Competitive and cooperative arm rehabilitation games played by a patient and unimpaired person: effects on motivation and exercise intensity

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 1-18

  Goršič, Maja ^a   Cikajlo, Imre ^b   Novak, Domen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY REHABILITATION INSTITUTE   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Exercise intensity; Interpersonal rehabilitation games; Motivation; Multiplayer games; Rehabilitation; Social interaction; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM DISEASE; ARTICLE; BLOOD RELATIVE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPETITIVE ARM REHABILITATION GAME; CONTROLLED STUDY; COOPERATIVE ARM REHABILITATION GAME; DISEASE SEVERITY; EXERCISE INTENSITY; FEMALE; GAME; HUMAN; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION INVENTORY QUESTIONNAIRE; MALE; MOTIVATION; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPIST; QUESTIONNAIRE; REHABILITATION EQUIPMENT; SENSOR; SOCIAL INTERACTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VELOCITY; VIDEO GAME; WEARABLE INERTIAL SENSOR; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ARM; CLINICAL TRIAL; HUMAN RELATION; KINESIOTHERAPY; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR DISORDERS; QUALITY OF LIFE;

ADULT; ARM; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; PSYCHOMOTOR DISORDERS; QUALITY OF LIFE; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; VIDEO GAMES;

EID: 85015934736     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12984-017-0231-4     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Seshadri S, Wolf PA. Lifetime risk of stroke and dementia: current concepts, and estimates from the Framingham study. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6:1106-14.
2. Bonita R, Beaglehole R. Recovery of motor function after stroke. Stroke. 1988;19:1497-500.
3. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M, De Simone G, Ferguson TB, Flegal K, Ford E, Furie K, Go A, Greenlund K, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2009 update: A report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2009;119:e21.
4. De Wit L, Putman K, Dejaeger E, Baert I, Berman P, Bogaerts K, Brinkmann N, Connell L, Feys H, Jenni W, Kaske C, Lesaffre E, Leys M, Lincoln N, Louckx F, Schuback B, Schupp W, Smith B, De Weerdt W. Use of time by stroke patients: a comparison of four European rehabilitation centers. Stroke. 2005;36:1977-83.
5. Webster D, Celik O. Systematic review of Kinect applications in elderly care and stroke rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11:108.
6. Amirabdollahian F, Ates S, Basteris A, Cesario A, Buurke J, Hermens H, Hofs D, Johansson E, Mountain G, Nasr N, Nijenhuis S, Prange G, Rahman N, Sale P, Schätzlein F, van Schooten B, Stienen A. Design, development and deployment of a hand/wrist exoskeleton for home-based rehabilitation after stroke - SCRIPT project. Robotica. 2014;32:1331-46.
7. Laver K, George S, Thomas S, Deutsch J, Crotty M. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;12:CD008349.
8. Colombo R, Pisano F, Mazzone A, Delconte C, Micera S, Carrozza MC, Dario P, Minuco G. Design strategies to improve patient motivation during robot-aided rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2007;4. Article no. 3, http://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1743-0003-4-3.
9. Mihelj M, Novak D, Milavec M, Ziherl J, Olenšek A, Munih M. Virtual rehabilitation environment using principles of intrinsic motivation and game design. Presence Teleop Virt. 2012;21:1-15.
10. Zimmerli L, Jacky M, Lünenburger L, Riener R, Bolliger M. Increasing patient engagement during virtual reality-based motor rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:1737-46.
11. Alankus G, Lazar A, May M, Kelleher C. Towards customizable games for stroke rehabilitation. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing systems - CHI ’10. New York: ACM Press; 2010. p. 2113.
12. Benvenuti F, Stuart M, Cappena V, Gabella S, Corsi S, Taviani A, Albino A, Scattareggia Marchese S, Weinrich M. Community-based exercise for upper limb paresis: a controlled trial with telerehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014;28:611-20.
13. Maclean N. The concept of patient motivation: a qualitative analysis of stroke professionals’ attitudes. Stroke. 2002;33:444-8.
14. Maclean N, Pound P, Wolfe C, Rudd A. Qualitative analysis of stroke patients’ motivation for rehabilitation. BMJ Br Med J. 2000;321:1051-4.
15. Friedrich M, Gittler G, Halberstadt Y, Cermak T, Heiller I. Combined exercise and motivation program: Effect on the compliance and level of disability of patients with chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:475-87.
16. Zondervan DK, Friedman N, Chang E, Zhao X, Augsburger R, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Cramer SC. Home-based hand rehabilitation after chronic stroke: Randomized, controlled single-blind trial comparing the MusicGlove with a conventional exercise program. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2016;53:457-72.
17. Nijenhuis SM, Prange GB, Amirabdollahian F, Sale P, Infarinato F, Nasr N, Mountain G, Hermens HJ, Stienen AHA, Buurke JH, Rietman JS. Feasibility study into self-administered training at home using an arm and hand device with motivational gaming environment in chronic stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015;12:89.
18. Weibel D, Wissmath B, Habegger S, Steiner Y, Groner R. Playing online games against computer- vs. human-controlled opponents: Effects on presence, flow, and enjoyment. Comput Hum Behav. 2008;24:2274-91.
19. Lim S, Reeves B. Computer agents versus avatars: Responses to interactive game characters controlled by a computer or other player. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2010;68:57-68.
20. Marker AM, Staiano AE. Better together: outcomes of cooperation versus competition in social exergaming. Games Health J. 2015;4:25-30.
21. Johnson MJ, Feng X, Johnson LM, Ramachandran B, Winters JM, Kosasih JB. Robotic systems that rehabilitate as well as motivate: three strategies for motivating impaired arm use. In: Proceedings of the First IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics. Piscataway: IEEE; 2006. p. 254-9
22. Carignan CR, Krebs HI. Telerehabilitation robotics: bright lights, big future? J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;43:695-710.
23. Flores E, Tobon G, Cavallaro E, Cavallaro FI, Perry JC, Keller T. Improving patient motivation in game development for motor deficit rehabilitation. In: Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference in Advances on Computer Entertainment Technology. New York: ACM Press; 2008. p. 381.
24. Johnson MJ, Loureiro RCV, Harwin WS. Collaborative tele-rehabilitation and robot-mediated therapy for stroke rehabilitation at home or clinic. Intell Serv Robot. 2008;1:109-21.
25. Ballester BR, Bermúdez i Badia S, Verschure PFMJ. Including social interaction in stroke VR-based motor rehabilitation enhances performance: a pilot study. Presence Teleop Virt. 2012;21:490-501.
26. Novak D, Nagle A, Keller U, Riener R. Increasing motivation in robot-aided arm rehabilitation with competitive and cooperative gameplay. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11. Article no. 64, https://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1743-0003-11-64.
27. Vanacken L, Notelaers S, Raymaekers C, Coninx K, van den Hoogen WM, IJsselsteijn WA, Feys P. Game-based collaborative training for arm rehabilitation of MS patients: a proof-of-concept game. In: Proceedings of GameDays. 2010. p. 2010.
28. Maier M, Ballester BR, Duarte E, Duff A, Verschure PFMJ. Social integration of stroke patients through the multiplayer Rehabilitation Gaming System. In: Proceedings of GameDays 2014. 2014. p. 100-14.
29. Goršič M, Novak D. Design and pilot evaluation of competitive and cooperative exercise games for arm rehabilitation at home. In: Proceedings of the 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Orlando: IEEE; 2016. p. 4690-4.
30. Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K. Adult norms for the Box and Block test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther. 1985;39:386-91.
31. Beravs T, Reberšek P, Novak D, Podobnik J, Munih M. Development and validation of a wearable inertial measurement system for use with lower limb exoskeletons. In: 11th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots. 2011. p. 212-7.
32. Šlajpah S, Kamnik R, Munih M. Kinematics based sensory fusion for wearable motion assessment in human walking. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2014;116:131-44.
33. McAuley E, Duncan T, Tammen VV. Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: a confirmatory factor analysis. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1989;60:48-58.
34. Weibel D, Wissmath B, Mast F. Immersion in mediated environments: the role of personality traits. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2010;13:251-56.
35. Fang X, Zhu M. Extraversion and computer game play: who plays what games? In: HCII ’11 Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Users and Applications. 2011. p. 659-67.
36. Goldberg LR, Johnson JA, Eber HW, Hogan R, Ashton MC, Cloninger CR, Gough HG. The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. J Res Pers. 2006;40:84-96.
37. Houston J, Harris P, McIntire S, Francis D. Revising the competitiveness index using factor analysis. Psychol Rep. 2002;90:31-4.
38. van der Pas SC, Verbunt JA, Breukelaar DE, van Woerden R, Seelen HA. Assessment of arm activity using triaxial accelerometry in patients with a stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:1437-42.
39. Tsurumi K, Itani T, Tachi N, Takanishi T, Suzumura H, Takeyama H. Estimation of energy expenditure during sedentary work with upper limb movement. J Occup Health. 2002;44:408-13.
40. McCrea SM, Geršak G, Novak D. Absolute and relative user perception of classification accuracy in an affective videogame. Interact Comput. 2017;29:271-86.
41. Jette DU, Warren RL, Wirtalla C. The relation between therapy intensity and outcomes of rehabilitation in skilled nursing facilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:373-9.
42. Kwakkel G. Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: issues for consideration. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:823-30.
43. Caurin GAP, Siqueira AAG, Andrade KO, Joaquim RC, Krebs HI. Adaptive strategy for multi-user robotic rehabilitation games. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 2011. p. 1395-8.
44. Andrade K, Martins J, Caurin GAP, Joaquim RC, Fernandes G. Relative performance analysis for robot rehabilitation procedure with two simultaneous users. In: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics. Piscataway: Ieee; 2012. p. 1530-4
45. Zimmerli L, Krewer C, Gassert R, Müller F, Riener R, Lünenburger L. Validation of a mechanism to balance exercise difficulty in robot-assisted upper-extremity rehabilitation after stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012;9. Article no. 6, https://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1743-0003-9-6.
46. Guidali M, Duschau-Wicke A, Broggi S, Klamroth-Marganska V, Nef T, Riener R. A robotic system to train activities of daily living in a virtual environment. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2011;49:1213-23.
47. Mace M, Rinne P, Kinany N, Bentley P, Burdet E: Collaborative gaming to enhance patient performance during virtual therapy. In 3rd International Conference on NeuroRehabilitation. Segovia, Spain; 2016:accepted for publication.
48. Ganesh G, Takagi A, Osu R, Yoshioka T, Kawato M, Burdet E. Two is better than one: Physical interactions improve motor performance in humans. Sci Rep. 2014;4. Article no. 3824, http://www.nature.com/articles/srep03824.
49. Lanini J, Tsuji T, Wolf P, Riener R, Novak D. Teleoperation of two six-degree-of-freedom arm rehabilitation exoskeletons. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics. 2015.
50. Reed K, Peshkin M, Hartmann MJ, Grabowecky M, Patton J, Vishton PM. Haptically linked dyads: are two motor-control systems better than one? Psychol Sci. 2006;17:365-6.
51. Reed KB, Peshkin MA. Physical collaboration of human-human and human-robot teams. IEEE Trans Haptics. 2008;1:108-20.
52. Noohi E, Zefran M. Quantitative measures of cooperation for a dyadic physical interaction task. In: Proceedings of the 14th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids). 2014. p. 469-74.
53. Trlep M, Mihelj M, Puh U, Munih M. Rehabilitation robot with patient-cooperative control for bimanual training of hemiparetic subjects. Adv Robot. 2011;25:1949-68.
54. Nagle A, Novak D, Wolf P, Riener R. Increased enjoyment using a tablet-based serious game with regularly changing visual elements: A pilot study. Gerontechnology. 2015;14:32-44.
55. Lum PS, Mulroy S, Amdur RL, Requejo P, Prilutsky BI, Dromerick AW. Gains in upper extremity function after stroke via recovery or compensation: potential differential effects on amount of real-world limb use. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009;16:237-53.
56. Roby-Brami A, Feydy A, Combeaud M, Bussell B, Levin MF. Motor compensation and recovery for reaching in stroke patients. Acta Neurol Scand. 2003;107:369-81.