QSAR modeling using chirality descriptors derived from molecular topology

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 144-154

  Golbraikh, Alexander ^a   Tropsha, Alexander ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHIRALITY DESCRIPTORS; ECDYSTEROIDS; MOLECULAR CONNECTIVITY; MOLECULAR TOPOLOGY; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

BINDING ENERGY; CALCULATIONS; CHEMICAL ACTIVATION; ISOMERS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; STEREOCHEMISTRY;

MOLECULAR PHYSICS;

ECDYSTEROID; HISTAMINE H1 RECEPTOR; LIGAND; PROTEINASE INHIBITOR; STEROID;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; FACTUAL DATABASE; IN VITRO STUDY; METABOLISM; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; STEREOISOMERISM;

DATABASES, FACTUAL; ECDYSTEROIDS; HIV PROTEASE INHIBITORS; LIGANDS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, CHEMICAL; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; RECEPTORS, HISTAMINE H1; STEREOISOMERISM; STEROIDS;

EID: 0037208307     PISSN: 00952338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci025516b     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Moran, L. A.; Scrimgeour, K. G.; Horton, H. R.; Ochs, R. S.; Rawn, J. D. Biochemistry; Neil Patterson Publishers Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1994.
2. Potapov, V. M. Stereochemistry; Khimia: Moscow, 1988.
3. Solms, J.; Vuataz, L.; Egli, R. H. The taste of L- and D-amino acids. Experiencia 1965, 21, 692-694.
4. Schiffman, S. S.; Clark, T. B. 3d; Gagnon, J. Influence of chirality of amino acids on the growth of perceived taste intensity with concentration. Physiol. Behav. 1982, 28, 457-465.
5. Laska, M.; Tuebner, P. Olfactory discrimination ability of human subjects for 10 pairs of enantiomers. Chem Senses. 1999, 24, 161-70.
6. Polak, E. H.; Fombon, A. M.; Tilquin, C.; Punter, P. H. Sensory evidence for olfactory receptors with opposite chiral selectivity. Behav. Brain. Res. 1989, 31, 199-206.
7. DeCamp, W. H. The FDA Perspective on the development of stereoisomers. Chirality 1989, 1, 2-6.
8. Hutt, A. J.; Tan, S. C. Drug chirality and its clinical significance. Drugs 1996, 52, 1-12.
9. Wnendt, S.; Zwingenberger, K. Thalidomide's chirality. Nature 1997, 285, 303-304.
10. Kurihara, N.; Miyamoto, J.; Paulson, G. D.; Zeeh, B.; Skidmore, M. W.; Hollingworth, R. M.; Kuiper, H. A. IUPAC reports on pesticides .37. Chirality in synthetic agrochemicals: Bioactivity and safety consideration. Pure Appl. Chem. 1997, 69, 1335-1348.
11. Stinson, S. C. Chiral Drugs. Chem. Eng. News 2000, 78, 43.
12. Stinson, S. C. Chiral Pharmaceuticals. Chem. Eng. News 2001, 79, 79-97.
13. Cramer, R. D., III.; Patterson, D. E.; Bunce, J. D. Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 5959-5967.
14. Marshall, G. R.; Cramer, R. D.; III Three-Dimensional Structure-Activity Relationships. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 1988, 9, 285-289.
15. Pérez, C.; Pastor, M.; Ortiz, A. R.; Gago, F. Comparative Binding Energy Analysis of HIV-1 Protease Inhibitors: Incorporation of Solvent Effects and Validation as a Powerful Tool in Receptor-Based Drug Design. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 836-852.
16. 2 Guided Region Selection for Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA): A Simple Method to Achieve Consistent Results. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 1060-1066.
17. Klebe, G. Comparative Molecular Similarity Indices Analysis - CoMSIA. In 3D QSAR in Drug Design. Volume 3. Recent Advances; Kubinyi, H., Folkers, G., Martin, Y. C., Eds.; Kluwer/ESCOM: Dordrecht, 1998; pp. 87-104.
18. Kubinyi, H.; Hamprecht, F. A., Mietzner, T. Three-Dimensional Quantitative Similarity-Activity Relationships (3D QSiAR) from Seal Similarity Matrices. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 2553-2564.
19. Golbraikh, A.; Bonchev, D.; Tropsha, A. Novel chirality descriptors derived from molecular topology. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 147-158.
20. Ewing, T. J.; Makino, S.; Skillman, A. G.; Kuntz, I. D. Dock 4.0: search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2001, 15, 411-28.
21. Osterberg, F.; Morris, G. M.; Sanner, M. F.; Olson, A. J.; Goodsell, D. S. Automated docking to multiple target structures: Incorporation of protein mobility and structural water heterogeneity in AutoDock. Proteins 2002, 46, 34-40.
22. Morris, G. M.; Goodsell, D. S.; Huey, R.; Olson, A. J. Distributed automated docking of flexible ligands to proteins: parallel applications of AutoDock 2.4. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1996, 4, 293-304.
23. Holloway, M. K.; Wai, J. M.; Halgren, T. A.; Fitzgerald, P. M. D.; Vacca, J. P.; Dorsey, B. D.; Levin, R. B.; Thompson, W. J.; Chen, L. J.; deSolms, S. J.; Gaffin, N.; Ghosh, A. K.; Giuliani, E. A.; Graham, S. L.; Guare, J. P.; Hungate, R. W.; Lyle, T. A.; Sanders, W. M.; Tucker, T. J.; Wiggins, M.; Wiscount, C. M.; Woltersdorf, O. W.; Young, S. D.; Darke, P. L.; Zugay, J. A. A Priori Prediction of Activity for HIV-1 Protease Inhibitors Employing Energy Minimization in the Active Site. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 305-317.
24. Judson, R. Genetic Algorithms and Their Use in Chemistry. In Reviews in Computational Chemistry; Lipkowitz, K. B. Boyd. D. B., Eds.; VCH Publishers: 1997; Vol. 10.
25. Kramer, B.; Rarey, M.; Lengauer, T. Evaluation of the Flexx incremental construction algorithm for protein-ligand docking. Proteins 1999, 37, 228-41.
26. Claussen, H.; Buning, C.; Rarey, M.; Lengauer T. FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 27, 377-95.
27. Cho, S. J.; Serrano, M. G.; Bier, J.; Tropsha, A. structure based alignment and comparative molecular field analysis of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 5064-5071.
28. Pilger, C.; Bartolucci, C.; Lamba, D.; Tropsha, A.; Fels, G. Accurate prediction of the bound conformation of galanthamine in the active site of Torpedo Californica acetylcholinesterase using molecular docking. J. Mol. Graphics Modeling 2001, 19, 288-296, 374-378.
29. Hoffman, B.; Cho, S. J.; Zheng, W.; Wyrick, S. D.; Nichols, D. E.; Mailman, R. B.; Tropsha, A. Quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling of dopamine D-1 antagonists using comparative molecular field analysis, genetic algorithms-partial least-squares, and K nearest neighbor methods. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 3217-3226.
30. Zheng, W.; Tropsha, A. novel variable selection quantitative structure-property relationship approach based on the k-nearest-neighbor principle. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 185-194.
31. Molconnz. http://www.eslc.vabiotech.com/
32. Julián-Ortiz, J. V. de; Alapont, C. de G.; Ríos-Santamarina, I.; García-Doménech, R.; Gálvez, J. Prediction of properties of chiral compounds by molecular topology. J. Mol. Graphics Mod. 1998, 16, 14-18.
33. Ecdysone: From chemistry to mode of action; Koolman J., Ed.; Thieme, 1989.
34. Dinan, L.; Hormann, R. E.; Fujimoto, T. An extensive ecdysteroid CoMFA. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1999, 13, 185-207.
35. Golbraikh, A.; Bonchev, D.; Xiao, Y.-D.; Tropsha, A. Novel chiral topological descriptors and their applications to QSAR. In Rational Approaches to Drug Design. Proceedings of the 13th European Symposium on quantitative Structure-Activity relationships, Prous Science, 2001, pp 219-223.
36. Coats, E. A. The CoMFA steroids as a benchmark data set for development of 3D QSAR methods. In 3D QSAR in Drug Design. V.3.; Kubinyi, H., Folkers, G., Martin, Y. C., Eds.; Kluwer/ESCOM: Dordrecht, 1998; pp 199-213.
37. Klebe, G.; Abraham, U.; Mietzner, T. Molecular similarity indices in a comparative analysis (CoMSIA) of drug molecules to correlate and predict their bioogical activity. J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 4130-4146.
38. Chen, H.; Zhou, J.; Xie, G. PARM: A genetic evolved algorithm to predict bioactivity. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 243-250.
39. Silverman, B. D. The thirty-one benchmark steroids revisited: comparative molecular moment analysis (CoMMA) with principal component regression. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 2000, 19, 237-246.
40. Bucholz, E.; Brown, R. L.; Tropsha, A.; Booth, R. G.; Wyrick, S. D. Synthesis, evolution, and comparative molecular field analysis of 1-phenyl-3-amino-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalenes as ligands for Histamine H1 receptors. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 3041-3054.
41. Bonchev, D. Overall connectivity - a next generation molecular connectivity. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2001, 20 Sp. Iss. SI, 65-75.
42. Gutman, I.; Ruscić, B.; Trinajstić, N.; Wilcox, C. F., Jr. Graph theory and molecular orbitals. XII. Acyclic polyenes. J. Chem. Phys. 1975, 62, 3399.
43. Randić, M. On characterization on molecular branching. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 6609-6615.
44. Kier, L. B.; Hall, L. H. Molecular connectivity in chemistry and drug research; Academic Press: New York, 1976.
45. Kier, L. B.; Hall, L. H. Molecular connectivity in structure-activity analysis; Wiley: New York, 1986.
46. Rücker, G.; Rücker, C. Counts of all walks as atomic and molecular descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1993, 33, 683-695.
47. Bonchev, D. Overall connectivity and molecular complexity. In Topological indices and related descriptors; Devillers, J., Balaban, A. T., Eds.; Gordon and Breach: Reading, U.K., 1999; pp 361-401.
48. Bonchev, D. Novel indices for the topological complexity of molecules. SAR/QSAR Environ. Res. 1997, 7, 23-43.
49. Wootton, R.; Cranfield, G.; Sheppey, C.; Goodford, P. J. Physicochemical-activity relationships in practice. 2. Rational selection of benzenoid substituents. J. Med. Chem. 1975, 18, 607-612.
50. Snarey, M.; Terrett, N. K.; Willett, P.; Wilton, D. J. Comparison of algorithms for dissimilarity-based compound selection. J. Mol. Graphics. Model. 1997, 15, 372-385.
51. Golbraikh, A.; Tropsha, A. Predictive QSAR modeling based on rational division of experimental datasets into diverse training and test sets. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des., in press.
52. Golbraikh A. Molecular dataset diversity indices and their applications to comparison of chemical databases and QSAR analysis. J. Chem. Inform. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 414-425.
53. 2!. J. Mol. Graphics Mod. 2002, 20, 269-276.
54. Sachs, L. Applied statistics. A handbook of techniques; Springer-Verlag: 1984.
55. MATLAB. http://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab/.
56. Clark, R. D.; Sprous, D. G.; Leonard, J. M. Validating models based on large datasets. In Rational approaches to drug design. Proceedings of the 13th European Symposium on Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships. Aug 17 - Sept 1, Duesseldorf, Germany. Hoeltje, H.-D., Sippl. W., Eds.: Prous Science: 2001.
57. 2 Guided Region Selection for Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA): A Simple Method to Achieve Consistent Results. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 1060-1066.