3D structures of individual mammalian genomes studied by single-cell Hi-C

Nature

Volumn 544, Issue 7648, 2017, Pages 59-64

  Stevens, Tim J ^a,b   Lando, David ^a   Basu, Srinjan ^a   Atkinson, Liam P ^a   Cao, Yang ^a   Lee, Steven F ^a   Leeb, Martin ^a,f,g,h   Wohlfahrt, Kai J ^a   Boucher, Wayne ^a   O'Shaughnessy Kirwan, Aoife ^a   Cramard, Julie ^a   Faure, Andre J ^c   Ralser, Meryem ^a   Blanco, Enrique ^c   Morey, Lluis ^c,f,g,h   Sansó, Miriam ^a   Palayret, Matthieu G S ^a   Lehner, Ben ^c,d,e   Di Croce, Luciano ^a,d,e   Wutz, Anton ^a   Hendrich, Brian ^a   Klenerman, Dave ^a   Laue, Ernest D ^a   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b MRC LABORATORY OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^c CENTRE FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^e INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

^f UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^g UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^h ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CENTROMERE PROTEIN A; COHESIN; GENOMIC DNA; HISTONE H2B; HISTONE H3; CCCTC-BINDING FACTOR; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; DNA; HISTONE DEACETYLASE; NONHISTONE PROTEIN; NUCLEOSOME; REPRESSOR PROTEIN;

BIOACTIVITY; CELLS AND CELL COMPONENTS; CHROMOSOME; CYTOGENETICS; ENZYME; GENOME; MAMMAL; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; B LYMPHOBLAST; CELL CYCLE G1 PHASE; CELL NUCLEUS MEMBRANE; CENTROMERE; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; CHROMOSOME 10; CHROMOSOME 12; CHROMOSOME 3; CHROMOSOME 9; CHROMOSOME STRUCTURE; DNA REPLICATION; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; ENHANCER REGION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOME ANALYSIS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; MAMMALIAN GENETICS; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOSOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMOTER REGION; RNA SEQUENCE; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; CHROMOSOME; CONFORMATION; CYTOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETICS; GENOME; HAPLOIDY; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR IMAGING; MOLECULAR MODEL; MOUSE EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARDS; VALIDATION STUDY;

MAMMALIA;

ANIMALS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; CHROMOSOMAL PROTEINS, NON-HISTONE; CHROMOSOMES, MAMMALIAN; DNA; ENHANCER ELEMENTS, GENETIC; G1 PHASE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; GENOME; HAPLOIDY; MI-2 NUCLEOSOME REMODELING AND DEACETYLASE COMPLEX; MICE; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; MOLECULAR IMAGING; MOUSE EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; NUCLEOSOMES; PROMOTER REGIONS, GENETIC; REPRESSOR PROTEINS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS;

EID: 85017186553     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature21429     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Cremer, T. et al. The 4D nucleome: Evidence for a dynamic nuclear landscape based on co-Aligned active and inactive nuclear compartments. FEBS Lett. 589 (20 Pt A), 2931-2943 (2015).
2. Bickmore, W. A. & van Steensel, B. Genome architecture: domain organization of interphase chromosomes. Cell 152, 1270-1284 (2013).
3. Lieberman-Aiden, E. et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326, 289-293 (2009).
4. Nora, E. P. et al. Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature 485, 381-385 (2012).
5. Dixon, J. R. et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485, 376-380 (2012).
6. Sexton, T. et al. Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome. Cell 148, 458-472 (2012).
7. Rao, S. S. et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell 159, 1665-1680 (2014).
8. Zuin, J. et al. Cohesin and CTCF differentially affect chromatin architecture and gene expression in human cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 996-1001 (2014).
9. Phillips-Cremins, J. E. et al. Architectural protein subclasses shape 3D organization of genomes during lineage commitment. Cell 153, 1281-1295 (2013).
10. Kalhor, R., Tjong, H., Jayathilaka, N., Alber, F. & Chen, L. Genome architectures revealed by tethered chromosome conformation capture and populationbased modeling. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 90-98 (2011).
11. Tjong, H. et al. Population-based 3D genome structure analysis reveals driving forces in spatial genome organization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E1663-E1672 (2016).
12. Naumova, N. et al. Organization of the mitotic chromosome. Science 342, 948-953 (2013).
13. Foti, R. et al. Nuclear architecture organized by Rif1 underpins the replicationtiming program. Mol. Cell 61, 260-273 (2016).
14. Wang, S. et al. Spatial organization of chromatin domains and compartments in single chromosomes. Science 353, 598-602 (2016).
15. Julienne, H., Zoufir, A., Audit, B. & Arneodo, A. Human genome replication proceeds through four chromatin states. PLOS Comput. Biol. 9, e1003233 (2013).
16. Peric-Hupkes, D. et al. Molecular maps of the reorganization of genomenuclear lamina interactions during differentiation. Mol. Cell 38, 603-613 (2010).
17. Meuleman, W. et al. Constitutive nuclear lamina-genome interactions are highly conserved and associated with A/T-rich sequence. Genome Res. 23, 270-280 (2013).
18. van Koningsbruggen, S. et al. High-resolution whole-genome sequencing reveals that specific chromatin domains from most human chromosomes associate with nucleoli. Mol. Biol. Cell 21, 3735-3748 (2010).
19. Kind, J. et al. Single-cell dynamics of genome-nuclear lamina interactions. Cell 153, 178-192 (2013).
20. Dunn, S. J., Martello, G., Yordanov, B., Emmott, S. & Smith, A. G. Defining an essential transcription factor program for naïve pluripotency. Science 344, 1156-1160 (2014).
21. Therizols, P. et al. Chromatin decondensation is sufficient to alter nuclear organization in embryonic stem cells. Science 346, 1238-1242 (2014).
22. Kröger, A. V. et al. Comprehensive single cell-resolution analysis of the role of chromatin regulators in early C. elegans embryogenesis. Dev. Biol. 398, 153-162 (2015).
23. Sofueva, S. et al. Cohesin-mediated interactions organize chromosomal domain architecture. EMBO J. 32, 3119-3129 (2013).
24. Giorgetti, L. et al. Predictive polymer modeling reveals coupled fluctuations in chromosome conformation and transcription. Cell 157, 950-963 (2014).
25. Naughton, C. et al. Transcription forms and remodels supercoiling domains unfolding large-scale chromatin structures. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 387-395 (2013).
26. Kouzine, F. et al. Transcription-dependent dynamic supercoiling is a short-range genomic force. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 396-403 (2013).
27. Guo, Y. et al. CRISPR inversion of CTCF sites alters genome topology and enhancer/promoter function. Cell 162, 900-910 (2015).
28. Sanborn, A. L. et al. Chromatin extrusion explains key features of loop and domain formation in wild-Type and engineered genomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E6456-E6465 (2015).
29. Fudenberg, G. et al. Formation of chromosomal domains by loop extrusion. Cell Reports 15, 2038-2049 (2016).
30. Lengronne, A. et al. Cohesin relocation from sites of chromosomal loading to places of convergent transcription. Nature 430, 573-578 (2004).
31. Eagen, K. P., Hartl, T. A. & Kornberg, R. D. Stable chromosome condensation revealed by chromosome conformation capture. Cell 163, 934-946 (2015).
32. Zhimulev, I. F. et al. Genetic organization of interphase chromosome bands and interbands in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One 9, e101631 (2014).
33. Minajigi, A. et al. Chromosomes. A comprehensive Xist interactome reveals cohesin repulsion and an RNA-directed chromosome conformation. Science 349, aab2276 (2015).
34. Giorgetti, L. et al. Structural organization of the inactive X chromosome in the mouse. Nature 535, 575-579 (2016).
35. de Wit, E. et al. The pluripotent genome in three dimensions is shaped around pluripotency factors. Nature 501, 227-231 (2013).
36. Wei, Z. et al. Klf4 organizes long-range chromosomal interactions with the Oct4 locus in reprogramming and pluripotency. Cell Stem Cell 13, 36-47 (2013).
37. Denholtz, M. et al. Long-range chromatin contacts in embryonic stem cells reveal a role for pluripotency factors and polycomb proteins in genome organization. Cell Stem Cell 13, 602-616 (2013).
38. Reynolds, N. et al. NuRD suppresses pluripotency gene expression to promote transcriptional heterogeneity and lineage commitment. Cell Stem Cell 10, 583-594 (2012).
39. Zhang, W. et al. The nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase complex NuRD is built from preformed catalytically active sub-modules. J. Mol. Biol. 428, 2931-2942 (2016).
40. Zhang, Y. et al. Spatial organization of the mouse genome and its role in recurrent chromosomal translocations. Cell 148, 908-921 (2012).