Motivated Rejection of Science

Current Directions in Psychological Science

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 217-222

  Lewandowsky, Stephan ^a,b   Oberauer, Klaus ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

cognition about science; rejection of science; science and the public; science communication

Indexed keywords

EID: 84981331897     PISSN: 09637214     EISSN: 14678721     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0963721416654436     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. J.CookS.Lewandowsky (2012). The debunking handbook. Retrieved from http://sks.to/debunk. A brief guide for practitioners about how to correct misinformation, available for download in seven languages. (An extended summary of the issue can be found in Lewandowsky, Ecker, Seifert, Schwarz, & Cook, 2012.)
2. N.OreskesE.M.Conway (2010). Merchants of doubt. London, England: Bloomsbury Publishing. An in-depth historical analysis of the role of ideology in organized denial of well-established scientific facts.
3. C.C.Abt (1983, September). The anti-smoking industry (Philip Morris internal report). Retrieved from http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/vob81f00
4. N.AllumP.SturgisD.TabouraziI.Brunton-Smith (2008). Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: A meta-analysis. Public Understanding of Science, 17, 35–54. doi:10.1177/0963662506070159
5. M.BailesS.BatesV.BhaleraoN.BhatM.BurgayS.Burke-SpolaorW.. van Straten (2011). Transformation of a star into a planet in a millisecond pulsar binary. Science, 333, 1717–1720.
6. R.BrionesX.NanK.MaddenL.Waks (2012). When vaccines go viral: An analysis of HPV vaccine coverage on YouTube. Health Communication, 27, 478–485. doi:10.1080/10410236.2011.610258
7. R.J.Brulle (2013). Institutionalizing delay: Foundation funding and the creation of U.S. climate change counter-movement organizations. Climatic Change, 122, 681–694. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-1018-7
8. R.J.BrulleJ.CarmichaelJ.C.Jenkins (2012). Shifting public opinion on climate change: An empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the U.S., 2002–2010. Climatic Change, 114, 169–188. doi:0.1007/s10584-012-0403-y
9. P.ChigwedereG.R.SeageIIIS.GruskinT.-H.LeeM.Essex (2008). Estimating the lost benefits of antiretroviral drug use in South Africa. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, 49, 410–415.
10. J.CookS.Lewandowsky (2016). Rational irrationality: Modeling climate change belief polarization using Bayesian networks. Topics in Cognitive Science, 8, 160–179. doi:10.1111/tops.12186
11. J.CookD.NuccitelliS.A.GreenM.RichardsonB.WinklerR.PaintingA.. Skuce (2014). Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environmental Research Letters, 8, Article 024024. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024
12. M.F.Dahlstrom (2014). Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 111, 13614–13620.
13. P.DiethelmM.McKee (2009). Denialism: What is it and how should scientists respond?European Journal of Public Health, 19, 2–4. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckn139
14. R.E.DunlapP.J.Jacques (2013). Climate change denial books and conservative think tanks: Exploring the connection. American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 1–33. doi:10.1177/0002764213477096
15. D.Galloway (2011, August25). Diamond planet found (if you like it then you should have put a ring on it). Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/diamond-planet-found-if-you-like-it-then-you-should-have-put-a-ring-on-it-3069
16. E.J.GangarosaA.M.GalazkaC.R.WolfeL.M.PhillipsR.E.GangarosaE.MillerR.T.Chen (1998). Impact of anti-vaccine movements on pertussis control: The untold story. The Lancet, 351, 356–361. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(97)04334-1
17. G.Gauchat (2012). Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review, 77, 167–187.
18. L.C.Hamilton (2011). Education, politics and opinions about climate change evidence for interaction effects. Climatic Change, 104, 231–242. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9957-8
19. L.C.Hamilton (2015). Conservative and liberal views of science: Does trust depend on topic? (Regional Issue Brief No. 45). Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire.
20. L.C.HamiltonJ.HartterM.Lemcke-StamponeD.W.MooreT.G.Safford (2015). Tracking public beliefs about anthropogenic climate change. PLoS ONE, 10(9), e0138208. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138208
21. L.C.HamiltonJ.HartterK.Saito (2015). Trust in scientists on climate change and vaccines. SAGE Open, 5(3). doi:10.1177/2158244015602752
22. D.J.HardistyE.J.JohnsonE.U.Weber (2010). A dirty word or a dirty world? Attribute framing, political affiliation, and query theory. Psychological Science, 21, 86–92.
23. S.HiltonK.HuntM.LanganV.HamiltonM.Petticrew (2009). Reporting of MMR evidence in professional publications: 1988–2007. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 94, 831–833. doi:10.1136/adc.2008.154310
24. J.Inhofe (2012). The greatest hoax: How the global warming conspiracy threatens your future. Washington, DC: WND Books.
25. D.M.Kahan (2015). Climate-science communication and the measurement problem. Political Psychology, 36, 1–43. doi:10.1111/pops.12244
26. D.M.KahanD.BramanG.L.CohenJ.GastilP.Slovic (2010). Who fears the HPV vaccine, who doesn’t, and why? An experimental study of the mechanisms of cultural cognition. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 501–516.
27. D.M.KahanD.BramanP.SlovicJ.GastilG.Cohen (2009). Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnology. Nature Nanotechnology, 4, 87–90.
28. D.M.KahanE.PetersE.C.DawsonP.Slovic (2013). Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government (Public Law Working Paper, Technical Report No. 307). New Haven, CT: Yale University Law School.
29. D.M.KahanE.PetersM.WittlinP.SlovicL.L.OuelletteD.BramanG.Mandel (2012). The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Climate Change, 2, 732–735. doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE1547
30. S.C.Kalichman (2009). Denying AIDS: Conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, and human tragedy. New York, NY: Springer.
31. S.LewandowskyJ.CookK.OberauerS.BrophyE.A.LloydM.Marriott (2015). Recurrent fury: Conspiratorial discourse in the blogosphere triggered by research on the role of conspiracist ideation in climate denial. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 3, 142–178. doi:10.5964/jspp.v3i1.443
32. S.LewandowskyU.K.H.EckerC.SeifertN.SchwarzJ.Cook (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 106–131. doi:10.1177/1529100612451018
33. S.LewandowskyG.E.GignacK.Oberauer (2013). The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science. PLoS ONE, 8(10), e75637. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0075637
34. S.LewandowskyG.E.GignacS.Vaughan (2013). The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science. Nature Climate Change, 3, 399–404. doi:10.1038/nclimate1720
35. E.LobatoJ.MendozaV.SimsM.Chin (2014). Examining the relationship between conspiracy theories, paranormal beliefs, and pseudoscience acceptance among a university population. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 617–625. doi:10.1002/acp.3042
36. A.Lupia (2013). Communicating science in politicized environments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 110, 14048–14054. doi:10.1073/pnas.1212726110
37. A.M.McCrightM.ChartersK.DentzmanT.Dietz (2016). Examining the effectiveness of climate change frames in the face of a climate change denial counter-frame. Topics in Cognitive Science, 8, 76–97. doi:10.1111/tops.12171
38. A.M.McCrightR.E.Dunlap (2003). Defeating Kyoto: The conservative movement’s impact on U.S. climate change policy. Social Problems, 50, 348–373.
39. A.M.McCrightR.E.Dunlap (2011). Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Global Environmental Change, 21, 1163–1172. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.003
40. M.McKeeP.Diethelm (2010). Christmas 2010: Reading between the lines how the growth of denialism undermines public health. British Medical Journal, 341, 1309–1311. doi:10.1136/bmj.c6950
41. M.PetrovicR.RobertsM.Ramsay (2001). Second dose of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine: Questionnaire survey of health professionals. British Medical Journal, 322, 82–85.
42. R.N.Proctor (2011). Golden holocaust: Origins of the cigarette catastrophe and the case for abolition. Berkeley: University of California Press.
43. M.A.RanneyD.Clark (2016). Climate change conceptual change: Scientific information can transform attitudes. Topics in Cognitive Science, 8, 49–75. doi:10.1111/tops.12187
44. A.SmithJ.YarwoodD.M.Salisbury (2007). Tracking mothers’ attitudes to MMR immunisation 1996–2006. Vaccine, 25, 3996–4002.
45. N.SmithA.Leiserowitz (2012). The rise of global warming skepticism: Exploring affective image associations in the United States over time. Risk Analysis, 32, 1021–1032. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01801.x
46. T.SpeersJ.Lewis (2004). Journalists and jabs: Media coverage of the MMR vaccine. Communication & Medicine, 1, 171–181.
47. V.Strauss (2016, February). Why in the world would rapper B.o.B think the Earth is flat? A quick science lesson. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2016/02/02/why-in-the-world-would-rapper-b-o-b-think-the-earth-is-flat-a-quick-science-lesson/
48. S.L.van der LindenA.A.LeiserowitzG.D.FeinbergE.W.Maibach (2015). The scientific consensus on climate change as a gateway belief: Experimental evidence. PLoS ONE, 10(2), e0118489. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118489
49. J.-W.van ProoijenA.P.M.KrouwelT.V.Pollet (2015). Political extremism predicts belief in conspiracy theories. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 6, 570–578. doi:10.1177/1948550614567356