High-Stakes testing: Does it increase achievement?

Journal of Applied School Psychology

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 47-64

  Nichols, Sharon L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic achievement; Accountability; Achievement tests; Educational policy; High stakes tests

Indexed keywords

EID: 71649115544     PISSN: 15377903     EISSN: 15377911     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J370v23n02_04     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Amrein, A.L., & Berliner, D.C. (2002a). High-Stakes testing, uncertainty, and student learning. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(18). Retrieved January 7, 2004, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n18/
2. Amrein, A.L., & Berliner, D.C. (2002b). The impact of high-stakes tests on student academic performance: An analysis of NAEP results in states with high-stakes tests and ACT, SAT, and AP test results in states with high school graduation exams. Retrieved January 7, 2004, from Arizona State University, Education Policy Studies Laboratory Web site: http://www.asu.edu/educ/epsl/EPRU/documents/EPSL-0211126EPRU.pdf
3. Amrein-Beardsley, A., & Berliner, D. (2003, August 4). Re-analysis of NAEP math and reading scores in states with and without high-stakes tests: Response to Rosenshine. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(25). Retrieved February 5, 2005, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n25/
4. Braun, H. (2004, January 4). Reconsidering the impact of high-stakes testing. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(1). Retrieved February 5, 2005, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n1/
5. Camilli, G. (2000). Texas gains on NAEP: Points of light? Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8 (42). Retrieved September 21, 2006, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n42.html
6. Cannell, J. J. (1988). Nationally normed elementary achievement testing in America's public schools: How all 50 states are above the national average. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 7(2), 5-9.
7. Carnoy, M., & Loeb, S. (2002). Does external accountability affect student outcomes? A cross-state analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(4), 305-331.
8. Clarke, M., Shore, A., Rhoades, K., Abrams, L., Miao, J., & Li, J. (2003). Perceived effects of state-mandated testing programs on teaching and learning: Findings from interviews with educators in low-, medium-, and high-stakes states. Retrieved January 7, 2004, from Boston College, National Board on Educational Testing and Public Policy Web site: http://www.bc.edu/research/nbetpp/statements/nbr1.pdf
9. Crocker, L. (2005). Teaching for the test: How and why test preparation is appropriate. In R. P. Phelps (Ed.), Defending standardized testing (pp. 159-174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Darling-Hammond, L., & Rustique-Forrester, E. (2005). The consequences of student testing for teaching and teacher quality. In J. L. Herman & E. H. Haertel (Eds.), Uses and misuses of data for educational accountability and improvement. The 104th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II (pp. 289-319). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
11. Grissmer, D., & Flanagan, A. (1998). Exploring rapid achievement gains in North Carolina and Texas. Washington, D.C.: National Education Goals Panel.
12. Gujarati, D. N. (1995)(3rd ed.), Basic econometrics. New York: McGraw Hill.
13. Haertel, E. H., & Herman, J. L. (2005). A historical perspective on validity arguments for accountability testing. In J. L. Herman & E. H. Haertel (Eds.), Uses and misuses of data for educational accountability and improvement. The 104th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II (pp. 1-34). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
14. Haney, W. (2000, August). The myth of the Texas miracle in education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(41). Retrieved February 5, 2005, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n41/
15. Haney, W. (2002). Lake Woebeguaranteed: Misuse of test scores in Massachusetts. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 10(24). Retrieved September 22, 2006, from, http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n24/
16. Hanushek, E., & Raymond, M. E. (2005). Does school accountability lead to improved student performance? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(2), 297-327.
17. Herman, J. L., & Haertel, E. H. (Eds.). (2005). Uses and misuses of data for educational accountability and improvement. The 104th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
18. Jacob, B. (2001). Getting tough? The impact of high school graduation exams. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 99-121.
19. Jacob, B. (2002, May). Accountability, incentives and behavior: The impact of highstakes testing in the Chicago public schools. (National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. W8968). Abstract retrieved June 3, 2006, from http://ssrn.com/abstract = 314639
20. Jones, B. D., & Egley, R. J. (2004, August 9). Voices from the frontlines: Teachers' perceptions of high-stakes testing. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(39). Retrieved December 2, 2004, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n39/
21. Jones, M. G., Jones, B. D., & Hargrove, T. (2003). The unintended consequences of high-stakes testing. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
22. Klein, S. P., Hamilton, L. S., McCaffrey, D. F., & Stecher, B. M. (2000, October 26). What do test scores in Texas tell us? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(49). Retrieved February 22, 2005, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n49/
23. Kober, N. (2002, June). Teaching to the test: The good, the bad, and who's responsible. Test talk for leaders, 1. Retrieved June 30, 2006, from http://www.cep-dc.org/testing/testtalkjune2002.pdf
24. Koretz, D., &Barron, S. (1998). The validity of gains in scores on the Kentucky Instructional Results Information System (KIRIS). Rand Corporation.
25. Kruger, L. J., Wandle, C. & Struzzieto, J. (2007). Coping with the Stress of High Stakes Testing. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 23 (2), 109-128.
26. Linn, R. L. (2000). Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29(2), 4-16.
27. Linn, R. L., Graue, M. E., & Sanders, N. M. (1990). Comparing state and district test results to national norms: The validity of claims that "everyone is above average." Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9(3), 5-14.
28. Marchant, G. J., & Paulson, S. E. (2005, January 21). The relationship of high school graduation exams to graduation rates and SAT scores. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(6). Retrieved June 30, 2006 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v13n6/.
29. Mathews, J. (2006, February 20). Let's teach to the test. The Washington Post, p. A21.
30. McCaslin, M., & Good, T. (1996). The informal curriculum. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 622-673). New York: Macmillan.
31. McDonnell, L. M. (2005). Assessment and accountability from the policymaker's perspective. In J. L. Herman & E. H. Haertel (Eds.), Uses and misuses of data for educational accountability and improvement. The 104th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II (pp. 35-54). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
32. Neill, M., Guisbond, L., & Schaeffer, B. (with Madison, J. & Legeros, L.). (2004). Failing our children: How "No Child Left Behind" undermines quality and equity in education and an accountability model that supports school improvement. Cambridge, MA: Fairtest.
33. Nichols, S., & Berliner, D. C. (2007). Collateral damage: How high-stakes testing corrupts America's schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
34. Nichols, S., & Berliner, D. C. (2007). The pressure to cheat in a high-stakes testing environment. In E. Anderman and T. Murdock (Eds.), Psychological Perspectives on Academic Cheating (pp. 289-312). NY: Elsevier.
35. Nichols, S. & Berliner, D. C. (2005, March). The inevitable corruption of indicators and educators through high-stakes testing. Retrieved March 23, 2005, from the Great Lakes Center Web site: http://www.greatlakescenter.org/pdf/EPSL-0503101-EPRU.pdf
36. Nichols, S., Glass, G. V., & Berliner, D.C. (2006). High-stakes testing and student achievement: Does accountability pressure increase student learning? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 14(1). Retrieved June 9, 2006, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v14n1/
37. Orfield, G. & Kornhaber, M.L. (Eds.). (2001). Raising standards or raising barriers? Inequality and high-stakes testing in public education. New York: The Century Foundation Press.
38. Palmaffy, T. (1998). The Gold Star State: How Texas jumped to the head of the class in elementary school achievement. Policy Review, 88, p. 30-38.
39. Pedulla, J. J., Abrams, L. M., Madaus, G. F., Russell, M. K., Ramos, M. A., & Miao, J. (2003, March). Perceived effects of state-mandated testing programs on teaching and learning: Findings from a national survey of teachers. Retrieved January 7, 2004, from Boston College, National Board on Educational Testing and Public Policy Web site: http://www.bc.edu/research/nbetpp/statements/nbr2.pdf
40. Peterson, P. E., & West, M. R. (Eds). (2003). No Child Left Behind? The politics and practice of school accountability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
41. Phelps, R. P. (Ed.) (2005). Defending standardized testing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Phillips, G. W. (1990). The Lake Wobegon effect. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9(3), 3, 14.
43. Raymond, M. E., & Hanushek, E. A. (2003). High-stakes research [Electronic version]. Education Next 3(3), pp. 48-55.
44. Roderick, M., Jacob, B. A., & Byrk, A. S. (2002). The impact of high-stakes testing in Chicago on student achievement in promotional gate grades. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(4), 333-357.
45. Rosenshine, B. (2003, August 4). High-stakes testing: Another analysis. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(24). Retrieved January 7, 2004, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n24/
46. Ryan, J. E. (2004). The perverse incentives of the No Child Left Behind Act. New York University Law Review, 79, 932-989.
47. Shepard, L. A. (1990). Inflated test scores gains: Is the problem old norms or teaching the test? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9(3), 15-22.
48. Taylor, G., Shepard, L., Kinner, F., & Rosenthal, J. (2003). A survey of teachers' perspectives on high-stakes testing in Colorado: What gets taught, what gets lost. (CSE Technical Report 588: CRESST/CREDE/University of Colorado at Boulder). Los Angeles: University of California.
49. Torgerson, W. S. (1960). Theory and methods of scaling. New York: John Wiley.
50. Valenzuela, A. (Ed.). (2005) Leaving children behind: How "Texas-style" accountability fails Latino youth. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.