A comprehensive Xist interactome reveals cohesin repulsion and an RNA-directed chromosome conformation

Science

Volumn 349, Issue 6245, 2015, Pages 1DUIMMY-

  Minajigi, Anand ^a,b   Froberg, John E ^a,b   Wei, Chunyao ^a,b   Sunwoo, Hongjae ^a,b   Kesner, Barry ^a,b   Colognori, David ^a,b   Lessing, Derek ^a,b   Payer, Bernhard ^a,b   Boukhali, Myriam ^b,c   Haas, Wilhelm ^b,c   Lee, Jeannie T ^a,b,d  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^d CENTRE FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AURORA B KINASE; BMI1 PROTEIN; COHESIN; CONDENSIN; CPG OLIGODEOXYNUCLEOTIDE; DNA METHYLTRANSFERASE; DNA TOPOISOMERASE; HISTONE DEACETYLASE; HISTONE H3; LAMIN B; LONG UNTRANSLATED RNA; NUCLEAR MATRIX PROTEIN; PROTEIN; PROTEIN SERINE THREONINE KINASE; RNA; RNA HELICASE; SHORT HAIRPIN RNA; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR CTCF; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; XIST INTERACTOME; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEX; NONHISTONE PROTEIN; XIST NON-CODING RNA;

CHEMICAL BINDING; CHROMOSOME; COHESION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; MAMMAL; PROTEIN; RNA;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CHROMATIN; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; CHROMOSOMAL LOCALIZATION; CHROMOSOME STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; EPIGENETIC REPRESSION; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE SILENCING; IDENTIFICATION OF DIRECT RNA INTERACTING PROTEIN; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN INTERACTION; RNA CONFORMATION; UPREGULATION; X CHROMOSOME; ANIMAL; CELL CULTURE; CHEMISTRY; CONFORMATION; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; FIBROBLAST; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PROTEOMICS; X CHROMOSOME INACTIVATION;

MAMMALIA;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASES; ANIMALS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CELLS, CULTURED; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; CHROMOSOMAL PROTEINS, NON-HISTONE; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; FIBROBLASTS; GENE KNOCKDOWN TECHNIQUES; GENE SILENCING; MICE; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; NUCLEIC ACID CONFORMATION; PROTEOMICS; RNA HELICASES; RNA, LONG NONCODING; X CHROMOSOME; X CHROMOSOME INACTIVATION;

EID: 84937960975     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.aab2276     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. J. Starmer, T. Magnuson, A new model for random X chromosome inactivation. Development 136, 1-10 (2009). doi: 10.1242/dev.025908; pmid: 19036804
2. C. M. Disteche, Dosage compensation of the sex chromosomes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 46, 537-560 (2012). doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-110711-155454; pmid: 22974302
3. A. Wutz, R. Agrelo, Response: The diversity of proteins linking Xist to gene silencing. Dev. Cell 23, 680 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.09.017; pmid: 23079595
4. C. J. Brown et al., The human XIST gene: Analysis of a 17 kb inactive X-specific RNA that contains conserved repeats and is highly localized within the nucleus. Cell 71, 527-542 (1992). doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90520-M; pmid: 1423611
5. J. Wang et al., Imprinted X inactivation maintained by a mouse Polycomb group gene. Nat. Genet. 28, 371-375 (2001). doi: 10.1038/ng574; pmid: 11479595
6. A. Kohlmaier et al., A chromosomal memory triggered by Xist regulates histonemethylation in X inactivation. PLOS Biol. 2, e171 (2004). doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020171; pmid: 15252442
7. K. Plath et al., Developmentally regulated alterations in Polycomb repressive complex 1 proteins on the inactive X chromosome. J. Cell Biol. 167, 1025-1035 (2004). doi: 10.1083/jcb.200409026; pmid: 15596546
8. J. Zhao et al., Genome-wide identification of polycombassociated RNAs by RIP-seq. Mol. Cell 40, 939-953 (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.12.011; pmid: 21172659
9. Y. Marahrens, B. Panning, J. Dausman, W. Strauss, R. Jaenisch, Xist-deficient mice are defective in dosage compensation but not spermatogenesis. Genes Dev. 11, 156-166 (1997). doi: 10.1101/gad.11.2.156; pmid: 9009199
10. E. Yildirim et al., Xist RNA is a potent suppressor of hematologic cancer in mice. Cell 152, 727-742 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.034; pmid: 23415223
11. C. J. Brown, H. F. Willard, The human X-inactivation centre is not required for maintenance of X-chromosome inactivation. Nature 368, 154-156 (1994). doi: 10.1038/368154a0; pmid: 8139659
12. G. Csankovszki, A. Nagy, R. Jaenisch, Synergism of Xist RNA, DNA methylation, and histone hypoacetylation in maintaining X chromosome inactivation. J. Cell Biol. 153, 773-784 (2001). pmid: 11352938
13. S. Bhatnagar et al., Genetic and pharmacological reactivation of the mammalian inactive X chromosome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 12591-12598 (2014). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1413620111; pmid: 25136103
14. W. Mak et al., Reactivation of the paternal X chromosome in early mouse embryos. Science 303, 666-669 (2004). doi: 10.1126/science.1092674; pmid: 14752160
15. M. Sugimoto, K. Abe, X chromosome reactivation initiates in nascent primordial germ cells in mice. PLOS Genet. 3, e116 (2007). pmid: 17676999
16. J. Zhao, B. K. Sun, J. A. Erwin, J. J. Song, J. T. Lee, Polycomb proteins targeted by a short repeat RNA to the mouse X chromosome. Science 322, 750-756 (2008). pmid: 18974356
17. K. Sarma et al., ATRX directs binding of PRC2 to Xist RNA and Polycomb targets. Cell 159, 869-883 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.019; pmid: 25417162
18. Y. Jeon, J. T. Lee, YY1 tethers Xist RNA to the inactive X nucleation center. Cell 146, 119-133 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.026; pmid: 21729784
19. Y. Hasegawa et al., The matrix protein hnRNP U is required for chromosomal localization of Xist RNA. Dev. Cell 19, 469-476 (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.08.006; pmid: 20833368
20. A. Wutz, Gene silencing in X-chromosome inactivation: Advances in understanding facultative heterochromatin formation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12, 542-553 (2011). doi: 10.1038/nrg3035; pmid: 21765457
21. D. H. Lundgren, S. I. Hwang, L. Wu, D. K. Han, Role of spectral counting in quantitative proteomics. Expert Rev. Proteomics 7, 39-53 (2010). doi: 10.1586/epr.09.69; pmid: 20121475
22. L. Ting, R. Rad, S. P. Gygi, W. Haas, MS3 eliminates ratio distortion in isobaric multiplexed quantitative proteomics. Nat. Methods 8, 937-940 (2011). doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1714; pmid: 21963607
23. S. Schoeftner et al., Recruitment of PRC1 function at the initiation of X inactivation independent of PRC2 and silencing. EMBO J. 25, 3110-3122 (2006). doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601187; pmid: 16763550
24. M. E. Blewitt et al., SmcHD1, containing a structuralmaintenance-of-chromosomes hinge domain, has a critical role in X inactivation. Nat. Genet. 40, 663-669 (2008). doi: 10.1038/ng.142; pmid: 18425126
25. J. T. Kung et al., Locus-specific targeting to the X chromosome revealed by the RNA interactome of CTCF. Mol. Cell 57, 361-375 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.12.006; pmid: 25578877
26. M. H. Kagey et al., Mediator and cohesin connect gene expression and chromatin architecture. Nature 467, 430-435 (2010). doi: 10.1038/nature09380; pmid: 20720539
27. J. R. Dixon et al., Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485, 376-380 (2012). doi: 10.1038/nature11082; pmid: 22495300
28. M. Merkenschlager, D. T. Odom, CTCF and cohesin: Linking gene regulatory elements with their targets. Cell 152, 1285-1297 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.029; pmid: 23498937
29. L. L. Hall, M. Byron, G. Pageau, J. B. Lawrence, AURKB-mediated effects on chromatin regulate binding versus release of XIST RNA to the inactive chromosome. J. Cell Biol. 186, 491-507 (2009). doi: 10.1083/jcb.200811143; pmid: 19704020
30. V. Singh, P. Sharma, N. Capalash, DNA methyltransferase-1 inhibitors as epigenetic therapy for cancer. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 13, 379-399 (2013). doi: 10.2174/15680096113139990077; pmid: 23517596
31. M. E. Ashour, R. Atteya, S. F. El-Khamisy, Topoisomerase-mediated chromosomal break repair: An emerging player in many games. Nat. Rev. Cancer 15, 137-151 (2015). doi: 10.1038/nrc3892; pmid: 25693836
32. S. F. Pinter et al., Spreading of X chromosome inactivation via a hierarchy of defined Polycomb stations. Genome Res. 22, 1864-1876 (2012). doi: 10.1101/gr.133751.111; pmid: 22948768
33. S. Lin, A. C. Ferguson-Smith, R. M. Schultz, M. S. Bartolomei, Nonallelic transcriptional roles of CTCF and cohesins at imprinted loci. Mol. Cell. Biol. 31, 3094-3104 (2011). doi: 10.1128/MCB.01449-10; pmid: 21628529
34. W. Li et al., Functional roles of enhancer RNAs for oestrogen-dependent transcriptional activation. Nature 498, 516-520 (2013). doi: 10.1038/nature12210; pmid: 23728302
35. J. M. Dowen et al., Control of cell identity genes occurs in insulated neighborhoods in mammalian chromosomes. Cell 159, 374-387 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.030; pmid: 25303531
36. J. M. Calabrese et al., Site-specific silencing of regulatory elements as a mechanism of X inactivation. Cell 151, 951-963 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.037; pmid: 23178118
37. L. F. Zhang, K. D. Huynh, J. T. Lee, Perinucleolar targeting of the inactive X during S phase: Evidence for a role in the maintenance of silencing. Cell 129, 693-706 (2007). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.03.036; pmid: 17512404
38. L. Carrel, H. F. Willard, X-inactivation profile reveals extensive variability in X-linked gene expression in females. Nature 434, 400-404 (2005). doi: 10.1038/nature03479; pmid: 15772666
39. J. B. Berletch, F. Yang, J. Xu, L. Carrel, C. M. Disteche, Genes that escape from X inactivation. Hum. Genet. 130, 237-245 (2011). doi: 10.1007/s00439-011-1011-z; pmid: 21614513
40. C. Feig, D. T. Odom, Cohesin's role as an active chromatin domain anchorage revealed. EMBO J. 32, 3114-3115 (2013). doi: 10.1038/emboj.2013.248; pmid: 24270571
41. C. T. Ong, V. G. Corces, CTCF: An architectural protein bridging genome topology and function. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15, 234-246 (2014). doi: 10.1038/nrg3663; pmid: 24614316
42. M. Vietri Rudan et al., Comparative Hi-C reveals that CTCF underlies evolution of chromosomal domain architecture. Cell Reports 10, 1297-1309 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.004; pmid: 25732821
43. E. Splinter et al., The inactive X chromosome adopts a unique three-dimensional conformation that is dependent on Xist RNA. Genes Dev. 25, 1371-1383 (2011). doi: 10.1101/gad.633311; pmid: 21690198
44. E. P. Nora et al., Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature 485, 381-385 (2012). doi: 10.1038/nature11049; pmid: 22495304
45. T. Nagano et al., Single-cell Hi-C reveals cell-to-cell variability in chromosome structure. Nature 502, 59-64 (2013). doi: 10.1038/nature12593; pmid: 24067610
46. S. S. Rao et al., A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell 159, 1665-1680 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021; pmid: 25497547
47. S. Sun et al., Jpx RNA activates Xist by evicting CTCF. Cell 153, 1537-1551 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.028; pmid: 23791181
48. A. Castello et al., Insights into RNA biology from an atlas of mammalian mRNA-binding proteins. Cell 149, 1393-1406 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.031; pmid: 22658674
49. S. C. Kwon et al., The RNA-binding protein repertoire of embryonic stem cells. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 1122-1130 (2013). doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2638; pmid: 23912277
50. G. C. McAlister et al., Increasing the multiplexing capacity of TMTs using reporter ion isotopologues with isobaric masses. Anal. Chem. 84, 7469-7478 (2012). doi: 10.1021/ac301572t; pmid: 22880955
51. A. Thompson et al., Tandem mass tags: A novel quantification strategy for comparative analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS. Anal. Chem. 75, 1895-1904 (2003). doi: 10.1021/ac0262560; pmid: 12713048
52. A. C. Tolonen, W. Haas, Quantitative proteomics using reductive dimethylation for stable isotope labeling. J. Vis. Exp. (89) (2014). pmid: 25045933
53. G. C. McAlister et al., MultiNotch MS3 enables accurate, sensitive, and multiplexed detection of differential expression across cancer cell line proteomes. Anal. Chem. 86, 7150-7158 (2014). doi: 10.1021/ac502040v; pmid: 24927332
54. M. P. Weekes et al., Quantitative temporal viromics: An approach to investigate host-pathogen interaction. Cell 157, 1460-1472 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.04.028; pmid: 24906157
55. J. K. Eng, A. L. McCormack, J. R. Yates, An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 5, 976-989 (1994). doi: 10.1016/1044-0305(94) 80016-2; pmid: 24226387
56. J. E. Elias, S. P. Gygi, Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 4, 207-214 (2007). doi: 10.1038/nmeth1019; pmid: 17327847
57. E. L. Huttlin et al., A tissue-specific atlas of mouse protein phosphorylation and expression. Cell 143, 1174-1189 (2010). pmid: 21183079
58. A. K. Hadjantonakis, L. L. Cox, P. P. Tam, A. Nagy, An X-linked GFP transgene reveals unexpected paternal X-chromosome activity in trophoblastic giant cells of the mouse placenta. Genesis 29, 133-140 (2001). doi: 10.1002/gene.1016; pmid: 11252054
59. S. Heinz et al., Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol. Cell 38, 576-589 (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.05.004; pmid: 20513432
60. M. D. Robinson, D. J. McCarthy, G. K. Smyth, edgeR: A Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139-140 (2010). doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616; pmid: 19910308
61. E. Lieberman-Aiden et al., Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326, 289-293 (2009). doi: 10.1126/science.1181369; pmid: 19815776
62. E. Yildirim, R. I. Sadreyev, S. F. Pinter, J. T. Lee, X-chromosome hyperactivation in mammals via nonlinear relationships between chromatin states and transcription. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 56-61 (2011). doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2195; pmid: 22139016
63. Y. C. Lin et al., Global changes in the nuclear positioning of genes and intra-and interdomain genomic interactions that orchestrate B cell fate. Nat. Immunol. 13, 1196-1204 (2012). doi: 10.1038/ni.2432; pmid: 23064439
64. S. Selvaraj, J. R Dixon, V. Bansal, B. Ren, Whole-genome haplotype reconstruction using proximity-ligation and shotgun sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 1111-1118 (2013). doi: 10.1038/nbt.2728; pmid: 24185094
65. P. A. Knight, D. Ruiz, A fast algorithm for matrix balancing. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 33, 1029-1047 (2013). doi: 10.1093/imanum/drs019
66. M. Imakaev et al., Iterative correction of Hi-C data reveals hallmarks of chromosome organization. Nat. Methods 9, 999-1003 (2012). doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2148; pmid: 22941365