Community-based exercise for upper limb paresis: A controlled trial with telerehabilitation

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Volumn 28, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 611-620

  Benvenuti, Francesco ^a   Stuart, Mary ^b   Cappena, Veruska ^a   Gabella, Sara ^a   Corsi, Sara ^a   Taviani, Antonio ^a   Albino, Antonio ^c   Scattareggia Marchese, Sandro ^d   Weinrich, Michael ^e  

^a Dipartimento della Riabilitazione e Delle Fragilitá   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

^c Dipartimento Tecnico Funzionale   (Italy)

^d Signo Motus Srl   (Italy)

^e NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

paresis; stroke; telerehabilitation; upper limb

Indexed keywords

9 HOLE PEG TEST; AGED; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COMMUNITY PROGRAM; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXERCISE; FEMALE; FUNCTION TEST; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTRICITY INDEX; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; NOTTINGHAM EXTENDED ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING SCALE; PARESIS; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; REHABILITATION; TELEREHABILITATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WOLF MOTOR FUNCTION TEST; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMMUNITY CARE; COMPLICATION; CONVALESCENCE; KINESIOTHERAPY; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; STROKE; TELEMEDICINE;

AGED; COHORT STUDIES; COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; PARESIS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; STROKE; TELEMEDICINE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84906277614     PISSN: 15459683     EISSN: 15526844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1545968314521003     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Nijland RH, van Wegen EE, Harmeling-van der Wel BC, Kwakkel G. Presence of finger extension and shoulder abduction within 72 hours after stroke predicts functional recovery: early prediction of functional outcome after stroke: the EPOS cohort study. Stroke. 2010 ; 41: 745-750
2. Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Horner RD, Landsman PB, Samsa GP, Matchar DB. Similar motor recovery of upper and lower extremities after stroke. Stroke. 1994 ; 25: 1181-1188
3. Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 ; 75: 394-398
4. Smania N, Gandolfi M, Paolucci S, et al. Reduced-intensity modified constraint-induced movement therapy versus conventional therapy for upper extremity rehabilitation after stroke: a multicenter trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 ; 26: 1035-1045
5. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006 ; 296: 2095-2104
6. Whitall J, Waller SM, Sorkin JD, et al. Bilateral and unilateral arm training improve motor function through differing neuroplastic mechanisms: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011 ; 25: 118-129
7. Lo AC, Guarino PD, Richards LG, et al. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2010 ; 362: 1772-1783
8. Cameirao MS, Badia SB, Duarte E, Frisoli A, Verschure PF. The combined impact of virtual reality neurorehabilitation and its interfaces on upper extremity functional recovery in patients with chronic stroke. Stroke. 2012 ; 43: 2720-2728
9. Saposnik G, Levin M. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis and implications for clinicians. Stroke. 2011 ; 42: 1380-1386
10. Cauraugh JH, Coombes SA, Lodha N, Naik SK, Summers JJ. Upper extremity improvements in chronic stroke: coupled bilateral load training. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2009 ; 27: 17-25
11. Cauraugh JH, Summers JJ. Neural plasticity and bilateral movements: a rehabilitation approach for chronic stroke. Prog Neurobiol. 2005 ; 75: 309-320
12. Chan MK, Tong RK, Chung KY. Bilateral upper limb training with functional electric stimulation in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 ; 23: 357-365
13. Lin KC, Chang YF, Wu CY, Chen YA. Effects of constraint-induced therapy versus bilateral arm training on motor performance, daily functions, and quality of life in stroke survivors. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 ; 23: 441-448
14. Macko RF, Ivey FM, Forrester LW. Task-oriented aerobic exercise in chronic hemiparetic stroke: training protocols and treatment effects. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2005 ; 12: 45-57
15. Oujamaa L, Relave I, Froger J, Mottet D, Pelissier JY. Rehabilitation of arm function after stroke. Literature review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2009 ; 52: 269-293
16. Dendale P, De Keulenaer G, Troisfontaines P, et al. Effect of a telemonitoring-facilitated collaboration between general practitioner and heart failure clinic on mortality and rehospitalization rates in severe heart failure: the TEMA-HF 1 (TElemonitoring in the MAnagement of Heart Failure) study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2012 ; 14: 333-340
17. Guiraud T, Granger R, Gremeaux V, et al. Telephone support oriented by accelerometric measurements enhances adherence to physical activity recommendations in non-compliant patients after a cardiac rehabilitation program. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 ; 93: 2141-2147
18. Moholdt T, Bekken Vold M, Grimsmo J, Slordahl SA, Wisloff U. Home-based aerobic interval training improves peak oxygen uptake equal to residential cardiac rehabilitation: a randomized, controlled trial. PLoS One. 2012 ; 7: e41199
19. Piron L, Turolla A, Agnosti M, et al. Exercise for paretic upper limb after stroke: a combined virtual-reality and telemedicine approach. J Rehabil Med. 2009 ; 41: 1016-1020
20. Chumbler NR, Quigley P, Li X, et al. Effects of telerehabilitation on physical function and disability for stroke patients. A randomized, controlled trial. Stroke. 2012 ; 43: 2168-2174
21. European Commission. CLEAR: Clinical Leading Environment for the Assessment and validation of Rehabilitation Protocols for home care, 2009. http://ec.europa.eu/information-society/apps/projects/factsheet/index.cfm? project-ref=224985. Accessed January 14, 2013.
22. Signo Motus. Habilis Europe, 2012. http://www.habiliseurope.eu.
23. Extending Upper Limb Rehabilitation for Stroke Survivors by the Habilis Platform. eChallenges e-2010. Cunningham P Cunningham M, ed. Warsaw, Poland: International Information Management Corporation ; 2010 :
24. Enjalbert M, Pellisier J, Lopez S, Perrigot M, Simon L. Le syndrome algodystrophique de l'hemiplegique adulte: interet d'un score d'evaluation. Ann Readpt Med Phys. 1987 ; 33: 35-42
25. Carr JH, Shepard RB A Motor Learning Program for Stroke. Philadelphia, PA: Butterworth-Heinemann ; 2002 :
26. Demeurisse G, Demol O, Robaye E. Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia. Eur Neurol. 1980 ; 19: 382-389
27. Fritz SL, Blanton S, Uswatte G, Taub E, Wolf SL. Minimal detectable change scores for the Wolf Motor Function Test. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 ; 23: 662-667
28. Earhart GM, Cavanaugh JT, Ellis T, Ford MP, Foreman KB, Dibble L. The 9-hole peg test of upper extremity function: average values, test-retest reliability, and factors contributing to performance in people with Parkinson disease. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2011 ; 35: 157-163
29. Beebe JA, Lang CE. Relationships and responsiveness of six upper extremity function tests during the first six months of recovery after stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2009 ; 33: 96-103
30. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J. 1965 ; 14: 61-65
31. Gladman JR, Lincoln NB, Adams SA. Use of the extended ADL scale with stroke patients. Age Ageing. 1993 ; 22: 419-424
32. Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Pieper CF, et al. Lower extremity function and subsequent disability: consistency across studies, predictive models, and value of gait speed alone compared with the short physical performance battery. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000 ; 55: M221 - M231
33. Duncan PW, Wallace D, Studenski S, Lai SM, Johnson D. Conceptualization of a new stroke-specific outcome measure: the Stroke Impact Scale. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2001 ; 8: 19-33
34. Pandyan AD, Johnson GR, Price CI, Curless RH, Barnes MP, Rodgers H. A review of the properties and limitations of the Ashworth and modified Ashworth Scales as measures of spasticity. Clin Rehabil. 1999 ; 13: 373-383
35. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis FD, Davis GB. User acceptance of information techology. MIS Q. 2003 ; 27: 425-478
36. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 1995 ; 57: 289-300
37. WeinkaufM. False discovery rate Excel spreadsheet. http://www.marum.de/ Binaries/Binary745/BenjaminiHochberg.xlsx. 2012.
38. Folstein MF, Robins LN, Helzer JE. The Mini-Mental State Examination. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1983 ; 40: 812
39. Yesavage JA. Geriatric Depression Scale. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1988 ; 24: 709-711
40. Conwell Y, Forbes NT, Cox C, Caine ED. Validation of a measure of physical illness burden at autopsy: the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993 ; 41: 38-41
41. Carlsson AM. Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale. Pain. 1983 ; 16: 87-101
42. Lin KC, Hsieh YW, Wu CY, Chen CL, Jang Y, Liu JS. Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of the Wolf Motor Function Test in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 ; 23: 429-434
43. Minelli C, Gondim FA, Barreira AA, Dromerick AW. Rehabilitation of the upper extremity and basic activities of daily living in the first month after ischemic stroke: an international cohort comparison study. Neurol Int. 2009 ; 1: e4
44. Coupar F, Pollock A, Legg LA, Sackley C, van Vliet P. Home-based therapy programmes for upper limb functional recovery following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 ; 5: CD006755
45. Roth DL, Haley WE, Clay OJ, et al. Race and gender differences in 1-year outcomes for community-dwelling stroke survivors with family caregivers. Stroke. 2011 ; 42: 626-631
46. Dobkin BH, Plummer-D'Amato P, Elashoff R, Lee J. International randomized clinical trial, stroke inpatient rehabilitation with reinforcement of walking speed (SIRROWS), improves outcomes. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 ; 24: 235-242
47. Barman J, Uswatte G, Sarkar N, Ghaffari T, Sokal B. Sensor-enabled RFID system for monitoring arm activity in daily life. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011 ; 2011: 5219-5223
48. Piron L, Turolla A, Agostini M, et al. Motor learning principles for rehabilitation: a pilot randomized controlled study in poststroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 ; 24: 501-508
49. Linder SM, Rosenfeldt AB, Reiss A, et al. The home stroke rehabilitation and monitoring system trial: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Stroke. 2013 ; 8: 46-53
50. Collin C, Wade D. Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1990 ; 53: 576-579
51. DiMatteo MR, Giordani PJ, Lepper HS, Croghan TW. Patient adherence and medical treatment outcomes: a meta-analysis. Med Care. 2002 ; 40: 794-811