FMNL formins boost lamellipodial force generation

Nature Communications

Volumn 8, Issue , 2017, Pages

  Kage, Frieda ^a,b   Winterhoff, Moritz ^c   Dimchev, Vanessa ^a,b   Mueller, Jan ^d   Thalheim, Tobias ^e   Freise, Anika ^a,b   Brühmann, Stefan ^c   Kollasser, Jana ^b,f   Block, Jennifer ^b   Dimchev, Georgi ^a,b   Geyer, Matthias ^g   Schnittler, Hans Joachim ^h   Brakebusch, Cord ^f   Stradal, Theresia E B ^b   Carlier, Marie France ⁱ   Sixt, Michael ^d   Käs, Josef ^e   Faix, Jan ^c   Rottner, Klemens ^a,b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF BRAUNSCHWEIG   (Germany)

^b HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR INFECTION RESEARCH   (Germany)

^c HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

^d INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AUSTRIA   (Austria)

^e UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^f UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^g UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^h UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

ⁱ LABORATOIRE D ENZYMOLOGIE ET BIOCHIMIE STRUCTURALES   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIN RELATED PROTEIN 2-3 COMPLEX; BETA ACTIN; COFILIN 1; EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR; F ACTIN; FMNL2 PROTEIN; FMNL3 PROTEIN; PROTEIN CDC42; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; FMNL2 PROTEIN, MOUSE; FMNL3 PROTEIN, MOUSE; PROTEIN; SIGNAL PEPTIDE;

CELLS AND CELL COMPONENTS; ENZYME ACTIVITY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; LABORATORY METHOD; PROTEIN;

3T3 CELL LINE; ACTIN FILAMENT; AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CELL MIGRATION; CELL ULTRASTRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRISPR CAS SYSTEM; GENE INACTIVATION; IN VITRO STUDY; LAMELLIPODIUM; MELANOMA B16; MELANOMA CELL; MOUSE; MYRISTYLATION; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; RNA INTERFERENCE; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMECHANICS; CELL MOTION; EXPERIMENTAL MELANOMA; FIBROBLAST; GENE KNOCKDOWN; GENETICS; KNOCKOUT MOUSE; METABOLISM; NIH 3T3 CELL LINE; PATHOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; POLYMERIZATION; PSEUDOPODIUM; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; CELL MOVEMENT; CRISPR-CAS SYSTEMS; FIBROBLASTS; GENE KNOCKDOWN TECHNIQUES; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; MELANOMA, EXPERIMENTAL; MICE; MICE, KNOCKOUT; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NIH 3T3 CELLS; PHENOTYPE; POLYMERIZATION; PROTEINS; PSEUDOPODIA; RNA INTERFERENCE;

EID: 85016148235     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14832     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Bergert, M., Chandradoss, S. D., Desai, R. A. & Paluch, E. Cell mechanics control rapid transitions between blebs and lamellipodia during migration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 14434-14439 (2012).
2. Lammermann, T. & Sixt, M. Mechanical modes of 'amoeboid' cell migration. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21, 636-644 (2009).
3. Krause, M. & Gautreau, A. Steering cell migration: lamellipodium dynamics and the regulation of directional persistence. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 577-590 (2014).
4. Chen, Z. et al. Structure and control of the actin regulatory WAVE complex. Nature 468, 533-538 (2010).
5. Lebensohn, A. M. & Kirschner, M. W. Activation of the WAVE complex by coincident signals controls actin assembly. Mol. Cell 36, 512-524 (2009).
6. Innocenti, M. et al. Abi1 is essential for the formation and activation of a WAVE2 signalling complex. Nat. Cell Biol. 6, 319-327 (2004).
7. Kunda, P., Craig, G., Dominguez, V. & Baum, B. Abi, Sra1, and Kette control the stability and localization of SCAR/WAVE to regulate the formation of actin-based protrusions. Curr. Biol. 13, 1867-1875 (2003).
8. Steffen, A. et al. Sra-1 and Nap1 link Rac to actin assembly driving lamellipodia formation. EMBO J. 23, 749-759 (2004).
9. Steffen, A. et al. Filopodia formation in the absence of functional WAVE-and Arp2/3-complexes. Mol. Biol. Cell 17, 2581-2591 (2006).
10. Suraneni, P. et al. The Arp2/3 complex is required for lamellipodia extension and directional fibroblast cell migration. J. Cell Biol. 197, 239-251 (2012).
11. Wu, C. et al. Arp2/3 is critical for lamellipodia and response to extracellular matrix cues but is dispensable for chemotaxis. Cell 148, 973-987 (2012).
12. Bear, J. E. & Gertler, F. B. Ena/VASP: towards resolving a pointed controversy at the barbed end. J. Cell Sci. 122, 1947-1953 (2009).
13. Gurel, P. S. et al. Assembly and turnover of short actin filaments by the formin INF2 and profilin. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 22494-22506 (2015).
14. Chesarone, M. A., DuPage, A. G. & Goode, B. L. Unleashing formins to remodel the actin and microtubule cytoskeletons. Nat. rev. Mol. cell biol. 11, 62-74 (2010).
15. Kovar, D. R., Harris, E. S., Mahaffy, R., Higgs, H. N. & Pollard, T. D. Control of the assembly of ATP-and ADP-actin by formins and profilin. Cell 124, 423-435 (2006).
16. Block, J. et al. Filopodia formation induced by active mDia2/Drf3. J. microsc. 231, 506-517 (2008).
17. Pellegrin, S. & Mellor, H. The Rho family GTPase Rif induces filopodia through mDia2. Curr. biol. 15, 129-133 (2005).
18. Schirenbeck, A., Bretschneider, T., Arasada, R., Schleicher, M. & Faix, J. The Diaphanous-related formin dDia2 is required for the formation and maintenance of filopodia. Nat. cell biol. 7, 619-625 (2005).
19. Yang, C. et al. Novel roles of formin mDia2 in lamellipodia and filopodia formation in motile cells. PLoS biol. 5, e317 (2007).
20. Faix, J., Breitsprecher, D., Stradal, T. E. & Rottner, K. Filopodia: complex models for simple rods. int. j. biochem. cell biol. 41, 1656-1664 (2009).
21. Young, L. E., Heimsath, E. G. & Higgs, H. N. Cell type-dependent mechanisms for formin-mediated assembly of filopodia. Mol. Biol. Cell 26, 4646-4659 (2015).
22. Colon-Franco, J. M., Gomez, T. S. & Billadeau, D. D. Dynamic remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton by FMNL1gamma is required for structural maintenance of the Golgi complex. J. cell sci. 124, 3118-3126 (2011).
23. Isogai, T. et al. Initiation of lamellipodia and ruffles involves cooperation between mDia1 and the Arp2/3 complex. J. Cell Sci. 128, 3796-3810 (2015).
24. Ramalingam, N. et al. A resilient formin-derived cortical actin meshwork in the rear drives actomyosin-based motility in 2D confinement. Nat. Commun. 6, 8496 (2015).
25. Lai, F. P. et al. Arp2/3 complex interactions and actin network turnover in lamellipodia. EMBO J. 27, 982-992 (2008).
26. Peng, J., Wallar, B. J., Flanders, A., Swiatek, P. J. & Alberts, A. S. Disruption of the Diaphanous-related formin Drf1 gene encoding mDia1 reveals a role for Drf3 as an effector for Cdc42. Curr. biol. 13, 534-545 (2003).
27. Gauvin, T. J., Young, L. E. & Higgs, H. N. The formin FMNL3 assembles plasma membrane protrusions that participate in cell-cell adhesion. Mol. biol. cell 26, 467-477 (2015).
28. Wakayama, Y., Fukuhara, S., Ando, K., Matsuda, M. & Mochizuki, N. Cdc42 mediates Bmp-induced sprouting angiogenesis through Fmnl3-driven assembly of endothelial filopodia in zebrafish. Dev. cell 32, 109-122 (2015).
29. Block, J. et al. FMNL2 drives actin-based protrusion and migration downstream of Cdc42. Curr. biol. 22, 1005-1012 (2012).
30. Kuhn, S. & Geyer, M. Formins as effector proteins of Rho GTPases. Small GTPases 5, e29513 (2014).
31. Harris, E. S., Gauvin, T. J., Heimsath, E. G. & Higgs, H. N. Assembly of filopodia by the formin FRL2 (FMNL3). Cytoskeleton 67, 755-772 (2010).
32. Heimsath, Jr E. G. & Higgs, H. N. The C terminus of formin FMNL3 accelerates actin polymerization and contains a WH2 domain-like sequence that binds both monomers and filament barbed ends. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 3087-3098 (2012).
33. Breitsprecher, D. et al. Molecular mechanism of Ena/VASP-mediated actin-filament elongation. EMBO j. 30, 456-467 (2011).
34. Hansen, S. D. & Mullins, R. D. VASP is a processive actin polymerase that requires monomeric actin for barbed end association. J. cell biol. 191, 571-584 (2010).
35. Kuhn, S. et al. The structure of FMNL2/Cdc42 yields insights into the mechanism of lamellipodia and filopodia formation. Nat. Commun. 6, 7088 (2015).
36. Paul, A. S. & Pollard, T. D. The role of the FH1 domain and profilin in forminmediated actin-filament elongation and nucleation. Curr. Biol. 18, 9-19 (2008).
37. Vinson, V. K., De La Cruz, E. M., Higgs, H. N. & Pollard, T. D. Interactions of Acanthamoeba profilin with actin and nucleotides bound to actin. Biochemistry 37, 10871-10880 (1998).
38. Lammers, M., Rose, R., Scrima, A. & Wittinghofer, A. The regulation of mDia1 by autoinhibition and its release by Rho∗GTP. EMBO j. 24, 4176-4187 (2005).
39. Schulte, A. et al. The human formin FHOD1 contains a bipartite structure of FH3 and GTPase-binding domains required for activation. Structure 16, 1313-1323 (2008).
40. Steffen, A. et al. Rac function is crucial for cell migration but is not required for spreading and focal adhesion formation. J. cell sci. 126, 4572-4588 (2013).
41. Pollard, T. D. & Borisy, G. G. Cellular motility driven by assembly and disassembly of actin filaments. Cell 112, 453-465 (2003).
42. Small, J. V., Stradal, T., Vignal, E. & Rottner, K. The lamellipodium: where motility begins. Trends Cell. Biol. 12, 112-120 (2002).
43. Wang, Y. L. Exchange of actin subunits at the leading edge of living fibroblasts: possible role of treadmilling. J. cell biol. 101, 597-602 (1985).
44. Cai, L., Makhov, A. M., Schafer, D. A. & Bear, J. E. Coronin 1B antagonizes cortactin and remodels Arp2/3-containing actin branches in lamellipodia. Cell 134, 828-842 (2008).
45. Ponti, A., Machacek, M., Gupton, S. L., Waterman-Storer, C. M. & Danuser, G. Two distinct actin networks drive the protrusion of migrating cells. Science 305, 1782-1786 (2004).
46. Watanabe, N. & Mitchison, T. J. Single-molecule speckle analysis of actin filament turnover in lamellipodia. Science 295, 1083-1086 (2002).
47. Peckham, M., Miller, G., Wells, C., Zicha, D. & Dunn, G. A. Specific changes to the mechanism of cell locomotion induced by overexpression of beta-actin. J. Cell Sci. 114, 1367-1377 (2001).
48. Bernstein, B. W. & Bamburg, J. R. ADF/cofilin: a functional node in cell biology. Trends cell biol. 20, 187-195 (2010).
49. Vitriol, E. A., Wise, A. L., Berginski, M. E., Bamburg, J. R. & Zheng, J. Q. Instantaneous inactivation of cofilin reveals its function of F-actin disassembly in lamellipodia. Mol. Biol. Cell 24, 2238-2247 (2013).
50. Adams, J. C. Roles of fascin in cell adhesion and motility. Curr. opin. cell biol. 16, 590-596 (2004).
51. Koestler, S. A. et al. Arp2/3 complex is essential for actin network treadmilling as well as for targeting of capping protein and cofilin. Mol. biol. cell 24, 2861-2875 (2013).
52. Dieterich, P. et al. Quantitative morphodynamics of endothelial cells within confluent cultures in response to fluid shear stress. Biophys. J. 79, 1285-1297 (2000).
53. Leithner, A. et al. Diversified actin protrusions promote environmental exploration but are dispensable for locomotion of leukocytes. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 1253-1259 (2016).
54. Machesky, L. M. & Insall, R. H. Scar1 and the related Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein, WASP, regulate the actin cytoskeleton through the Arp2/3 complex. Curr. biol. 8, 1347-1356 (1998).
55. Nicholson-Dykstra, S. M. & Higgs, H. N. Arp2 depletion inhibits sheet-like protrusions but not linear protrusions of fibroblasts and lymphocytes. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 65, 904-922 (2008).
56. Suraneni, P. et al. A mechanism of leading-edge protrusion in the absence of Arp2/3 complex. Mol. biol. cell 26, 901-912 (2015).
57. Blanchoin, L., Boujemaa-Paterski, R., Sykes, C. & Plastino, J. Actin dynamics, architecture, and mechanics in cell motility. Physiol. Rev. 94, 235-263 (2014).
58. Anderson, K. L. et al. Nano-scale actin-network characterization of fibroblast cells lacking functional Arp2/3 complex. J. Struct. Biol. S1047-8477, 30254-30254 (2016).
59. Zeng, Y. F. et al. Increased expression of formin-like 3 contributes to metastasis and poor prognosis in colorectal carcinoma. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 98, 260-267 (2015).
60. Zhu, X. L. et al. FMNL2 is a positive regulator of cell motility and metastasis in colorectal carcinoma. J. Pathol. 224, 377-388 (2011).
61. Winterhoff, M. et al. The Diaphanous-related formin dDia1 is required for highly directional phototaxis and formation of properly sized fruiting bodies in Dictyostelium. Eur. j. cell biol. 93, 212-224 (2014).
62. Malm, B. Chemical modification of Cys-374 of actin interferes with the formation of the profilactin complex. FEBS lett. 173, 399-402 (1984).
63. Ran, F. A. et al. Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat. protoc. 8, 2281-2308 (2013).
64. Leibiger, C. et al. First molecular cytogenetic high resolution characterization of the NIH 3T3 cell line by murine multicolor banding. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 61, 306-312 (2013).
65. Gurniak, C. B. et al. Severe protein aggregate myopathy in a knockout mouse model points to an essential role of cofilin2 in sarcomeric actin exchange and muscle maintenance. Eur. j. cell biol. 93, 252-266 (2014).
66. Olazabal, I. M. et al. Rho-kinase and myosin-II control phagocytic cup formation during CR, but not FcgammaR, phagocytosis. Curr. biol. 12, 1413-1418 (2002).
67. Gorelik, R. & Gautreau, A. Quantitative and unbiased analysis of directional persistence in cell migration. Nat. protoc. 9, 1931-1943 (2014).
68. Brunner, C. A. et al. Cell migration through small gaps. Eur. Biophys. J. 35, 713-719 (2006).
69. Kremer, J. R., Mastronarde, D. N. & McIntosh, J. R. Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. J. struct. biol. 116, 71-76 (1996).
70. Winkler, C., Vinzenz, M., Small, J. V. & Schmeiser, C. Actin filament tracking in electron tomograms of negatively stained lamellipodia using the localized radon transform. J. struct. biol. 178, 19-28 (2012).