Predictive quantitative structure-activity relationships modeling: Data preparation and the general modeling workflow

Handbook of Chemoinformatics Algorithms

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 173-210

  Tropsha, Alexander ^a   Golbraikh, Alexander ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85015746123     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9781420082999     Document Type: Chapter

References (89)

1. PubChem. http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/. 2008.
2. Oprea, T. and Tropsha, A., Target, chemical and bioactivity databases-integration is key. Drug Discov. Today 2006, 3, 357-365.
3. Golbraikh, A. and Tropsha, A., Predictive QSAR modeling based on diversity sampling of experimental datasets for the training and test set selection. Mol. Divers. 2002, 5, 231-243.
4. Golbraikh, A., Shen, M., Xiao, Z., Xiao, Y. D., Lee, K. H., and Tropsha, A., Rational selection of training and test sets for the development of validated QSAR models. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2003, 17, 241-253.
5. Irwin, J. J. and Shoichet, B. K., ZINC-a free database of commercially available compounds for virtual screening. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2005, 45, 177-182.
6. Tropsha, A., Application of predictive QSAR models to database mining. In T. Oprea (Ed.), Cheminformatics in Drug Discovery. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2005.
7. Tropsha, A., Predictive QSAR (quantitative structure activity relationships) modeling. In: J. Mason (Ed.), Comprehensive Medicinal Chemistry II. V. 4 (Computer-Aided Drug Design). Elsevier, Oxford, UK, pp. 149-165, 2006.
8. Tropsha, A., Gramatica, P., and Gombar, V. K., The importance of being earnest:Validation is the absolute essential for successful application and interpretation of QSPR models. Quant. Struct. Act. Relat. Comb. Sci. 2003, 22, 69-77.
9. Tropsha, A. and Golbraikh, A., Predictive QSAR modeling workflow, model applicability domains, and virtual screening. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2007, 13, 3494-3504.
10. Cho, S. J., Zheng, W., and Tropsha, A., Rational combinatorial library design. 2. Rational design of targeted combinatorial peptide libraries using chemical similarity probe and the inverse QSAR approaches. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 259-268.
11. Tropsha, A., Cho, S. J., and Zheng, W., “New Tricks for an Old Dog”: Development and application of novelQSARmethods for rational design of combinatorial chemical libraries and database mining. In:A. L. Parrill and M. R. Reddy (Eds), Rational Drug Design: Novel Methodology and Practical Applications. American Chemical Society, Washington, pp. 198-211, 1999.
12. Gussio, R., Pattabiraman, N., Kellogg, G. E., and Zaharevitz, D. W., Use of 3D QSAR methodology for data mining the National Cancer Institute repository of small molecules: Application to HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibition. Methods 1998, 14, 255-263.
13. Shen, M., Beguin, C., Golbraikh, A., Stables, J. P., Kohn, H., and Tropsha, A., Application of predictive QSAR models to database mining: Identification and experimental validation of novel anticonvulsant compounds. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 2356-2364.
14. Medina-Franco, J. L., Golbraikh, A., Oloff, S., Castillo, R., and Tropsha, A., Quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis of pyridinone HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitors using the k nearest neighbor method and QSAR-based database mining. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2005, 19, 229-242.
15. Oloff, S., Mailman, R. B., and Tropsha, A., Application of validated QSAR models of D1 dopaminergic antagonists for database mining. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 7322-7332.
16. Zhang, S., Wei, L., Bastow, K., Zheng, W., Brossi, A., Lee, K. H., and Tropsha, A., Antitumor agents 252. Application of validated QSAR models to database mining: Discovery of novel tylophorine derivatives as potential anticancer agents. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2007, 21, 97-112.
17. Hsieh, J. H., Wang, X. S., Teotico, D., Golbraikh, A., and Tropsha, A., Differentiation of AmpC beta-lactamase binders vs. decoys using classification KNN QSAR modeling and application of the QSAR classifier to virtual screening. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2008, 22, 593-609.
18. Tang, H., Wang, X. S., Huang, X. P., Roth, B. L., Butler, K. V., Kozikowski, A. P., Jung, M., and Tropsha, A., Novel inhibitors of human histone deacetylase (HDAC) identified by QSAR modeling of known inhibitors, virtual screening, and experimental validation. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49, 461-476.
19. Tropsha, A. and Zheng, W., Identification of the descriptor pharmacophores using variable selection QSAR: Applications to database mining. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2001, 7, 599-612.
20. Hoffman, B., Cho, S. J., Zheng, W., Wyrick, S., Nichols, D. E., Mailman, R. B., and Tropsha, A., Quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling of dopamine D(1) antagonists using comparative molecular field analysis, genetic algorithmspartial least-squares, and K nearest neighbor methods. J Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 3217-3226.
21. Zheng, W. and Tropsha, A., Novel variable selection quantitative structure-property relationship approach based on the K-nearest-neighbor principle. J Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 185-194.
22. Elkan, C., The foundations of cost-sensitive learning. Proceedings of the 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 973-978, 2001.
23. Chen, C., Liaw, A., and Breiman, L., Using Random Forest to Learn Imbalanced Data, p. 666. Department of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley, 2004.
24. Young, D. and Martin, T., Are the chemical structures in your QSAR correct? Qsar & Combinatorial Science 2008, 27, 1337-1345.
25. Chemical Computig Group. Molecular Operating Environment (MOE), http://www.chemcomp.com/. 2008.
26. ChemAxon, ChemAxon http://www.chemaxon.com, 2008.
27. OpenEye, OpenBabel, 2008.
28. Wiener, H. J., Structural determination of paraffin boiling points. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1947, 15, 17-20.
29. Platt, J. R., Influence of neighbor bonds on additive bond properties in paraffins. J. Chem. Phys. 1947, 15, 419-420.
30. Todeschini, R. and Consonni, V., Handbook of Molecular Descriptors. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2000.
31. Todeschini, R. and Consonni, V., Dragon, http://www.talete.mi.it/help/dragon_help/index. html?IntroducingDRAGON, 2007.
32. EduSoft, MolconnZ http://www.edusoft-lc.com/, 2007.
33. Golbraikh, A., Bonchev, D., and Tropsha, A., Novel chirality descriptors derived from molecular topology. J Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 147-158.
34. Golbraikh, A., Bonchev, D., and Tropsha, A., Novel ZE-isomerism descriptors derived from molecular topology and their application to QSAR analysis. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 769-787.
35. Golbraikh, A. and Tropsha, A., QSAR modeling using chirality descriptors derived from molecular topology. J Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 144-154.
36. Carhart, R. E., Smith, D. H., and Venkataraghavan, R., Atom pairs as molecular features in structure-activity studies: Definition and applications. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1985, 25, 64-73.
37. Kovatcheva, A., Golbraikh, A., Oloff, S., Feng, J., Zheng, W., and Tropsha, A., QSAR modeling of datasets with enantioselective compounds using chirality sensitive molecular descriptors. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 2005, 16, 93-102.
38. Marshall, G. R. and Cramer, R. D., III Three-dimensional structure-activity relationships. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 1988, 9, 285-289.
39. Klebe, G., Comparative molecular similarity indices: CoMSI. In H. Kubinyi, G. Folkers, and Y. Martin (Eds), 3D QSAR in Drug Design, Vol. 3. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Great Britain, 1998.
40. Kubinyi, H., Hamprecht, F.A., and Mietzner, T., Three-dimensional quantitative similarityactivity relationships (3D QSiAR) from SEAL similarity matrices. J Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 2553-2564.
41. Robinson, D. D., Winn, P. J., Lyne, P. D., and Richards, W. G., Self-organizing molecular field analysis: A tool for structure-activity studies. J Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 573-583.
42. Tripos, Sybyl http://www.tripos.com, 2008.
43. Accelrys, Catalyst http://www.accelrys.com, 2008.
44. Inte:Ligand, LigandScout http://www.inteligand.com/ligandscout/, 2008.
45. Bures, M. G. and Martin, Y. C., Computational methods in molecular diversity and combinatorial chemistry. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1998, 2, 376-380.
46. Cherkasov, A., An updated steroid benchmark set and its application in the discovery of novel nanomolar ligands of sex hormone-binding globulin. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 2047-2056.
47. Crivori, P., Cruciani, G., Carrupt, P. A., and Testa, B., Predicting blood-brain barrier permeation from three-dimensional molecular structure. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 2204-2216.
48. Cruciani, G., Pastor, M., and Guba, W., VolSurf: A new tool for the pharmacokinetic optimization of lead compounds 1. Eur. J Pharm. Sci. 2000, 11(Suppl 2), S29-S39.
49. Pastor, M., Cruciani, G., McLay, I., Pickett, S., and Clementi, S., GRid-INdependent Descriptors (GRIND):A novel class of alignment-independent three-dimensional molecular descriptors. J Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 3233-3243.
50. McGregor, M. J. and Pallai, P. V., Clustering of large databases of compounds: Using the MDL “Keys” as structural descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 443-448.
51. Waller, C. L., A comparative QSAR study using CoMFA, HQSAR, and FRED/SKEYS paradigms for estrogen receptor binding affinities of structurally diverse compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 758-765.
52. Huan, J., Bandyopadhyay, D., Prins, J., Snoeyink, J., Tropsha, A., and Wang, W., Distancebased identification of structure motifs in proteins using constrained frequent subgraph mining. Comput. Syst. Bioinform. Conf. 2006, 47, 227-238.
53. Horvath, D., Bonachera, F., Solov’ev, V., Gaudin, C., and Varnek, A., Stochastic versus stepwise strategies for quantitative structure-activity relationship generation-how much effort may the mining for successful QSAR models take? J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2007, 47, 927-939.
54. Hong, H., Xie, Q., Ge, W., Qian, F., Fang, H., Shi, L., Su, Z., Perkins, R., and Tong, W., Mold(2), molecular descriptors from 2D structures for chemoinformatics and toxicoinformatics. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 48, 1337-1344.
55. Schroeter, T. S., Schwaighofer, A., Mika, S., Ter, L. A., Suelzle, D., Ganzer, U., Heinrich, N., and Muller, K. R., Estimating the domain of applicability for machine learning QSAR models: A study on aqueous solubility of drug discovery molecules. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2007, 21, 485-498.
56. Willett, P., Barnard, J. M., and Owns, G. M., Chemical similarity searching. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 983-996.
57. Sachs, L., Applied Statistics: A Handbook of Techniques. Springer, NewYork, 1984.
58. Adams, M. J., Chemometrics in Analytical Spectroscopy. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 2004.
59. Whitley, D. C., Ford, M. G., and Livingstone, D. J., Unsupervised forward selection: A method for eliminating redundant variables. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 1160-1168.
60. Zhang, S., Golbraikh, A., Oloff, S., Kohn, H., and Tropsha, A., A novel automated lazy learning QSAR (ALL-QSAR) approach: Method development, applications, and virtual screening of chemical databases using validatedALL-QSAR models. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46, 1984-1995.
61. Reynolds, C. H., Tropsha, A., Pfahler, L. B., Druker, R., Chakravorty, S., Ethiraj, G., and Zheng, W., Diversity and coverage of structural sublibraries selected using the SAGE and SCA algorithms. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 1470-1477.
62. Reynolds, C. H., Druker, R., and Pfahler, L. B., Lead discovery using stochastic cluster analysis (SCA): A new method for clustering. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 305-312.
63. Maggiora, G. M., On outliers and activity cliffs-why QSAR often disappoints. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46, 1535.
64. Zhang, L., Zhu, H., Oprea, T. I., Golbraikh, A., and Tropsha, A., QSAR modeling of the blood-brain barrier permeability for diverse organic compounds. Pharm. Res. 2008, 25, 1902-1914.
65. Zhu, H., Ye, L., Richard, A., Golbraikh, A., Wright, F. A., Rusyn, I., and Tropsha A. Anovel two-step hierarchical quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling work flow for predicting acute toxicity of chemicals in rodents. Environ. Health Perspect. 2009, 117, 1257-1264.
66. Dixon, W. T. Processing data for outliers. Biometrics, 1953, 9, 74-89.
67. Fallon, A. and Spada, C., Detection and accommodation of outliers in normally distributed data sets, http://ewr.cee.vt.edu/environmental/teach/smprimer/outlier/outlier.html, 1997.
68. Environmental Protection Agency. Statistical training course for ground-water monitoring data analysis, EPA/530-R-93-003, Office of SolidWaste, Washington, DC, 1992.
69. Taylor, J. K. Quality assurance of chemical measurements, Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI, 1987.
70. Kanji, G. K., 100 Statistical Tests. Sage, 1993.
71. Yen, S.-J. and Lee, Y.-S., Under-sampling approaches for improving prediction of the minority class in an imbalanced dataset. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences 2006, 344, 731-740.
72. Kubat, M. and Matwin, S., Addressing the curse of imbalanced training sets: One sided selection. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Machine Learning, San Francisco, CA, Morgan Kaufmann, 1997.
73. Japkowicz, N., Learning from imbalanced datasets: A comparison of various strategies. AAAIWorkshop, Learning From Imbalanced Datasets, Papers FromTheAAAIWorkshop, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, 2000.
74. Golbraikh, A. and Tropsha, A., Beware of Q2! J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2002, 20, 269-276.
75. Organisation for Economic and Co-operation Development (OECD), Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships [(Q)SARs] Project, http://www.oecd.org/document/23/0,3343, en_2649_34365_33957015_1_1_1_1,00.html, 2008.
76. Harju, M., Hamers, T., Kamstra, J. H., Sonneveld, E., Boon, J. P., Tysklind, M., and Andersson, P. L., Quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling on in vitro endocrine effects and metabolic stability involving 26 selected brominated flame retardants. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2007, 26, 816-826.
77. Sharma, D., Narasimhan, B., Kumar, P., and Jalbout, A., Synthesis and QSAR evaluation of 2-(substituted phenyl)-1H-benzimidazoles and [2-(substituted phenyl)-benzimidazol-1-Yl]-pyridin-3-Yl-methanones. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 44, 1119-1127.
78. Zvinavashe, E., van den, B. H., Soffers, A. E., Vervoort, J., Freidig, A., Murk, A. J., and Rietjens, I. M., QSAR models for predicting in vivo aquatic toxicity of chlorinated alkanes to fish. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2008, 21, 739-745.
79. Padmanabhan, J., Parthasarathi, R., Subramanian, V., and Chattaraj, P. K., Group philicity and electrophilicity as possible descriptors for modeling ecotoxicity applied to chlorophenols. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2006, 19, 356-364.
80. Song, M. and Clark, M., Development and evaluation of an in silico model for HERG binding. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46, 392-400.
81. Iyer, M., Zheng, T., Hopfinger, A. J., and Tseng, Y. J., QSAR analyses of skin penetration enhancers. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2007, 47, 1130-1149.
82. Kovatcheva, A., Golbraikh, A., Oloff, S., Xiao, Y. D., Zheng, W., Wolschann, P., Buchbauer, G., and Tropsha, A., Combinatorial QSAR of ambergris fragrance compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 582-595.
83. de Cerqueira, L. P., Golbraikh, A., Oloff, S., Xiao, Y., and Tropsha, A., Combinatorial QSAR modeling of P-glycoprotein substrates. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46, 1245-1254.
84. Pandey, G. and Saxena, A. K., 3D QSAR studies on protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B inhibitors: Comparison of the quality and predictivity among 3D QSAR models obtained from different conformer-based alignments. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46, 2579-2590.
85. Roberts, D. W., Aptula, A. O., and Patlewicz, G., Mechanistic applicability domains for non-animal based prediction of toxicological endpoints. QSAR analysis of the Schiff base applicability domain for skin sensitization. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2006, 19, 1228-1233.
86. Ferré, J. and Rius, F. X., Selection of the best calibration sample subset for multivariate regression. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 1565-1571.
87. Ferré, J. and Rius, F. X., Constructing D-optimal designs from a list of candidate samples. Trends Anal. Chem. 1997, 16, 70-73.
88. Maesschalck, R. De., Estienne, F., Verdú-Andrés, J., Candolfi, A., Centner, V., Despagne, F., Jouan-Rimbaud, D., Walczak, B., Massart, D. L., Jong, S., de Noord, O. E. D., Puel, C., and Vandeginste, B. M. G., PCR tutorial. 10. Selection and representativity of the calibration sample subset, http://www.vub.ac.be/fabi/multi/pcr/chaps/chap10.html#fin, 2008.
89. Kennard, R. W. and Stone, L. A., Computer-aided design of experiments. Technometrics 1969, 11, 137-148.