Emotions, Partisanship, and Misperceptions: How Anger and Anxiety Moderate the Effect of Partisan Bias on Susceptibility to Political Misinformation

Journal of Communication

Volumn 65, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 699-719

  Weeks, Brian E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Anger; Anxiety; Corrections; Emotion; Fact checking; Misinformation; Misperceptions; Motivated Reasoning

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; INFORMATION SYSTEM; PARTY POLITICS; PERCEPTION; POLITICAL IDEOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY;

EID: 84938206051     PISSN: 00219916     EISSN: 14602466     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jcom.12164     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Brader, T. (2005). Striking a responsive chord: How political ads motivate and persuade voters by appealing to emotions. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 388-405. doi:10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00130.x.
2. Brader, T. (2011). The political relevance of emotions: "Reassessing" revisited. Political Psychology, 32, 337-346. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00803.x.
3. Bullock, J. G. (2009). Partisan bias and the Bayesian ideal in the study of public opinion. Journal of Politics, 71, 1109-1124. doi:10.1017/S0022381609090914.
4. Bullock, J.G., Gerber, A.S., Hill, S.J., & Huber, G.A. (2013). Partisan bias in factual beliefs about politics. Working Paper 19080, National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w19080
5. Carver, C. S., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2009). Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 183-204. doi:10.1037/a0013965.
6. Cassino, D. (2013, January 17). Conspiracy theories prosper: 25% of Americans are "truthers." Fairleigh Dickinson University's Public Mind Poll. Retrieved from http://www.scribd.com/doc/120815791/Fairleigh-Dickinson-poll-on-conspiracy-theories
7. Coe, K., Kenski, K., & Rains, S. A. (2014). Online and uncivil? Patterns and determinants of incivility in newspaper website comments. Journal of Communication, 64, 658-679. doi:10.1111/jcom.12104.
8. Druckman, J. N. (2012). The politics of motivation. Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society, 24, 199-216. doi:10.1080/08913811.2012.711022.
9. Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Fenton, O., & Martin, K. (2014). Do people keep believing because they want to? Pre-existing attitudes and the continued influence of misinformation. Memory & Cognition, 42, 292-304. doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0358-x.
10. Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attention control theory. Emotion, 7, 336-353. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.336.
11. Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
12. Gaines, B. J., Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Peyton, B., & Verkuilen, J. (2007). Same facts, different interpretations: Partisan motivation and opinion on Iraq. Journal of Politics, 69, 957-974. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00601.x.
13. Gallup. (2011, May 13). Obama's birth certificate convinces some, but not all, skeptics. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/147530/obama-birth-certificate-convinces-not-skeptics.aspx
14. Garrett, R. K. (2011). Troubling consequences of online political rumoring. Human Communication Research, 37, 255-274. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01401.x.
15. Garrett, R. K., Nisbet, E. C., & Lynch, E. K. (2013). Undermining the corrective effects of media-based political fact checking? The role of contextual cues and naïve theory. Journal of Communication, 63, 617-637. doi:10.1111/jcom.12038.
16. Garrett, R. K., & Weeks, B. E. (2013). The promise and peril of real-time corrections to political misperceptions. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the ACM 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (pp. 1047-1058), San Antonio, TX. New York, NY: ACM.
17. Goodall, C. E., Slater, M. D., & Myers, T. A. (2013). Fear and anger responses to local news coverage of alcohol-related crimes, accidents, and injuries: Explaining news effects on policy support using a representative sample of messages and people. Journal of Communication, 63, 373-392. doi:10.1111/jcom.12020.
18. Gottfried, J. A., Hardy, B. W., Winneg, K. M., & Jamieson, K. H. (2013). Did fact checking matter in the 2012 presidential campaign? American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 1558-1567. doi:10.1177/0002764213489012.
19. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
20. Huddy, L., Feldman, S., & Cassese, E. (2007). On the distinct political effects of anxiety and anger. In W. R. Neuman, G. E. Marcus, A. N. Crigler, & M. Mackuen (Eds.), The affect effect: Dynamics of emotion in political thinking and behavior (pp. 202-230). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21. Jerit, J., & Barabas, J. (2012). Partisan perceptual bias and the information environment. The Journal of Politics, 74, 672-684. doi:10.1017/S0022381612000187.
22. Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Jerit, J., Schwieder, D., & Rich, R. F. (2000). Misinformation and the currency of democratic citizenship. The Journal of Politics, 62, 790-816. doi:10.1111/0022-3816.00033.
23. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480.
24. Ladd, J. M., & Lenz, G. S. (2008). Reassessing the role of anxiety and vote choice. Political Psychology, 29, 275-296.
25. Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
26. Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 146-159. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.146.
27. MacKuen, M., Wolak, J., Keele, L., & Marcus, G. E. (2010). Civic engagements: Resolute partisanship or reflective deliberation. American Journal of Political Science, 54, 440-458. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00440.x.
28. Marcus, G. E. (2002). The sentimental citizen: Emotion in democratic politics. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
29. Marcus, G. E., MacKuen, M., & Neuman, W. R. (2011). Parsimony and complexity: Developing and testing theories of affective intelligence. Political Psychology, 32, 323-336. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00806.x.
30. Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R., & MacKuen, M. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31. Marcus, G. E., Sullivan, J. T., Theiss-Morse, E., & Stevens, D. (2005). The emotional foundation of political cognition: The impact of extrinsic anxiety on the formation of political tolerance judgments. Political Psychology, 26, 949-963. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00452.x.
32. Meirick, P. C. (2013). Motivated misperception? Party, education, partisan news, and belief in "death panels". Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90, 39-57. doi:10.1177/1077699012468696.
33. Nabi, R. L. (1999). A cognitive-functional model for the effects of discrete negative emotions on information processing, attitude change, and recall. Communication Theory, 9, 292-320. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00172.x.
34. Nabi, R. L. (2003). Exploring the framing effects of emotion: Do discrete emotions differentially influence information accessibility, information seeking, and policy preference? Communication Research, 30, 224-247. doi:10.1177/0093650202250881.
35. Nabi, R. L. (2010). The case for emphasizing discrete emotions in communication research. Communication Monographs, 77, 153-159. doi:10.1080/03637751003790444.
36. Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32, 303-330. doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2.
37. Papacharissi, Z. (2012). Without you, I'm nothing: Performances of the self on Twitter. International Journal of Communication, 6, 1989-2006.
38. Prior, M., Sood, G., & Khanna, K. (2013). You cannot be serious: Do partisans believe what they say? Working Paper. Retrieved from http://government.arts.cornell.edu/assets/psac/sp13/Prior_PSAC_Apr15.pdf
39. Redlawsk, D. P., Civettini, A. J., & Emmerson, K. M. (2010). The affective tipping point: Do motivated reasoners ever "get it"? Political Psychology, 31, 563-593. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00772.x.
40. Redlawsk, D. P., Tolbert, C. J., & McNeely, N. A. (2014). Symbolic racism and emotional responses to the 2012 presidential candidates. Political Research Quarterly, 67, 680-694. doi:10.1177/1065912914531091.
41. Roseman, I. J., Wiest, C., & Swartz, T. S. (1994). Phenomenology, behaviors, and goals differentiate discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 206-221. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.206.
42. Slater, M. D. (2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory, 17, 281-303. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.x.
43. Steinhauser, P. (2013, October 7). CNN shutdown poll: Plenty of blame to go around. Retrieved from http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/10/07/cnn-shutdown-poll-plenty-of-blame-to-go-around/
44. Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 755-769. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x.
45. Valentino, B. (2012). Survey on foreign policy and American overseas commitments. YouGov. Retrieved from http://www.dartmouth.edu/-benv/data.html.
46. Valentino, N. A., Brader, T., Groenendyk, E. W., Gregorowicz, K., & Hutchings, V. L. (2011). Election night's alright for fighting: The role of emotions in political participation. Journal of Politics, 73, 156-170. doi:10.1017/S0022381610000939.
47. Valentino, N. A., Hutchings, V. L., Banks, A. J., & Davis, A. K. (2008). Is a worried citizen a good citizen? Emotions, political information seeking, and learning via the internet. Political Psychology, 29, 247-273. doi:10.1017/S0022381610000939.
48. Weeks, B. E., & Garrett, R. K. (2014). Electoral consequences of political rumors: Motivated reasoning, candidate rumors, and vote choice during the 2008 U.S. presidential election. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 26, 401-422. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edu005.
49. Weeks, B., & Southwell, B. (2010). The symbiosis of news coverage and aggregate on-line search behavior: Obama, rumors, and presidential politics. Mass Communication and Society, 13, 341-360. doi:10.1080/15205430903470532.
50. Wells, G. L., & Windschitl, P. D. (1999). Stimulus sampling and social psychological experimentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1115-1125. doi:10.1177/01461672992512005.