Compensation of dosage-sensitive genes on the chicken Z chromosome

Genome Biology and Evolution

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 1233-1242

  Zimmer, Fabian ^a   Harrison, Peter W ^a   Dessimoz, Christophe ^a,b,c   Mank, Judith E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^c SWISS INSTITUTE OF BIOINFORMATICS   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Dosage sensitivity; Ohnologs; Sex chromosomes; Whole genome duplication

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; CHICKEN; FEMALE; GENE DOSAGE; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; MALE; SEX CHROMOSOME; SEX DETERMINATION PROCESS;

ANIMALS; CHICKENS; DOSAGE COMPENSATION, GENETIC; FEMALE; GENE DOSAGE; GENE DUPLICATION; MALE; SEX CHROMOSOMES; SEX DETERMINATION PROCESSES;

EID: 85015353251     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17596653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evw075     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Albritton SE, et al. 2014. Sex-biased gene expression and evolution of the X chromosome in nematodes. Genetics doi: 10.1534/ genetics.114.163311.
2. Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W. 2014. HTSeq-a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 31(2):166-169.
3. Ashburner M, et al. 2000. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet. 25:25-29.
4. Bachtrog D, et al. 2011. Are all sex chromosomes created equal? Trends Genet. 27:350-357.
5. Bachtrog D, et al. 2014. Sex determination: why so many ways of doing it? PLoS Biol. 12:e1001899.
6. Beukeboom L, Perrin N. 2014. The evolution of sex determination. Cambridge (MA): Oxford University Press.
7. Birchler JA, Bhadra U, Bhadra MP, Auger DL. 2001. Dosage-dependent gene regulation in multicellular eukaryotes: implications for dosage compensation, aneuploid syndromes, and quantitative traits. Dev Biol. 234:275-288.
8. Birchler JA, Riddle NC, Auger DL, Veitia RA. 2005. Dosage balance in gene regulation: biological implications. Trends Genet. 21: 219-226.
9. Birchler JA, Veitia RA. 2012. Gene balance hypothesis: connecting issues of dosage sensitivity across biological disciplines. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 109:14746-14753.
10. Blomme T, et al. 2006. The gain and loss of genes during 600 million years of vertebrate evolution. Genome Biol. 7:R43.
11. Brawand D, et al. 2011. The evolution of gene expression levels in mammalian organs. Nature 478:343-348.
12. Charlesworth B. 1978. Model for evolution of Y chromosomes and dosage compensation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 75:5618-5622.
13. Charlesworth B. 1996. The evolution of chromosomal sex determination and dosage compensation. Curr Biol. 6:149-162.
14. Charlesworth B. 1998. Sex chromosomes: evolving dosage compensation. Curr Biol. 8:R931-R933.
15. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B, Marais G. 2005. Steps in the evolution of heteromorphic sex chromosomes. Heredity 95:118-128.
16. Chen S, et al. 2014. Whole-genome sequence of a flatfish provides insights into ZW sex chromosome evolution and adaptation to a benthic lifestyle. Nat Genet. 46:253-260.
17. Conrad T, Akhtar A. 2012. Dosage compensation in Drosophila melano-gaster: epigenetic fine-tuning of chromosome-wide transcription. Nat Rev Genet. 13:123-134.
18. Cooper DW, Johnston PG, Watson JM, Graves JAM. 1993. X-inactivation in marsupials and monotremes. Semin Dev Biol. 4:117-128.
19. Cui L, et al. 2006. Widespread genome duplications throughout the history of flowering plants. Genome Res. 16:738-749.
20. Cunningham F, et al. 2015. Ensembl 2015. Nucleic Acids Res. 43:D662-D669.
21. Deakin J, Chaumeil J, Hore T, Marshall Graves J. 2009. Unravelling the evolutionary origins of X chromosome inactivation in mammals: insights from marsupials and monotremes. Chromosome Res. 17:671-685.
22. Dehal P, Boore JL. 2005. Two rounds of whole genome duplication in the ancestral vertebrate. PLoS Biol. 3:e314.
23. Edger P, Pires JC. 2009. Gene and genome duplications: the impact of dosage-sensitivity on the fate of nuclear genes. Chromosome Res. 17:699-717.
24. Ellegren H. 2005. The avian genome uncovered. Trends Ecol Evol. 20:180-186.
25. Ellegren H, et al. 2007. Faced with inequality: chicken do not have a general dosage compensation of sex-linked genes. BMC Biol. 5:40.
26. Emerson JJ, Kaessmann H, Betrán E, Long M. 2004. Extensive gene traffic on the mammalian X chromosome. Science 303:537-540.
27. Ercan S. 2015. Mechanisms of X chromosome dosage compensation. J Genomics 3:1-19.
28. Graves JM. 2014. Avian sex, sex chromosomes, and dosage compensation in the age of genomics. Chromosome Res. 22:45-57.
29. Hillier LW, et al. 2004. Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature 432:695-716.
30. Hunter JD. 2007. Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment. Comput Sci Eng. 9:90-95.
31. Hurst L, Tashakkori Ghanbarian A, Forrest ARR, Huminiecki L. 2015. The constrained maximal expression level owing to haploidy shapes gene content on the mammalian X chromosome. PLoS Biol. 13(12):e1002315.
32. Itoh Y, et al. 2007. Dosage compensation is less effective in birds than in mammals. J Biol. 6:2.
33. Julien P, et al. 2012. Mechanisms and evolutionary patterns of mammalian and avian dosage compensation. PLoS Biol. 10:e1001328.
34. Kellis M, Birren BW, Lander ES. 2004. Proof and evolutionary analysis of ancient genome duplication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 428:617-624.
35. Kim D, et al. 2013. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 14:R36.
36. Koboldt DC, et al. 2012. VarScan 2: Somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing. Genome Res. 22:568-576.
37. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9:357-359.
38. Leder EH, et al. 2010. Female-biased expression on the X chromosome as a key step in sex chromosome evolution in threespine sticklebacks. Mol Biol Evol. 27:1495-1503.
39. Li H, et al. 2009. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078-2079.
40. Lin F, Xing K, Zhang J, He X. 2012. Expression reduction in mammalian X chromosome evolution refutes Ohno's hypothesis of dosage compensation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 109:11752-11757.
41. Livernois AM, et al. 2013. Independent evolution of transcriptional inactivation on sex chromosomes in birds and mammals. PLoS Genet. 9:e1003635.
42. Lohse M, et al. 2012. RobiNA: a user-friendly, integrated software solution for RNA-Seq-based transcriptomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 40:W622-W627.
43. Makino T, Hokamp K, McLysaght A. 2009. The complex relationship of gene duplication and essentiality. Trends Genet. 25:152-155.
44. Makino T, McLysaght A. 2010. Ohnologs in the human genome are dosage balanced and frequently associated with disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 107:9270-9274.
45. Malone J, et al. 2012. Mediation of Drosophila autosomal dosage effects and compensation by network interactions. Genome Biol. 13:R28.
46. Mank JE. 2013. Sex chromosome dosage compensation: definitely not for everyone. Trends Genet. 29:677-683.
47. Mank JE, Ellegren H. 2008. All dosage compensation is local: gene-by-gene regulation of sex-biased expression on the chicken Z chromosome. Heredity 102:312-320.
48. Mank JE, Hosken DJ, Wedell N. 2011. Some inconvenient truths about sex chromosome dosage compensation and the potential role of sexual conflict. Evolution 65:2133-2144.
49. Meyer BJ. 2010. Targeting X chromosomes for repression. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 20:179-189.
50. Moghadam HK, et al. 2012. W chromosome expression responds to female-specific selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 109:8207-8211.
51. Naurin S, et al. 2011. The sex-biased brain: sexual dimorphism in gene expression in two species of songbirds. BMC Genomics 12:37.
52. Ohno S. 1967. Sex chromosomes and sex-linked genes. Berlin: Springer.
53. Organ CL, et al. 2007. Origin of avian genome size and structure in non-avian dinosaurs. Nature 446:180-184.
54. Papp B, Pál C, Hurst LD. 2003. Dosage sensitivity and the evolution of gene families in yeast. Nature 424:194-197.
55. Pérez F, Granger BE. 2007. IPython: a system for interactive scientific computing. Comput Sci Eng. 9:21-29.
56. Pessia E, Engelstädter J, Marais GAB. 2013. The evolution of X chromosome inactivation in mammals: the demise of Ohno's hypothesis? Cell Mol Life Sci. 71(8):1383-1394.
57. Pessia E, et al. 2012. Mammalian X chromosome inactivation evolved as a dosage-compensation mechanism for dosage-sensitive genes on the X chromosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 109:5346-5351.
58. Pollack JR, et al. 2002. Microarray analysis reveals a major direct role of DNA copy number alteration in the transcriptional program of human breast tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 99:12963-12968.
59. Potrzebowski L, et al. 2008. Chromosomal gene movements reflect the recent origin and biology of therian sex chromosomes. PLoS Biol. 6:e80.
60. Quinlan AR, Hall IM. 2010. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26:841-842.
61. Quinn A, Juneja P, Jiggins FM. 2014. Estimates of allele-specific expression in Drosophila with a single genome sequence and RNA-seq data. Bioinformatics 30:2603-2610.
62. R Core Team 2015. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
63. Reimand J, Arak T, Vilo J. 2011. g:Profiler-a web server for functional interpretation of gene lists (2011 update). Nucleic Acids Res. 39:W307-W315.
64. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. 2010. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26:139-140.
65. Ruepp A, et al. 2010. CORUM: the comprehensive resource of mammalian protein complexes-2009. Nucleic Acids Res. 38:D497-D501.
66. Singh PP, Arora J, Isambert H. 2015. Identification of ohnolog genes originating from whole genome duplication in early vertebrates, based on synteny comparison across multiple genomes. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11:e1004394.
67. Stevenson K, Coolon J, Wittkopp P. 2013. Sources of bias in measures of allele-specific expression derived from RNA-seq data aligned to a single reference genome. BMC Genomics 14:536.
68. Straub T, Becker PB. 2007. Dosage compensation: the beginning and end of generalization. Nat Rev Genet. 8:47-57.
69. Torres EM, et al. 2007. Effects of aneuploidy on cellular physiology and cell division in haploid yeast. Science 317:916-924.
70. Uebbing S, et al. 2015. Quantitative mass spectrometry reveals partial translational regulation for dosage compensation in chicken. Mol Biol Evol. 32:2716-2725.
71. Uebbing S, Künstner A, Mäkinen H, Ellegren H. 2013. Transcriptome sequencing reveals the character of incomplete dosage compensation across multiple tissues in flycatchers. Genome Biol Evol. 5:1555-1566.
72. Van de Peer Y, Maere S, Meyer A. 2009. The evolutionary significance of ancient genome duplications. Nat Rev Genet. 10:725-732.
73. Veitia RA. 2004. Gene dosage balance in cellular pathways: implications for dominance and gene duplicability. Genetics 168:569-574.
74. Veitia RA, Veyrunes F, Bottani S, Birchler JA. 2015. X chromosome inactivation and active X upregulation in therian mammals: facts, questions, and hypotheses. J Mol Cell Biol. 7:2-11.
75. Vibranovski MD, Zhang Y, Long M. 2009. General gene movement off the X chromosome in the Drosophila genus. Genome Res. 19:897-903.
76. Vicoso B, et al. 2013. Comparative sex chromosome genomics in snakes: differentiation, evolutionary strata, and lack of global dosage compensation. PLoS Biol. 11:e1001643.
77. Vicoso B, Bachtrog D. 2015. Numerous transitions of sex chromosomes in diptera. PLoS Biol. 13:e1002078.
78. White MA, Kitano J, Peichel CL. 2015. Purifying selection maintains dosage-sensitive genes during degeneration of the threespine stickleback Y chromosome. Mol Biol Evol. 32:1981-1995.
79. Wolf J, Bryk J. 2011. General lack of global dosage compensation in ZZ/ZW systems? Broadening the perspective with RNA-seq. BMC Genomics 12:91.
80. Wolfe K. 2000. Robustness-it's not where you think it is. Nat Genet. 25:3-4.
81. Wolfe KH. 2001. Yesterday's polyploids and the mystery of diploidization. Nat Rev Genet. 2:333-341.
82. Wolfe KH, Shields DC. 1997. Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome. Nature 387:708-713.
83. Wright AE, Moghadam HK, Mank JE. 2012. Trade-off between selection for dosage compensation and masculinization on the avian Z chromosome. Genetics 192:1433-1445.
84. Wright AE, Zimmer F, Harrison PW, Mank JE. 2015. Conservation of regional variation in sex-specific sex chromosome regulation. Genetics 201:587-598.
85. Xiong Y, et al. 2010. RNA sequencing shows no dosage compensation of the active X-chromosome. Nat Genet. 42:1043-1047.
86. Yates A, et al. 2015. The ensembl REST API: ensembl data for any language. Bioinformatics 31:143-145.