The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research

Information Systems Research

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 724-735

  Yoo, Youngjin ^a   Henfridsson, Ola ^b,c   Lyytinen, Kalle ^d  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VIKTORIA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^d CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Digital innovation; Digitization; Doubly distributed networks; Layered modular architecture; Organizing logic; Product architecture

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650630327     PISSN: 10477047     EISSN: 15265536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/isre.1100.0322     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Adomavicius, G., J. C. Bockstedt, A. Gupta, R. J. Kauffman. 2008. Making sense of technology trends in the information technology landscape: A design science approach. MIS Quart. 32(4) 779-809.
2. Baldwin, C. Y., K. B. Clark. 2000. Design Rules, Vol. 1: The Power of Modularity. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. Barney, J. B. 1996. The resource-based theory of the firm. Organ. Sci. 7(5) 469.
4. Benkler, Y. 2006. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
5. Boland, R. J., K. Lyytinen, Y. Yoo. 2007. Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering and construction. Organ. Sci. 18(4) 631-647.
6. Broadbent, M., P. Weill, D. St. Clair. 1999. The implications of information technology infrastructure for business process redesign. MIS Quart. 23(2) 159-182.
7. Chandler, A. D., J. W. Cortada. 2000. The information age: Continuities and differences. A. Chandler, Jr., J. W. Cortada, eds. A Nation Transformed by Information: How Information Has Shaped the United States from Colonial Times to the Present. Oxford University Press, New York, 281-300.
8. Clark, K. B. 1985. The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution. Res. Policy 14 235-251.
9. Eisenman, T., G. Parker, M. W. Van Aystyne. 2006. Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84(10) 92-101.
10. Farrell, J., P. J. Weiser. 2003. Modularity, vertical integration, and open access policies: Toward a convergence of antitrust and regulation in the Internet age. Harvard J. Law Tech. 17(1) 86-134.
11. Gao, L. S., B. Iyer. 2006. Analyzing complementarities using software stacks for software industry acquisitions. J. Management Inform. Systems 23(2) 119-147.
12. Gawer, A., M. Cusumano. 2008. How companies become platform leaders. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 49(2) 28.
13. Ghazawneh, A., O. Henfridsson. 2010. Governing third-party development through platform boundary resources. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (ICIS) 2010, St. Louis, MO.
14. Hanseth, O., K. Lyytinen. 2010. Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: The case of building Internet. J. Inform. Tech. 25(1) 1-19.
15. Henfridsson, O., R. Lindgren. 2010. User involvement in developing mobile and temporarily interconnected systems. Inform. Systems J. 20(2) 119-135.
16. Kohli, R., V. Grover. 2008. Business value of IT: An essay on expanding research directions to keep up with the time. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 9(2) 23-39.
17. Kusunoki, K., Y. Aoshima. 2010. Redefining innovation as system re-definition. H. Itami, K. Kusunoki, T. Numagami, A. Takeishi, eds. Dynamics of Knowledge, Corporate Systems, and Innovation. Springer, London, 43-76.
18. Langlois, R. N. 2003. The vanishing hand: The changing dynamics of industrial capitalism. Indust. Corporate Change 12(2) 351-385.
19. Langlois, R. N. 2007. Computers and semiconductors. B. Steil, D. G. Victor, R. R. Nelson, eds. Technological Innovation and Economic Performance. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 265-284.
20. Lyytinen, K., Y. Yoo. 2002. The next wave of nomadic computing. Inform. Systems Res. 13(4) 377-388.
21. Malone, T. W. 2004. The Future of Work: How the New Order of Business Will Shape Your Organization, Your Management Style, and Your Life. Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston.
22. Nevo, S., M. R. Wade. 2010. The formation and value of IT-enabled resources: Antecedents and consequences of synergistic relationships. MIS Quart. 34(1) 163-183.
23. Nohria, N., R. G. Eccles. 1992. Networks and Organizations. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
24. Porter, M. E. 1980. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. The Free Press, New York.
25. Sambamurthy, V., R. W. Zmud. 2000. The organizing logic for an enterprise's IT activities in the digital era-A prognosis of practice and a call for research. Inform. Systems Res. 11(2) 105-114.
26. Sambamurthy, V., A. Bharadwaj, V. Grover. 2003. Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quart. 27(2) 237-264.
27. Schilling, M. A. 2000. Toward a general modular system theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. Acad. Management Rev. 25(2) 312-334.
28. Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
29. Simon, H. A. 1996. The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
30. Simon, H. A. 2002. Near decomposability and the speed of evolution. Indust. Corporate Change 11(3) 587-599.
31. Swanson, E. B. 1994. Information systems innovation among organizations. Management Sci. 40(9) 1069-1092.
32. Teece, D. 1993. The dynamics of industrial capitalism: Perspectives on Alfred Chandler's scale and scope. J. Econom. Literature 31(1) 199-225.
33. Tilson, D., K. Lyytinen, C. Sørenson. 2010. Desperately seeking the infrastructure in IS research: Conceptualization of "digital convergence. Proc. 43rd HICSS, Koloa, Kauai, HI.
34. Tuomi, I. 2002. Networks of Innovation: Change and Meaning in the Age of the Internet. Oxford University Press, New York.
35. Ulrich, K. 1995. The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res. Policy 24(3) 419-440.
36. Verganti, R. 2009. Design-Driven Innovation: Changing the Rules of Competition by Radically Innovating What Things Mean. Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston.
37. Wheeler, B. C. 2003. NEBIC: A dynamic capabilities theory for assessing net enablement. Inform. Systems Res. 13(2) 125-146.
38. Yoo, Y. 2010. Computing in everyday life: A call for research on experiential computing. MIS Quart. 34(2) 213-231.
39. Zittrain, J. 2006. The generative Internet. Harvard Law Rev. 119 1974-2040.