Processing political misinformation: Comprehending the trump phenomenon

Royal Society Open Science

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2017, Pages

  Swire, Briony ^a,b   Berinsky, Adam J ^a   Lewandowsky, Stephan ^b,c   Ecker, Ullrich K H ^b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Belief updating; Continued influence effect; Misinformation; Motivated cognition; Source credibility

Indexed keywords

EID: 85014613479     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20545703     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.160802     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Hochschild JL, Einstein KL. 2015 Do facts matter? Information and misinformation in American politics. Norman, France: University of Oklahoma Press.
2. Bartels LM. 2002 Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions. Polit. Behav. 24, 117–150. (doi:10.1023/A:1021226224601).
3. Berinsky AJ. 2015 Rumors and health care reform: experiments in political misinformation. Br. J. Polit. Sci., 1–22. (doi:10.1017/S0007123415000186).
4. Kahan DM. 2013 Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 8, 407–424.
5. Lewandowsky S, Stritzke WGK, Freund AM, Oberauer K, Krueger JI. 2013 Misinformation, disinformation, and violent conflict: from Iraq and the ‘War on Terror’ to future threats to peace. Am. Psychol. 68, 487–501. (doi:10.1037/a0034515).
6. Housholder EE, LaMarre HL. 2014 Facebook politics: toward a process model for achieving political source credibility through social media. J. Inform. Tech. Polit. 11, 368–382. (doi:10.1080/19331681.2014.951753).
7. Ecker UKH, Lewandowsky S, Swire B, Chang D. 2011 Correcting false information in memory: manipulating the strength of misinformation encoding and its retraction. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 18, 570–578. (doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0065-1).
8. Johnson HM, Seifert CM. 2014 Sources of the continued influence effect: when discredited information in memory affects later inferences. J. Exp. Psycho-Learn Mem. Cogn. 20, 1420–1436. (doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.6.1420).
9. Lewandowsky S, Ecker UKH, Seifert CM, Schwarz N, Cook J. 2012 Misinformation and its correction: continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 13, 106–131. (doi:10.1177/1529100612451018).
10. Ecker UKH, Lewandowsky S, Cheung CSC, Maybery MT. 2014 He did it! She did it! No, she did not! Multiple causal explanations and the continued influence of misinformation. J. Mem. Lang. 85, 101–115. (doi:10.1016/j.jml.2015.09.002).
11. Ecker UKH, Lewandowsky S, Tang DTW. 2010 Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation. Mem. Cognit. 38, 1087–1100. (doi:10.3758/MC.38.8.1087).
12. Bolsen T, Druckman J, Cook F. 2014 The influence of partisan motivated reasoning on public opinion. Polit. Behav. 36, 235–262. (doi:10.1007/s11109-013-9238-0).
13. Lewandowsky S, Stritzke WGK, Oberauer K, Morales M. 2005 Memory for fact, fiction, and misinformation: the Iraq War 2003. Psychol. Sci. 16, 190–195. (doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00802.x).
14. Wells C, Reedy J, Gastil J, Lee C. 2009 Information distortion and voting choices: the origins and effects of factual beliefs in initiative elections. Polit. Psychol. 3, 953–969. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00735.x).
15. Kunda Z. 1990 The case for motivated reasoning. Psychol. Bull. 108, 480–498. (doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480).
16. Gaines BJ, Kuklinski JH, Quirk PJ, Peyton B, Verkuilen J. 2007 Same facts, different interpretations: partisan motivation and opinion on Iraq. J. Polit. 69, 957–974. (doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00601.x).
17. McGuire WJ. 1972 Attitude change: the information processing paradigm. In Experimental social psychology (ed. CG McClintock), pp. 108–141. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
18. Taber CS, Lodge M. 2006 Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 50, 755–769. (doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x).
19. Lord CG, Ross L, Lepper MR. 1979 Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: the effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 37, 2098–2109. (doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098).
20. Jost JT, Krochik M. 2014 Ideological differences in epistemic motivation: implications for attitude structure, depth of information processing, susceptibility to persuasion, and stereotyping. Adv. Motiv. Sci. 1, 181–231. (doi:10.1016/bs.adms.2014.08.005).
21. Nyhan B, Reifler J. 2015 Does correcting myths about the flu vaccine work? An experimental evaluation of the effects of corrective information. Vaccine 33, 459–464. (doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.11.017).
22. Hart PS, Nisbet EC. 2012 Boomerang effects in science communication how motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Comm. Res. 39, 701–723. (doi:10.1177/0093650211416646).
23. Nyhan B, Reifler J. 2010 When corrections fail: the persistence of political misperceptions. Polit. Behav. 32, 303–330. (doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2).
24. Jost JT, Glaser J, Kruglanski AW, Sulloway FJ. 2003 Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychol. Bull. 129, 339–375. (doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339).
25. Nam HH, Jost JT, Bavel JV. 2013 ‘Not for all the tea in china!’ Political ideology and the avoidance of dissonance-arousing situations. PLoS ONE 8, e59837. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059837).
26. Frederick S. 2005 Cognitive reflection and decision making. J Econ. Perspect. 19, 25–42. (doi:10.1257/089533005775196732).
27. Mooney C. 2012 The Republican brain: the science of why they deny science and reality. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
28. Lewandowsky S, Oberauer K. 2016 Motivated rejection of science. Curr. Dir. Psychol. 25, 217–222. (doi:10.1177/0963721416654436).
29. Nisbet EC, Cooper KE, Garrett RK. 2015 The partisan brain: how dissonant science messages lead conservatives and liberals to (dis)trust science. AAPSS 658, 36–66. (doi:10.1177/00027162145 55474).
30. Kahan DM. 2015 Climate-science communication and the measurement problem. Adv. Polit. Psychol. 36, 1–43. (doi:10.1111/pops.12244).
31. Kuklinski JH, Quirk PJ, Jerit J, Schwieder D, Rich RF. 2000 Misinformation and the currency of democratic citizenship. J. Polit. 62, 790–816. (doi:10.1111/0022-3816.00033).
32. Bullock JG. 2009 Partisan bias and the Bayesian ideal in the study of public opinion. J. Polit. 71, 1109–1124. (doi:10.1017/S0022381609090914).
33. Ecker UKH, Lewandowsky S, Fenton O, Martin K. 2014 Do people keep believing because they want to? Preexisting attitudes and the continued influence of misinformation. Mem. Cognit. 42, 292–304. (doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0358-x).
34. Eagly A, Chaiken S. 1993 The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
35. Pornpitakpan C. 2004 The persuasiveness of source credibility: a critical review of five decades’ evidence. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 34, 243–281. (doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x).
36. Guillory JJ, Geraci L. 2013 Correcting erroneous inferences in memory: the role of source credibility. J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cogn. 2, 201–209. (doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.10.001).
37. McGinnes E, Ward C. 1980 ‘Better liked than right’: trustworthiness and expertise in credibility. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 6, 67–472. (doi:10.1177/014616728063023).
38. Anderson MC, Hanslmayr S. 2014 Neural mechanisms of motivated forgetting. Trends Cogn. Sci. 18, 279–292. (doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014. 03.002).
39. Redlawsk DP. 2002 Hot cognition or cool consideration? Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision making. J. Polit. 64, 1021–1044. (doi:10.1111/1468-2508.00161).
40. Meffert MF, Chung S, Joiner AJ, Waks L, Garst J. 2006 The effects of negativity and motivated information processing during a political campaign. J. Commun. 56, 27–51. (doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00003.x).
41. Fox News. 2016 ‘Post-truth’ beats out ‘alt-right’ as Oxford Dictionaries’ word of the year. 2016 November. See http://www.foxnews.com/world/2016/11/16/post-truth-chosen-as-oxford-dictionaries-word-year.html.
42. Lippman D, Samuelsohn D, Arnsdorf I. 2016 Trump’s week of errors, exaggerations and flat out falsehoods. Politico Magazine. See http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/03/trump-fact-check-errors-exaggerations-falsehoods-213730.
43. Grenier E. 2016 Donald Trump’s Republican party is still divided. In CBC News: Politics. See http://www. cbc.ca/news/politics/grenier-us-election-cruz-trump-1.3689037.
44. Ramsay C, Kull S, Lewis E, Subias S. 2010 Misinformation and the 2010 election: a study of the US electorate. World Opinion, University of Maryland. See http://drum.lib.umd.edu/handle/1903/11375.
45. Keith BE, Magleby DB, Nelson CJ, Orr EA, Westlye MC, Wolfinger RE. 1992 The myth of the independent voter. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
46. Greer JD. 2003 Evaluating the credibility of online information: a test of source and advertising influence. Mass Commun. Soc. 6, 11–28. (doi:10.1207/S15327825MCS0601_3).
47. Weeks BE. 2015 Emotions, partisanship, and misperceptions: how anger and anxiety moderate the effect of partisan bias on susceptibility to political misinformation. J. Commun. 65, 699–719. (doi:10.1111/jcom.12164).
48. Blais A, Gidengil E, Fournier P, Nevitte N, Everitt J, Kim J. 2010 Political judgments, perceptions of facts, and partisan effects. Elect. Stud. 29, 1–12. (doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2009.07.001).
49. Parker-Stephen E. 2013 Tides of disagreement: how reality facilitates (and inhibits) partisan public opinion. J. Polit. 75, 1077–1088. (doi:10.1017/S0022381613000789).
50. Ottati VC, Isabell LM. 1996 Effects of mood during exposure to target information and subsequently reported judgements: an on-line model of misattribution and correction. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 71, 39–53. (doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.39).
51. Isbell LM, Wyer RS. 1999 Correcting for mood-induced bias in the evaluation of political candidates: the roles of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 25, 237–249. (doi:10.1177/0146167299025002009).
52. Dugan A. 2015 As in 1999, most do not see Trump as a serious candidate. In Gallup Poll. July 2015. See http://www.gallup.com/poll/184115/1999-not-trump-serious-candidate.aspx.
53. Mayer WG. 2015 Why Trump –and howfar can he go? Forum. 13, 541–558.
54. Skinner G, Evans H. 2015 Politicians trusted less than estate agents, bankers and journalists. In Ipsos MORI. See https://www.ipsos-mori.com/researchpublications/researcharchive/3504/Politicians-trusted-less-than-estate-agents-bankers-and-journalists.aspx.
55. Berinsky AJ, Huber GA, Lenz G. 2012 Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Polit. Anal. 20, 351–368. (doi:10.1093/pan/mpr057).
56. Mullinix KJ, Leeper TJ, Druckman JN, Freese J. 2015 The generalizability of survey experiments. J. Exp. Polit. Sci. 2, 109–138. (doi:10.1017/XPS.2015.19).
57. Newport F, Saad L. 2016 Economic issues are Trump’s strong suit among Republicans. In Gallup. March 2016. See http://www.gallup.com/poll/189731/economic-issues-trump-strong-suit-among-republicans.aspx.
58. Newport F, Saad L. 2016 Trump support build on outsider status, business experience. In Gallup. March 2016. See http://www.gallup.com/poll/189773/trump-support-built-outsider-status-business-experience.aspx.
59. Trump wins presidency, defeats Clinton in historic election upset. In Fox News. November 2016. See http://www.foxnews.com/politics/elections/2016/presidential-election-headquarters.
60. Trump reaches delegate number to clinch GOP nomination. In Fox News. November 2016. See http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/05/26/trump-reaches-delegate-number-to-clinch-gop-nomination.html.
61. Swire B, Berinsky AJ, Lewandowsky S, Ecker UKH. 2017 Data from: Processing political misinformation: comprehending the Trump phenomenon. Dryad Digital Repository. (http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.nc571).