Dosage compensation is less effective in birds than in mammals

Journal of Biology

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2007, Pages

  Itoh, Yuichiro ^a   Melamed, Esther ^a   Yang, Xia ^b   Kampf, Kathy ^a   Wang, Susanna ^b   Yehya, Nadir ^b   Van Nas, Atila ^b   Replogle, Kirstin ^c   Band, Mark R ^d   Clayton, David F ^c   Schadt, Eric E ^e   Lusis, Aldons J ^b   Arnold, Arthur P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^e ROSETTA INPHARMATICS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; AUTOSOMAL INHERITANCE; BIRD; CHICKEN; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; FEMALE; FINCH; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; MALE; MAMMAL; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; MOUSE; MOUSE STRAIN; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX CHROMOSOME; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; X CHROMOSOME; Y CHROMOSOME; ANIMAL; CHICK EMBRYO; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DNA MICROARRAY; GENE DOSAGE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETICS; HUMAN; SEX RATIO;

ANIMALIA; AVES; MAMMALIA; TAENIOPYGIA GUTTATA;

ANIMALS; CHICK EMBRYO; CHICKENS; DOSAGE COMPENSATION, GENETIC; FEMALE; FINCHES; GENE DOSAGE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; HUMANS; MALE; MICE; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SEX CHROMOSOMES; SEX RATIO;

EID: 33947528380     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14754924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/jbiol53     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. The evolution of dosage-compensation mechanisms. I Marin ML Siegal BS Baker, BioEssays 2000 22 1106 1114 10.1002/1521-1878(200012)22:12<1106::AID- BIES8>3.0.CO;2-W 11084626
2. Chromatin remodeling in dosage compensation. JC Lucchesi WG Kelly B Panning, Annu Rev Genet 2005 39 615 631 10.1146/annurev.genet.39.073003.094210 16285873
3. Dosage compensation of the active X chromosome in mammals. DK Nguyen CM Disteche, Nat Genet 2006 38 47 53 10.1038/ng1705 16341221
4. Global analysis of X-chromosome dosage compensation. V Gupta M Parisi D Sturgill R Nuttall M Doctolero OK Dudko JD Malley PS Eastman B Oliver, J Biol 2006 5 3 16507155 10.1186/jbiol30
5. Commonalities in compensation. JA Birchler HR Fernandez HH Kavi, BioEssays 2006 28 565 568 10.1002/bies.20408 16700062
6. A sex-linked enzyme in birds - Z-chromosome conservation but no dosage compensation. PR Baverstock M Adams RW Polkinghorne M Gelder, Nature 1982 296 763 766 10.1038/296763a0 7070516
7. Dosage compensation in birds. HA McQueen D McBride G Miele AP Bird M Clinton, Curr Biol 2001 11 253 257 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00070-7 11250153
8. Biallelic expression of Z-linked genes in male chickens. A Kuroiwa T Yokomine H Sasaki M Tsudzuki K Tanaka T Namikawa Y Matsuda, Cytogenet Genome Res 2002 99 310 314 10.1159/000071609 12900580
9. Enhanced gene expression in the forebrain of hatchling and juvenile male zebra finches. J Wade YP Tang C Peabody RJ Tempelman, J Neurobiol 2005 64 224 238 10.1002/neu.20141 15849735
10. Sex-dependent gene expression in early brain development of chicken embryos. B Scholz K Kultima A Mattsson J Axelsson B Brunstrom K Halldin M Stigson L Dencker, BMC Neurosci 2006 7 12 16480516 10.1186/1471-2202-7-12
11. Neural not gonadal origin of brain sex differences in a gynandromorphic finch. RJ Agate W Grisham J Wade S Mann J Wingfield C Schanen A Palotie AP Arnold, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003 100 4873 4878 12672961 10.1073/pnas. 0636925100
12. Sex differences in structure and expression of the sex chromosome genes CHD1Z and CHD1W in zebra finches. RJ Agate M Choe AP Arnold, Mol Biol Evol 2004 21 384 396 10.1093/molbev/msh027 14660691
13. Sexually dimorphic expression of trkB, a Z-linked gene, in early posthatch zebra finch brain. XQ Chen RJ Agate Y Itoh AP Arnold, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005 102 7730 7735 15894627 10.1073/pnas.0408350102
14. Dosage-dependent gene regulation in multicellular eukaryotes: implications for dosage compensation, aneuploid syndromes, and quantitative traits. JA Birchler U Bhadra MP Bhadra DL Auger, Dev Biol 2001 234 275 288 10.1006/dbio.2001.0262 11396999
15. Dosage balance in gene regulation: biological implications. JA Birchler NC Riddle DL Auger RA Veitia, Trends Genet 2005 21 219 226 10.1016/j.tig.2005. 02.010 15797617
16. X-inactivation profile reveals extensive variability in X-linked gene expression in females. L Carrel HF Willard, Nature 2005 434 400 404 10.1038/nature03479 15772666
17. Sex differences in sex chromosome gene expression in mouse brain. J Xu PS Burgoyne AP Arnold, Hum Mol Genet 2002 11 1409 1419 10.1093/hmg/11.12.1409 12023983
18. Absence of Z-chromosome inactivation for five genes in male chickens. Y Kuroda N Arai M Arita M Teranishi T Hori M Harata S Mizuno, Chromosome Res 2001 9 457 468 10.1023/A:1011672227256 11592480
19. Transcripts of the MHM region on the chicken Z chromosome accumulate as non-coding RNA in the nucleus of female cells adjacent to the DMRT1 locus. M Teranishi Y Shimada T Hori O Nakabayashi T Kikuchi T Macleod R Pym B Sheldon I Solovei H Macgregor S Mizuno, Chromosome Res 2001 9 147 165 10.1023/A: 1009235120741 11321370
20. Female-specific hyperacetylation of histone H4 in the chicken Z chromosome. L Bisoni L Batlle-Morera AP Bird M Suzuki HA McQueen, Chromosome Res 2005 13 205 214 10.1007/s10577-005-1505-4 15861309
21. Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. WR Rice, Evolution 1984 38 735 742 10.2307/2408385
22. How mammalian sex chromosomes acquired their peculiar gene content. EJ Vallender BT Lahn, BioEssays 2004 26 159 169 10.1002/bies.10393 14745834
23. Molecular features and functional constraints in the evolution of the mammalian X chromosome. PR Khil RD Camerini-Otero, Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 2005 40 313 330 10.1080/10409230500356703 16338684
24. Sex and the genome. V Reinke, Nat Genet 2004 36 548 549 10.1038/ng0604-548 15167926
25. Sex chromosome specialization and degeneration in mammals. JAM Graves, Cell 2006 124 901 914 10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.024 16530039
26. Nonrandom distribution of genes with sex-biased expression in the chicken genome. VB Kaiser H Ellegren, Evolution Int J Org Evolution 2006 60 1945 1951 10.1554/06-233.1 17089978
27. Nonrandom representation of sex-biased genes on chicken Z chromosome. R Storchova P Divina, J Mol Evol 2006 63 676 681 10.1007/s00239-006-0022-1 17031459
28. Microarray standard data set and figures of merit for comparing data processing methods and experiment designs. YD He H Dai EE Schadt G Cavet SW Edwards SB Stepaniants S Duenwald R Kleinhanz AR Jones DD Shoemaker RB Stoughton, Bioinformatics 2003 19 956 965 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg126 12761058
29. The dip test of unimodality. JA Hartigan PM Hartigan, Ann Stat 1985 13 70 84
30. Paucity of genes on the Drosophila X chromosome showing male-biased expression. M Parisi R Nuttall D Naiman G Bouffard J Malley J Andrews S Eastman B Oliver, Science 2003 299 697 700 12511656 10.1126/science.1079190
31. Tissue-specific expression and regulation of sexually dimorphic genes in mice. X Yang EE Schadt S Wang H Wang AP Arnold L Ingram-Drake TA Drake AJ Lusis, Genome Res 2006 16 995 1004 16825664 10.1101/gr.5217506
32. Genetic inheritance of gene expression in human cell lines. SA Monks A Leonardson H Zhu P Cundiff P Pietrusiak S Edwards JW Phillips A Sachs EE Schadt, Am J Hum Genet 2004 75 1094 1105 15514893 10.1086/426461
33. Variation in gene expression profiles of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from healthy volunteers. JJ Eady GM Wortley YM Wormstone JC Hughes SB Astley RJ Foxall JF Doleman RM Elliott, Physiol Genomics 2005 22 402 411 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00080.2005 16014386
34. Major molecular differences between mammalian sexes are involved in drug metabolism and renal function. JL Rinn JS Rozowsky IJ Laurenzi PH Petersen KY Zou WM Zhong M Gerstein M Snyder, Dev Cell 2004 6 791 800 10.1016/j.devcel.2004. 05.005 15177028
35. Gene expression profile of aging in human muscle. S Welle AI Brooks JM Delehanty N Needler CA Thornton, Physiol Genomics 2003 14 149 159 12783983
36. Skeletal muscle gene expression profiles in 20-29 year old and 65-71 year old women. S Welle AI Brooks JM Delehanty N Needler K Bhatt B Shah CA Thornton, Exp Gerontol 2004 39 369 377 10.1016/j.exger.2003.11.011 15036396
37. Dystrophin expression in heterozygous mdx/+ mice indicates imprinting of X chromosome inactivation by parent of origin, tissue, strain and position dependent factors. RE Bittner I Popoff S Shorny H Hoger F Wachtler, Anat Embryol (Berl) 1997 195 175 182 10.1007/s004290050036 9045987
38. Segmental trisomy of chromosome 17: a mouse model of human aneuploidy syndromes. T Vacik M Ort S Gregorova P Strnad R Blatny N Conte A Bradley J Bures J Forejt, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005 102 4500 4505 15755806 10.1073/pnas.0500802102
39. Transcriptional consequences of autosomal trisomy: primary gene dosage with complex downstream effects. DR Fitzpatrick, Trends Genet 2005 21 249 253 10.1016/j.tig.2005.02.012 15851056
40. Autosomal dosage compensation in Drosophila melanogaster strains trisomic for the left arm of chromosome-2. RH Devlin DG Holm TA Grigliatti, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1982 79 1200 1204 6803235 10.1073/pnas.79.4.1200
41. Concepts of genetic and hormonal induction of vertebrate sexual differentiation in the twentieth century, with special reference to the brain. AP Arnold, Hormones, Brain, and Behavior San Diego: Academic Press, Pfaff DW, Arnold AP, Etgen A, Fahrbach S, Rubin R, 2002 4 105 135
42. A stain upon the silence: genes escaping X inactivation. CJ Brown JM Greally, Trends Genet 2003 19 432 438 10.1016/S0168-9525(03)00177-X 12902161
43. Escape from X inactivation. CM Disteche GN Filippova KD Tsuchiya, Cytogenet Genome Res 2002 99 36 43 10.1159/000071572 12900543
44. Chromosomal polymorphism and comparative painting analysis in the zebra finch. Y Itoh AP Arnold, Chromosome Res 2005 13 47 56 10.1007/s10577-005-6602-x 15791411
45. Ensembl. http://www.ensembl.org
46. Songbird EST database. http://titan.biotec.uiuc.edu/cgi-bin/ESTWebsite/ estima_start?seqSet=songbird
47. A W-chromosome linked marker for gender identification in the zebra finch. D Runciman RA Zann ND Murray, Anim Genet 1999 30 66 67 10.1046/j.1365-2052.1999.00323-1.x 10050290
48. ArrayExpress. http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress
49. Eisen Lab. http://rana.lbl.gov/EisenSoftware.htm
50. Statistical significance for genome-wide studies. JD Storey R Tibshirani, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003 100 9440 9445 12883005 10.1073/pnas.1530509100
51. NIH Neuroscience Microarray Consortium. http://arrayconsortium.tgen.org
52. Gene Expression Omnibus. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo
53. Model-based analysis of oligonucleotide arrays: expression index computation and outlier detection. C Li WH Wong, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001 98 31 36 11134512 10.1073/pnas.011404098
54. The R Project for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org
55. Unique responses of the avian macrophage to different species of Eimeria. RA Dalloul TW Bliss YH Hong I Ben-Chouikha DW Park CL Keeler HS Lillehoj, Mol Immunol 2006 44 558 566 10.1016/j.molimm.2006.02.004 16563507
56. Gene expression profiling during cellular differentiation in the embryonic pituitary gland using cDNA microarrays. LE Ellestad W Carre M Muchow SA Jenkins X Wang LA Cogburn TE Porter, Physiol Genomics 2006 25 414 425 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00248.2005 16493019
57. Genetics of gene expression surveyed in maize, mouse and man. EE Schadt SA Monks TA Drake AJ Lusis N Che V Colinayo TG Ruff SB Milligan JR Lamb G Cavet, Nature 2003 422 297 302 10.1038/nature01434 12646919
58. Rosetta error model for gene expression analysis. L Weng HY Dai YH Zhan YD He SB Stepaniants DE Bassett, Bioinformatics 2006 22 1111 1121 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl045 16522673
59. CEPH Reference Families. http://locus.umdnj.edu/nigms/ceph/ceph.html