned about student engagement in the past twenty years. In D. M. McInerney & S. V. Etten (Eds.), Big theories revisited (pp. 299-328). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
31. Crooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58 438-481.
32. Crooks, T J., & Mahalski, P. A. (1986). Relationships among assessment practices, study methods, and grades obtained. In J. Jones & M. Horsburgh (Eds.), Research and development in higher education (Vol. 8). Sydney, Australia: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia.
33. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Abuhamdeh, S., & Nakamura, J. (2005). Flow. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 598-608). New York: Guilford Press.
34. Cuban, L. (1988). Constancy and change in schools (1880s to the present). In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Contributing to educational change: Perspectives on research and practice. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing.
35. Darling-Hammond, L. (2007). Race, inequality, and educational accountability: The irony of 'No Child Left Behind'. Race Ethnicity and Education, 10(3), 245-260.
36. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A metaanalytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627-668.
37. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1995). Human autonomy: The basis for true self-esteem. In M. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 31-49). New York: Plenum Publishing Co.
38. Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., & Koestner, R. (2001). The pervasive negative effects of rewards on intrinsic motivation: Response to Cameron (2001). Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 43-51.
39. Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The selfdetermination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26 (3&4), 325-346.
40. Dougherty, M. L. (1913). Report on the Binet-Simon tests given to four hundred and eighty-three children in the public schools of Kansas City, Kansas. Journal of Educational Psychology, 4 338-352.
41. Eccles, J. S. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behavior. In J. T. Spencer (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75-146). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
42. Eccles, J. S., & Midgley, C. (1989). Stage/environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for early adolescents. In R. E. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 3, pp. 139-186). New York: Academic.
43. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational belief, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53 109-132.
44. Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., Flanagan, G., Miller, G., Reuman, D., & Yee, D. (1989). Self-concepts, domain values, and self-esteem: Relations and changes at early adolescence. Journal of Personality, 57 283-310.
45. Elliot, A. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 169-189.
46. Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232.
47. Elliot, A. J., & Dweck, C. S. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of competence and motivation. New York: Guilford Press.
48. Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 461-475.
49. Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 5-12.
50. Entwistle, N. J., & Kozeski, B. (1985). Relationship between school motivation, approaches to studying, and attainment, among British and Hungarian adolescents. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 55 124-137.
51. Feather, N. T. (Ed.). (1982). Expectations and actions: Expectancy-value models in psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Foster, S. (2006). How Latino students negotiate the demands of high-stakes testing: A case study of one school in Texas. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
53. Fredericksen, N. (1984). The real test bias: Influences of testing on teaching and learning. American Psychologist, 39 193-202.
54. Frederiksen, J. R., & White, B. J. (1997). Reflective assessment of students' research within an inquiry-based middle school science curriculum. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
55. Gamson, D. (2007). Historical perspectives on democratic decision making in education: Paradigms, paradoxes, and promises. In P. Moss (Ed.), Evidence and decision making: 106th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I (pp. 15-45). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
56. Gayler, K., Chudowsky, N., Hamilton, M., Kober, N., & Yeager, M. (2004). State high school exit exams: A maturing reform. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy. Retrieved June 5, 2007, from http://www. cep-dc. org/highschoolexit/ExitExamAug2004/ExitExam2004. pdf
57. Giordano, G. (2005). How testing came to dominate American schools: The history of educational assessment. New York: Peter Lang.
58. Glass, G. V. (2008). Fertilizers, pills, and magnetic strips: The fate of public education in America. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
59. Good, T. L. (1981). Teacher expectations and student perceptions: A decade of research. Educational Leadership, 38 415-423.
60. Good, T. L. (1987). Two decades of research on teacher expectations: Findings and future directions. Journal of Teacher Education, 38(4), 32-47.
61. Good, T. L. (1996). Educational researchers comment on the educational summit and other policy proclamations from 1983-1997. Educational Researcher, 25 (8), 4-6.
62. Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (1972). Behavioral expression of teacher attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63 617-624.
63. Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (1974). Changing teacher and student behavior: An empirical investigation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66 390-405.
64. Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (2008). Looking in classrooms (10th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
65. Good, T. L., & Thompson, E. K. (1998). Research on the communication of performance expectations: A review of recent perspectives. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: Expectations in the classroom (Vol. 7, pp. 273-308). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
66. Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). Autonomy in children's learning: An experimental and individual different investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 890-898.
67. Haney, W. (2008). Evidence on education under NCLB (and How Florida boosted NAEP scores and reduced the race gap). In G. L. Sunderman (Ed.), Holding NCLB accountable: Achieving accountability, equity, and school reform (pp. 91-102). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
68. Henderlong, J., & Lepper, M. R. (2002). The effects of praise on children's intrinsic motivation: A review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 128(5), 774-795.
69. Herman, J. L., & Haertel, E. H. (Eds.). (2005). Uses and misuses of data for educational accountability and improvement: The 104th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, part II. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
70. Hull, C. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton.
71. Hull, C. (1952). A behavior system. New Haven: Yale University Press.
72. Jacob, B. (2001). Getting tough? The impact of high school graduation exams. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 99-121.
73. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1985). Motivational processes in cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning situation. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Vol. 2. The classroom milieu. New York: Academic.
74. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
75. Jones, B. D., & Egley, R. J. (2004, August 9). Voices from the frontlines: Teachers' perceptions of high-stakes testing. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(39). Retrieved December 2, 2004, from http://epaa. asu. edu/epaa/v12n39/
76. Jones, M. G., Jones, B. D., Hardin, B., Chapman, L., Yarbrough, T., & Davis, M. (1999). The impact of high-stakes testing on teachers and students in North Carolina. The Phi Delta Kappan, 81(3), 199-203.
77. Jones, M. G., Jones, B. D., & Hargrove, T. (2003). The unintended consequences of high-stakes testing. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
78. Kaplan, A. (2004). Achievement goals and intergroup relations. In P. R. Pintrich & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in research on motivation and achievement: Vol. 13: Motivating students, improving schools: The legacy of Carol Midgley (pp. 97-136). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
79. Kaplan, A., & Flum, H. (Guest Eds.). (2009). Motivation and identity [Special issue]. Educational Psychologist, 44(2).
80. Kaplan, A., & Maehr, M. L. (2007). The contributions and prospects of goal orientation theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19 141-184.
81. Kaplan, A., Middleton, M. J., Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2002). Achievement goals and goal structures. In C. Midgley (Ed.), Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning (pp. 21-53). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
82. Kellaghan, T., Madaus, G. F., & Airasian, P. W. (1982). The effects of standardized testing. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
83. Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212-218.
84. Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H., & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 184-196.
85. Madaus, G., Russell, M., & Higgins, J. (2009). The paradoxes of high-stakes testing: How they affect students, their parents, teachers, principals, schools, and society. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
86. Marchant, G. J., & Paulson, S. E. (2005, January 21). The relationship of high school graduation exams to graduation rates and SAT scores. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(6). Retrieved June 30, 2006, from http://epaa. asu. edu/epaa/v13n6/
87. Martin, E., & Ramsden, P. (1987). Learning skills and skill in learning. In J. T. E. Richardson, M. W. Eysenck, & D. W. Piper (Eds.), Student learning: Research in education and cognitive psychology. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press & Society for Research into Higher Education.
88. McCaslin, M. (2009). Co-regulation of student motivation and emergent identity. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 137-146.
89. McCaslin, M., & DiMarino-Linnen, E. (2000). Motivation and learning in school: Societal contexts, psychological constructs, and educational practices. In T. Good (Ed.), Schooling in America: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. 100th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 84-151). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
90. McClelland, D. C. (1980). Motive disposition: The merits of operant and respondent measures. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 1). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
91. McClelland, D. C. (1985). How motives, skills, and values determine what people do. American Psychologist, 40(7), 812-825.
92. McDonnell, L. (2005). Assessment and accountability from the policymaker's perspective. In J. L. Herman & E. H. Haertel (Eds.), Uses and misuses of data for educational accountability and improvement: The 104th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
93. McInerney, D. M., Brown, G. T. L., & Liem, G. A. D. (Eds.). (2009). Student perspectives on assessment: What students can tell us about assessment for learning. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
94. McMillan, J. H. (2001). Classroom assessment: Principles and practice for effective instruction (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
95. McNeil, L. M., Coppola, E., Radigan, J., & Vasquez Heilig, J. (2008). Avoidable losses: High-stakes accountability and the dropout crisis. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 16(3). Retrieved March 16, 2009, from http://epaa. asu. edu/epaa/v16n3/
96. Meichenbaum, D. H., & Smart, T. (1971). Use of direct expectancy to modify academic performance and attitudes of college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 18 531-535.
97. Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. J. (2001). Performance-approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93 77-86.
98. Miller, A. D., & Murdock, T. B. (2007). Modeling latent true scores to determine the utility of aggregate student perceptions as classroom indicators in HLM: The case of classroom goal structures. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 83-104.
99. Miller, C. M. L., & Parlett, M. (1974). Up to the mark: A study of the examination game. London: Society for Research into Higher Education.
100. Mishel, L., & Roy, J. (2006). Rethinking high school graduation rates and trends. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
101. Moss, P. (Ed.). (2007). Evidence and decision making. The 106th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 1. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
102. Murdock, T B., & Miller, A. D. (2009). Specification issues in the use of multilevel modeling to examine the effects of classroom context. In M. Wosnitza, S. A. Karabenick, A. Efklides, & P. Nenniger (Eds.), Contemporary motivation research: From global to local perspectives (pp. 249-264). Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe.
103. National Commission for Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperatives for educational reform. Washington, DC: Author.
104. Natriello, G. (1987). The impact of evaluation processes on students. Educational Psychologist, 22(2), 155-175.
105. Natriello, G., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1984). Teacher evaluative standards and student effort. New York: Longman.
106. Nichols, S. L. (2007). High-stakes testing: Does it increase achievement? Journal of Applied School Psychology, 23(2), 47-64.
107. Nichols, S., & Berliner, D. C. (2007). Collateral damage: How high-stakes testing corrupts America's schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
108. Nichols, S. L., Glass, G. V., & Berliner, D. C. (2006). High-stakes testing and student achievement: Does accountability pressure increase student learning? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 14(1). Retrieved July 20, 2009, from http://epaa. asu. edu/epaa/v14n1/
109. Orfield, G. (Ed.). (2004). Dropouts in America: Confronting the graduation rate crisis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
110. Orfield, G., & Kornhaber, M. L. (Eds.). (2001). Raising standards or raising barriers? Inequality and high stakes testing in public education. New York: The Century Foundation Press.
111. Orfield, G., Losen, D., Wald, D., & Swanson, C. (2004). Losing our future: How minority youth are being left behind by the graduation rate crisis. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
112. Paris, S. G., Lawton, T. A., Turner, J. C., & Roth, J. L. (1991). A developmental perspective on standardized achievement testing. Educational Researcher, 20, 12-20.
113. Paris, S. G., Roth, J. L., & Turner, J. C. (2000). Developing disillusionment: Students' perceptions of academic achievement tests. Issues in Education, 6(1/2), 17-46.
114. Paris, S. G., Turner, J. C., & Lawton, T. A. (1990, April). Students' views of standardized achievement tests. Paper presented at Educational Research Association, Boston.
115. Paris, S. G., & Urdan, T. (2000). Policies and practices of high-stakes testing that influence teachers and schools. Issues in Education, 6(1/2), 83-108.
116. Pedulla, J. J., Abrams, L. M., Madaus, G. F., Russell, M. K., Ramos, M. A., & Miao, J. (2003, March). Perceived effects of state-mandated testing programs on teaching and learning: Findings from a national survey of teachers. Boston: Boston College, National Board on Educational Testing and Public Policy. Retrieved January 7, 2004, from http://www. bc. edu/research/nbetpp/statements/nbr2. pdf
117. Perlstein, L. (2007). Tested: One American school struggles to make the grade. New York: Henry Holt & Co.
118. Peterson, P. L., & Walberg, H. J. (Eds.). (1979). Research on teaching: Concepts, findings, and implications. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing.
119. Peterson, P. E., & West, M. R. (Eds.). (2003). No Child Left Behind? The politics and practice of school accountability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
120. Phelps, R. P. (Ed.). (2005). Defending standardized testing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
121. Raymond, M. E., & Hanushek, E. A. (2003, Summer). High-stakes research. Education Next, 3(3), 48-55. Retrieved from http://www. educationnext. org/
122. Rodriguez, M. C. (2004). The role of classroom assessment in student performance on TIMSS. Applied Measurement in Education, 17(1), 1-24.
123. Rogers, E. M. (1969). Examinations: Powerful agents for good or ill in teaching. American Journal of Physics, 37, 954-962.
124. Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
125. Ryan, J. (2004). The perverse incentives of the No Child Left Behind Act. New York University Law Review, 79 932-989.
126. Sacks, P. (1999). Standardized minds: The high price of America's testing culture and what we can do to change it. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing.
127. San Antonio Express-News (2007, March 9). Teen talk: Tackling TAKS. San Antonio Express-News, p. 1F.
128. Schunk, D. H. (1996). Goal and self-evaluative influences during children's cognitive skill learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33 359-382.
129. Snyder, B. R. (1971). The hidden curriculum. Cambridge, MA: M. I. T. Press.
130. Starch, D., & Elliott, E. C. (1912). Reliability of the grading of high-school work in English. School Review, 20, 442-457.
131. Stiggins, R. J. (2001). The unfulfilled promise of classroom assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20 (3), 5-15.
132. Stiggins, R. J., & Bridgeford, N. J. (1985). The ecology of classroom assessment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 22 (4), 271-286.
133. Stiggins, R. J., & Conklin, N. F. (1992). In teachers' hands: Investigating the practices of classroom assessment. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
134. Taylor, G., Shepard, L., Kinner, F., & Rosenthal, J. (2003). A survey of teachers' perspectives on high-stakes testing in Colorado: What gets taught, what gets lost (CSE Technical Report 588). Los Angeles: University of California.
135. Thomas, J. W. (1993). Promoting independent learning in the middle grades: The role of instructional support practices. The Elementary School Journal, 93 575-591.
136. Thorndike, E. L. (1923). Education: A first book. New York: Macmillan.
137. Toy, V. (2006, January 1). Elmont's school success is a lesson to others. New York Times, p. 14L.
138. Tyack, D. (1974). The one best system: A history of American urban education. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.
139. Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1997). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
140. Urdan, T. (1997). Achievement goal theory: Past results, future directions. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 99-141). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
141. Valenzuela, A. (Ed.). (2005). Leaving children behind: How "Texas-style" accountability fails Latino youth. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
142. Vasquez Heilig, J., Cole, H., & Aguilar, A. (2010). From Dewey to No Child Left Behind: The evolution and devolution of public arts education. Arts Education Policy Review, 111 136-145.
143. Vasquez Heilig, J., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Accountability Texas-style: The progress and learning of urban minority students in a high-stakes testing context. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(2), 75-110.
144. Warren, J. R., Jenkins, K. N., & Kulick, R. B. (2006). High school exit examinations and state-level completion and GED Rates, 1975 through 2002. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28(20), 131-152.
145. Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer.
146. Weinstein, R. S. (2002). Reaching higher: The power of expectations in schooling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
147. Whipple, G. M. (1921). The national intelligence tests. The Journal of Educational Research, 4 16-31.
148. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12 265-310.
149. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (2000). Expectancy x value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25 68-81.
150. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J., MacIver, D., Reuman, D., & Midgley, C. (1991). Transitions at early adolescence: Changes in children's domain-specific self-perceptions and general self-esteem across the transition to junior high school. Developmental Psychology, 27 552-565.
151. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). The development of competence beliefs, expectancies for success, and achievement values from childhood through adolescence. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 91-120). San Diego, CA: Academic.
152. Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Relations of children's motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89 420-432.
153. Wigfield, A., & Wagner, A. L. (2005). Competence and motivation during adolescence. In A. J. Elliott & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 222-239). New York: Guilford Press.
154. Winne, P. H. (1995). Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 30, 173-187.
155. Wong, C. A., & Paris, S. G. (2000). Students' beliefs about classroom tests and standardized tests. Issues in Education, 6(1/2), 47-6677.